Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But you are a libertarian; You refuse to provide a name of a single country that has managed to become a successful libertarian country, ed. Till then don't expect any help from me.You don't get. Liberalism is based on pure ignorance that is why they must change to subject to personal attack!! Its easy enough to prove.
PLease say something substantive in support of liberalism. I won't holds my breath.
What Edward means is he is sick of personal attacks (even if he brings them on himself by being soo darned abrasive)
But you are a libertarian; You refuse to provide a name of a single country that has managed to become a successful libertarian country, ed. Till then don't expect any help from me.What Edward means is he is sick of personal attacks (even if he brings them on himself by being soo darned abrasive)
obviously USA is most libertarian country in human history and so the richest country in human history, not to mention that we are the world's moral policeman too!! Still over your head???
Over the last year, I've heard a number of GOP politicians talk about how we need to preserve the middle class and turn the poor into productive citizens. Personally, I think this is an excellent idea. I'm all for it.
And now, Mr. Speaker and other gentlemen, here's what needs to happen in order to achieve this very worthy goal:
- Guarantee ample funding and the most talented educators in public schools at all levels and in all neighborhoods
- Make tuition at colleges and universities free or greatly subsidized, for those who are academically qualified and who want to pursue an economically useful degree (those who want to major in lesbian Uzbekistani basket weaving can do it on their own dime)
- Fund a public option for universal health care
- Regulate markets to prevent scams that discourage widespread investment
- Rebuild the infrastructure to pave the way for faster economic development
- Revamp the justice system so that it no longer disproportionately punishes the poor
- Bring the percentage of incarcerated citizens back in line with the rest of the free world (jails aren't free)
You realize that NONE of the items above is a handout for lazy, irresponsible people, of course. They are simply tools for those willing to make the effort to escape poverty and be successful.
Time to put your money where your mouths are.
better to eliminate the liberal reforms as follows since your ideas are liberal and stupid and not worth reading. We already spend tons on education and you want to spend more?? Stupid!!!
1) Make unions illegal ( 10 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
2) make minimum wage illegal ( 5 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
3) end business taxation; especially tax incentives to off-shore jobs ( 5 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
4) make inflation illegal ( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
5) make Federal debt illegal( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
6) send illegal workers home(8 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
7) Pass Balanced Budget Amendment to Constitution( 3 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
8) cut pay of government workers in half( 4 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
9) Make health insurance competition legal( 6 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
10) end needless business regulations ( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
11) restrict Federal spending to 15% of GNP( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
12) support unlimited free trade( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
13) reduced unemployment compensation, welfare, food stamps, medicaid.( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
14) privatize education, social security ( 4 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
15) end payroll taxes ( 1 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
Since Democrats always oppose wisdom and common sense the only serious option is to make them illegal as the Constitution intended.
Ed, you are simply proving you are an idiot. Regulated capitalism does not equal a Libertarian economy. Jesus, are you stupid. Now, again, about that libertarian economy. Name a successful one.But you are a libertarian; You refuse to provide a name of a single country that has managed to become a successful libertarian country, ed. Till then don't expect any help from me.What Edward means is he is sick of personal attacks (even if he brings them on himself by being soo darned abrasive)
obviously USA is most libertarian country in human history and so the richest country in human history, not to mention that we are the world's moral policeman too!! Still over your head???
Regulated capitalism does not equal a Libertarian economy. .
Regulated capitalism does not equal a Libertarian economy. .
if I said it did I'll pay you $10,000. Bet or run away with your liberal strawman between your legs once again. Bet??
Regulated capitalism does not equal a Libertarian economy. .
if I said it did I'll pay you $10,000. Bet or run away with your liberal strawman between your legs once again. Bet??
You'd lose, Eddie. Because if a = b, and c = b, then a = c. You don't have to explicitly state that a = c for it to be true.
Regulated capitalism does not equal a Libertarian economy. .
if I said it did I'll pay you $10,000. Bet or run away with your liberal strawman between your legs once again. Bet??
You'd lose, Eddie. Because if a = b, and c = b, then a = c. You don't have to explicitly state that a = c for it to be true.
But you are a libertarian; You refuse to provide a name of a single country that has managed to become a successful libertarian country, ed. Till then don't expect any help from me.
obviously USA is most libertarian country in human history and so the richest country in human history, not to mention that we are the world's moral policeman too!! Still over your head???
The transcontinental railroad and land.grant programs of the mid 1800's are your idea of a country that grew great from small government after military plunder?
Or are we talking the 1950's world FDR created?
Ah, so you did not say that the US economy was the best you could name as a libertarian economy?Regulated capitalism does not equal a Libertarian economy. .
if I said it did I'll pay you $10,000. Bet or run away with your liberal strawman between your legs once again. Bet??
So, me boy, I know this is complicated. But my question was can you name a successful Libertarian economy? And you said, stupidly, the USA is the most libertarian in human history.obviously USA is most libertarian country in human history
if I said it did I'll pay you $10,000. Bet or run away with your liberal strawman between your legs once again. Bet??
You'd lose, Eddie. Because if a = b, and c = b, then a = c. You don't have to explicitly state that a = c for it to be true.
Regulated capitalism does not equal a Libertarian economy. .
if I said it did I'll pay you $10,000. Bet or run away with your liberal strawman between your legs once again. Bet??
You'd lose, Eddie. Because if a = b, and c = b, then a = c. You don't have to explicitly state that a = c for it to be true.
Regulated capitalism does not equal a Libertarian economy. .
if I said it did I'll pay you $10,000. Bet or run away with your liberal strawman between your legs once again. Bet??
The strawman is lonely there, there being no balls to hang out with.
You want to worship the guy/spambot/whatever-it-is just for posting the exact same thing twice? You're even more pathetic than Ed is.
Go play rep points with your little swamp friends.
i agree that poor people should work but if you get a low wage job which is considered productive it doesn't mean you can make a living off it, ie food shelter electricity water...
You want to worship the guy/spambot/whatever-it-is just for posting the exact same thing twice? You're even more pathetic than Ed is.
Go play rep points with your little swamp friends.
You'd think a pundit could actually add to the body of knowledge discussed in a thread.
This is a wonky troll.
But Ed. You are a Libertarian. Like communism, it seems that Liebertarinism can not make it. Should we not throw them all in the garbage. Or is there a successful libertarian country.You want to worship the guy/spambot/whatever-it-is just for posting the exact same thing twice? You're even more pathetic than Ed is.
Go play rep points with your little swamp friends.
You'd think a pundit could actually add to the body of knowledge discussed in a thread.
This is a wonky troll.
Yes the wonk is a typical low IQ liberal. Easy enough to prove; let's hear him say one intelligent thing in defense of liberalism. Should be easy for a wonk. No conservative or libertarian would have to run away like that.
But Ed. You are a Libertarian. Like communism, it seems that Liebertarinism can not make it. Should we not throw them all in the garbage. Or is there a successful libertarian country.You'd think a pundit could actually add to the body of knowledge discussed in a thread.
This is a wonky troll.
Yes the wonk is a typical low IQ liberal. Easy enough to prove; let's hear him say one intelligent thing in defense of liberalism. Should be easy for a wonk. No conservative or libertarian would have to run away like that.
If not, why would you back a looser??? About as stupid as a communist. But at least they can point to long periods when communist countries existed, sort of. But poor ed can not point to a single libertarian country that lasted as long as, say cuba. Poor ed. Backing a looser.
But Ed. You are a Libertarian. Like communism, it seems that Liebertarinism can not make it. Should we not throw them all in the garbage. Or is there a successful libertarian country.Yes the wonk is a typical low IQ liberal. Easy enough to prove; let's hear him say one intelligent thing in defense of liberalism. Should be easy for a wonk. No conservative or libertarian would have to run away like that.
If not, why would you back a looser??? About as stupid as a communist. But at least they can point to long periods when communist countries existed, sort of. But poor ed can not point to a single libertarian country that lasted as long as, say cuba. Poor ed. Backing a looser.
Meaningless lunacy since there was never a pure libertarian communist socialist fascist Fabian socialist or capitalist countryon earth; so by your liberal logic all political philosophies are losers. Moreover, for the first 200,000 years of human life on this planet there was no relatively libertarian country until America, but that did not mean the philosophy was a looser.
See what happens when a liberal tries to think?? Why not try law school and learn how to think Socratically??
Now ed. Playing the con game of changing what was said so you can try to attack it is disingenuous. Which i know does not bother you. What I said, me boy, is that like Communism, Libertarian economies are bound to fail. We all are just waiting for you to name one that did not. And you, comically, name the united states.But Ed. You are a Libertarian. Like communism, it seems that Liebertarinism can not make it. Should we not throw them all in the garbage. Or is there a successful libertarian country.Yes the wonk is a typical low IQ liberal. Easy enough to prove; let's hear him say one intelligent thing in defense of liberalism. Should be easy for a wonk. No conservative or libertarian would have to run away like that.
If not, why would you back a looser??? About as stupid as a communist. But at least they can point to long periods when communist countries existed, sort of. But poor ed can not point to a single libertarian country that lasted as long as, say cuba. Poor ed. Backing a looser.
Meaningless lunacy since there was never a pure libertarian communist socialist fascist Fabian socialist or capitalist countryon earth; so by your liberal logic all political philosophies are losers. Moreover, for the first 200,000 years of human life on this planet there was no relatively libertarian country until America, but that did not mean the philosophy was a looser.
See what happens when a liberal tries to think?? Why not try law school and learn how to think Socratically??
