WillowTree
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2008
- 84,532
- 16,092
- 2,180
Transcanada/ Keystone Pipeline has already been sued, I think I am satisfied with my opinion we should do a little more research.
what kind of research are you going to dew..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Transcanada/ Keystone Pipeline has already been sued, I think I am satisfied with my opinion we should do a little more research.
QED.Hysterics at best ,we have an antiquated pipeline system,and the emotional don't want to repair replace,but will scream if there is a spill,or there is no gas.
There are thousands of miles of pipe going everywhere,bringing your energy way cheaper and safer than another way.
Anyone can be sued by anyone else at any time, with or without having a legitimate reason. All it takes is going to the courthouse and filing some paperwork. Being sued proves nothing.Transcanada/ Keystone Pipeline has already been sued, I think I am satisfied with my opinion we should do a little more research.
Sigh.
A pipeline within the United States is relatively easy. An "international" pipeline between countries takes more time and is much more difficult to get built.
Especially when politicians throw up ridiculous obstacles for partisan reasons.Sigh.
A pipeline within the United States is relatively easy. An "international" pipeline between countries takes more time and is much more difficult to get built.
Sigh.
A pipeline within the United States is relatively easy. An "international" pipeline between countries takes more time and is much more difficult to get built.
Looks to me like the GOP is willing to comprimise - to give The Obama what He wants, so long as they get something back.
:shrug:
Anyone can be sued by anyone else at any time, with or without having a legitimate reason. All it takes is going to the courthouse and filing some paperwork. Being sued proves nothing.Transcanada/ Keystone Pipeline has already been sued, I think I am satisfied with my opinion we should do a little more research.
Pipeline showdown escalates payroll tax cut fight - CNN.com
But when it comes to the rich, no rider and no conditions. The GOP has historically shown that their hearts and minds are with the wealthy. They know the Dems want to help the middle class, so they chose what they can pull from thieir goody bag to throw in as a condition.
Fantastic.Anyone can be sued by anyone else at any time, with or without having a legitimate reason. All it takes is going to the courthouse and filing some paperwork. Being sued proves nothing.Transcanada/ Keystone Pipeline has already been sued, I think I am satisfied with my opinion we should do a little more research.
It was over what they said the tolls would be, and what the tolls actually might be.
Looks to me like the GOP is willing to comprimise - to give The Obama what He wants, so long as they get something back.
:shrug:
Shouldn't they want a tax cut to begin with??
This should have been the quickest bill through the legislature in history. Give me one reason they should be against it besides that Obama wants it.
Sigh.
A pipeline within the United States is relatively easy. An "international" pipeline between countries takes more time and is much more difficult to get built.
Of course it's going to take time if you refuse to authorize it being built.
So let's build it. It's 2011. Almost 2012. We have the technology to make it safe. We need the jobs. Why not build it?
Looks to me like the GOP is willing to comprimise - to give The Obama what He wants, so long as they get something back.
:shrug:
Shouldn't they want a tax cut to begin with??
This should have been the quickest bill through the legislature in history. Give me one reason they should be against it besides that Obama wants it.
no, not really, first its a rebate, second it was sold by obama as a 1 year rebate. third what happened to all the hoopla over taxes crashing the deficit? Oh wait; a 10 year tax for a (another) 1 year rebate. seriously.....?
Compromise is fine, it still shouldn't be in the bill, along with allowing states to drug test people applying for unemployment.
Why the heck not?
We are suggesting tax cuts to encourage job growth and you don't see the relationship between that and authorizing a pipeline that is guaranteed to create jobs?
How about we do a little more research into the Pipeline? I am all for the US self contained when it comes to Oil, but I don't want to pass something before we know all the facts. We need a payroll tax now, we need to do a little more research into the Pipeline.
I have talked to my friends dad who is engineer for BP in Alaska, and he has reservations about it. I think I will go with an expert, and say we should spend a little more time before we start a massive project.
Shouldn't they want a tax cut to begin with??
This should have been the quickest bill through the legislature in history. Give me one reason they should be against it besides that Obama wants it.
no, not really, first its a rebate, second it was sold by obama as a 1 year rebate. third what happened to all the hoopla over taxes crashing the deficit? Oh wait; a 10 year tax for a (another) 1 year rebate. seriously.....?
So you point out budgetary issues related to a tax cut for the first time in history, as soon as Dems propose one.....?
Shouldn't your same logic apply to Bush II tax cuts? But it doesn't, does it?
Compromise is fine, it still shouldn't be in the bill, along with allowing states to drug test people applying for unemployment.
Why the heck not?
We are suggesting tax cuts to encourage job growth and you don't see the relationship between that and authorizing a pipeline that is guaranteed to create jobs?
How about we do a little more research into the Pipeline? I am all for the US self contained when it comes to Oil, but I don't want to pass something before we know all the facts. We need a payroll tax now, we need to do a little more research into the Pipeline.
I have talked to my friends dad who is engineer for BP in Alaska, and he has reservations about it. I think I will go with an expert, and say we should spend a little more time before we start a massive project.
Sigh.
A pipeline within the United States is relatively easy. An "international" pipeline between countries takes more time and is much more difficult to get built.
Pipeline showdown escalates payroll tax cut fight - CNN.com
But when it comes to the rich, no rider and no conditions. The GOP has historically shown that their hearts and minds are with the wealthy. They know the Dems want to help the middle class, so they chose what they can pull from thieir goody bag to throw in as a condition.