Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You call it a bad bill because you repeat talking points, but in reality it had many measures that help the border situation that now are not being done. It shows how unserious Trump and his puppets are about the border. Party over countryNot passing a bad bill is the fault of of anybody? We live in a representative republic where everyone has a say in any legislation. Citizen Trump has every right to voice opposition as does anyone. How many bills that were passed didn't have any yea or nea opposition from citizen entities?
Ok, so are you admitting it funded border wall and fencing aka security?I didn't say anything of the sort to what you just claimed.
Funded under Obama/Biden in 2015?How true, it was funded back in 2015 and levels increased in 2019 by the Trump administration
What does it hurt to reemphasis and better define?My God man, US law already prohibits that, why do we need another law to address that?
www.foxnews.com
Super tough?! Uhh maybe. But yes at a point it triggers a mandatory emergency summary deportation process. You do understand what the word mandatory means right? That’s a mandate
triggers a mandate if a prez isn’t taking action.
What are you talking about. It was posted in the snippet we’ve been discussing. You pasted it and commented on itBut yes at a point it triggers a mandatory emergency summary deportation process.
Wow! Post that part.
That’s what elections are for. Meanwhile a law dictating how to handle these situations can help. More the conservative cause than the liberal.If the President isn't taking action, we need one who will.
Almost every section leaves enforcement/decisions, etc, totally up the 'The Secretary'. Bet there'd be no partisanship in that appointment. (already is).You call it a bad bill because you repeat talking points, but in reality it had many measures that help the border situation that now are not being done.
Yes the prez has the authority. This bill has a provision that triggers a mandate if a prez isn’t taking action. Again… better than the current situation
Not the same Lankford who voted against his own bill is he?And Langford (R)
Yep.............lets get these babies in country and fast track them to permanent resident status so we can naturalize them ASAP to support the democrat party.Party over country
I care more about the numbers invading our country and addressing that first and foremost. You do realize there's no mechanism in the bill for immediate funding for border wall construction, don't you? Ah, we'll get around to that in the future.Ok, so are you admitting it funded border wall and fencing aka security?
Yes, created in 2006.Funded under Obama/Biden in 2015?
Well, existing immigration law isn't being followed now, so why would this law suddenly be obeyed? Boy Scout oath or something?What does it hurt to reemphasis and better define?
On Wednesday exactly 12 posts between noon to 11pm then goneWhat does it hurt to reemphasis and better define?
What are you talking about. It was posted in the snippet we’ve been discussing. You pasted it and commented on it
We have a bingo......no chance that's another reason to salvo the bill?The government would be allowed to opt people out of summary removal for a variety of reasons, including operational constraints such as overcrowding. Non-Mexican unaccompanied children would also be exempted. Those set for summary removal could receive a screening for non-asylum humanitarian protection by affirmatively “manifesting” fear of persecution or torture to a border official—volunteering without prompting that they fear return or showing an obvious sign of fear.
Looks like a bunch of loopholes. Loopholes tend to make it not so mandatory.
Yup mandatory and with some exceptions and loopholes… like with most complex systemsThe government would be allowed to opt people out of summary removal for a variety of reasons, including operational constraints such as overcrowding. Non-Mexican unaccompanied children would also be exempted. Those set for summary removal could receive a screening for non-asylum humanitarian protection by affirmatively “manifesting” fear of persecution or torture to a border official—volunteering without prompting that they fear return or showing an obvious sign of fear.
Looks like a bunch of loopholes. Loopholes tend to make it not so mandatory.
Yup mandatory and with some exceptions and loopholes… like which most complex systems
And you care why?Dude, you swallow very well.
Already outlined my concerns over your border bill.............useful idiots have been in vogue for sometime, thought you were a cut above.And you care why?
No you didn’t. You’re just too deep in Trumps sack to admit that something is better than nothing and this bill would have helped things at the border.Already outlined my concerns over your border bill.............useful idiots have been in vogue for sometime, thought you were a cut above.
That was very useful, you idiot.No you didn’t. You’re just too deep in Trumps sack to admit that something is better than nothing and this bill would have helped things at the border.
DittoThat was very useful, you idiot.
