Help me understand something about Black culture / behaviors/ beliefs?

Oh "Whites have benefitted the most from Affirmative action" ? Do you really think anyone I dumb enough to believe that ?

FALSE BS propaganda, like much fake news spouted by the ludicrous left.

Doesn't matter what you believe. The only thing that matters is what is. And what is, is whites have benefitted the most from Affirmative action. The opinions of 5-6 stormfront regulars don't change this and your opinions certainly don't matter.
 
Doesn't matter what you believe. The only thing that matters is what is. And what is, is whites have benefitted the most from Affirmative action. The opinions of 5-6 stormfront regulars don't change this and your opinions certainly don't matter.
FALSE BS propaganda, like much fake news spouted by the ludicrous left. I've refuted this dopey line 1000 times. How could whites benefit most from AA when they're the ones being discriminated against ? Sheeesh!

What doesn't matter, is your fool ideas propagated by the lying left.
 
There is no thread more comical than one with people defending the behavior of TODAYS African American....FUCKING HILARIOUS!
 
There is no thread more comical than one with people defending the behavior of TODAYS African American....FUCKING HILARIOUS!
Mind boggling when you read the poppycock they expect intelligent people to believe. Like that "whites have benefitted the most from Affirmative Action"

If they actually believe this, it just goes to show hw stupid they are.

Very few white women get helped by affirmative action compared to wives & daughters of white men who are discriminated against. Far more white women have been HARMED by Affirmative Action than have been helped by it. 1000 to 1.
 
Last edited:
Whites are instinctively criminals. Its all genetics. They came from an area of very few resources so they are genetically geared to steal, plunder, and kill to acquire more resources. You have to think about who we are dealing with here. Whites are the remnants of people that were trapped in europe and thoroughly inbred. To top it off they interbred with Neanderthals who were basically the equivalent of an autistic child with superb visual acuity. They dont really want to know about Black culture. They want information on how to further crush their enemy. We are the antithesis of whites in many ways. We are the hue-mans. Were we have a connection with the world via our melanin they lack that connection and the ability to gain it. Where we have built multiple amazing civilizations from scratch they have only been able to sorta copy and even that was after we educated them. They dont really want to actually know us because they are missing what is required to communicate with us. They lack what we have and instinctively wish to destroy it.
me1_zpsvuq8c1nr.png

blk1_zpskpsyor3s.jpg
ROTFLMAO!!!!!

Shit, you must be kidding. Hell, most blacks don't seem to know what soap is for even today!

If you doubt me, take a ride on an inner city bus. But be prepared when you inhale...
 
Caucasian male here....generalizing ofcourse.
Us quality Caucasians tend to condemn and distance ourselves from the white criminals, white trash, white drug addicts and just overall poor quality Caucasians among us...we do this not only because they are poor quality humans but also because we are mindful that we are and can be grouped in with the common behaviors of our majority...like it or not generalizing and stereotyping isn't going away....It seems like more times than not the quality blacks are too quick to make excuses for the lesser quality and almost never condemn their piers who make them look bad...in fact, I've even seen them almost support the behaviors. Isn't this constant excuse making for bad behavior basically giving the youth a justification for their actions and behaviors? How will they ever hold themselves accountable if it's always someone else or another cause that made them do it. Aren't you in a sense condoning such bad behaviors by not condemning?
It seems blacks only follow and listen to blacks so until well respected blacks who are basically mentors to the youth...such as the Drake and Kanye's condemn bad behaviors can't we be pretty certain that X cycles will continue?
Caucasian male here....generalizing ofcourse.
Us quality Caucasians tend to condemn and distance ourselves from the white criminals, white trash, white drug addicts and just overall poor quality Caucasians among us...we do this not only because they are poor quality humans but also because we are mindful that we are and can be grouped in with the common behaviors of our majority...like it or not generalizing and stereotyping isn't going away....It seems like more times than not the quality blacks are too quick to make excuses for the lesser quality and almost never condemn their piers who make them look bad...in fact, I've even seen them almost support the behaviors. Isn't this constant excuse making for bad behavior basically giving the youth a justification for their actions and behaviors? How will they ever hold themselves accountable if it's always someone else or another cause that made them do it. Aren't you in a sense condoning such bad behaviors by not condemning?
It seems blacks only follow and listen to blacks so until well respected blacks who are basically mentors to the youth...such as the Drake and Kanye's condemn bad behaviors can't we be pretty certain that X cycles will continue?
Dear
Any black speaking against another black is considered an uncle Tom. Uncle Tom's are sell out's to those who hate the white race, hate the history of the nation, and want to remain seperate from those in which they hate including the known sell out. However, when it comes to voting, there is unity among most blacks regardless of individual character or differences they might have, because they see strength in the numbers when voting in hopes that all will get something out of it (uncle Tom's not included). They wish they could hold it together afterwards, but they are just like the whites after the election, where as most go back to doing what they need in order to survive just like any other American does, and they hope for the best to come as a result of.
Dear BrokeLoser
Thanks for your honest question.
If everyone asked and talked openly as you did here, we would all have a chance to discuss and resolve these issues and reach a greater understanding. I really hope you continue asking and encouraging others to be this free to share.

To answer your question in the equivalent context, I'd compare it with conservatives especially white middle to upper class who seem to excuse or even applaud the financial exploitations and profits by big corporate owners and interests. Excusing Soros Bush Clinton Gore, any big corporate players despite mass accusations of financial legal or political abuses is part of the Good Old Boy system.

The good benefits that people do and get from capitalism and free market are often used to justify excusing the wrongs and even crimes committed.

It is also just as wrongful to blame all blacks or poor ppl on welfare for the wrongs of thugs, as it is to punish all wealthy or blame all rich or corporate heads for the wrongs of others of their class.

So I'd say blaming the poor or the blacks for thuggery is like blaming all the wealthy or whites for greed. Either way, if you attack people as a whole class, rich or poor, black or white, it creates a defensive backlash where ppl are so busy defending their own group from attacks they even go too far and end up denying wrongs that are actually committed or downplaying them as a response.

If we quit attacking whole groups, maybe we won't see this defense mechanism where ppl excuse themselves while attacking the other. There is the equivalent on the other side, and I've run into conservatives downplaying the corporate thievery and destruction by corporate abuses at taxpayer expense because they want to promote free Enterprise and capitalism as greater good than harm. It looks like cover up and excuses as well!
 
There is no black racism against whites as affirmative action was a policy created by whites.
Doesn't matter who created it. What matters is it discriminates by race - against whites. And both whites and blacks (mostly them) support it.

It doesn't discriminate by race and most certainly not against whites.
Sure it does. Even the Supreme Court said so.

The Supreme Court ruled Thursday in a 4-3 decision that it is lawful for the University of Texas at Austin to consider race when determining student admissions.
 
Well it discriminated against Blacks for over 400 years. Suck it up buttercup. Just be happy white women benefit the most from it.
1. The over 400 years doesn't apply to anyone in the work force, alive today.

2. White women DON'T benefit the most from it. I've refuted that lame line 1000 times in this forum.

The 400 years include today. So there are people in the work force this applis to. Like you..

You've refuted nothing. You can't refute the truth.

While people of color, individually and as groups, have been helped by affirmative action in the subsequent years, data and studies suggest women — white women in particular — have benefited disproportionately. According to one study, in 1995, 6 million women, the majority of whom were white, had jobs they wouldn’t have otherwise held but for affirmative action.
So your point is that gender discrimination happens so racial discrimination is OK? One doesn't prove the other doesn't exist.
 
10's of millions of Russians killed, 6 million Jews, and 10's of thousands of Blacks killed if that.

How come the Jewish, and Black lives matter more than the White Christian (Russian) ones?

Maybe because Western European society is a sickness of anti-White sentiments?
There’s nothing wrong with people of European descent being proud of their specific ethnic and national heritage.

But here's the thing those cultures, the traditions of Scotland and Ireland and England and the Russian Jews and Poles. Those are traditions that have been lost or diminished in the name of this pan-European unity called whiteness.

It's white people who celebrate this fking ridiculous notion of whiteness. A notion which nobody can actually explain what white culture is, because white culture has only existed as a concept for maybe three hundred years.

So suck it up. It's white people's fault that the Russian cultures, Polish cultures, Irish cultures, Scottish cultures or Italian cultures have had to take a back seat for whiteness. The languages, the history, the customs have been lost to such an extent that you're grasping at straws.

That's why your up here like "What about me ?" "What about my people" "What about my history" "What about my people's suffering ?"

White people have been culturally castrated but not by liberalism, not by the Left and for sure not by black people. White people have been castrated culturally by whiteness.

The U.S.A has a pan-White culture because it supports assimilation to "American" what ever that is some kind of inferior "Junk Capitalist culture" of Walmart, and McDonald's.
 
A culture not based on seeing criminals as heroes is by any definition superior.
Yeah white people don't celebrate white criminals. I mean. People like Al Capone, John Dillinger, Pretty Boy Floyd, Baby Face Nelson. Yeah no one has ever heard of them have they ?

Or how about films and programmes to show how stylish and “mysterious” white gangsters are ? Goodfellas ? Sopranos anyone? Biker gangs ? Game of Thrones ? Bonnie and Clyde ?

Or let's go back to the Wild West and films about killers like Billy The Kid, Wild Bill Hickcock, Jessie James.

You didn't really think this through.....Did ya ?
Whites are instinctively criminals. Its all genetics. They came from an area of very few resources so they are genetically geared to steal, plunder, and kill to acquire more resources. You have to think about who we are dealing with here. Whites are the remnants of people that were trapped in europe and thoroughly inbred. To top it off they interbred with Neanderthals who were basically the equivalent of an autistic child with superb visual acuity. They dont really want to know about Black culture. They want information on how to further crush their enemy. We are the antithesis of whites in many ways. We are the hue-mans. Were we have a connection with the world via our melanin they lack that connection and the ability to gain it. Where we have built multiple amazing civilizations from scratch they have only been able to sorta copy and even that was after we educated them. They dont really want to actually know us because they are missing what is required to communicate with us. They lack what we have and instinctively wish to destroy it.
So how did these mentally deficient, inbred, stupid primitives (who probably couldn't read or do math without a negro teaching them how) with no resources and barely any organization in the form of civilization manage to defeat and/or colonize pretty much all of Africa (which was filled with their complete superiors who I am told are better at pleasing their women and physically superior to boot)?
 
A culture not based on seeing criminals as heroes is by any definition superior.
Yeah white people don't celebrate white criminals. I mean. People like Al Capone, John Dillinger, Pretty Boy Floyd, Baby Face Nelson. Yeah no one has ever heard of them have they ?

Or how about films and programmes to show how stylish and “mysterious” white gangsters are ? Goodfellas ? Sopranos anyone? Biker gangs ? Game of Thrones ? Bonnie and Clyde ?

Or let's go back to the Wild West and films about killers like Billy The Kid, Wild Bill Hickcock, Jessie James.

You didn't really think this through.....Did ya ?
Whites are instinctively criminals. Its all genetics. They came from an area of very few resources so they are genetically geared to steal, plunder, and kill to acquire more resources. You have to think about who we are dealing with here. Whites are the remnants of people that were trapped in europe and thoroughly inbred. To top it off they interbred with Neanderthals who were basically the equivalent of an autistic child with superb visual acuity. They dont really want to know about Black culture. They want information on how to further crush their enemy. We are the antithesis of whites in many ways. We are the hue-mans. Were we have a connection with the world via our melanin they lack that connection and the ability to gain it. Where we have built multiple amazing civilizations from scratch they have only been able to sorta copy and even that was after we educated them. They dont really want to actually know us because they are missing what is required to communicate with us. They lack what we have and instinctively wish to destroy it.
So how did these mentally deficient, inbred, stupid primitives (who probably couldn't read or do math without a negro teaching them how) with no resources and barely any organization in the form of civilization manage to defeat and/or colonize pretty much all of Africa (which was filled with their complete superiors who I am told are better at pleasing their women and physically superior to boot)?

Go take some classes and find out. Because it damn sure wasn't because whites were inherently superior.
 
A culture not based on seeing criminals as heroes is by any definition superior.
Yeah white people don't celebrate white criminals. I mean. People like Al Capone, John Dillinger, Pretty Boy Floyd, Baby Face Nelson. Yeah no one has ever heard of them have they ?

Or how about films and programmes to show how stylish and “mysterious” white gangsters are ? Goodfellas ? Sopranos anyone? Biker gangs ? Game of Thrones ? Bonnie and Clyde ?

Or let's go back to the Wild West and films about killers like Billy The Kid, Wild Bill Hickcock, Jessie James.

You didn't really think this through.....Did ya ?
Whites are instinctively criminals. Its all genetics. They came from an area of very few resources so they are genetically geared to steal, plunder, and kill to acquire more resources. You have to think about who we are dealing with here. Whites are the remnants of people that were trapped in europe and thoroughly inbred. To top it off they interbred with Neanderthals who were basically the equivalent of an autistic child with superb visual acuity. They dont really want to know about Black culture. They want information on how to further crush their enemy. We are the antithesis of whites in many ways. We are the hue-mans. Were we have a connection with the world via our melanin they lack that connection and the ability to gain it. Where we have built multiple amazing civilizations from scratch they have only been able to sorta copy and even that was after we educated them. They dont really want to actually know us because they are missing what is required to communicate with us. They lack what we have and instinctively wish to destroy it.
So how did these mentally deficient, inbred, stupid primitives (who probably couldn't read or do math without a negro teaching them how) with no resources and barely any organization in the form of civilization manage to defeat and/or colonize pretty much all of Africa (which was filled with their complete superiors who I am told are better at pleasing their women and physically superior to boot)?

Go take some classes and find out. Because it damn sure wasn't because whites were inherently superior.
I thought you negroes were supposed to teach us stupid, uncivilized whites. So what are you waiting for? Butthurt much? Want some cream for that?

Whites used better tactics and equipment. Not sure how they got those, being stupid and all. I suppose the guns just fell into their laps after materializing out of thin air and the tactics just happened to work better accidentally, throughout all of Africa. I suppose it's possible to win the lottery 100 times in a row and maybe something like that happened to the whites. Or maybe, each time the blacks were about to land the finishing blow on the whites, it just so happened that they were all struck by lightning. At the same time.

Bwahahahahahahaha!
 
Last edited:
There is no black racism against whites as affirmative action was a policy created by whites.
Doesn't matter who created it. What matters is it discriminates by race - against whites. And both whites and blacks (mostly them) support it.

It doesn't discriminate by race and most certainly not against whites.
Sure it does. Even the Supreme Court said so.

The Supreme Court ruled Thursday in a 4-3 decision that it is lawful for the University of Texas at Austin to consider race when determining student admissions.

Whites are a race bgrouse, I hate to inform you of the obvious.
 
A culture not based on seeing criminals as heroes is by any definition superior.
Yeah white people don't celebrate white criminals. I mean. People like Al Capone, John Dillinger, Pretty Boy Floyd, Baby Face Nelson. Yeah no one has ever heard of them have they ?

Or how about films and programmes to show how stylish and “mysterious” white gangsters are ? Goodfellas ? Sopranos anyone? Biker gangs ? Game of Thrones ? Bonnie and Clyde ?

Or let's go back to the Wild West and films about killers like Billy The Kid, Wild Bill Hickcock, Jessie James.

You didn't really think this through.....Did ya ?
Whites are instinctively criminals. Its all genetics. They came from an area of very few resources so they are genetically geared to steal, plunder, and kill to acquire more resources. You have to think about who we are dealing with here. Whites are the remnants of people that were trapped in europe and thoroughly inbred. To top it off they interbred with Neanderthals who were basically the equivalent of an autistic child with superb visual acuity. They dont really want to know about Black culture. They want information on how to further crush their enemy. We are the antithesis of whites in many ways. We are the hue-mans. Were we have a connection with the world via our melanin they lack that connection and the ability to gain it. Where we have built multiple amazing civilizations from scratch they have only been able to sorta copy and even that was after we educated them. They dont really want to actually know us because they are missing what is required to communicate with us. They lack what we have and instinctively wish to destroy it.
So how did these mentally deficient, inbred, stupid primitives (who probably couldn't read or do math without a negro teaching them how) with no resources and barely any organization in the form of civilization manage to defeat and/or colonize pretty much all of Africa (which was filled with their complete superiors who I am told are better at pleasing their women and physically superior to boot)?

Go take some classes and find out. Because it damn sure wasn't because whites were inherently superior.
I thought you negroes were supposed to teach us stupid, uncivilized whites. So what are you waiting for? Butthurt much? Want some cream for that?

Whites used better tactics and equipment. Not sure how they got those, being stupid and all. I suppose the guns just fell into their laps after materializing out of thin air and the tactics just happened to work better accidentally, throughout all of Africa. I suppose it's possible to win the lottery 100 times in a row and maybe something like that happened to the whites. Or maybe, each time the blacks were about to land the finishing blow on the whites, it just so happened that they were all struck by lightning. At the same time.

Bwahahahahahahaha!

Well the problem with all this is those tactically and equipment superior whites got forced out of those nations.
 
There is no thread more comical than one with people defending the behavior of TODAYS African American....FUCKING HILARIOUS!
Mind boggling when you read the poppycock they expect intelligent people to believe. Like that "whites have benefitted the most from Affirmative Action"

If they actually believe this, it just goes to show hw stupid they are.

Very few white women get helped by affirmative action compared to wives & daughters of white men who are discriminated against. Far more white women have been HARMED by Affirmative Action than have been helped by it. 1000 to 1.

These are lies.
 
Well it discriminated against Blacks for over 400 years. Suck it up buttercup. Just be happy white women benefit the most from it.
1. The over 400 years doesn't apply to anyone in the work force, alive today.

2. White women DON'T benefit the most from it. I've refuted that lame line 1000 times in this forum.

The 400 years include today. So there are people in the work force this applis to. Like you..

You've refuted nothing. You can't refute the truth.

While people of color, individually and as groups, have been helped by affirmative action in the subsequent years, data and studies suggest women — white women in particular — have benefited disproportionately. According to one study, in 1995, 6 million women, the majority of whom were white, had jobs they wouldn’t have otherwise held but for affirmative action.
So your point is that gender discrimination happens so racial discrimination is OK? One doesn't prove the other doesn't exist.

White women are white people black, Asian, native American middle eastern and pacific island women are all part of the gender. But somehow white women benefitted the most.There is no racial discrimination against whites. Only you few storrmfront troopers believe this.
 
So how did these mentally deficient, inbred, stupid primitives (who probably couldn't read or do math without a negro teaching them how) with no resources and barely any organization in the form of civilization manage to defeat and/or colonize pretty much all of Africa (which was filled with their complete superiors who I am told are better at pleasing their women and physically superior to boot)?
!
Whites rise to power (UK, French, German etc) was done with the barrel of gun. At the time of the whites first contact with the Africans. The white northerners were savages, greased in rancid bear fat with cow and goat butter used in their hair. The African historians mention the foul smell of them on several occasions.

Not to mention they were inept and disorganized warriors who got their heads handed to them by the African legions at every encounter. Their military strategy consisted of screaming, yelling, shouting, and charging head-on into the African archers and phalanx.

It was only after centuries of being defeated and later trained by Africans then fighting and trained by Romans that the Northen barbarians became more efficient.

But the real game changer was gunpowder

African armies were only defeated when the Europeans got access to gunpowder. Marco Polo brought it back to Europe, and whites immediately started using it to kill people with.

And even then white Europeans never did a Rambo on Africa (At First)

The came in as friends, with smiles. That's the tactic they still use to Today with the Red Cross, Oxfam and missionaries (A bag of rice for a bag of diamonds)

But there is no question that whites used to gunpowder to take over the world. That meant they could shoot and kill someone from distance. Rather up close and personal, Sword with Sword.
 
Caucasian male here....generalizing ofcourse.
Us quality Caucasians tend to condemn and distance ourselves from the white criminals, white trash, white drug addicts and just overall poor quality Caucasians among us...we do this not only because they are poor quality humans but also because we are mindful that we are and can be grouped in with the common behaviors of our majority...like it or not generalizing and stereotyping isn't going away....It seems like more times than not the quality blacks are too quick to make excuses for the lesser quality and almost never condemn their piers who make them look bad...in fact, I've even seen them almost support the behaviors. Isn't this constant excuse making for bad behavior basically giving the youth a justification for their actions and behaviors? How will they ever hold themselves accountable if it's always someone else or another cause that made them do it. Aren't you in a sense condoning such bad behaviors by not condemning?
It seems blacks only follow and listen to blacks so until well respected blacks who are basically mentors to the youth...such as the Drake and Kanye's condemn bad behaviors can't we be pretty certain that X cycles will continue?
Caucasian male here....generalizing ofcourse.
Us quality Caucasians tend to condemn and distance ourselves from the white criminals, white trash, white drug addicts and just overall poor quality Caucasians among us...we do this not only because they are poor quality humans but also because we are mindful that we are and can be grouped in with the common behaviors of our majority...like it or not generalizing and stereotyping isn't going away....It seems like more times than not the quality blacks are too quick to make excuses for the lesser quality and almost never condemn their piers who make them look bad...in fact, I've even seen them almost support the behaviors. Isn't this constant excuse making for bad behavior basically giving the youth a justification for their actions and behaviors? How will they ever hold themselves accountable if it's always someone else or another cause that made them do it. Aren't you in a sense condoning such bad behaviors by not condemning?
It seems blacks only follow and listen to blacks so until well respected blacks who are basically mentors to the youth...such as the Drake and Kanye's condemn bad behaviors can't we be pretty certain that X cycles will continue?
Dear
Any black speaking against another black is considered an uncle Tom. Uncle Tom's are sell out's to those who hate the white race, hate the history of the nation, and want to remain seperate from those in which they hate including the known sell out. However, when it comes to voting, there is unity among most blacks regardless of individual character or differences they might have, because they see strength in the numbers when voting in hopes that all will get something out of it (uncle Tom's not included). They wish they could hold it together afterwards, but they are just like the whites after the election, where as most go back to doing what they need in order to survive just like any other American does, and they hope for the best to come as a result of.
Dear BrokeLoser
Thanks for your honest question.
If everyone asked and talked openly as you did here, we would all have a chance to discuss and resolve these issues and reach a greater understanding. I really hope you continue asking and encouraging others to be this free to share.

To answer your question in the equivalent context, I'd compare it with conservatives especially white middle to upper class who seem to excuse or even applaud the financial exploitations and profits by big corporate owners and interests. Excusing Soros Bush Clinton Gore, any big corporate players despite mass accusations of financial legal or political abuses is part of the Good Old Boy system.

The good benefits that people do and get from capitalism and free market are often used to justify excusing the wrongs and even crimes committed.

It is also just as wrongful to blame all blacks or poor ppl on welfare for the wrongs of thugs, as it is to punish all wealthy or blame all rich or corporate heads for the wrongs of others of their class.

So I'd say blaming the poor or the blacks for thuggery is like blaming all the wealthy or whites for greed. Either way, if you attack people as a whole class, rich or poor, black or white, it creates a defensive backlash where ppl are so busy defending their own group from attacks they even go too far and end up denying wrongs that are actually committed or downplaying them as a response.

If we quit attacking whole groups, maybe we won't see this defense mechanism where ppl excuse themselves while attacking the other. There is the equivalent on the other side, and I've run into conservatives downplaying the corporate thievery and destruction by corporate abuses at taxpayer expense because they want to promote free Enterprise and capitalism as greater good than harm. It looks like cover up and excuses as well!

I get headaches reading this really. I understand what you are trying to do but what you say just doesn't match the realty of how laws and policies are put together and why. We are dealing with macro level problems. So when talking about dealing with things that affect millions of people all at the same time talking about one individual at a time just isn't going to get anything done. And really the truth here is that one group is responsible for these problems whether they want to hear or read it or not. There are tens of millions of whites who recognize that as a group whites have done things that have negatively affected other groups and don't cry about it. So that's who you work with not these guys. All you do when you start talking as you with these guys is validate their racism and they just double down. They don't want to see change, they want this nation be for whites and whites only. Not white individuals, but whites. They think this is a white nation, not a nation of white individuals but a nation that belongs to the white race as a group. So we need to stop appeasing people like this and if they don't like what's being said, if they get defensive or mad, oh well.

Because we have been asking that whites treat us as individuals since the 1600's and they decided we were individuals that should be enslaved until I got hot for them. After that they decided that we were lesser individuals than whites and did not deserve equal treatment or facilities. All of us. And in 1965 after the overt racism was made illegal, they decided that we were individuals who they did not have to follow laws to ensure e quality and here we are today, still arguing about how we are individuals as blacks to people who never saw it that way and now want to fake and shake a lie to get over. You don't seem to understand the trick Emily. These people here think they all are better smarter and genetically superior to us. So if we move to their way, then we go back to de jure segregation, Jim Crow and apartheid because they will claim they are looking at things by merit and by this so called merit, since we are dumber, more violent and all the things we get accused of, then as individuals we will not get the opportunities we truly deserve.
 
So how did these mentally deficient, inbred, stupid primitives (who probably couldn't read or do math without a negro teaching them how) with no resources and barely any organization in the form of civilization manage to defeat and/or colonize pretty much all of Africa (which was filled with their complete superiors who I am told are better at pleasing their women and physically superior to boot)?
!
Whites rise to power (UK, French, German etc) was done with the barrel of gun. At the time of the whites first contact with the Africans. The white northerners were savages, greased in rancid bear fat with cow and goat butter used in their hair. The African historians mention the foul smell of them on several occasions.

Not to mention they were inept and disorganized warriors who got their heads handed to them by the African legions at every encounter. Their military strategy consisted of screaming, yelling, shouting, and charging head-on into the African archers and phalanx.

It was only after centuries of being defeated and later trained by Africans then fighting and trained by Romans that the Northen barbarians became more efficient.

But the real game changer was gunpowder

African armies were only defeated when the Europeans got access to gunpowder. Marco Polo brought it back to Europe, and whites immediately started using it to kill people with.

And even then white Europeans never did a Rambo on Africa (At First)

The came in as friends, with smiles. That's the tactic they still use to Today with the Red Cross, Oxfam and missionaries (A bag of rice for a bag of diamonds)

But there is no question that whites used to gunpowder to take over the world. That meant they could shoot and kill someone from distance. Rather up close and personal, Sword with Sword.

Source for bear fat, cow, and goat butter used in European hair?
 

Forum List

Back
Top