jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,369
- 1,130
WHAT!?!? Ferguson starters over one person breaking a cops ocular cavity while he was sitting in his cruiser. That has nothing to do with guns, and if there’s a car where guns where ok to use by the state, micheal Brown was that case. Even outside of the police cruiser, that cop (and even you brain would be totally justified to shoot micheal brown. Skins color doesn’t matter, you cannot punch cops then wrestle for their gun with them, then try to charge them. If it were the same circumstances but a white supremicist trying to disarm micheal brown in his car, non of us would have a problem when micheal brown shot this guy to death...(as If you need more than one attempt murder to justify shooting someone).Well there are countries with much fewer guns. They have lower crime than us...
And there are places with fewer guns that have more crime than us. In case you can't see, the US is flagged by a red line:
View attachment 158537
Yes they are called 3rd world countries. Economic and political instability can play quite a roll on crime.
So what? I thought you said crime is directly related to the amount of guns people had. I guess you were wrong. Guns were never the problem. Thats why until the Ferguson effect, violent and gun crime has been on the decline since the mid 90's.
Yes and Ferguson is a direct result of too many guns. Police shoot lots of people because they themselves are shot. This happens because we have too many guns and leads to unrest and higher crime rates.
leftards being the racists they are
only see color
so accordingly the rest of your message is lost on the cop hater