Harris to end filibuster to support abortion

[Freedomisneverfree]

This right here is why I cannot support Kamala Harris. She wants to end the filibuster so the democrats can pass abortion rights with 51 votes. It's only for abortion she says, but any idiot knows that once you abolish the filibuster for a specific reason it ends up being permanent for everything. And once that happens, there will be no more compromise or cooperation in the Senate and bipartisanship goes right down the drain.

Harris backs ditching filibuster to pass nationwide abortion protections, angering Manchin in the process

Vice President Kamala Harris declared Tuesday that she supported changing Senate filibuster rules to allow a simple majority vote to codify the nationwide right for women to obtain an abortion.

www.yahoo.com

The democrats came close to doing just that back in 2021 when they tried to abolish the filibuster but Manchin and Sinema wouldn't go along. One of these days, they're going to get it done and that's when we start down the road to a one-party rule gov't. If you think gridlock is bad, wait until you get one-party rule.

Don't let that worthless BITCH end the filibuster.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I don’t give a dam which party tries to do it it’s a shortsighted dumbass move.

Not as much, when they can just change the rules back, though, right?

Reid and the democrats managed to provide health coverage to 10s of millions of people, with the nuke option.

And every one of those millions is glad they did.

 

[jc456]

Chuck never blocked a hearing or a vote on any one of Benedict Donald's nominees. But if he could have.....

neither did McConnell, he didn't bring it in.

 

[BlindBoo]

Well, clearly you were ignorant of that fact. Don't worry, ignorance is very common in your cult. We're glad to help

Oh you're not alone. Faux Not News had the Neo-GOP cult eating out of their hand. Well, salivating all over it.

 

[BackAgain]

Well, maybe, but I don't quite think that's how candidates run their campaigns.

She is leading the entire party in an election.

Yes. I recall the coup that sent Biden back to his basement and her — appointment to the rank of nominee for President by Obumbler.

But that brilliant mean diddlynduckin’ dog relative to her new position on ending the filibuster for SCOTUS justices.

Flip and flip.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yes. I recall the coup that sent Biden back to his basement and her — appointment to the rank of nominee for President by Obumbler.

But that brilliant mean diddlynduckin’ dog relative to her new position on ending the filibuster for SCOTUS justices.

Flip and flip.

Maybe you also recall literally every other presidential candidate also running as leader of an entire party in every single election.

That's why they talk about things they would do with a same party Senate.

This is not a new development.

 

[BackAgain]

Maybe you also recall literally every other presidential candidate also running as leader of an entire party in every single election.

That's why they talk about things they would do with a same party Senate.

This is not a new development.

“Maybe” most candidates don’t talk about changing the Senate rules and almost none ever have.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

“Maybe” most candidates don’t talk about changing the Senate rules and almost none ever have.

And most candidates aren't running in an environment where a constitutionally protected right was just deleted for half the country.

Coincidence? No.

 

[BlindBoo]

Nope. That was why Haerybdid it other than for SCOTUS justices.

Learn a little history. You won’t sound so stupid all the time.

Another Groomed New Republican. Looks like you all have saliva dripping out of your mouths.

 

[jc456]

Not as much, when they can just change the rules back, though, right?

Reid and the democrats managed to provide health coverage to 10s of millions of people, with the nuke option.

And every one of those millions is glad they did.

the other 250 million felt nothing other than price increases and failure to keep their doctor. That's the rif.

 

[jc456]

And most candidates aren't running in an environment where a constitutionally protected right was just deleted for half the country.

Coincidence? No.

every demofk one is.

 

[BackAgain]

And most candidates aren't running in an environment where a constitutionally protected right was just deleted for half the country.

Coincidence? No.

No. No such thing occurred, either.

 

[BackAgain]

Another Groomed New Republican. Looks like you all have saliva dripping out of your mouths.

Your cowardly refusal to admit your mistake is noted. Not unexpected, however.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No. No such thing occurred, either.

Better get a grip on reality. It was a constitutionally protected right for almost 50 years.

Then the Jesus freaks conned a fat orange rapist into helping them delete it.

These are facts.

 

[ThisIsMe]

It doesn't bypass anything. These rules aren't new.

Sure it does, if you think Congress can get around it by making it relevant to the commerce clause, then we can find a way to make everything relevant to that statute.

It belongs at the state level. We need to get back to where the government isn’t involved in everything it’s not mandated to do

 

[BackAgain]

Better get a grip on reality. It was a constitutionally protected right for almost 50 years.

Nope. Reality ain’t your strong suit.
It was never a Constitutionallybprotected “right.” It was a claimed “right”. And a stupid SCOTUS DECISION made it appear to be a Constitutional “right.”

And that legality is now up to the States.

Then the Jesus freaks conned a fat orange rapist into helping them delete it.

. No part of that sentence is true.

These are facts

No part of what you posted there is a “fact.”

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Sure it does, if you think Congress can get around it by making it relevant to the commerce clause, then we can find a way to make everything relevant to that statute.

Which is obviously both not what I meant and utterly false.

Because we have indeed already passed abortion regulation via commerce clause, and yet the slippery slope fantasy you invented has not and is not happening.

It belongs at the state level.

Because you want peope to be able to ban it.

I know.

Please spare me the bad acting that you are saying it on any other principle. The con doesn't fool anyone, anymore.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It was never a Constitutionallybprotected “right.”

100% wrong, of course. A constituionally protected, unenumerated right is precisely what the SCOTUS says it is.

And abortion up to 20 weeks was precisely that. For almost 50 years.

There is no debate there. If this question were on a 10th grade civics quiz, you would fail the quiz.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Right. Her values didn't change. The lay of the land did. Now abortion must be federally protected, since it was deleted as a constitutionally protected right.

How can you not puzzle this out?

For "changing values", see Trump's flip flop on the Florida abortion law. He can do it seamlessly, in mere minutes.

You still haven’t puzzled out you’ve been lied to for fifty years. Abortion was never a constitutional right.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You still haven’t puzzled out you’ve been lied to for fifty years. Abortion was never a constitutional right.

Oh look, another guy who can't pass 10th grade civics.