Trump classified documents case dismissed. Jack Smith loses again.

Wrong, as Cannon described in her decision.
Point that out please.

District Judge Aileen Cannon said in a 93-page ruling that the case should be tossed out based on her finding that special counsel Jack Smith, who brought the charges, was unlawfully appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland.


Her rationale came purely on technical legal grounds and was not based on specifics of Trump’s alleged actions or the strength or weakness of the charges. In fact, she only mentioned the details about Mar-a-Lago and classified documents in one cursory paragraph within the 93-page ruling.
 
Didn't Jack's Jan 6th case just get blown up by the SCOTUS?
Who has been telling you this?
Oh wait....I already know LMAO!
Your cult has.

No, all the SCOTUS did was rule that a POTUS is immune from prosecution for some official acts taken while in office but not immune for other actions.
Something we already knew anyway.
So basically the SCOTUS just punted the case back to The D.C. Circuit Court for Tanya Chutkan to review all the evidence against convicted felon Trump (meaning EVERYTHING discovered and presented by The January 6th Committee PLUS the evidence Jack Smith has) to make the determination about which of Trump's words and acfions in his failed coup attempt might have been "official" and which ones had nothing to do with "official" duties.
The Trump camp has done it's damnest to bury the Jan. 6th evidence and certainly didn't want it in the light before the election....which is why they've worked so long to delay the trial, but thanks to the SCOTUS ruling we're going to see a "mini trial" in Chutkan's courtroom beginning in September so even voters who didn't bother to tune into the Jan. 6th hearings will get to go to the polls with all the granular details of convicted felon Trump's attempts to subvert our democracy fresh in their minds.
Thank you SCOTUS!!!
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

Why do you think the Judge in NY decided to continue the sentencing hearing til September?
Because in order to make convicted felon Trump's conviction appeal-proof it is important for the record to show how much slack he was afforded that would have been denied to any ordinary citizen.
 
Who has been telling you this?
Oh wait....I already know LMAO!
Your cult has.

No, all the SCOTUS did was rule that a POTUS is immune from prosecution for some official acts taken while in office but not immune for other actions.
Something we already knew anyway.
So basically the SCOTUS just punted the case back to The D.C. Circuit Court for Tanya Chutkan to review all the evidence against convicted felon Trump (meaning EVERYTHING discovered and presented by The January 6th Committee PLUS the evidence Jack Smith has) to make the determination about which of Trump's words and acfions in his failed coup attempt might have been "official" and which ones had nothing to do with "official" duties.
The Trump camp has done it's damnest to bury the Jan. 6th evidence and certainly didn't want it in the light before the election....which is why they've worked so long to delay the trial, but thanks to the SCOTUS ruling we're going to see a "mini trial" in Chutkan's courtroom beginning in September so even voters who didn't bother to tune into the Jan. 6th hearings will get to go to the polls with all the granular details of convicted felon Trump's attempts to subvert our democracy fresh in their minds.
Thank you SCOTUS!!!

Because in order to make convicted felon Trump's conviction appeal-proof it is important for the record to show how much slack he was afforded that would have been denied to any ordinary citizen.
You all keep losing
 
Tell me, are Democrats growing tired of losing to Trump? Trump shredded their candidate during the debate. God protected Trump dodged a bullet to the head. Team Trump DOMINATES the news.
 

Forum List

Back
Top