GOP releases 1023 form outlining $10 million bribe to Joe and Hunter Biden.

[Care4all]

So much for the argument nothing is pointing to Joe. I'm sure this will be dismissed as all the other evidence against the Biden Crime Family.

But that evidence grows by the day. And unlike RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA, it's real.


The highly-anticipated internal FBI form that allegedly puts Joe and Hunter Biden at the center of a $10 million bribery scheme to 'coerce' Burisma CEO into making the payments in exchange for their help has been released by Republicans.

The FBI FD-1023 form was created on June 30, 2020 based off information from a highly-paid informant and brought to the attention of Republicans by a whistleblower. It details a $5 million each 'arrangement' between then-Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden and an oil executive - identified as Burisma CEO Mykola Zlochevsky - in exchange for getting a Ukrainian prosecutor who had a probe open into the company fired.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, obtained and published the document after a months-long back-and-forth between the top Republican and the FBI through 'legally protected disclosures' by Department of Justice (DOJ) whistleblowers.

The FD-1023 form obtained by DailyMail.com Thursday includes reporting from a confidential human source (CHS) that begins with a 'late 2025 or 2016' first meeting with the source and Burisma executives in Kyiv, Ukraine.

The CHS participated in the meeting during which it was explained to him by Burisma's CFO Vadim Pojarskii that the then-vice president's son Hunter was a sitting board member.

According to the source's recount of the meeting, Pojarskii said Burisma hired Hunter Biden to 'protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems.'

According to the form, the source asked why Burisma needed to get assistance 'regarding the purchase/merger of a US-based company when Biden was on their board.'

Pojarskii replied 'that at Hunter Biden was not smart, and they wanted to get additional counsel.'

According to the form, the source said the meeting took place around the time then-Vice President Joe Biden 'made a public statement about (former) Ukraine Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin being corrupt, and that he should be fired/removed from office.'

At the time, Shokin had opened an investigation into Burisma, which the company knew 'would have a substantial negative impact on Burisma's prospective IPO in the United States.'

The form states that Zlochevsky replied, 'Don't worry Hunter will take care of all of those issues through his dad.'

Burisma CEO Mykola Zlochevsky told the source: 'it costs (million) to pay one Biden, and 5 (million) to another Biden.'

MSN

www.msn.com

It's 100% fake news

You know nothing about this, that is why you believe it and believe Zlochevsky....a crook who stole millions from the Ukrainian people, and all the foreign entities financially supporting them, from 2010-2012... Hunter went to work for Burisma in 2014, AFTER Zlochevsky escaped to live in Russia, where Shokin also escaped to....Russia. Shokin never went after him.

Shokin was not actively investigating Burisma, or any corruption, and was the reason why the IMF, World Bank, the USA, Great Britain, etc ALL pushed for the corrupt Shokin, to be fired...starting back in late May, 2015. Joe Biden pushed firing Shokin in early December 2015... Shokin was removed by their parliament late March 2016, after massive protests of Shokin by the Ukrainians against corruption.

 

[Lastamender]

Careful. Talk like that might get you put in jail for election interference.

Repeating what you have heard should never put anyone in jail, should it? Fascist.

 

[Lastamender]

It's 100% fake news

You know nothing about this, that is why you believe it and believe Zlochevsky....a crook who stole millions from the Ukrainian people, and all the foreign entities financially supporting them, from 2010-2012... Hunter went to work for Burisma in 2014, AFTER Zlochevsky escaped to live in Russia, where Shokin also escaped to....Russia. Shokin never went after him.

Shokin was not actively investigating Burisma, and was the reason why the IMF, World Bank, the USA, Great Britain, etc ALL pushed for the corrupt Shokin, to be fired...starting back in late May, 2015. Joe Biden pushed firing Shokin in early December 2015... Shokin was removed by their parliament late March 2016, after massive protests of Shokin by the Ukrainians against corruption.

 

[Lastamender]

All I wanted is people to tell the truth and let the cards fall where they may.

Apparently that’s not what you want. You want a cover up.

But whatever. The point is that hearsay is admissible for this reason.

The people and media you listen to have not told the truth for a very long time.

 

[Marener]

Repeating what you have heard should never put anyone in jail, should it? Fascist.

Well, that’s what the other poster suggested to me yesterday but whatever I dont make the rules.

I was told adamantly by this other poster that his beliefs didn’t make him fascist so maybe you can tell him and he’ll listen.

 

[Lastamender]

Well, that’s what the other poster suggested to me yesterday but whatever I dont make the rules.

I was told adamantly by this other poster that his beliefs didn’t make him fascist so maybe you can tell him and he’ll listen.

They do not make the rules either. They abuse their power and ignore the rules.

 

[Marener]

The people and media you listen to have not told the truth for a very long time.

that’s why I want them under oath.

Because this is why:

 

[Lastamender]

that’s why I want them under oath.

Because this is why:

Can they lie like Comey, Fauci, Brennan, Clapper, and McCabe and not be held accountable? That seems fair, right?

 

[yidnar]

Prove it. This is not a whistleblower. A whistleblower goes through certain steps to determine whether the information is credible. None of these people went through this process because they know they are lying.

did casper the ghost fill out the 1023 ?

 

[WEATHER53]

Hearsay can be evidence. There’s all sorts of rules about when hearsay is admissible.

But if you beliefs hearsay isn’t evidence, then the FD-1023 that is released about this supposed bribe isn’t evidence.

Saying what someone else told you they overheard someone else say is Never accepted as evidence. It is sometimes permitted as testimony but classified as hearsay
Stop lying

 

[Marener]

Saying what someone else told you they overheard someone else say is Never accepted as evidence. It is sometimes permitted as testimony but classified as hearsay
Stop lying

That’s hearsay within hearsay, so probably not.

Have you guys figured out that this supposed FD 1023 is all hearsay?

 

[WEATHER53]

That’s hearsay within hearsay, so probably not.

Have you guys figured out that this supposed FD 1023 is all hearsay?

If Johnny tells you that he saw Jimmy beat up Paul then you won’t be able to get that accepted as evidence in court.

 

[Marener]

If Johnny tells you that he saw Jimmy beat up Paul then you won’t be able to get that accepted as evidence in court.

Okay.

The confidential source didn’t witness anything illegal.

 

[Rawley]

It’s an ALLEGATION based on anonymous sources and no evidence

LOL The Steele Dossier ring any bells?

 

[Rawley]

Can they lie like Comey, Fauci, Brennan, Clapper, and McCabe and not be held accountable? That seems fair, right?

Not held accountable? Hell, it gets you a job at CNN, MSNBC ...

 

[Kilroy2]

what about the 1023 form is fantasy?

The source is just making a statement and does not back it up with proof such as a recording or documentation. If the investigator believe it then he must decide to allocate manpower to look for collaborating evidence that can be used in a court of law.

 

[maybelooking]

The source is just making a statement and does not back it up with proof such as a recording or documentation.

so what about the actual 1023 is fantasy? never mind. you just claimed an actual document isn't back up with documentation!! LMAO. You're fucking retarded and no amount of evidence will convince you of anything beyond your idiotic partisan view.

 

[Lesh]

LOL The Steele Dossier ring any bells?

And where that go? Nowhere?

 

[Lesh]

so what about the actual 1023 is fantasy? never mind. you just claimed an actual document isn't back up with documentation!! LMAO. You're fucking retarded and no amount of evidence will convince you of anything beyond your idiotic partisan view.

What is a 1023? It’s a report of an interview.

Not unlike an affidavit

Remember all those affidavits that were gonna turn the election your way?

How’d that work out?

 

[WEATHER53]

so what about the actual 1023 is fantasy? never mind. you just claimed an actual document isn't back up with documentation!! LMAO. You're fucking retarded and no amount of evidence will convince you of anything beyond your idiotic partisan view.

Yes
If I see Paul beating up Johnny and so state then that is evidence. Another individual does not have to confirm what I say I saw
If Jimmy tells me that he saw it and I try to report that then it’s considered hearsay