Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not a question of Gorsuch being worse than Scalia. The challenge is for him to be as thoughtful, brilliant and high integrity as him. Scalia set a Very High Standard.
Yeah, you regressives can't continue to legislate through the courts when the judges have fidelity to the law and Constitution.
Black kids have an average I.Q. of 85. White kids (Northern Europeans) have an average of 100. East Asians run about 107.It's not a question of Gorsuch being worse than Scalia. The challenge is for him to be as thoughtful, brilliant and high integrity as him. Scalia set a Very High Standard.
Here's an example of Scalia's "brilliance".....
He once suggested that black kids would do better at schools that weren't too fast for them. The racism and segregationist mindset cannot be too easily hidden in that basically evil heart of his.......and don't forget that Scalia also thought that women weren't as sharp as men and should know their place.
Black kids have an average I.Q. of 85. White kids (Northern Europeans) have an average of 100. East Asians run about 107.
Yes, Black kids would do better with curriculum that matched their diminished capacity. Concurrently, the other aforementioned would do much better if they were permitted to go at a pace that suited their intelligence levels.
Bussing was a SCOTUS abortion.Yeah, you regressives can't continue to legislate through the courts when the judges have fidelity to the law and Constitution.
Sure....you DON'T want a human judge, you want a computer.
Based on the strict reading of the Constitution we would still have segregation.
The village just called they need their idiot back.Black kids have an average I.Q. of 85. White kids (Northern Europeans) have an average of 100. East Asians run about 107.
Yes, Black kids would do better with curriculum that matched their diminished capacity. Concurrently, the other aforementioned would do much better if they were permitted to go at a pace that suited their intelligence levels.
The cleaners just called....Your white sheet and pointed hood are ready for pick-up.
As a liberal democrat, I would still urge the Senate to vote in Gorsuch and pray that both Ginsburg and Breyer live to be 100 years old.
Lets face it, Gorsuch cannot be any worse than Scalia and probably lacks the charm of that departed justice who hid his ultra right wing politics behind an elfin smile.
With Gorsuch, the SCOTUS is split to 4-4, with Kennedy as the swing vote. However, the next open seat will be an all-out war by both sides of the aisle.
Post-truth comment by bear, who knows and has admitted the CA voters would be more than 60% for LGBT marriage today.As a liberal democrat, I would still urge the Senate to vote in Gorsuch and pray that both Ginsburg and Breyer live to be 100 years old.
Lets face it, Gorsuch cannot be any worse than Scalia and probably lacks the charm of that departed justice who hid his ultra right wing politics behind an elfin smile.
With Gorsuch, the SCOTUS is split to 4-4, with Kennedy as the swing vote. However, the next open seat will be an all-out war by both sides of the aisle.
Yeah, you regressives can't continue to legislate through the courts when the judges have fidelity to the law and Constitution. Then you're going to have to actually compete on ideas instead of courts with activist judges. So far you've been a miserable failure outside the courts.
No kidding even the people of California voted against gay marriage, they had to use the activist judges, to get it to the supremes
.
Post-truth comment by bear, who knows and has admitted the CA voters would be more than 60% for LGBT marriage today.As a liberal democrat, I would still urge the Senate to vote in Gorsuch and pray that both Ginsburg and Breyer live to be 100 years old.
Lets face it, Gorsuch cannot be any worse than Scalia and probably lacks the charm of that departed justice who hid his ultra right wing politics behind an elfin smile.
With Gorsuch, the SCOTUS is split to 4-4, with Kennedy as the swing vote. However, the next open seat will be an all-out war by both sides of the aisle.
Yeah, you regressives can't continue to legislate through the courts when the judges have fidelity to the law and Constitution. Then you're going to have to actually compete on ideas instead of courts with activist judges. So far you've been a miserable failure outside the courts.
No kidding even the people of California voted against gay marriage, they had to use the activist judges, to get it to the supremes
.
It's not a question of Gorsuch being worse than Scalia. The challenge is for him to be as thoughtful, brilliant and high integrity as him. Scalia set a Very High Standard.
Here's an example of Scalia's "brilliance".....
He once suggested that black kids would do better at schools that weren't too fast for them. The racism and segregationist mindset cannot be too easily hidden in that basically evil heart of his.......and don't forget that Scalia also thought that women weren't as sharp as men and should know their place.
Yeah, you regressives can't continue to legislate through the courts when the judges have fidelity to the law and Constitution.
Sure....you DON'T want a human judge, you want a computer.
Based on the strict reading of the Constitution we would still have segregation.
We can't have an SC justice who strictly abides by the Constitution. That would be so fucking RADICAL right wing kookier.As a liberal democrat, I would still urge the Senate to vote in Gorsuch and pray that both Ginsburg and Breyer live to be 100 years old.
Lets face it, Gorsuch cannot be any worse than Scalia and probably lacks the charm of that departed justice who hid his ultra right wing politics behind an elfin smile.
With Gorsuch, the SCOTUS is split to 4-4, with Kennedy as the swing vote. However, the next open seat will be an all-out war by both sides of the aisle.
Bear demonstrates his growing dementia. And he thinks he did not admit when he did. He can look for it. The way to deal with the crazed like Bear is to force them into reality by making them to their own research.Prove it Nat, and when did I admit it? .Post-truth comment by bear, who knows and has admitted the CA voters would be more than 60% for LGBT marriage today.As a liberal democrat, I would still urge the Senate to vote in Gorsuch and pray that both Ginsburg and Breyer live to be 100 years old.
Lets face it, Gorsuch cannot be any worse than Scalia and probably lacks the charm of that departed justice who hid his ultra right wing politics behind an elfin smile.
With Gorsuch, the SCOTUS is split to 4-4, with Kennedy as the swing vote. However, the next open seat will be an all-out war by both sides of the aisle.
Yeah, you regressives can't continue to legislate through the courts when the judges have fidelity to the law and Constitution. Then you're going to have to actually compete on ideas instead of courts with activist judges. So far you've been a miserable failure outside the courts.
No kidding even the people of California voted against gay marriage, they had to use the activist judges, to get it to the supremes
.
Only people like you would think any such thing.Yeah, you regressives can't continue to legislate through the courts when the judges have fidelity to the law and Constitution.
Sure....you DON'T want a human judge, you want a computer.
Based on the strict reading of the Constitution we would still have segregation.
So what's the purpose of written laws if judges can do anything they want?
Post-truth comment by bear, who knows and has admitted the CA voters would be more than 60% for LGBT marriage today.
Only people like you would think any such thing.Yeah, you regressives can't continue to legislate through the courts when the judges have fidelity to the law and Constitution.
Sure....you DON'T want a human judge, you want a computer.
Based on the strict reading of the Constitution we would still have segregation.
So what's the purpose of written laws if judges can do anything they want?
You shouldn't care one bit. Anyone who thinks big government run by a small criminal elite is good, obviously has lost their minds and not worthy of consideration.38 of 50 governorships
67 of 98 State legislatures
Control of the US House
Control of the US Senate
Control of the Presidency
Democrats regulated to coastal regions of the country
By 2020, the SCOTUS should be 7 GOP appointed and 2 Democrat-appointed judges.Hopefully, there will also be a veto-proof majority in both chambers of the US Legislative branch with an increase to 70 or 72 State legislatures.
Remind Me again why I should care what the radicalized progressives think?
