Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2" will be enough.So how high do you think the sea level will rise by 2100, chicken little?ummm... the world will become much wetter Joe. The warming will be predominantly at the poles.
Again, 95% of REAL scientists disagree with you.
But, yeah, you might have a point, the world will be a lot "Wetter"
Fuck you, Florida!!!
Not the left, just NASA and every scientific community.Here we go again. The flip flop argument, just waiting for a warm January day and the left will be proclaiming it is proof of Gorebal Warming again.Once again, Billy-bob Cleetus the redneck shows he doesn't understand the difference between climate and weather.
You going to give me a dollar for every Lefty on USMB using weather to prove gorebal warming?Not the left, just NASA and every scientific community.Here we go again. The flip flop argument, just waiting for a warm January day and the left will be proclaiming it is proof of Gorebal Warming again.Once again, Billy-bob Cleetus the redneck shows he doesn't understand the difference between climate and weather.
And your climate science degree was from where genius?
We're still waiting for your PhD in climate science.You going to give me a dollar for every Lefty on USMB using weather to prove gorebal warming?Not the left, just NASA and every scientific community.Here we go again. The flip flop argument, just waiting for a warm January day and the left will be proclaiming it is proof of Gorebal Warming again.Once again, Billy-bob Cleetus the redneck shows he doesn't understand the difference between climate and weather.
And your climate science degree was from where genius?
We're still waiting for your PhD in climate science.You going to give me a dollar for every Lefty on USMB using weather to prove gorebal warming?Not the left, just NASA and every scientific community.Here we go again. The flip flop argument, just waiting for a warm January day and the left will be proclaiming it is proof of Gorebal Warming again.Once again, Billy-bob Cleetus the redneck shows he doesn't understand the difference between climate and weather.
And your climate science degree was from where genius?
Ah well, what do 95 % of the climate scientists know?
2" will be enough.So how high do you think the sea level will rise by 2100, chicken little?ummm... the world will become much wetter Joe. The warming will be predominantly at the poles.
Again, 95% of REAL scientists disagree with you.
But, yeah, you might have a point, the world will be a lot "Wetter"
Fuck you, Florida!!!
Enjoy Miami while you can
If what you say is true, why do all the liberal elites buy up properties next to the fucking ocean? Pull your head out of your ass man, and see what your side is doing, like riding around in limos, flying around in private jets, and living in mansions that energy use is like a small city......dumbasses vote Dumbocrat.2" will be enough.So how high do you think the sea level will rise by 2100, chicken little?ummm... the world will become much wetter Joe. The warming will be predominantly at the poles.
Again, 95% of REAL scientists disagree with you.
But, yeah, you might have a point, the world will be a lot "Wetter"
Fuck you, Florida!!!
Enjoy Miami while you can
• In September of 2016, Gore’s home consumed 30,993 kWh in just one month – as much energy as a typical American family burns in 34 months.
• During the last 12 months, Gore devoured 66,159 kWh of electricity just heating his pool. That is enough energy to power six average U.S. households for a year.
• From August 2016 through July 2017, Gore spent almost $22,000 on electricity bills.6
• Gore paid an estimated $60,000 to install 33 solar panels. Those solar panels produce an average of 1,092 kWh per month, only 5.7% of Gore’s typical monthly energy consumption.
And you are either abnormally stupid or a lying bastard. Most likely both.Bitter cold windchills and snow stick around… « FOX News Weather BlogSo lets try this again.December 13, 2017 | 7:02 AM ET
Bitter cold windchills and snow stick around...
Good morning everyone. Happy Wednesday!
It’s a bitter cold midweek with windchills in the single digits and teens for millions this morning across the Great Lakes, Northeast, and Mid-Atlantic over the next few days.
Back in 2000 Al Gore said that the Earth was going to burn up in 10 years if the United States didn't do something about it. The Earth is still here.
Back in 2006 Al Gore produced an Inconvenient Truth predicting increased in Cat 5 hurricanes each year, massive tornado's, very little snow events, and warming to the point the Earth would burn up in 10 years. Guess what, less hurricanes each year, little tornado activities, lots of snow through polar vortexes, and the Earth is still here.
So with Global Warming year after year, because of the increase of CO2 each year, (liberal's words not mine) if last 2 years the temperature around Manassas has been in the high 30s and low 40s, WITH THE INCREASE OF TEMPERATURE YEAR AFTER YEAR....Where did the 20 degree temperature come from. What you morons don't understand is that your science says "each year with CO2 on the increase, the temperature will increase", yet is is 15 degrees lower...And don't give me shit that it is only weather... Yeah and when the summer is HOT , it is only weather.
You didn't put anything as a choice I would want to vote for. Just like standing in front of a redneck bar asking about gay rights, you rigged the outcome of your opinion pole. You didn't want a real result.
Start with a cold room. Enter room. Burn oil. Cook food, Have friends over. Breathe. Exhale. Move about. Is the room still cold? No. It has warmed up. The room is a closed system illustration. Earth is a closed system. Produce mass quantities of heat and the planet heats up. Fairly simple stuff. Yes global warming is real. The weather is decidedly different than when I was a child. I am 65 now. Al Gore's timetable may be off but his message is true.
Unfortunately conservatives tend to be somewhat narrow minded in perspective. The toe the line and their philosophical leanings tend toward subjective views. Too bad.So if the planet continues to heat up year after year, and records are set, over and over, the temperature is rising to alarming levels? Where does the record cold come from?Produce mass quantities of heat and the planet heats up.
There may be record cold in some places, but the polar caps are receding and high glaciers are disappearing. Ice diesn't melt because it's cold.Yeah, ice doesn't melt when it is cold, but why is there an increase of ice caps by 29%, are you saying that it is cold?but the polar caps are receding and high glaciers are disappearing. Ice diesn't melt because it's cold
And now it's global COOLING! Return of Arctic ice cap as it grows by 29% in a year | Daily Mail OnlineAnd now it's global COOLING! Return of Arctic ice cap as it grows by 29% in a year
- 533,000 more square miles of ocean covered with ice than in 2012
- BBC reported in 2007 global warming would leave Arctic ice-free in summer by 2013
No. The same polar configurations conducive to an icehouse planet. Land mass centered over the south pole and land locked north pole. Basically both poles are isolated from the warmer marine currents.The same conditions today, meaning no humans? Ummm... no.You are kind of slow. Yes. No humans back then and there was real climate changes. The same conditions exist today too.Dumb fuck, there were no humans alive at that time. Not only that, we have been homo sap only for about the last 200,000 years, just about two glacial cycles. So we were never around when the CO2 was above 300 ppm. Yes, 12,000 years ago, there was a continental ice sheet. So what?You said that already. Did you know that atmospheric CO2 used to be ten times what it is today. Guess what? No one died.The GHGs that we're pumping into the atmosphere these days is helping to change the climate.I never claimed not to be an ass, Taz.
The only question is do you think you are any different.
As for my head being stuck in the sand, I've studied the geologic record extensively and I have yet to see any signs that atmospheric CO2 drives climate change. What about you?
12,000 years ago New York was under a quarter mile sheet of ice.
And there have been a few times in geological history when the GHGs increased very rapidly. They were times of extinctions.
Over dramatize much?2" will be enough.So how high do you think the sea level will rise by 2100, chicken little?ummm... the world will become much wetter Joe. The warming will be predominantly at the poles.
Again, 95% of REAL scientists disagree with you.
But, yeah, you might have a point, the world will be a lot "Wetter"
Fuck you, Florida!!!
Enjoy Miami while you can
Here we go again. The flip flop argument, just waiting for a warm January day and the left will be proclaiming it is proof of Gorebal Warming again.
You going to give me a dollar for every Lefty on USMB using weather to prove gorebal warming?
https://cei.org/content/govt-funded-research-unit-destroyed-original-climate-data
You go ahead and tell those Global Warming scientists who went to study the decrease in polar ice, during the summertime of the south, and ended up stranded in more ice than ever. God you guys are the stupidest people in the world who cant see how your side has lied to you over and over.And you are either abnormally stupid or a lying bastard. Most likely both.Bitter cold windchills and snow stick around… « FOX News Weather Blog So lets try this again.
Back in 2000 Al Gore said that the Earth was going to burn up in 10 years if the United States didn't do something about it. The Earth is still here.
Back in 2006 Al Gore produced an Inconvenient Truth predicting increased in Cat 5 hurricanes each year, massive tornado's, very little snow events, and warming to the point the Earth would burn up in 10 years. Guess what, less hurricanes each year, little tornado activities, lots of snow through polar vortexes, and the Earth is still here.
So with Global Warming year after year, because of the increase of CO2 each year, (liberal's words not mine) if last 2 years the temperature around Manassas has been in the high 30s and low 40s, WITH THE INCREASE OF TEMPERATURE YEAR AFTER YEAR....Where did the 20 degree temperature come from. What you morons don't understand is that your science says "each year with CO2 on the increase, the temperature will increase", yet is is 15 degrees lower...And don't give me shit that it is only weather... Yeah and when the summer is HOT , it is only weather.
You didn't put anything as a choice I would want to vote for. Just like standing in front of a redneck bar asking about gay rights, you rigged the outcome of your opinion pole. You didn't want a real result.
Start with a cold room. Enter room. Burn oil. Cook food, Have friends over. Breathe. Exhale. Move about. Is the room still cold? No. It has warmed up. The room is a closed system illustration. Earth is a closed system. Produce mass quantities of heat and the planet heats up. Fairly simple stuff. Yes global warming is real. The weather is decidedly different than when I was a child. I am 65 now. Al Gore's timetable may be off but his message is true.
Unfortunately conservatives tend to be somewhat narrow minded in perspective. The toe the line and their philosophical leanings tend toward subjective views. Too bad.So if the planet continues to heat up year after year, and records are set, over and over, the temperature is rising to alarming levels? Where does the record cold come from?Produce mass quantities of heat and the planet heats up.
There may be record cold in some places, but the polar caps are receding and high glaciers are disappearing. Ice diesn't melt because it's cold.Yeah, ice doesn't melt when it is cold, but why is there an increase of ice caps by 29%, are you saying that it is cold?but the polar caps are receding and high glaciers are disappearing. Ice diesn't melt because it's cold
And now it's global COOLING! Return of Arctic ice cap as it grows by 29% in a year | Daily Mail OnlineAnd now it's global COOLING! Return of Arctic ice cap as it grows by 29% in a year
- 533,000 more square miles of ocean covered with ice than in 2012
- BBC reported in 2007 global warming would leave Arctic ice-free in summer by 2013
The thicker ice, known as multi-year ice, survives through the cyclical summer melt season, when young ice that has formed over winter just as quickly melts again.
The rapid disappearance of older ice makes Arctic sea ice even more vulnerable to further decline in the summer, said Joey Comiso, senior scientist at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
1980: The floating ice cap is a large sprawling mass across the top of our planet, holding giant amounts of water
Sign of the times in 2012: The ice covering has dramatically shrunk, with research showing the cap is losing around 15-20% of its mass per decade
The new research takes a closer look at how multi-year ice, ice that has made it through at least two summers, has diminished with each passing winter over the last three decades.
Read more: Disturbing pictures by NASA show polar cap is shrinking in mass by around 15% per decade | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Antarctic crew build ice helipad to help rescuers | Daily Mail OnlineThe leader of a scientific expedition whose ship remains stranded in Antarctic ice says the team, which set out to prove climate change, is "stuck in our own experiment."
But Chris Turney, a professor of climate change at Australia’s University of New South Wales, said it was “silly” to suggest he and 73 others aboard the MV Akademic Shokalskiy were trapped in ice they’d sought to prove had melted. He remained adamant that sea ice is melting, even as the boat remained trapped in frozen seas
They went in search evidence of the world’s melting ice caps, but instead a team of climate scientists have been forced to abandon their mission … because the Antarctic ice is thicker than usual at this time of year.
The scientists have been stuck aboard the stricken MV Akademik Schokalskiy since Christmas Day, with repeated sea rescue attempts being abandoned as icebreaking ships failed to reach them.
Only thing I can explain for your stupidity.
What your lying pals at CEI failed to mention ...
The "data destruction" took place in the 1980s, when large magnetic tapes were the method of data storage.
And all of the data is still available from original sources.
You tried to spin that as being current destruction of irreplaceable data. That is, you tried to foist yet another open fraud off on us. Fraud is all you ever do, because it's all you're capable of.
Now, pucker up and get to work.
Except that the last time, there weren't 7 billion little pollution factories and all their gear stinking up the joint.No. The same polar configurations conducive to an icehouse planet. Land mass centered over the south pole and land locked north pole. Basically both poles are isolated from the warmer marine currents.The same conditions today, meaning no humans? Ummm... no.You are kind of slow. Yes. No humans back then and there was real climate changes. The same conditions exist today too.Dumb fuck, there were no humans alive at that time. Not only that, we have been homo sap only for about the last 200,000 years, just about two glacial cycles. So we were never around when the CO2 was above 300 ppm. Yes, 12,000 years ago, there was a continental ice sheet. So what?You said that already. Did you know that atmospheric CO2 used to be ten times what it is today. Guess what? No one died.The GHGs that we're pumping into the atmosphere these days is helping to change the climate.
12,000 years ago New York was under a quarter mile sheet of ice.
And there have been a few times in geological history when the GHGs increased very rapidly. They were times of extinctions.
And that changes it how?Except that the last time, there weren't 7 billion little pollution factories and all their gear stinking up the joint.No. The same polar configurations conducive to an icehouse planet. Land mass centered over the south pole and land locked north pole. Basically both poles are isolated from the warmer marine currents.The same conditions today, meaning no humans? Ummm... no.You are kind of slow. Yes. No humans back then and there was real climate changes. The same conditions exist today too.Dumb fuck, there were no humans alive at that time. Not only that, we have been homo sap only for about the last 200,000 years, just about two glacial cycles. So we were never around when the CO2 was above 300 ppm. Yes, 12,000 years ago, there was a continental ice sheet. So what?You said that already. Did you know that atmospheric CO2 used to be ten times what it is today. Guess what? No one died.
12,000 years ago New York was under a quarter mile sheet of ice.
And there have been a few times in geological history when the GHGs increased very rapidly. They were times of extinctions.
Because last time whatever changes were brought upon the earth's climate was done when there weren't any humans polluting the place even more. Sheesh, you're slow.And that changes it how?Except that the last time, there weren't 7 billion little pollution factories and all their gear stinking up the joint.No. The same polar configurations conducive to an icehouse planet. Land mass centered over the south pole and land locked north pole. Basically both poles are isolated from the warmer marine currents.The same conditions today, meaning no humans? Ummm... no.You are kind of slow. Yes. No humans back then and there was real climate changes. The same conditions exist today too.Dumb fuck, there were no humans alive at that time. Not only that, we have been homo sap only for about the last 200,000 years, just about two glacial cycles. So we were never around when the CO2 was above 300 ppm. Yes, 12,000 years ago, there was a continental ice sheet. So what?
And there have been a few times in geological history when the GHGs increased very rapidly. They were times of extinctions.
I think you got that backwards, my little trolling friendBecause last time whatever changes were brought upon the earth's climate was done when there weren't any humans polluting the place even more. Sheesh, you're slow.And that changes it how?Except that the last time, there weren't 7 billion little pollution factories and all their gear stinking up the joint.No. The same polar configurations conducive to an icehouse planet. Land mass centered over the south pole and land locked north pole. Basically both poles are isolated from the warmer marine currents.The same conditions today, meaning no humans? Ummm... no.You are kind of slow. Yes. No humans back then and there was real climate changes. The same conditions exist today too.
I got one of those too but it's a little more fancy. It actually makes predictions based upon the existing trend. Does yours do that too?
Coastal and low-lying areas are already in trouble. You need to get a fucking clue. Quickly.I think you got that backwards, my little trolling friendBecause last time whatever changes were brought upon the earth's climate was done when there weren't any humans polluting the place even more. Sheesh, you're slow.And that changes it how?Except that the last time, there weren't 7 billion little pollution factories and all their gear stinking up the joint.No. The same polar configurations conducive to an icehouse planet. Land mass centered over the south pole and land locked north pole. Basically both poles are isolated from the warmer marine currents.The same conditions today, meaning no humans? Ummm... no.
The sky isn't falling. Relax.
