C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
True.Rand Paul was born about 200 years too late to be the pro-slavery states rightser he surely would have been back then.
I know you graduated from a government school controlled by the education wing of the democrat party....so you don't understand history, the truth or reality......but how is Rand Paul being against the government setting doctors wages being pro fucking slavery.....do you even think before you post....
Oh...I get it....you think you just have to say Ramd Paul is pro slavery....then your lefty nitwit fellow travelers will take up that point up and repeat it like trained seals and then the democrats in the main stream press will push the idea and wherever he goes they will ask him..." Senator Paul...why do you support slavery" and then your smear job will be complete....
You leftists,are vile and disgusting human beings....
It is logical to speculate that Rand Paul would have been a states right champion from Kentucky in the 1800's,
which makes it therefore logical to speculate that he would have supported his state's right to keep slavery legal.
No, Rand Paul is a libertarian.....he believes in freedom of the individual....unlike you lefties, so he would have been against slavery...and against slavery in the United States.......do some thinking.....
He supports business discrimination by race. He wants states to have the right to take away abortion rights. He wants states to have the right to ban same sex marriage.
He is far from believing in freedom for the individual.
As is the case with most – if not all – of the GOP candidates.
Otherwise, that Paul is a libertarian loon should come as no surprise, his positions on the issues are as bizarre as they are wrong.