Global warming

[basquebromance]

"MSNBC reporting that parts of the United States are now COLDER THAN MARS"

 

[RealDave]

So, with the cold setting in today and tomorrow, Trump tweets "What the hell is going on with Global Warming?" Well, Trump, it's beyond your intelligence level to understand. It's the long term trend, as in the last four years were the warmest recorded on the planet.

Remember when Repub Senator Inhofe brought a snowball into Congress, as a prop to debunk global warming theories? Well, now Trump has placed himself in the same stupid, uneducated, lack of scientific knowledge ballpark. Just more evidence for his lack of qualification to hold the office he holds. Bigly!

Our President is just opening up a dialogue on the issue of Global Warmism and Warmist beliefs.

If those who believe in this want to speak out, that's fine, Mr. Trump isn't prejudging anyone.

Before we can really take action, we need to start an open debate. The Warmist theory that requiring the purchase of Carbon Credits somehow appeases Mother Gaia and convinces her to keep it cool sounds a lot like the theory of indulgences from the Middle Ages when folks felt that buying indulgences could reduce the temperatures in Purgatory.

Let's not prejudge, let's have an open debate where all scenarios are considered.

Jesus Fuck you are an idiot.

Trump denied AGW because he is stupid.

I guess we should consider the scenario where we roll off the tuirtle's back. Or the one where God saves us?

So, trees in California are global.

So you believe one set of "scientists" and not another. Why were the scientists wrong in the 70's but totally right now, even though their predictions did not pan out. Leftists today are worse than medieval zealots, they are using their warped ideology of fear to control humanity and in the process destroy it.

All reporting on the same report. So, you are really usuing this as an excuse for your ignorance of AGW?

 

[RealDave]

Coulda shoulda woulda. Nobody knows for sure what is happening, including the scientists and the hacks in the media. The climate is changing, like it has for millions of years. There are fossils in dry areas that used to have oceans and forests and icebergs. Man did not cause it.

That is true, they are like odds makers.

Likelihood Statements
The terminology here for likelihood statements generally follows the conventions used in the IPCC assessments, i.e., for the assessed likelihood of an outcome or result:

• Very Likely: > 90%,
• Likely: > 66%
• More Likely Than Not (or Better Than Even Odds) > 50%

Global Warming and Hurricanes – Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

The predictions by the Global Warming crowd were so wrong that they sneakily changed it to Climate Change. This new name now covers all changes and inexplicable phenomenon, and it can all be blamed on man (the evil white man, to be specific). The only "change" I see is that the media has become much more biased and effective in spreading fear and propaganda.

The only question is, is today's media actually in control our country and the politicians? From the looks of it, it appears so.

Global Warming is a form of climate chnge.

 

[RealDave]

How did Trump & the Republicans get so anti-science?

They did not used to be this way.

It probably started with dick Cheney realized it was easier to dupe their base than act against Big Oil & Coal.

Trump denies AGW. Stupid, uninformed, dumbass Trump & his base STILL believes it.

 

[basquebromance]

i cant wait for the day we have a president who believes in science and understands the difference between weather and climate!

 

[Roudy]

So they were wrong before, but this time....they're right. Despite the fact that so far all the doomsday predictions have not panned out.

This was the press reporting on one scientist & was not widely agreed by climatologists.

You assfucks pull our any excuse for your stupidity & ignorance.

Yeah, right, same non stop barrage and coverage by the media and confirmed by scientists telling us of an imminent ice age.

It's good to have a critical, objective mind, something ignorant Leftard idiots like you are incapable of.

"He outlined recent research suggesting that the next glaciation would begin in 3,000 to 7,000 years, and wrote "It is to be noted here that there is no necessary contradiction between forecast expectations of (a) some renewed (or continuation of) slight cooling of world climate for some years to come, e.g. from volcanic or solar activity variations; (b) an abrupt warming due to the effect of increasing carbon dioxide, lasting some centuries until fossil fuels are exhausted and a while thereafter; and this followed in turn by (c) a glaciation lasting (like the previous ones) for many thousands of years

Hubert Lamb - Wikipedia

Bottom line, the scientific community in the 70's was predicting a massive global cooling in the decades to follow, and they had all the calculations and measurements to prove it.

Not really.

https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1

LOL. So you would be called the same name "Global Warming Denier" that Leftists call those who question the veracity of today's claims regarding "Climate Change". Do you not see how totally ironic that is?

 

[Roudy]

How did Trump & the Republicans get so anti-science?

They did not used to be this way.

It probably started with dick Cheney realized it was easier to dupe their base than act against Big Oil & Coal.

Trump denies AGW. Stupid, uninformed, dumbass Trump & his base STILL believes it.

Actually it's the Dems that are anti science that think a man can be a woman or vice versa just because they think so. To hell with genes, and human physiology! Ha ha ha! But hey, anything to get more voters!

 

[RealDave]

This was the press reporting on one scientist & was not widely agreed by climatologists.

You assfucks pull our any excuse for your stupidity & ignorance.

Yeah, right, same non stop barrage and coverage by the media and confirmed by scientists telling us of an imminent ice age.

It's good to have a critical, objective mind, something ignorant Leftard idiots like you are incapable of.

"He outlined recent research suggesting that the next glaciation would begin in 3,000 to 7,000 years, and wrote "It is to be noted here that there is no necessary contradiction between forecast expectations of (a) some renewed (or continuation of) slight cooling of world climate for some years to come, e.g. from volcanic or solar activity variations; (b) an abrupt warming due to the effect of increasing carbon dioxide, lasting some centuries until fossil fuels are exhausted and a while thereafter; and this followed in turn by (c) a glaciation lasting (like the previous ones) for many thousands of years

Hubert Lamb - Wikipedia

Bottom line, the scientific community in the 70's was predicting a massive global cooling in the decades to follow, and they had all the calculations and measurements to prove it.

Not really.

https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1

LOL. So you would be called the same name "Global Warming Denier" that Leftists call those who question the veracity of today's claims regarding "Climate Change". Do you not see how totally ironic that is?

One has most climatologists not supporting & the other has most supporting it.

 

[RealDave]

How did Trump & the Republicans get so anti-science?

They did not used to be this way.

It probably started with dick Cheney realized it was easier to dupe their base than act against Big Oil & Coal.

Trump denies AGW. Stupid, uninformed, dumbass Trump & his base STILL believes it.

Actually it's the Dems that are anti science that think a man can be a woman or vice versa just because they think so. To hell with genes, and human physiology! Ha ha ha! But hey, anything to get more voters!

Sexuality in in the mind. As scientfic studies have shown.

 

[basquebromance]

Jesse Watters tips for surviving the cold weather:

grow a beard
wear a sweater
drive an SUV

 

[Cellblock2429]

"MSNBC reporting that parts of the United States are now COLDER THAN MARS"

/-----/ colder than Nancy Pelosi's brass bra.

 

[BlindBoo]

This was the press reporting on one scientist & was not widely agreed by climatologists.

You assfucks pull our any excuse for your stupidity & ignorance.

Yeah, right, same non stop barrage and coverage by the media and confirmed by scientists telling us of an imminent ice age.

It's good to have a critical, objective mind, something ignorant Leftard idiots like you are incapable of.

"He outlined recent research suggesting that the next glaciation would begin in 3,000 to 7,000 years, and wrote "It is to be noted here that there is no necessary contradiction between forecast expectations of (a) some renewed (or continuation of) slight cooling of world climate for some years to come, e.g. from volcanic or solar activity variations; (b) an abrupt warming due to the effect of increasing carbon dioxide, lasting some centuries until fossil fuels are exhausted and a while thereafter; and this followed in turn by (c) a glaciation lasting (like the previous ones) for many thousands of years

Hubert Lamb - Wikipedia

Bottom line, the scientific community in the 70's was predicting a massive global cooling in the decades to follow, and they had all the calculations and measurements to prove it.

Not really.

https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1

LOL. So you would be called the same name "Global Warming Denier" that Leftists call those who question the veracity of today's claims regarding "Climate Change". Do you not see how totally ironic that is?

Maybe. I donno, back in 70's it was fucking cold. Also climatology was a new field and many of those saying a new Ice age might be coming all stressed the need for further research.

 

[DustyInfinity]

How did Trump & the Republicans get so anti-science?

They did not used to be this way.

It probably started with dick Cheney realized it was easier to dupe their base than act against Big Oil & Coal.

Trump denies AGW. Stupid, uninformed, dumbass Trump & his base STILL believes it.

Actually it's the Dems that are anti science that think a man can be a woman or vice versa just because they think so. To hell with genes, and human physiology! Ha ha ha! But hey, anything to get more voters!

Sexuality in in the mind. As scientfic studies have shown.

Yes, this is the good ole its okay to fall in love with a toaster branch of science.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Yeah, right, same non stop barrage and coverage by the media and confirmed by scientists telling us of an imminent ice age.

It's good to have a critical, objective mind, something ignorant Leftard idiots like you are incapable of.

"He outlined recent research suggesting that the next glaciation would begin in 3,000 to 7,000 years, and wrote "It is to be noted here that there is no necessary contradiction between forecast expectations of (a) some renewed (or continuation of) slight cooling of world climate for some years to come, e.g. from volcanic or solar activity variations; (b) an abrupt warming due to the effect of increasing carbon dioxide, lasting some centuries until fossil fuels are exhausted and a while thereafter; and this followed in turn by (c) a glaciation lasting (like the previous ones) for many thousands of years

Hubert Lamb - Wikipedia

Bottom line, the scientific community in the 70's was predicting a massive global cooling in the decades to follow, and they had all the calculations and measurements to prove it.

Not really.

https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1

LOL. So you would be called the same name "Global Warming Denier" that Leftists call those who question the veracity of today's claims regarding "Climate Change". Do you not see how totally ironic that is?

Maybe. I donno, back in 70's it was fucking cold. Also climatology was a new field and many of those saying a new Ice age might be coming all stressed the need for further research.

/-----/

 

[Roudy]

Coulda shoulda woulda. Nobody knows for sure what is happening, including the scientists and the hacks in the media. The climate is changing, like it has for millions of years. There are fossils in dry areas that used to have oceans and forests and icebergs. Man did not cause it.

That is true, they are like odds makers.

Likelihood Statements
The terminology here for likelihood statements generally follows the conventions used in the IPCC assessments, i.e., for the assessed likelihood of an outcome or result:

• Very Likely: > 90%,
• Likely: > 66%
• More Likely Than Not (or Better Than Even Odds) > 50%

Global Warming and Hurricanes – Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

The predictions by the Global Warming crowd were so wrong that they sneakily changed it to Climate Change. This new name now covers all changes and inexplicable phenomenon, and it can all be blamed on man (the evil white man, to be specific). The only "change" I see is that the media has become much more biased and effective in spreading fear and propaganda.

The only question is, is today's media actually in control our country and the politicians? From the looks of it, it appears so.

Global Warming is a form of climate chnge.

The Eath's climate has been changing since its creation. Nobody is denying the obvious. Thirty years ago "scientists" claimed that the Earth is cooling, now they making claims for the opposite, that it is warming, and all their predications have not panned out, i.e. that ten years ago most of the world's coastal cities would be under water. So excuse me for being skeptical, especially during a time when we are experiencing RECORD LOW TEMPS in the USA.

 

[Roudy]

Yeah, right, same non stop barrage and coverage by the media and confirmed by scientists telling us of an imminent ice age.

It's good to have a critical, objective mind, something ignorant Leftard idiots like you are incapable of.

"He outlined recent research suggesting that the next glaciation would begin in 3,000 to 7,000 years, and wrote "It is to be noted here that there is no necessary contradiction between forecast expectations of (a) some renewed (or continuation of) slight cooling of world climate for some years to come, e.g. from volcanic or solar activity variations; (b) an abrupt warming due to the effect of increasing carbon dioxide, lasting some centuries until fossil fuels are exhausted and a while thereafter; and this followed in turn by (c) a glaciation lasting (like the previous ones) for many thousands of years

Hubert Lamb - Wikipedia

Bottom line, the scientific community in the 70's was predicting a massive global cooling in the decades to follow, and they had all the calculations and measurements to prove it.

Not really.

https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1

LOL. So you would be called the same name "Global Warming Denier" that Leftists call those who question the veracity of today's claims regarding "Climate Change". Do you not see how totally ironic that is?

Maybe. I donno, back in 70's it was fucking cold. Also climatology was a new field and many of those saying a new Ice age might be coming all stressed the need for further research.

Okay so the scientists that made those Global Cooling predictions in the 70's were dumb and ignorant and had faulty numbers.

 

[Pilot1]

I wonder what government scam the Left will come up with when they give up on man made climate change. Very few buy into that crap anymore, so they will have to come up with something.

 

[KissMy]

This ain't record setting cold! It was much colder in the 1970's! Global warming is real, but it ain't real bad for our generation like Al Gore said it would be. 6" sea level rise in the past 100 years ain't the disaster he claimed. If Gore believed it was as bad as he claimed. he should have never allowed billions of Asians & Indians get cars or live like US citizens. Yeah sea levels will rise exponentially faster over the next 100 to 200 years, but houses don't last that long anyhow, so just halt rebuilding below sea levels predicted 100 years in the future.

 

[Roudy]

How did Trump & the Republicans get so anti-science?

They did not used to be this way.

It probably started with dick Cheney realized it was easier to dupe their base than act against Big Oil & Coal.

Trump denies AGW. Stupid, uninformed, dumbass Trump & his base STILL believes it.

Actually it's the Dems that are anti science that think a man can be a woman or vice versa just because they think so. To hell with genes, and human physiology! Ha ha ha! But hey, anything to get more voters!

Sexuality in in the mind. As scientfic studies have shown.

Silly me, I thought your sexuality was science based, and is determined by your chromosomes, hormones, and your sexual organs. Can you point us to the specific area "in the mind" that determines sexuality? Ha ha ha. Such a scientific person you are.

 

[BlindBoo]

"He outlined recent research suggesting that the next glaciation would begin in 3,000 to 7,000 years, and wrote "It is to be noted here that there is no necessary contradiction between forecast expectations of (a) some renewed (or continuation of) slight cooling of world climate for some years to come, e.g. from volcanic or solar activity variations; (b) an abrupt warming due to the effect of increasing carbon dioxide, lasting some centuries until fossil fuels are exhausted and a while thereafter; and this followed in turn by (c) a glaciation lasting (like the previous ones) for many thousands of years

Hubert Lamb - Wikipedia

Bottom line, the scientific community in the 70's was predicting a massive global cooling in the decades to follow, and they had all the calculations and measurements to prove it.

Not really.

https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1

LOL. So you would be called the same name "Global Warming Denier" that Leftists call those who question the veracity of today's claims regarding "Climate Change". Do you not see how totally ironic that is?

Maybe. I donno, back in 70's it was fucking cold. Also climatology was a new field and many of those saying a new Ice age might be coming all stressed the need for further research.

Okay so the scientists that made those Global Cooling predictions in the 70's were dumb and ignorant and had faulty numbers.

In reality there was no consensus on the cooling and most of the scientist were already on board with the CO2 increase from fossil fuel use was causing the opposite. Just because someone is wrong doesn't mean they were dumb and ignorant either.