Guns Don't Kill People...

Chicago (Chiraq) has some of the strictest "gun ownership laws" on the books.

If you have such faith in these laws, take a stroll on the south side. Where the colored girls say "Doo do doo do doo do do doo..."

Chiraq is just proof that what laws do exist aren't working. Time to try something else.






They've banned the guns. So what's next? Kill all the people with guns no matter who or why they have them? If you're a hunter and have committed no crime you still get killed because you have one??

I'm curious what your next step is...
 
Chicago (Chiraq) has some of the strictest "gun ownership laws" on the books.

If you have such faith in these laws, take a stroll on the south side. Where the colored girls say "Doo do doo do doo do do doo..."

Chiraq is just proof that what laws do exist aren't working. Time to try something else.

They've banned the guns. So what's next? Kill all the people with guns no matter who or why they have them? If you're a hunter and have committed no crime you still get killed because you have one??

I'm curious what your next step is...
Step 1: Declare the NRA a terrorist organization. Once you've accepted Step 1, then we'll move on to Step 2.
 
Chiraq is just proof that what laws do exist aren't working. Time to try something else.

They've banned the guns. So what's next? Kill all the people with guns no matter who or why they have them? If you're a hunter and have committed no crime you still get killed because you have one??

I'm curious what your next step is...
Step 1: Declare the NRA a terrorist organization. Once you've accepted Step 1, then we'll move on to Step 2.






What's your reasoning for that? And what's your next step?
 
They've banned the guns. So what's next? Kill all the people with guns no matter who or why they have them? If you're a hunter and have committed no crime you still get killed because you have one??

I'm curious what your next step is...
Step 1: Declare the NRA a terrorist organization. Once you've accepted Step 1, then we'll move on to Step 2.

What's your reasoning for that? And what's your next step?

Let's say the was a Muslim organization in the US that was advocating arming all Muslims to make it safer for them. They'd all get arrested and be followed by the FBI, CIA, homeland security and every other American with a gun. The NRA is a lapdog for the gun companies and more Americans are killed every year at home by American owned guns than by terrorists anywhere in the world, and multiplied by probably 500. So why send an army after Al-Qaeda who killed maybe 3500 civilians total when the NRA helps kill over 10000 Americans every year?

Step 2: outlaw bullets, there's no constitutional protection for bullets. Even if you think that there is, outlaw the sale of bullets and let people have to make their own.

Step 3 will be next once you accept 1 and 2.


.
 
Last edited:
Step 1: Declare the NRA a terrorist organization. Once you've accepted Step 1, then we'll move on to Step 2.

What's your reasoning for that? And what's your next step?

Let's say the was a Muslim organization in the US that was advocating arming all Muslims to make it safer for them. They'd all get arrested and be followed by the FBI, CIA, homeland security and every other American with a gun. The NRA is a lapdog for the gun companies and more Americans are killed every year at home by American owned guns than by terrorists anywhere in the world, and multiplied by probably 500. So why send an army after Al-Qaeda who killed maybe 3500 civilians total when the NRA helps kill over 10000 Americans every year?






The NRA DOESN'T advocate arming everyone. They WANT stiffer penalties for criminals who use guns to commit crimes. Where the hell do you read this BS?
 
What's your reasoning for that? And what's your next step?

Let's say the was a Muslim organization in the US that was advocating arming all Muslims to make it safer for them. They'd all get arrested and be followed by the FBI, CIA, homeland security and every other American with a gun. The NRA is a lapdog for the gun companies and more Americans are killed every year at home by American owned guns than by terrorists anywhere in the world, and multiplied by probably 500. So why send an army after Al-Qaeda who killed maybe 3500 civilians total when the NRA helps kill over 10000 Americans every year?

The NRA DOESN'T advocate arming everyone. They WANT stiffer penalties for criminals who use guns to commit crimes. Where the hell do you read this BS?

After sandy hook, as just one example, they advocated arming all the adults at the school to make it safer.
 
Let's say the was a Muslim organization in the US that was advocating arming all Muslims to make it safer for them. They'd all get arrested and be followed by the FBI, CIA, homeland security and every other American with a gun. The NRA is a lapdog for the gun companies and more Americans are killed every year at home by American owned guns than by terrorists anywhere in the world, and multiplied by probably 500. So why send an army after Al-Qaeda who killed maybe 3500 civilians total when the NRA helps kill over 10000 Americans every year?

The NRA DOESN'T advocate arming everyone. They WANT stiffer penalties for criminals who use guns to commit crimes. Where the hell do you read this BS?

After sandy hook, as just one example, they advocated arming all the adults at the school to make it safer.





No, they didn't. They advocated placing armed guards in schools or having designated teachers or other school personnel who were trustworthy and trained to carry weapons.

You're just all kind of screwed up on what you think the NRA wants and doesn't want.

You need to stop listening to whoever it is that is filling your head with BS 'cause they're not doing you any favors.
 
The NRA DOESN'T advocate arming everyone. They WANT stiffer penalties for criminals who use guns to commit crimes. Where the hell do you read this BS?

After sandy hook, as just one example, they advocated arming all the adults at the school to make it safer.

No, they didn't. They advocated placing armed guards in schools or having designated teachers or other school personnel who were trustworthy and trained to carry weapons.

You're just all kind of screwed up on what you think the NRA wants and doesn't want.

You need to stop listening to whoever it is that is filling your head with BS 'cause they're not doing you any favors.

Ok, maybe not ALL the teachers, but they advocated more guns and more people (some teachers also) with guns. Same thing pretty much.
 
Let's say the was a Muslim organization in the US that was advocating arming all Muslims to make it safer for them. They'd all get arrested and be followed by the FBI, CIA, homeland security and every other American with a gun. The NRA is a lapdog for the gun companies and more Americans are killed every year at home by American owned guns than by terrorists anywhere in the world, and multiplied by probably 500. So why send an army after Al-Qaeda who killed maybe 3500 civilians total when the NRA helps kill over 10000 Americans every year?

The NRA DOESN'T advocate arming everyone. They WANT stiffer penalties for criminals who use guns to commit crimes. Where the hell do you read this BS?

After sandy hook, as just one example, they advocated arming all the adults at the school to make it safer.

Could you provide your source of information? Although I do agree that the prevailing thought is that law enforcement wants everyone to carry, which I think is BS, I am not sure that is what the NRA advocates.
 
Sling Blades kill people too!

[ame=http://youtu.be/sL6QJSdqlt0]Sling Blade (12/12) Movie CLIP - I Aim to Kill You (1996) HD - YouTube[/ame]
 
After sandy hook, as just one example, they advocated arming all the adults at the school to make it safer.

No, they didn't. They advocated placing armed guards in schools or having designated teachers or other school personnel who were trustworthy and trained to carry weapons.

You're just all kind of screwed up on what you think the NRA wants and doesn't want.

You need to stop listening to whoever it is that is filling your head with BS 'cause they're not doing you any favors.

Ok, maybe not ALL the teachers, but they advocated more guns and more people (some teachers also) with guns. Same thing pretty much.

The NRA response:

Ladies and gentlemen, there’s no national one size fits all solution to protecting our children. But do know that this president zeroed out school emergency planning grants in last year’s budget and scrapped Secure Our Schools policing grants in next year’s budget.

With all the foreign aid the United States does, with all the money in the federal budget, can’t we afford to put a police officer in every single school? Even if they did that, politicians have no business and no authority denying us the right, the ability, and the moral imperative to protect ourselves and our loved ones from harm.

LAPIERRE: Now, the National Rifle Association knows there are millions of qualified and active retired police, active, Reserve, and retired military, security professionals, certified firefighters, security professionals, rescue personnel, an extraordinary corps of patriotic, trained, qualified citizens to join with local school officials and police in devising a protection plan for every single school.

We could deploy them to protect our kids now. We can immediately make America’s schools safer, relying on the brave men and women in America’s police forces. The budgets -- and you all know this, everyone in the country knows this -- of our local police departments are strained, and the resources are severely limited, but their dedication and courage is second to none. And, they can be deployed right now.

I call on Congress today, to act immediately to appropriate whatever is necessary to put armed police officers in every single school in this nation. And, to do it now to make sure that blanket safety is in place when our kids return to school in January.

Remarks from the NRA press conference on Sandy Hook school shooting, delivered on Dec. 21, 2012 (Transcript) - The Washington Post
 
Step 1: Declare the NRA a terrorist organization. Once you've accepted Step 1, then we'll move on to Step 2.

What's your reasoning for that? And what's your next step?

Let's say the was a Muslim organization in the US that was advocating arming all Muslims to make it safer for them. They'd all get arrested and be followed by the FBI, CIA, homeland security and every other American with a gun. The NRA is a lapdog for the gun companies and more Americans are killed every year at home by American owned guns than by terrorists anywhere in the world, and multiplied by probably 500. So why send an army after Al-Qaeda who killed maybe 3500 civilians total when the NRA helps kill over 10000 Americans every year?

Step 2: outlaw bullets, there's no constitutional protection for bullets. Even if you think that there is, outlaw the sale of bullets and let people have to make their own.

Step 3 will be next once you accept 1 and 2.


.

Interesting. My idea is a bit more radical but I think would work.

Seeing as how most mass killing and gang banger shootings are done by males under the age of 30, that would be my cut off.

No gun sales to men under 30. If you are under 30 and get picked up possessing a gun, go directly to jail for 10 years or until the age of 35. Gun residue. Go to jail. Murder someone. Forfeit your life.

Take guns away from those that use them the most for societal harm and see what happens.

You think a young women with a 25 year old hot head for a husband/boyfriend wouldn't like it that her "man" couldn't just walk into a gun shop and buy a gun to shoot HER with?

There are all kinds of people that would like it that a machismo, hormone laden, rage filled young man couldn't buy a gun till they were past the age of 30. Including me.
 
No, they didn't. They advocated placing armed guards in schools or having designated teachers or other school personnel who were trustworthy and trained to carry weapons.

You're just all kind of screwed up on what you think the NRA wants and doesn't want.

You need to stop listening to whoever it is that is filling your head with BS 'cause they're not doing you any favors.

Ok, maybe not ALL the teachers, but they advocated more guns and more people (some teachers also) with guns. Same thing pretty much.

The NRA response:

Ladies and gentlemen, there’s no national one size fits all solution to protecting our children. But do know that this president zeroed out school emergency planning grants in last year’s budget and scrapped Secure Our Schools policing grants in next year’s budget.

With all the foreign aid the United States does, with all the money in the federal budget, can’t we afford to put a police officer in every single school? Even if they did that, politicians have no business and no authority denying us the right, the ability, and the moral imperative to protect ourselves and our loved ones from harm.

LAPIERRE: Now, the National Rifle Association knows there are millions of qualified and active retired police, active, Reserve, and retired military, security professionals, certified firefighters, security professionals, rescue personnel, an extraordinary corps of patriotic, trained, qualified citizens to join with local school officials and police in devising a protection plan for every single school.

We could deploy them to protect our kids now. We can immediately make America’s schools safer, relying on the brave men and women in America’s police forces. The budgets -- and you all know this, everyone in the country knows this -- of our local police departments are strained, and the resources are severely limited, but their dedication and courage is second to none. And, they can be deployed right now.

I call on Congress today, to act immediately to appropriate whatever is necessary to put armed police officers in every single school in this nation. And, to do it now to make sure that blanket safety is in place when our kids return to school in January.

Remarks from the NRA press conference on Sandy Hook school shooting, delivered on Dec. 21, 2012 (Transcript) - The Washington Post


And I would call on the NRA and the gun manufactures to PAY for all this protection that evidently is needed because we can't get a handle on guns and gun violence.

Think they would do that free?
 
If more guns means less crime and guns have been around for the last 300 years of American history then why hasn't crime stopped yet?

because of mindless leftwing loons like James Holmes, Jared Loughner, Eric Harris. Dylan Klebold, many others.., and of course people like yourself who may be calm one day and the next, you become a mass murderer.

then you have this:
 
Ok, maybe not ALL the teachers, but they advocated more guns and more people (some teachers also) with guns. Same thing pretty much.

The NRA response:

Ladies and gentlemen, there’s no national one size fits all solution to protecting our children. But do know that this president zeroed out school emergency planning grants in last year’s budget and scrapped Secure Our Schools policing grants in next year’s budget.

With all the foreign aid the United States does, with all the money in the federal budget, can’t we afford to put a police officer in every single school? Even if they did that, politicians have no business and no authority denying us the right, the ability, and the moral imperative to protect ourselves and our loved ones from harm.

LAPIERRE: Now, the National Rifle Association knows there are millions of qualified and active retired police, active, Reserve, and retired military, security professionals, certified firefighters, security professionals, rescue personnel, an extraordinary corps of patriotic, trained, qualified citizens to join with local school officials and police in devising a protection plan for every single school.

We could deploy them to protect our kids now. We can immediately make America’s schools safer, relying on the brave men and women in America’s police forces. The budgets -- and you all know this, everyone in the country knows this -- of our local police departments are strained, and the resources are severely limited, but their dedication and courage is second to none. And, they can be deployed right now.

I call on Congress today, to act immediately to appropriate whatever is necessary to put armed police officers in every single school in this nation. And, to do it now to make sure that blanket safety is in place when our kids return to school in January.

Remarks from the NRA press conference on Sandy Hook school shooting, delivered on Dec. 21, 2012 (Transcript) - The Washington Post


And I would call on the NRA and the gun manufactures to PAY for all this protection that evidently is needed because we can't get a handle on guns and gun violence.

Think they would do that free?

Considering that conservatives, thus gun owners, are basically more economically successful the liberals, yes they will be paying for the bulk of the protection.
 
Chiraq is just proof that what laws do exist aren't working. Time to try something else.

They've banned the guns. So what's next? Kill all the people with guns no matter who or why they have them? If you're a hunter and have committed no crime you still get killed because you have one??

I'm curious what your next step is...
Step 1: Declare the NRA a terrorist organization. Once you've accepted Step 1, then we'll move on to Step 2.

Declaring the NRA a terrorist organization is exactly what your fucked up messiah is wanting and trying his damned best to do....., oooooh BTW have been checked lately for an active brain cell ?
 
The NRA response:

Ladies and gentlemen, there’s no national one size fits all solution to protecting our children. But do know that this president zeroed out school emergency planning grants in last year’s budget and scrapped Secure Our Schools policing grants in next year’s budget.

With all the foreign aid the United States does, with all the money in the federal budget, can’t we afford to put a police officer in every single school? Even if they did that, politicians have no business and no authority denying us the right, the ability, and the moral imperative to protect ourselves and our loved ones from harm.

LAPIERRE: Now, the National Rifle Association knows there are millions of qualified and active retired police, active, Reserve, and retired military, security professionals, certified firefighters, security professionals, rescue personnel, an extraordinary corps of patriotic, trained, qualified citizens to join with local school officials and police in devising a protection plan for every single school.

We could deploy them to protect our kids now. We can immediately make America’s schools safer, relying on the brave men and women in America’s police forces. The budgets -- and you all know this, everyone in the country knows this -- of our local police departments are strained, and the resources are severely limited, but their dedication and courage is second to none. And, they can be deployed right now.

I call on Congress today, to act immediately to appropriate whatever is necessary to put armed police officers in every single school in this nation. And, to do it now to make sure that blanket safety is in place when our kids return to school in January.

Remarks from the NRA press conference on Sandy Hook school shooting, delivered on Dec. 21, 2012 (Transcript) - The Washington Post


And I would call on the NRA and the gun manufactures to PAY for all this protection that evidently is needed because we can't get a handle on guns and gun violence.

Think they would do that free?

Considering that conservatives, thus gun owners, are basically more economically successful the liberals, yes they will be paying for the bulk of the protection.



What a bullshit "answer" if that was what it was supposed to be.

I'll ask again. Will the NRA and the gun manufactures PAY for all this armed protection in the schools?

And if you ever want to compare guns and net worth with this "liberal" let me know.
Maybe you can be disabused of your strange beliefs about "liberals". And even stranger beliefs about cons.
 

Forum List

Back
Top