Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And your faux outrage at the Tea Party only works when you are outraged at all of them.You've dis-proven nothing! All you did was pontificate. I've defended no one, I've only exposed your bullshit claim that Tea Partyer Clinton was a member of the 1%.
ed the flux, outrage of the 1%er's only works when you are outraged at them all.
He pushed his status and got his daughter who has no exprince in the media industry a job. With all the people out of work and this person daughter does not need to work yes he got her a job with NBC. Guess who that 1% was?
Her name got her the job, no doubt about it. However, to say she isn't qualified for the job is ludicrous. Her accomplishments are many and varied and make her OVER qualified, especially when you look at the tools that Fox news hires on a daily basis.
Isn't Jenna Bush on The Today Show? Never heard you righties complain about that. She was hired by NBC in 2009. Where's the outrage?
"Today Show" Hires Jenna Bush
Isn't Jenna Bush on The Today Show? Never heard you righties complain about that. She was hired by NBC in 2009. Where's the outrage?
"Today Show" Hires Jenna Bush
And? why are you defending certain members of the 1% why all the flux outrage?
You are hypocritically condemning only a certain Tea Party member who is not a 1%er.And your faux outrage at the Tea Party only works when you are outraged at all of them.ed the flux, outrage of the 1%er's only works when you are outraged at them all.
ed you are drunk, you are so drunk you are defending a 1%er
Her name got her the job, no doubt about it. However, to say she isn't qualified for the job is ludicrous. Her accomplishments are many and varied and make her OVER qualified, especially when you look at the tools that Fox news hires on a daily basis.
Defending a member of the 1% club? Why are certain members of that club not to be discussed?
Her name got her the job, no doubt about it. However, to say she isn't qualified for the job is ludicrous. Her accomplishments are many and varied and make her OVER qualified, especially when you look at the tools that Fox news hires on a daily basis.
Defending a member of the 1% club? Why are certain members of that club not to be discussed?
What club? The Clintons are not in the top 1%, but you knew that already...
Even if they were, I would defend anyone who is being unfairly attacked by an impotent internet clown such as yourself. Start a thread on the Bush twins and see...
You are hypocritically condemning only a certain Tea Party member who is not a 1%er.And your faux outrage at the Tea Party only works when you are outraged at all of them.
ed you are drunk, you are so drunk you are defending a 1%er
The Clintons are in the top 1%.
Where is that indicated?
Her name got her the job, no doubt about it. However, to say she isn't qualified for the job is ludicrous. Her accomplishments are many and varied and make her OVER qualified, especially when you look at the tools that Fox news hires on a daily basis.
Defending a member of the 1% club? Why are certain members of that club not to be discussed?
What club? The Clintons are not in the top 1%, but you knew that already...
Even if they were, I would defend anyone who is being unfairly attacked by an impotent internet clown such as yourself. Start a thread on the Bush twins and see...
The Clintons are in the top 1%.
Where is that indicated?
Brought up in previous post. After further research, I may be mistaken. I had looked at a link a couple weeks ago regarding whether Michael Moore was in the top 1%, and that link showed income over about $350k. However, the following link paints a much different picture:
Where the 1 Percent Fit in the Hierarchy of Income - Interactive Graphic - NYTimes.com
However, Bill Clinton may still be in the top 1%.
The Clintons are in the top 1%.
Where is that indicated?
