Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
He knows.The right of self defense, even when it comes to the state, say a police officer acting unjustly. The constitution is just a piece of paper, it had no real power, the founders recognized this. If the population wasn’t armed, then the state, or some rogue group, with power (firearms) could at any time ignore the constitution at will. So the second defends the natural right of self defense, as well as defense the entire constitution, that put the power (firearms) into the hands of its people. This shouldn’t have to be explained to you.
He and his communist ilk are trying to subvert the meaning so they can confiscate our guns and leave us powerless when Red October arrives.