Has Sleepy Joe Condemned the Election Fraud?

[SassyIrishLass]

If not, why not?

What fraud?

The fraud being done by the blacks in Georgia and the hispanics in Arizona.

LOL!! now your not even trying to hide your stupidity..

I can bet he'd know what link he uses...you didn't....lmao

 

[Skylar]

This is the rare instance that I will give Biden the benefit of the doubt. His handlers most likely haven't even told him about the fraud, or allowed him any free time to access the news/internet to discover it for himself.


This would be the most logical move since it would keep him sincere and and full of vigor each time he makes a public announcement.

So in my opinion, Biden doesn't even know what's going on.

Or....you've imagined the fraud.

That explanation works far better than your conspiracy.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

That's not what it says. It ways that the instructions in August were incorrect. It also says that they were corrected in October BEFORE the ballots were mailed out and the ballots were legal. No ballots were discounted.

Fake news.

You didn't actually read it what you posted, did you:

This argument fails, however, because the County was able to remove the New Instruction and mail the early ballots by the October 7 deadline. SeeNovember General Election Early Voting Begins October 7, Maricopa County(Oct. 7,2020),Maricopa County, AZ.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

This is the rare instance that I will give Biden the benefit of the doubt. His handlers most likely haven't even told him about the fraud, or allowed him any free time to access the news/internet to discover it for himself.


This would be the most logical move since it would keep him sincere and and full of vigor each time he makes a public announcement.

So in my opinion, Biden doesn't even know what's going on.

Or....you've imagined the fraud.

That explanation works far better than your conspiracy.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

That's not what it says. It ways that the instructions in August were incorrect. It also says that they were corrected in October BEFORE the ballots were mailed out and the ballots were legal. No ballots were discounted.

Yup.

This argument fails, however, because the County was able to remove the New Instruction and mail the early ballots by the October 7 deadline. SeeNovember General Election Early Voting Begins October 7, Maricopa County(Oct. 7,2020),Maricopa County, AZ.

And it doesn't say a thing about this imaginary 'election fraud'.

Anything not censored by twitter or facebook or hailed by MSM doesn't mention fraud either.

 

[Skylar]

This is the rare instance that I will give Biden the benefit of the doubt. His handlers most likely haven't even told him about the fraud, or allowed him any free time to access the news/internet to discover it for himself.


This would be the most logical move since it would keep him sincere and and full of vigor each time he makes a public announcement.

So in my opinion, Biden doesn't even know what's going on.

Or....you've imagined the fraud.

That explanation works far better than your conspiracy.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

What does that have to do with your conspiracy batshit?

Antrim County admits errors, ballot results subject to change

ANTRIM COUNTY, Mich. (WLNS) – Antrim County announced issues with the counting software, causing results reported this morning to not match up with tabulators. Ballots will be manually recoun…

www.wlns.com

And? Where's your imaginary 'voter fraud'?

 

[Skylar]

This is the rare instance that I will give Biden the benefit of the doubt. His handlers most likely haven't even told him about the fraud, or allowed him any free time to access the news/internet to discover it for himself.


This would be the most logical move since it would keep him sincere and and full of vigor each time he makes a public announcement.

So in my opinion, Biden doesn't even know what's going on.

Or....you've imagined the fraud.

That explanation works far better than your conspiracy.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

That's not what it says. It ways that the instructions in August were incorrect. It also says that they were corrected in October BEFORE the ballots were mailed out and the ballots were legal. No ballots were discounted.

Yup.

This argument fails, however, because the County was able to remove the New Instruction and mail the early ballots by the October 7 deadline. SeeNovember General Election Early Voting Begins October 7, Maricopa County(Oct. 7,2020),Maricopa County, AZ.

And it doesn't say a thing about this imaginary 'election fraud'.

Anything not censored by twitter or facebook or hailed by MSM doesn't mention fraud either.

If twitter and facebook are your primary source for news, that might explain why you blundered so badly in your interpretation of the ruling.

As the county in question was able to remove the new instructions and mail early ballots without them.

 

[Uncensored2008]

This is the rare instance that I will give Biden the benefit of the doubt. His handlers most likely haven't even told him about the fraud, or allowed him any free time to access the news/internet to discover it for himself.


This would be the most logical move since it would keep him sincere and and full of vigor each time he makes a public announcement.

So in my opinion, Biden doesn't even know what's going on.

Or....you've imagined the fraud.

That explanation works far better than your conspiracy.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

What does that have to do with your conspiracy batshit?

Antrim County admits errors, ballot results subject to change

ANTRIM COUNTY, Mich. (WLNS) – Antrim County announced issues with the counting software, causing results reported this morning to not match up with tabulators. Ballots will be manually recoun…

www.wlns.com

And? Where's your imaginary 'voter fraud'?

Voter Fraud Map: Election Fraud Database | The Heritage Foundation

Explore a sampling of recent proven instances of election fraud from across the country. The database is intended to demonstrate the vulnerabilities in the election system and the many ways in which fraud is committed.

www.heritage.org

 

[Uncensored2008]

This is the rare instance that I will give Biden the benefit of the doubt. His handlers most likely haven't even told him about the fraud, or allowed him any free time to access the news/internet to discover it for himself.


This would be the most logical move since it would keep him sincere and and full of vigor each time he makes a public announcement.

So in my opinion, Biden doesn't even know what's going on.

Or....you've imagined the fraud.

That explanation works far better than your conspiracy.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

That's not what it says. It ways that the instructions in August were incorrect. It also says that they were corrected in October BEFORE the ballots were mailed out and the ballots were legal. No ballots were discounted.

Fake news.

You didn't actually read it what you posted, did you:

This argument fails, however, because the County was able to remove the New Instruction and mail the early ballots by the October 7 deadline. SeeNovember General Election Early Voting Begins October 7, Maricopa County(Oct. 7,2020),Maricopa County, AZ.

Confessions of a voter fraud: I was a master at fixing mail-in ballots

A top Democratic operative says voter fraud, especially with mail-in ballots, is no myth. And he knows this because he’s been doing it, on a grand scale, for decades. Mail-in ballots have bec…

nypost.com

 

[Snouter]

So basically it is TDS folks, who insisted the fake Russia Hoax was real, now insisting that real voter fraud is fake. The pathology of TDS is quite profound.

 

[ninja007]

LIBS ARE IN DEEP SHIT IF THE WATERMARKING BALLOTS FROM TRUMP ARE REALLY TRUE...

 

[ninja007]

If not, why not?

What fraud?

The fraud being done by the blacks in Georgia and the hispanics in Arizona.

What fraud are you referring to?

Remembering of course that your imagination doesn't amount to much. You'll need more.

There's a reason why Trump is whining on national television rather than presenting evidence of fraud in court; there is no such evidence.

WATERMARKS on real ballots, Trump isnt dumb; he knew libs would cheat- libs are in a corner now. It will ALL come out soon.

 

[Snouter]

President Trump, Tom Fitton and others close to our President knew the democrat "mail-in" vote scheme would inevitably lead to voter fraud and it actually turns out to be worse with cities like Detroit and Philadelphia hiring beasts committing felonies basically making shit up to help Sleepy Joe and preventing legal observers, with their law enforcement told to stand down violating court orders.

 

[CowboyTed]

This is the rare instance that I will give Biden the benefit of the doubt. His handlers most likely haven't even told him about the fraud, or allowed him any free time to access the news/internet to discover it for himself.


This would be the most logical move since it would keep him sincere and and full of vigor each time he makes a public announcement.

So in my opinion, Biden doesn't even know what's going on.

Or....you've imagined the fraud.

That explanation works far better than your conspiracy.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

What does that have to do with your conspiracy batshit?

Antrim County admits errors, ballot results subject to change

ANTRIM COUNTY, Mich. (WLNS) – Antrim County announced issues with the counting software, causing results reported this morning to not match up with tabulators. Ballots will be manually recoun…

www.wlns.com

And? Where's your imaginary 'voter fraud'?

Voter Fraud Map: Election Fraud Database | The Heritage Foundation

Explore a sampling of recent proven instances of election fraud from across the country. The database is intended to demonstrate the vulnerabilities in the election system and the many ways in which fraud is committed.

www.heritage.org

That is a thirty year database of incidences in every election.....

And the grand total is 1,298 incidents...

Here is an example of an incident:
Delores "Dee" Handy, of Crowley was found guilty of failing to mark a ballot as instructed when assisting an eldery voter, a misdemeanor.

 

[lennypartiv]

WATERMARKS on real ballots, Trump isnt dumb; he knew libs would cheat- libs are in a corner now. It will ALL come out soon.

I can't wait until this comes out in court.

 

[CowboyTed]

If not, why not?

What fraud?

The fraud being done by the blacks in Georgia and the hispanics in Arizona.

What fraud are you referring to?

Remembering of course that your imagination doesn't amount to much. You'll need more.

There's a reason why Trump is whining on national television rather than presenting evidence of fraud in court; there is no such evidence.

WATERMARKS on real ballots, Trump isnt dumb; he knew libs would cheat- libs are in a corner now. It will ALL come out soon.

Bogus QAnon Claim that Mail-In Ballots Are Illegitimate - FactCheck.org

A bogus QAnon-related claim that many of the mail-in ballots for the Nov. 3 election were illegitimate has spread widely on social media. But the claim is based on the faulty assumption that ballots are produced by the federal government.

www.factcheck.org

Another commonly copied post on Facebook says, in part: “The ‘watch the water’ intel refers to …..THE WATERMARK on the official election ballots!!!! …The DEMS fell right into the trap of this sting operation and TRUMP has it all!!! Fraud will be exposed for the world to see.”

Ye fucking idiots have to stop reading that shit.... It is utter crap... US has problems if idiots keep believing QAnon...

 

[CowboyTed]

WATERMARKS on real ballots, Trump isnt dumb; he knew libs would cheat- libs are in a corner now. It will ALL come out soon.

I can't wait until this comes out in court.

WATERMARKS on real ballots, Trump isnt dumb; he knew libs would cheat- libs are in a corner now. It will ALL come out soon.

I can't wait until this comes out in court.

Your honor, I would like submit as evidence this QAnon sourced information...

They might not even find that funny....

 

[L.K.Eder]

this piece of shit thread is still in politics. lol