RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,565
- 290
Please don't tell you that you are so fucking stupid as to believe that no one has ever been convicted based on the victims testimony.Prove he is a deviant.It’s probably less abnormal that constantly making things up and faking as The activity of ones existenceWe have witnesses.
Or maybe you think rubbing your dick on unsuspecting women is normal.
It is not normal for you to worship sexually deviant men & then lying to protect them. You should get help.
A college professor with nothing to gain vs a drunken fool with everything to protect.
Ford Ramirez and Swetnick all failed to do so
If the facts had been presented before an unbiased Jury, and if Grassley was not a dishonest cheat, and Kavanaugh behaved before said jury as he did before the Senate Committee, he would have been convicted, of that I'm certain.
There were no FACTS.
There were only unsupported accusations.
If anyone can be convicted based on unsupported allegations then our entire justice system has failed and we have reverted back to witch hunts.
If that is justice system you want move to a third world nation. We are still more civilized and no jury would have convicted Kavanuagh