Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would you keep background checks?
Many states require background checks. They happen to be states with high murder rates. They don't work. Never will.
You must be a really bad shit if you need an ar15 for those uses.
It's a Bill of Rights, not a bill of needs.
So no, you'd let felons buy guns. More more guns. You'd do much more damage than good.
So you don't need it. My point is made.
What other countries?
I only mentioned the UK.
Germany, Sweden, Norway, Japan.....
Show me where I mentioned them, you lying fuck.
Germany, Sweden, Norway, Japan.....
Show me where I mentioned them, you lying fuck.
I mentioned them several times. Do they also fudge the numbers? They all have much lower homicide rates.
Many states require background checks. They happen to be states with high murder rates. They don't work. Never will.
It's a Bill of Rights, not a bill of needs.
So no, you'd let felons buy guns. More more guns. You'd do much more damage than good.
So you don't need it. My point is made.
Already laws against felons buying guns. They don't obtain them from legitimate sources, where background checks make no difference.
Your point is clear: Restrict law abiding citizens ability to effectively defend themselves in some vain hope that your good intentions will prevent bad people from doing bad things.
Pass.
I don't give a fuck how often you mention them.Show me where I mentioned them, you lying fuck.
I mentioned them several times. Do they also fudge the numbers? They all have much lower homicide rates.
Germany quite possibly does, I don't know much about Germany I only lived there for 2 years and that was a military posting.
I don't know about Sweden, 3 short visits.
Norway has very low crime overall, probably because of the way the country is settled.
Wherever you live in Norway you have easy access to the outdoors.
People who enjoy nature tend to be less inclined to criminal behavior.
You can walk in safety from Sandviken to Bergen at any age.
It's weird, but great.
I don't give a fuck how often you mention them.
Germany quite possibly does, I don't know much about Germany I only lived there for 2 years and that was a military posting.
I don't know about Sweden, 3 short visits.
Norway has very low crime overall, probably because of the way the country is settled.
Wherever you live in Norway you have easy access to the outdoors.
People who enjoy nature tend to be less inclined to criminal behavior.
You can walk in safety from Sandviken to Bergen at any age.
It's weird, but great.
So your argument is that one of the many developed countries with much lower homicide rates might fudge the numbers. Strong argument.
My argument, given that you fanatics always use the UK as an example of the perfect society, is that the UK uses a different method to compile data than the USA.
That being that in law a person cannot be called a murderer until he has been found guilty of the crime of murder.
That a murder cannot be recorded as such until the facts have been fully established in law. ie A conviction secured.
Very easy to comprehend.
As for the other countries you refer to, I haven't lived in them for any extended period of time, so I wouldn't know.
Unlike you fanatical liberal totalitarians, I don't claim to be an expert on a country I have no experience of.
What I can say is the USA is a safer, wealthier and happier place than the UK.
Healthcare is better here and standard of living higher and easier to achieve.
Based on experience.
So your argument is that one of the many developed countries with much lower homicide rates might fudge the numbers. Strong argument.
My argument, given that you fanatics always use the UK as an example of the perfect society, is that the UK uses a different method to compile data than the USA.
That being that in law a person cannot be called a murderer until he has been found guilty of the crime of murder.
That a murder cannot be recorded as such until the facts have been fully established in law. ie A conviction secured.
Very easy to comprehend.
As for the other countries you refer to, I haven't lived in them for any extended period of time, so I wouldn't know.
Unlike you fanatical liberal totalitarians, I don't claim to be an expert on a country I have no experience of.
What I can say is the USA is a safer, wealthier and happier place than the UK.
Healthcare is better here and standard of living higher and easier to achieve.
Based on experience.
Good thing I seldom use the uk as an example.
I don't give a fuck how often you mention them.
Germany quite possibly does, I don't know much about Germany I only lived there for 2 years and that was a military posting.
I don't know about Sweden, 3 short visits.
Norway has very low crime overall, probably because of the way the country is settled.
Wherever you live in Norway you have easy access to the outdoors.
People who enjoy nature tend to be less inclined to criminal behavior.
You can walk in safety from Sandviken to Bergen at any age.
It's weird, but great.
So your argument is that one of the many developed countries with much lower homicide rates might fudge the numbers. Strong argument.
My argument, given that you fanatics always use the UK as an example of the perfect society, is that the UK uses a different method to compile data than the USA.
That being that in law a person cannot be called a murderer until he has been found guilty of the crime of murder.
That a murder cannot be recorded as such until the facts have been fully established in law. ie A conviction secured.
Very easy to comprehend.
As for the other countries you refer to, I haven't lived in them for any extended period of time, so I wouldn't know.
Unlike you fanatical liberal totalitarians, I don't claim to be an expert on a country I have no experience of.
What I can say is the USA is a safer, wealthier and happier place than the UK.
Healthcare is better here and standard of living higher and easier to achieve.
Based on experience.
Not true
Most homicides are by someone you know.
If we didn't have minority gangs all of whom have a raging sense of entitlement, we would have the murder rate of Brussels.
If we didn't have minority gangs all of whom have a raging sense of entitlement, we would have the murder rate of Brussels.
If we didn't have minority gangs all of whom have a raging sense of entitlement, we would have the murder rate of Brussels.
Perhaps. I guess we should do something about income inequality.
Income Inequality?s Strange Relationship to Violence | Political Violence @ a Glance
We should, stop paying the fuckers foodstamps.
Tell the fuckers to get a job.
Problem solved.
Two thirds are by gun
Next question?
So your argument is that one of the many developed countries with much lower homicide rates might fudge the numbers. Strong argument.
My argument, given that you fanatics always use the UK as an example of the perfect society, is that the UK uses a different method to compile data than the USA.
That being that in law a person cannot be called a murderer until he has been found guilty of the crime of murder.
That a murder cannot be recorded as such until the facts have been fully established in law. ie A conviction secured.
Very easy to comprehend.
As for the other countries you refer to, I haven't lived in them for any extended period of time, so I wouldn't know.
Unlike you fanatical liberal totalitarians, I don't claim to be an expert on a country I have no experience of.
What I can say is the USA is a safer, wealthier and happier place than the UK.
Healthcare is better here and standard of living higher and easier to achieve.
Based on experience.
The UK, France, Germany, Italy, Canada, Spain, Sweden, Denmark all have murder rates around one per hundred thousand. The US is close to five
Spin that any way you like
The US is perfectly happy with their murder rate as long as we can keep our guns
Does it matter when we have a murder rate three times that which we consider the "civilized" world?
My argument, given that you fanatics always use the UK as an example of the perfect society, is that the UK uses a different method to compile data than the USA.
That being that in law a person cannot be called a murderer until he has been found guilty of the crime of murder.
That a murder cannot be recorded as such until the facts have been fully established in law. ie A conviction secured.
Very easy to comprehend.
As for the other countries you refer to, I haven't lived in them for any extended period of time, so I wouldn't know.
Unlike you fanatical liberal totalitarians, I don't claim to be an expert on a country I have no experience of.
What I can say is the USA is a safer, wealthier and happier place than the UK.
Healthcare is better here and standard of living higher and easier to achieve.
Based on experience.
The UK, France, Germany, Italy, Canada, Spain, Sweden, Denmark all have murder rates around one per hundred thousand. The US is close to five
Spin that any way you like
The US is perfectly happy with their murder rate as long as we can keep our guns
I'm pretty sure you have never been to the UK.
Care to explain why the violent crime, murder and gun crime rates in the UK increased dramatically since the 1997 firearms act?
Care to tell us what effect it had on mass shootings?
None perhaps?
A slight increase in mass shootings?
How about police shot dead on duty?
Same?
Increased?
Stopped?
Successful gun control in the UK caused all crime to increase.
What do you think might happen here when you fanatics ban guns?
It's not guns that are the problem, it's our tolerance for the criminal element. We just do not have serious deterrents to crime. No consequences result in increased risk taking
We have all these guns, 50% of all owned in the world, yet you are 30% less likely to die of homicide in the USA than you are outside her borders
It's our failed diversity experiment that has America sailing like a ship without a rudder
-Geaux
Again your comparing us to 3rd world countries. You must think very little of this country. Compare us to to developed countries and we're 4X more likely. You don't even think we belong in the company of developed countries?
