Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can carry two extra mags in the holster, so I do.
Just as when I get in the car, my gun comes out of the holster and under the handtowel I keep on the passenger seat. When I park the car, the gun goes back in the holster.
I won't get caught not being able to reach my gun again.
It must be terrible to live in such fear.
It must be terrible to live in such ignorance and denial.
Does a grizzly bear "live in fear" because it never leaves its den without its claws and teeth?
Shows that even dumb animals have more common sense than you...
It must be terrible to live in such fear.
It must be terrible to live in such ignorance and denial.
Does a grizzly bear "live in fear" because it never leaves its den without its claws and teeth?
Shows that even dumb animals have more common sense than you...
I do not live in ignorance or denial. I live a free life without fear and paranoia. I live a safe and happy life and so does my family. How would a grizzly bear go about leaving its' den without its' teeth and claws?
Some folks have watched too much Walking Dead and Doomsday Preppers.
Ok. When was the last time a private citizen had to fight off a spontaneous "mob" with a rifle?
It must be terrible to live in such ignorance and denial.
Does a grizzly bear "live in fear" because it never leaves its den without its claws and teeth?
Shows that even dumb animals have more common sense than you...
I do not live in ignorance or denial. I live a free life without fear and paranoia. I live a safe and happy life and so does my family. How would a grizzly bear go about leaving its' den without its' teeth and claws?
Exactly... defense is so critical, nature won't even let animals leave their "homes" without their defense mechanisms. And yet you walk around in a zombie-like stupor somehow believing you lead a better life because "ignorance is bliss".
There are bad people out there. There are so many bad people out there, are prisons are literally filled with MILLIONS of prisoners. That's right, no hundreds, not thousands, MILLIONS. How many robereries occur every year? How many rapes? How many murders? Seriously, the numbers are catastrophic. To pretend like you don't need to take simple, basic precautions is pure absurdity. If you want to pretend your "safe and happy" - knock yourself out kid. You're the only one who will pay the price.
Like ALL animals in the entire world, I recognize it is in fact a dangerous world and that I better have my defense mechanisms with me - both in the home and when I leave.
Funny, you never see a deer "relax" and just walk up to houses. You never see a rabbit "relax" and let people pet it. Humans are supposed to be the most "intelligent" of the animal kingdom, and yet we have so many liberals who walk around in their "ignorance is bliss" stupor pretending they are completely safe and exempt from harm
Wait a minute. In some threads, we hear the right talk about how Americas violent crime rate is actually quite low by global standards, despite having the most guns per capita. But now, you tell us the rapes, robberies, murders are so out of control? Which is it?
It must be terrible to live in such fear.
I've got 3 fire extinguisher in my home. Is that living in fear? I don't think so. I consider it being prepared to protect myself, my family and my home in case of fire. Having a firearm is to be prepared to protect myself, my family and my home from scumbags who would wish to bring harm. Prepardness doesn't equal fear, it equals common sense.
Do you carry it on the car seat next to you under a towel? This is no way to live. I live in a country where people do not even think about carrying firearms. To me, this is freedom.
Some folks have watched too much Walking Dead and Doomsday Preppers.
Ok. When was the last time a private citizen had to fight off a spontaneous "mob" with a rifle?
Some folks have watched too much Walking Dead and Doomsday Preppers.
Ok. When was the last time a private citizen had to fight off a spontaneous "mob" with a rifle?
Some folks have watched too much Walking Dead and Doomsday Preppers.
Ok. When was the last time a private citizen had to fight off a spontaneous "mob" with a rifle?
Read up on what ACTUALLY went down on Ruby Ridge.
Look into the LA riots in early 90's...
Thought ya just wanted a logical answer....ya got that two pages ago.
I own and carry. But I feel safe 99% of the time, even if not armed. Almost all acts ov violence are done by drug abuse, love, or a family member.
I own and carry. But I feel safe 99% of the time, even if not armed. I dont frequent the drug infested parts of town. I dont buy dope. I dont date clinically insane people. My life is basically work, the gym, the grocery store, maybe a movie, dog park, beach, repeat. I dont feel I am ever in any true danger.
The cheeseburgers at fast food joints offer more danger to my life than does a stranger. Thats a fact for almost all Americans who dont live in a drug infested shithole. Almost all acts ov violence are done by drug abuse, love, or a family member.
Los Angeles riots, to name one......Those Korean Business owners down in South Central weren't taking shit from anybody, and they damn sure knew the fucking cops weren't doing shit to protect 'em.....In fact, the cops turned tail and ran.Some folks have watched too much Walking Dead and Doomsday Preppers.
Ok. When was the last time a private citizen had to fight off a spontaneous "mob" with a rifle?
I want some facts and truthiness. Has ANY private citizen (not a cop, solider, militia, security guard)....EVER needed more than 20 shots for any single incident of self-defense? I tried researching it, and I cant fine a single incident. Ever. I found one website with a lot of good stats from the NRA's own sources: The Thinking Gunfighter: Self Defense Findings
How many self defense situations required a "reload"? : About 1/2 of 1% it says, so, 0.5%.
How many shots are fired by the defender? : In most cases, about 2. Yes, TWO.
The average number of shots fired by the defender? 2. The median? 2.
It says the majority of cases where more than 2 were fired were the defender simply shooting the gun until empty, out of reaction, not necessity.
Out 482 shooting incidents studied (By the NRA), only 3 required a reload. 1 of the 3 was to kill a Lion (like the cat) who escaped, and a large cal revolver was used, needing 13 shots to kill the animal.
The largest number of "attackers" reported, across the country, was 7...where 7 men tried to do a home invasion. The home owner fought them off, killed 2, wounded 1................with a SHOTGUN.
Im trying to find an example. And I cant. I cant find one single example of a private citizen needing a 30 round magazine to fight off intruders or attackers. Not one. Not one single incident. In fact, every single incident seems that a 15 round magazine would be PLENTY to get the job done....yep, even if the attacker is an African Lion.
Im a gun rights supporter, but I also try to see both sides of all issues. Well....Im having trouble justifying the need for 30, 45, 50, or 100 round magazines in the hands of private citizens. Should they be banned? I dont think so. It wouldnt change anything except add more work for the understaffed PD's to enforce yet another law. But, is there a justified NEED for them? Absolutely not.
So what?I want some facts and truthiness. Has ANY private citizen (not a cop, solider, militia, security guard)....EVER needed more than 20 shots for any single incident of self-defense? I tried researching it, and I cant fine a single incident.
Living in fear of "a mob" is rational.
And you jag-offs call yourselves "rational". Deluded is more like it.
Regards from Rosie
Pistorius killed with 4. Actually 3 did the job, but he squeezed off 4.
.
Zimmerman killed with 1.
Averaging, that's 2.5. Rounding up, you get 3.
3 bullets are the ideal killing number
Regards from Rosie
Pistorius killed with 4. Actually 3 did the job, but he squeezed off 4.
.
Zimmerman killed with 1.
Averaging, that's 2.5. Rounding up, you get 3.
3 bullets are the ideal killing number
Regards from Rosie
Tell that to Reginald Deny you fool.....
Like the typical uneducated liberal discussing an issue they know absolutely NOTHING about (in this case - security), you make wild and irrational assumptions based strictly on TWO situations that neatly fit with your predetermined conclusion.
You start with your conclusion, then look for any "facts" that will support that conclusion. The world has been filled with millions of shooting since the beginning of time - perhaps you might want to explore data from more than TWO shootings that just happen to fit your agenda?
God almighty are you an idiot....
More than 6 bullets is called "overkill", moron. More than 10 bullets is called "self-proclaimed security expert overcompensating for a tiny penis", cretin.
Regards from Rosie
I own and carry. But I feel safe 99% of the time, even if not armed. I dont frequent the drug infested parts of town. I dont buy dope. I dont date clinically insane people. My life is basically work, the gym, the grocery store, maybe a movie, dog park, beach, repeat. I dont feel I am ever in any true danger.
The cheeseburgers at fast food joints offer more danger to my life than does a stranger. Thats a fact for almost all Americans who dont live in a drug infested shithole. Almost all acts ov violence are done by drug abuse, love, or a family member.
This keeps getting funnier every time I read it... I never stop being amazed at how liberals contradict themselves. All you have to do is give a liberal enough rope and they will hang themselves every time. I suspect this is why they are always so angry and violent (violent that is, with the weak and timid - complete and total cowards with those that are not vulnerable).
Thank you for your mindless, ignorant and bigoted opinion.Pistorius killed with 4. Actually 3 did the job, but he squeezed off 4.
.
Zimmerman killed with 1.
Averaging, that's 2.5. Rounding up, you get 3.
3 bullets are the ideal killing number
Regards from Rosie
Tell that to Reginald Deny you fool.....
Like the typical uneducated liberal discussing an issue they know absolutely NOTHING about (in this case - security), you make wild and irrational assumptions based strictly on TWO situations that neatly fit with your predetermined conclusion.
You start with your conclusion, then look for any "facts" that will support that conclusion. The world has been filled with millions of shooting since the beginning of time - perhaps you might want to explore data from more than TWO shootings that just happen to fit your agenda?
God almighty are you an idiot....
More than 6 bullets is called "overkill", moron. More than 10 bullets is called "self-proclaimed security expert overcompensating for a tiny penis", cretin.
