Gun Control Has Only 1 Motive - Confiscation of All Guns from Law Abiding Citizens

[Dr Grump]

LOL...Yanks and their obsession with their peashooters...chortle....

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Do enumerated rights also depend on technology? All gun laws are unconstitutional. Every last one of them. We don’t need gun control, we need criminal control.

Are the regulations concerning fully automatic weapons effective where public safety is concerned? Where's your RPG? Your mortar? Your 20mm? The constitution is not a suicide pact.

All gun laws are unconstitutional. All means all.

The courts and the vast majority of Americans look at your statement and slap their foreheads in incredulity.

Funny how the Founding Fathers didn’t...

When can I get my cannons the Founding Fathers allowed citizens to own?

Common Citizens could not afford to own a cannon. It was way outside their pay grade so the Founding Fathers didn't think to include them. Only the Rich owned Cannons and they were used to protect the villages against various nasties. This is why each small town ended up with a cannon in the town square for display and ceremony even today. While some nutcases think the FFs were omnipotent when they wrote the 2nd A they weren't.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

The OP must be drunk. I cant figure out why he would think it was smart to limit what laws you can make regarding anything. Can you imagine some of the draconian laws that would still be in effect today from the 1700's

I did I know you can’t think of any political leader laying out an endgame to gun laws.

And when firearm technology evolves, should the public and law makers turn a blind eye? Laws follow technology. Your premise is typically short sighted.

Do enumerated rights also depend on technology? All gun laws are unconstitutional. Every last one of them. We don’t need gun control, we need criminal control.

Are the regulations concerning fully automatic weapons effective where public safety is concerned? Where's your RPG? Your mortar? Your 20mm? The constitution is not a suicide pact.

No, they're not. Bad guys get all the unregistered machineguns they want. Not one has ever had the slightest problem getting one.

Here is a test question for you, Pinky. When was the last time that fully auto weapons were using in a crime in the United States? Be specific. I would accept one or two in the last 40 years but the way you run your fingers, it must be a common place thing.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

And when firearm technology evolves, should the public and law makers turn a blind eye? Laws follow technology. Your premise is typically short sighted.

Do enumerated rights also depend on technology? All gun laws are unconstitutional. Every last one of them. We don’t need gun control, we need criminal control.

Are the regulations concerning fully automatic weapons effective where public safety is concerned? Where's your RPG? Your mortar? Your 20mm? The constitution is not a suicide pact.

All gun laws are unconstitutional. All means all.

The courts and the vast majority of Americans look at your statement and slap their foreheads in incredulity.

Funny how the Founding Fathers didn’t...

Someone else brought up the Cannon. It wasn't covered in the 2nd A because only the rich owned cannons. In their time, even the Military didn't even have them. The "Borrowed" them from Rich Guys. And, don't kid yourself, the "Revolution" was as much about the Rich getting Richer as anything else so the Rich, for the most part, supported it. Only later did the Military get enough funds to buy cannons.

 

[westwall]

I did I know you can’t think of any political leader laying out an endgame to gun laws.

And when firearm technology evolves, should the public and law makers turn a blind eye? Laws follow technology. Your premise is typically short sighted.

Do enumerated rights also depend on technology? All gun laws are unconstitutional. Every last one of them. We don’t need gun control, we need criminal control.

Are the regulations concerning fully automatic weapons effective where public safety is concerned? Where's your RPG? Your mortar? Your 20mm? The constitution is not a suicide pact.

No, they're not. Bad guys get all the unregistered machineguns they want. Not one has ever had the slightest problem getting one.

Here is a test question for you, Pinky. When was the last time that fully auto weapons were using in a crime in the United States? Be specific. I would accept one or two in the last 40 years but the way you run your fingers, it must be a common place thing.

Look up "record number of machine gun kits seized by CBP"

 

[westwall]

Do enumerated rights also depend on technology? All gun laws are unconstitutional. Every last one of them. We don’t need gun control, we need criminal control.

Are the regulations concerning fully automatic weapons effective where public safety is concerned? Where's your RPG? Your mortar? Your 20mm? The constitution is not a suicide pact.

All gun laws are unconstitutional. All means all.

The courts and the vast majority of Americans look at your statement and slap their foreheads in incredulity.

Funny how the Founding Fathers didn’t...

Someone else brought up the Cannon. It wasn't covered in the 2nd A because only the rich owned cannons. In their time, even the Military didn't even have them. The "Borrowed" them from Rich Guys. And, don't kid yourself, the "Revolution" was as much about the Rich getting Richer as anything else so the Rich, for the most part, supported it. Only later did the Military get enough funds to buy cannons.

The first cannon unit in the USA was the Ancient and Honorable Artillery Company of Boston.

Private businessmen banding together to provide for the common good.

 

[Shawnee_b]

Isn't that what the British wanted to do in 1775? And every other oppressive tyrannical government?

Yes they did.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

And when firearm technology evolves, should the public and law makers turn a blind eye? Laws follow technology. Your premise is typically short sighted.

Do enumerated rights also depend on technology? All gun laws are unconstitutional. Every last one of them. We don’t need gun control, we need criminal control.

Are the regulations concerning fully automatic weapons effective where public safety is concerned? Where's your RPG? Your mortar? Your 20mm? The constitution is not a suicide pact.

No, they're not. Bad guys get all the unregistered machineguns they want. Not one has ever had the slightest problem getting one.

Here is a test question for you, Pinky. When was the last time that fully auto weapons were using in a crime in the United States? Be specific. I would accept one or two in the last 40 years but the way you run your fingers, it must be a common place thing.

Look up "record number of machine gun kits seized by CBP"

You stated that ANYONE can get them. Obviously not. Those were the seized kits. They never made it into circulation. If it were as bad as you originally claimed, the Bad Guys would be using them while committing crimes. They aren't. Nice "Hey, look over there". Now, how many crimes have been recorded where full auto weapons have been used in the US in the last 40 years? And don't try and change the subject to cover the fact that your original statement was full of crap.

 

[Shawnee_b]

Moron, the entire list of democrat party nominees supports gun banning and confisction, and bobby o'rourke..... we will go house to house to get your guns....is now biden's anti-gun czar....you dope.....

Swallowswell gonna nuke us.

 

[Weatherman2020]

1. The Left release Felons early to commit more crime.

2. The Left demand more gun restrictions upon law abiding citizens as a response.

3. Go to 1 and repeat.

 

[Nosmo King]

Are the regulations concerning fully automatic weapons effective where public safety is concerned? Where's your RPG? Your mortar? Your 20mm? The constitution is not a suicide pact.

All gun laws are unconstitutional. All means all.

The courts and the vast majority of Americans look at your statement and slap their foreheads in incredulity.

Funny how the Founding Fathers didn’t...

When can I get my cannons the Founding Fathers allowed citizens to own?

Common Citizens could not afford to own a cannon. It was way outside their pay grade so the Founding Fathers didn't think to include them. Only the Rich owned Cannons and they were used to protect the villages against various nasties. This is why each small town ended up with a cannon in the town square for display and ceremony even today. While some nutcases think the FFs were omnipotent when they wrote the 2nd A they weren't.

Common citizens could barely afford guns then. There were no mass producers of guns. Each gun was handmade. No interchangible parts, no catalogued various makes and models. Weapons for defense of the state were provided by the state.

 

[2aguy]

All gun laws are unconstitutional. All means all.

The courts and the vast majority of Americans look at your statement and slap their foreheads in incredulity.

Funny how the Founding Fathers didn’t...

When can I get my cannons the Founding Fathers allowed citizens to own?

Common Citizens could not afford to own a cannon. It was way outside their pay grade so the Founding Fathers didn't think to include them. Only the Rich owned Cannons and they were used to protect the villages against various nasties. This is why each small town ended up with a cannon in the town square for display and ceremony even today. While some nutcases think the FFs were omnipotent when they wrote the 2nd A they weren't.

Common citizens could barely afford guns then. There were no mass producers of guns. Each gun was handmade. No interchangible parts, no catalogued various makes and models. Weapons for defense of the state were provided by the state.

And you are just wrong.....every home had a rifle for hunting and self defense from "native Americans."

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No?
But Weatherman, we only want sensible gun laws passed!


OK

List the ‘sensible’ gun laws that still need to pass and just ONE Democrat saying once these pass we’ve done all we can do, no more laws about guns will be pushed for.

There isn’t one Leftist. It’s all about riding the slippery slope and making sure felons are on the streets to create more violence to further their agenda of grabbing all guns from law abiding citizens.

Now the end game: Name one tyrannical government in modern history that didn’t grab guns from law abiding citizens.

There isn’t one. They all grabbed the guns first.

We ain't buying what you are selling , skippy.

Of course you're going to deny the end game of gun control.

In Colorado, we have common sense gun regs and no need for more unless something changes. That makes your BS more BS.

If they are common sense gun laws why would you need to change them? You dumb fuck criminals don't obey laws therefore there is no such thing as common sense gun laws stupid son of a b****

 

[Weatherman2020]

No?
But Weatherman, we only want sensible gun laws passed!


OK

List the ‘sensible’ gun laws that still need to pass and just ONE Democrat saying once these pass we’ve done all we can do, no more laws about guns will be pushed for.

There isn’t one Leftist. It’s all about riding the slippery slope and making sure felons are on the streets to create more violence to further their agenda of grabbing all guns from law abiding citizens.

Now the end game: Name one tyrannical government in modern history that didn’t grab guns from law abiding citizens.

There isn’t one. They all grabbed the guns first.

We ain't buying what you are selling , skippy.

Of course you're going to deny the end game of gun control.

In Colorado, we have common sense gun regs and no need for more unless something changes. That makes your BS more BS.

Then why does Colorado have new gun laws and more in the process of being passed?

 

[Weatherman2020]

All gun laws are unconstitutional. All means all.

The courts and the vast majority of Americans look at your statement and slap their foreheads in incredulity.

Funny how the Founding Fathers didn’t...

When can I get my cannons the Founding Fathers allowed citizens to own?

Common Citizens could not afford to own a cannon. It was way outside their pay grade so the Founding Fathers didn't think to include them. Only the Rich owned Cannons and they were used to protect the villages against various nasties. This is why each small town ended up with a cannon in the town square for display and ceremony even today. While some nutcases think the FFs were omnipotent when they wrote the 2nd A they weren't.

Common citizens could barely afford guns then. There were no mass producers of guns. Each gun was handmade. No interchangible parts, no catalogued various makes and models. Weapons for defense of the state were provided by the state.

You’re a victim of Leftard education skipping history.

 

[rightwinger]

Gun control only has one motive

Stop the senseless killing

 

[22lcidw]

Gun control only has one motive

Stop the senseless killing

To many people who are criminals that will use weapons. You must stop this. But Saul Alinsky tactics never end. Everything I learned about our system being overrun by people like yourselves thinking that removing guns will end violence. You are totalitarian and you have nothing more important in your agenda then to take over the nation completely. Look at the tactics everyday. The world is over used by your ilk is sickening condemning a person who is president who is very moderate in real terms. Your policies destroy our nation. Prog women have brought their values of being the rulers of the house into our everyday lives. It is not the same. As you see the poverty areas now with males not listening to females and most of it from the social craziness enabled by women and beta males, as they expand it will be a hundred times worse. End of nation. There is a marriage of social justice programs and the economic system we use. That is the best you are going to get at this time in human evolution. You see how we humans screw up, all around you. Who knew, a man who is President that promotes a little stronger hetero family relationships, is the worse thing in history. We can't have that!

 

[rightwinger]

Gun control only has one motive

Stop the senseless killing

To many people who are criminals that will use weapons. You must stop this. But Saul Alinsky tactics never end. Everything I learned about our system being overrun by people like yourselves thinking that removing guns will end violence. You are totalitarian and you have nothing more important in your agenda then to take over the nation completely. Look at the tactics everyday. The world is over used by your ilk is sickening condemning a person who is president who is very moderate in real terms. Your policies destroy our nation. Prog women have brought their values of being the rulers of the house into our everyday lives. It is not the same. As you see the poverty areas now with males not listening to females and most of it from the social craziness enabled by women and beta males, as they expand it will be a hundred times worse. End of nation. There is a marriage of social justice programs and the economic system we use. That is the best you are going to get at this time in human evolution. You see how we humans screw up, all around you. Who knew, a man who is President that promotes a little stronger hetero family relationships, is the worse thing in history. We can't have that!

ALINSKY!!!!!!!

 

[Preacher]

Hitler, Stalin and Mao had that same motive.

Hitler didn't take the guns, he actually EXPANDED the gun laws for German Citizens.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

To many people who are criminals that will use weapons. You must stop this. But Saul Alinsky tactics never end. Everything I learned about our system being overrun by people like yourselves thinking that removing guns will end violence. You are totalitarian and you have nothing more important in your agenda then to take over the nation completely.

Let us not let them get away with claiming this. Let us not repeat this claim, in such a manner as to give them any additional credence.

They know damn well that interfering with the right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms will not reduce violence, and that is not their purpose, no matter what they claim.

This lie needs to be called out as such, every time it is told, and those who tell it need to be shamed and discredited.