Guess what a member of the 1% club did?

But you guys forget some of the 1% agree with the 99%.

They are the ones who care about their country and their fellow Americans.

Why does the right play these very stupid useless games?

The only reason some in the 1% may agree is that they have a loophole to hide their money. Buffett agrees but owes back taxes.
 
Defending a member of the 1% club? Why are certain members of that club not to be discussed?

What club? The Clintons are not in the top 1%, but you knew that already...

Even if they were, I would defend anyone who is being unfairly attacked by an impotent internet clown such as yourself. Start a thread on the Bush twins and see...

Oh but yes the clintons are in the 1% club, the only weapon against the left defending them so much is to deny they are members in the 1% club anything else is just flux outrage
The Tea Party Clintons are not now, never have been, and never will be in the 1% club. The OWS is so effective that the fearful CON$' only weapon is to include nonmembers of the 1% in the 1%.
 
What club? The Clintons are not in the top 1%, but you knew that already...

Even if they were, I would defend anyone who is being unfairly attacked by an impotent internet clown such as yourself. Start a thread on the Bush twins and see...

Oh but yes the clintons are in the 1% club, the only weapon against the left defending them so much is to deny they are members in the 1% club anything else is just flux outrage
The Tea Party Clintons are not now, never have been, and never will be in the 1% club. The OWS is so effective that the fearful CON$' only weapon is to include nonmembers of the 1% in the 1%.

:lmao:

You always seem to manage putting your stupidity on display.
 
Isn't Jenna Bush on The Today Show? Never heard you righties complain about that. She was hired by NBC in 2009. Where's the outrage?

"Today Show" Hires Jenna Bush

Thats because republicans, who are about 30% of the country, never made a stink by creating a straw man about representing 99% of the country in the OWS and the 1% shouldn't get anything because they are the boogeyman.

99% of obama's voting base is not 99% of the country by the way ;)
 
Last edited:
What club? The Clintons are not in the top 1%, but you knew that already...

Even if they were, I would defend anyone who is being unfairly attacked by an impotent internet clown such as yourself. Start a thread on the Bush twins and see...

Oh but yes the clintons are in the 1% club, the only weapon against the left defending them so much is to deny they are members in the 1% club anything else is just flux outrage
The Tea Party Clintons are not now, never have been, and never will be in the 1% club. The OWS is so effective that the fearful CON$' only weapon is to include nonmembers of the 1% in the 1%.

edthedrunk:lol: Clintons a tea party member?:lol:
 
But you guys forget some of the 1% agree with the 99%.

They are the ones who care about their country and their fellow Americans.

Why does the right play these very stupid useless games?

The only reason some in the 1% may agree is that they have a loophole to hide their money. Buffett agrees but owes back taxes.

Oh the irony of buffet and his dishonesty :)
 
Oh but yes the clintons are in the 1% club, the only weapon against the left defending them so much is to deny they are members in the 1% club anything else is just flux outrage
The Tea Party Clintons are not now, never have been, and never will be in the 1% club. The OWS is so effective that the fearful CON$' only weapon is to include nonmembers of the 1% in the 1%.

:lmao:

You always seem to manage putting your stupidity on display.

Thats the only way he can still bash the 1%er's by claiming clinton is a tea party member and is not a member of the 1%. silly ain't?:lol:
 
The Tea Party Clintons are not now, never have been, and never will be in the 1% club. The OWS is so effective that the fearful CON$' only weapon is to include nonmembers of the 1% in the 1%.

:lmao:

You always seem to manage putting your stupidity on display.

Thats the only way he can still bash the 1%er's by claiming clinton is a tea party member and is not a member of the 1%. silly ain't?:lol:

I DO find it interesting that you NOW consider being a member of the 1% club being somehow bad now. Apparently you are in the OWS camp.
 
The Clintons are in the top 1%.

Where is that indicated?

Brought up in previous post. After further research, I may be mistaken. I had looked at a link a couple weeks ago regarding whether Michael Moore was in the top 1%, and that link showed income over about $350k. However, the following link paints a much different picture - incomes starting at $11 million:

Where the 1 Percent Fit in the Hierarchy of Income - Interactive Graphic - NYTimes.com

However, Bill Clinton may still be in the top 1%.
The 1% is not based on income, it is based on established wealth passed from generation to generation. There are only 60 family groups who are the 1%. They are the puppet masters who pull the Clinton's and all other politician's strings. And CON$ know this which is why they are desperately trying to muddy the waters by making the 1% about income rather than the power of wealth.
 
Last edited:
But you guys forget some of the 1% agree with the 99%.

They are the ones who care about their country and their fellow Americans.

Why does the right play these very stupid useless games?

The only reason some in the 1% may agree is that they have a loophole to hide their money. Buffett agrees but owes back taxes.

Oh the irony of buffet and his dishonesty :)

you really hate them huh?

oh but only if they are willing to pay more taxes though huh?
 
According to the left some 1%ers should never be touched or talked about. Hypocrites thats what they are.
 
Defending a member of the 1% club? Why are certain members of that club not to be discussed?

What club? The Clintons are not in the top 1%, but you knew that already...

Even if they were, I would defend anyone who is being unfairly attacked by an impotent internet clown such as yourself. Start a thread on the Bush twins and see...

Who's being unfairly attacked? That's right the left is being attacked for being the hypocrites they are. Some 1%er's should never be touched.

There is no hypocrisy, you just have a very demented view of what the 99% movement is about.

The 99% movement isn't about hating capitalism or the wealthy, but thanks for playing.
 
The Tea Party Clintons are not now, never have been, and never will be in the 1% club. The OWS is so effective that the fearful CON$' only weapon is to include nonmembers of the 1% in the 1%.

:lmao:

You always seem to manage putting your stupidity on display.

Thats the only way he can still bash the 1%er's by claiming clinton is a tea party member and is not a member of the 1%. silly ain't?:lol:

Comical, but I havent seen an excuse the dems are not willing to use.
 
According to the left some 1%ers should never be touched or talked about. Hypocrites thats what they are.

No one should be LIED about no matter who they are.


The 99% are telling the 1% that they will take no more.

Its happened before in history.

Its the patreo effect
 
The only reason some in the 1% may agree is that they have a loophole to hide their money. Buffett agrees but owes back taxes.

Oh the irony of buffet and his dishonesty :)

you really hate them huh?

oh but only if they are willing to pay more taxes though huh?

The only one that seem to hate the 1%er's are the left unless one of those 1%er's are a favorite beloved son. Such as Little billy.
 
Oh but yes the clintons are in the 1% club, the only weapon against the left defending them so much is to deny they are members in the 1% club anything else is just flux outrage
The Tea Party Clintons are not now, never have been, and never will be in the 1% club. The OWS is so effective that the fearful CON$' only weapon is to include nonmembers of the 1% in the 1%.

edthedrunk:lol: Clintons a tea party member?:lol:
It is just as valid to say the Clintons are Tea Partyers as it is to say they are the 1%. If you get to say who is a 1%er then I get to say who is in the Tea Party. You have no special privileges here.
 
Pareto principle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


its all just to sceincy and history like for you to absorb




Business-management consultant Joseph M. Juran suggested the principle and named it after Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto, who observed in 1906 that 80% of the land in Italy was owned by 20% of the population; he developed the principle by observing that 20% of the pea pods in his garden contained 80% of the peas.[2]
 
Last edited:
According to the left some 1%ers should never be touched or talked about. Hypocrites thats what they are.

No one should be LIED about no matter who they are.


The 99% are telling the 1% that they will take no more.

Its happened before in history.

Its the patreo effect

No one should be LIED about no matter who they are.

What Lie?

The 99% are telling the 1% that they will take no more.

You're drifting you are defending a 1%er why is that? Why are you being so hypocritical?
 
The Tea Party Clintons are not now, never have been, and never will be in the 1% club. The OWS is so effective that the fearful CON$' only weapon is to include nonmembers of the 1% in the 1%.

edthedrunk:lol: Clintons a tea party member?:lol:
It is just as valid to say the Clintons are Tea Partyers as it is to say they are the 1%. If you get to say who is a 1%er then I get to say who is in the Tea Party. You have no special privileges here.

You're killing me:lmao::lmao::lmao: stop it.
What tea party rally has clinton been too what tea party member has clinton supported?
 

Forum List

Back
Top