Here We Go Again! New Sexual Misconduct Accusations Emerge Against Brett Kavanaugh

[Lakhota]

Yep, more shoes to drop on Kavanaugh. He should be impeached.

Two New York Times reporters say they’ve uncovered a previously unreported account of sexual misconduct allegedly carried out by Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh when he was a student at Yale.

In an op-ed for the Times, Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly said they learned of the alleged misconduct during a 10-month investigation of Kavanaugh’s life at prep-school and Yale, including the assault accusations, for their upcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation.”

Max Stier, Kavanaugh’s classmate at Yale, told the reporters that he once saw Kavanaugh with his pants down while his friends pushed his penis into the hands of a female student during a dorm party.

According to Pogrebin and Kelly, Stier reported his account to senators and the FBI, though the FBI didn’t investigate it. Pogrebin and Kelly said they “corroborated the story with two officials who have communicated with” Stier.

What Stier said he witnessed is similar to an allegation lodged against Kavanaugh by his former classmate Deborah Ramirez, which was first reported by the New Yorker’s Ronan Farrow last September.

NYT Reporters Say They Uncovered New Sexual Misconduct Claim Against Kavanaugh

Kavanaugh is creepy

Republicans could care less

I agree!

Kavanaugh*

 

[Wry Catcher]

It is not normal for you to worship sexually deviant men & then lying to protect them. You should get help.

A college professor with nothing to gain vs a drunken fool with everything to protect.

Prove he is a deviant.

Ford Ramirez and Swetnick all failed to do so

If the facts had been presented before an unbiased Jury, and if Grassley was not a dishonest cheat, and Kavanaugh behaved before said jury as he did before the Senate Committee, he would have been convicted, of that I'm certain.

There were no FACTS.

There were only unsupported accusations.

If anyone can be convicted based on unsupported allegations then our entire justice system has failed and we have reverted back to witch hunts.

If that is justice system you want move to a third world nation. We are still more civilized and no jury would have convicted Kavanuagh

You are misinformed, or a damn liar. Testimony under oath is evidence, and in all jury trials the judge tells the jurors in the jury instructions that they must use common sense in determining which person under oath is the most credible.

Dr. Ford was credible, Judge Kavanaugh was not. In my professional opinion, Kavanaugh committed perjury.

I am informed and you are the uneducated liar

An accusation whether under oath or not is NOT EVIDENCE

An accusation requires SOME kind of evidence to support it and ford HAD NONE WHATSOEVER

We do not have a justice system which engages in circular logic which is what you are trying to claim
Judges to not give such instructions you liar,

They instruct jurors to consider or disregard EVIDENCE

Dr. Fords had no credibility. Kavanaugh needed none because he was the accused and the burden is always on THE ACCUSER

testimony

TESTIMONY: "Oral or written evidence given by a competent witness, under oath, at trial or in an affidavit or deposition."

You are thinking of a criminal trial where the burden is on the prosecutor to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Senate hearings are not criminal nor civil so the burden of truth is not presented to an unbiased jury.

For argument's sake the burden of truth is on those who paid close attention to the hearings, the demeanor of the Senators, the demeanor of the Witnesses and the credibility of each of them.

Having been a witness in Criminal and Youth Court many many times, and in the jury box five times (and always thanked and excused by the defendant's attorney) I can assure you testimony under oath and presented to the triers of fact is evidence.

 

[skye]

Democrat Desperation has set in. This tells me that the Media knows that something damageing is coming out soon and they need to create a distraction from it.

New sexual misconduct accusation against Kavanaugh emerges, echoing previous Yale allegation

Brett Kavanaugh Fit In With the Privileged Kids. She Did Not.

Good grief.... After those hearings, now we have new allegations brewing ?? Ruth Ginsburg must be getting real close, and the crats are getting very worried about the future court make up again.

BINGO!

Last minute desperation on part of the DemonRats .....related to Ginsburg retirement, may be?? yeahh I think so.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Prove he is a deviant.

Ford Ramirez and Swetnick all failed to do so

If the facts had been presented before an unbiased Jury, and if Grassley was not a dishonest cheat, and Kavanaugh behaved before said jury as he did before the Senate Committee, he would have been convicted, of that I'm certain.

There were no FACTS.

There were only unsupported accusations.

If anyone can be convicted based on unsupported allegations then our entire justice system has failed and we have reverted back to witch hunts.

If that is justice system you want move to a third world nation. We are still more civilized and no jury would have convicted Kavanuagh

You are misinformed, or a damn liar. Testimony under oath is evidence, and in all jury trials the judge tells the jurors in the jury instructions that they must use common sense in determining which person under oath is the most credible.

Dr. Ford was credible, Judge Kavanaugh was not. In my professional opinion, Kavanaugh committed perjury.

I am informed and you are the uneducated liar

An accusation whether under oath or not is NOT EVIDENCE

An accusation requires SOME kind of evidence to support it and ford HAD NONE WHATSOEVER

We do not have a justice system which engages in circular logic which is what you are trying to claim
Judges to not give such instructions you liar,

They instruct jurors to consider or disregard EVIDENCE

Dr. Fords had no credibility. Kavanaugh needed none because he was the accused and the burden is always on THE ACCUSER

testimony

TESTIMONY: "Oral or written evidence given by a competent witness, under oath, at trial or in an affidavit or deposition."

You are thinking of a criminal trial where the burden is on the prosecutor to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Senate hearings are not criminal nor civil so the burden of truth is not presented to an unbiased jury.

For argument's sake the burden of truth is on those who paid close attention to the hearings, the demeanor of the Senators, the demeanor of the Witnesses and the credibility of each of them.

Having been a witness in Criminal and Youth Court many many times, and in the jury box five times (and always thanked and excused by the defendant's attorney) I can assure you testimony under oath and presented to the triers of fact is evidence.

Wrong

I am not thinking of criminal trial WE BOTH were discussing criminal trial

You actually made a bogus and dishonest claim that judges ALWAYS tell the jury who's testimony should be believed. You also claimed Kavanaugh would have been found guilty by any jury DESPITE a COMPLETE lack of evidence. That is BULLSHIT.

The fact is an accusation whether sworn or not is NOT evidence An accusation does not prove itself nor can it be used as evidence that the accusation is true

An accusation requires evidence and the burden is on the accuser


That principle does not only apply to criminal trial it is a principle for any intelligent person who hears an accusation.

You are a liar and a proven dunce and you know it

You disgusting defense of with hunts and hearsay is vile and dishonest

 

[Terri4Trump]

Yep, more shoes to drop on Kavanaugh. He should be impeached.

So not only do you murder babies but you also think that a person is guilty until proven innocent. You are a good Nazi.

 

[Wry Catcher]

If the facts had been presented before an unbiased Jury, and if Grassley was not a dishonest cheat, and Kavanaugh behaved before said jury as he did before the Senate Committee, he would have been convicted, of that I'm certain.

There were no FACTS.

There were only unsupported accusations.

If anyone can be convicted based on unsupported allegations then our entire justice system has failed and we have reverted back to witch hunts.

If that is justice system you want move to a third world nation. We are still more civilized and no jury would have convicted Kavanuagh

You are misinformed, or a damn liar. Testimony under oath is evidence, and in all jury trials the judge tells the jurors in the jury instructions that they must use common sense in determining which person under oath is the most credible.

Dr. Ford was credible, Judge Kavanaugh was not. In my professional opinion, Kavanaugh committed perjury.

I am informed and you are the uneducated liar

An accusation whether under oath or not is NOT EVIDENCE

An accusation requires SOME kind of evidence to support it and ford HAD NONE WHATSOEVER

We do not have a justice system which engages in circular logic which is what you are trying to claim
Judges to not give such instructions you liar,

They instruct jurors to consider or disregard EVIDENCE

Dr. Fords had no credibility. Kavanaugh needed none because he was the accused and the burden is always on THE ACCUSER

testimony

TESTIMONY: "Oral or written evidence given by a competent witness, under oath, at trial or in an affidavit or deposition."

You are thinking of a criminal trial where the burden is on the prosecutor to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Senate hearings are not criminal nor civil so the burden of truth is not presented to an unbiased jury.

For argument's sake the burden of truth is on those who paid close attention to the hearings, the demeanor of the Senators, the demeanor of the Witnesses and the credibility of each of them.

Having been a witness in Criminal and Youth Court many many times, and in the jury box five times (and always thanked and excused by the defendant's attorney) I can assure you testimony under oath and presented to the triers of fact is evidence.

Wrong

I am not thinking of criminal trial WE BOTH were discussing criminal trial

You actually made a bogus and dishonest claim that judges ALWAYS tell the jury who's testimony should be believed. You also claimed Kavanaugh would have been found guilty by any jury DESPITE a COMPLETE lack of evidence. That is BULLSHIT.

The fact is an accusation whether sworn or not is NOT evidence An accusation does not prove itself nor can it be used as evidence that the accusation is true

An accusation requires evidence and the burden is on the accuser


That principle does not only apply to criminal trial it is a principle for any intelligent person who hears an accusation.

You are a liar and a proven dunce and you know it

You disgusting defense of with hunts and hearsay is vile and dishonest

"You actually made a bogus and dishonest claim that judges ALWAYS tell the jury who's testimony should be believed."
Soupnazi630

This is a damn lie ^^^. Any judge who would make this statement to a jury or juror would immediately cause a mistrial, and likely be sanctioned by the State Commission on Judaical Conduct.

Go away Nazi, you have no clue as to what the issue is.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Prove he is a deviant.

Ford Ramirez and Swetnick all failed to do so

If the facts had been presented before an unbiased Jury, and if Grassley was not a dishonest cheat, and Kavanaugh behaved before said jury as he did before the Senate Committee, he would have been convicted, of that I'm certain.

There were no FACTS.

There were only unsupported accusations.

If anyone can be convicted based on unsupported allegations then our entire justice system has failed and we have reverted back to witch hunts.

If that is justice system you want move to a third world nation. We are still more civilized and no jury would have convicted Kavanuagh

You are misinformed, or a damn liar. Testimony under oath is evidence, and in all jury trials the judge tells the jurors in the jury instructions that they must use common sense in determining which person under oath is the most credible.

Dr. Ford was credible, Judge Kavanaugh was not. In my professional opinion, Kavanaugh committed perjury.

I am informed and you are the uneducated liar

An accusation whether under oath or not is NOT EVIDENCE

An accusation requires SOME kind of evidence to support it and ford HAD NONE WHATSOEVER

We do not have a justice system which engages in circular logic which is what you are trying to claim
Judges to not give such instructions you liar,

They instruct jurors to consider or disregard EVIDENCE

Dr. Fords had no credibility. Kavanaugh needed none because he was the accused and the burden is always on THE ACCUSER

testimony

TESTIMONY: "Oral or written evidence given by a competent witness, under oath, at trial or in an affidavit or deposition."

You are thinking of a criminal trial where the burden is on the prosecutor to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Senate hearings are not criminal nor civil so the burden of truth is not presented to an unbiased jury.

For argument's sake the burden of truth is on those who paid close attention to the hearings, the demeanor of the Senators, the demeanor of the Witnesses and the credibility of each of them.

Having been a witness in Criminal and Youth Court many many times, and in the jury box five times (and always thanked and excused by the defendant's attorney) I can assure you testimony under oath and presented to the triers of fact is evidence.

There were no FACTS.

There were only unsupported accusations.

If anyone can be convicted based on unsupported allegations then our entire justice system has failed and we have reverted back to witch hunts.

If that is justice system you want move to a third world nation. We are still more civilized and no jury would have convicted Kavanuagh

You are misinformed, or a damn liar. Testimony under oath is evidence, and in all jury trials the judge tells the jurors in the jury instructions that they must use common sense in determining which person under oath is the most credible.

Dr. Ford was credible, Judge Kavanaugh was not. In my professional opinion, Kavanaugh committed perjury.

I am informed and you are the uneducated liar

An accusation whether under oath or not is NOT EVIDENCE

An accusation requires SOME kind of evidence to support it and ford HAD NONE WHATSOEVER

We do not have a justice system which engages in circular logic which is what you are trying to claim
Judges to not give such instructions you liar,

They instruct jurors to consider or disregard EVIDENCE

Dr. Fords had no credibility. Kavanaugh needed none because he was the accused and the burden is always on THE ACCUSER

testimony

TESTIMONY: "Oral or written evidence given by a competent witness, under oath, at trial or in an affidavit or deposition."

You are thinking of a criminal trial where the burden is on the prosecutor to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Senate hearings are not criminal nor civil so the burden of truth is not presented to an unbiased jury.

For argument's sake the burden of truth is on those who paid close attention to the hearings, the demeanor of the Senators, the demeanor of the Witnesses and the credibility of each of them.

Having been a witness in Criminal and Youth Court many many times, and in the jury box five times (and always thanked and excused by the defendant's attorney) I can assure you testimony under oath and presented to the triers of fact is evidence.

Wrong

I am not thinking of criminal trial WE BOTH were discussing criminal trial

You actually made a bogus and dishonest claim that judges ALWAYS tell the jury who's testimony should be believed. You also claimed Kavanaugh would have been found guilty by any jury DESPITE a COMPLETE lack of evidence. That is BULLSHIT.

The fact is an accusation whether sworn or not is NOT evidence An accusation does not prove itself nor can it be used as evidence that the accusation is true

An accusation requires evidence and the burden is on the accuser


That principle does not only apply to criminal trial it is a principle for any intelligent person who hears an accusation.

You are a liar and a proven dunce and you know it

You disgusting defense of with hunts and hearsay is vile and dishonest

"You actually made a bogus and dishonest claim that judges ALWAYS tell the jury who's testimony should be believed."
Soupnazi630

This is a damn lie ^^^. Any judge who would make this statement to a jury or juror would immediately cause a mistrial, and likely be sanctioned by the State Committee Commission on Judaical Conduct.

Yes but it is what you implied.

 

[edward37]

There were no FACTS.

There were only unsupported accusations.

If anyone can be convicted based on unsupported allegations then our entire justice system has failed and we have reverted back to witch hunts.

If that is justice system you want move to a third world nation. We are still more civilized and no jury would have convicted Kavanuagh

You are misinformed, or a damn liar. Testimony under oath is evidence, and in all jury trials the judge tells the jurors in the jury instructions that they must use common sense in determining which person under oath is the most credible.

Dr. Ford was credible, Judge Kavanaugh was not. In my professional opinion, Kavanaugh committed perjury.

I am informed and you are the uneducated liar

An accusation whether under oath or not is NOT EVIDENCE

An accusation requires SOME kind of evidence to support it and ford HAD NONE WHATSOEVER

We do not have a justice system which engages in circular logic which is what you are trying to claim
Judges to not give such instructions you liar,

They instruct jurors to consider or disregard EVIDENCE

Dr. Fords had no credibility. Kavanaugh needed none because he was the accused and the burden is always on THE ACCUSER

testimony

TESTIMONY: "Oral or written evidence given by a competent witness, under oath, at trial or in an affidavit or deposition."

You are thinking of a criminal trial where the burden is on the prosecutor to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Senate hearings are not criminal nor civil so the burden of truth is not presented to an unbiased jury.

For argument's sake the burden of truth is on those who paid close attention to the hearings, the demeanor of the Senators, the demeanor of the Witnesses and the credibility of each of them.

Having been a witness in Criminal and Youth Court many many times, and in the jury box five times (and always thanked and excused by the defendant's attorney) I can assure you testimony under oath and presented to the triers of fact is evidence.

Wrong

I am not thinking of criminal trial WE BOTH were discussing criminal trial

You actually made a bogus and dishonest claim that judges ALWAYS tell the jury who's testimony should be believed. You also claimed Kavanaugh would have been found guilty by any jury DESPITE a COMPLETE lack of evidence. That is BULLSHIT.

The fact is an accusation whether sworn or not is NOT evidence An accusation does not prove itself nor can it be used as evidence that the accusation is true

An accusation requires evidence and the burden is on the accuser


That principle does not only apply to criminal trial it is a principle for any intelligent person who hears an accusation.

You are a liar and a proven dunce and you know it

You disgusting defense of with hunts and hearsay is vile and dishonest

"You actually made a bogus and dishonest claim that judges ALWAYS tell the jury who's testimony should be believed."
Soupnazi630

This is a damn lie ^^^. Any judge who would make this statement to a jury or juror would immediately cause a mistrial, and likely be sanctioned by the State Commission on Judaical Conduct.

Go away Nazi, you have no clue as to what the issue is.

Every trump supporter here is a Nazi at heart They support a lying degenerate scumbag

 

[Soupnazi630]

You are misinformed, or a damn liar. Testimony under oath is evidence, and in all jury trials the judge tells the jurors in the jury instructions that they must use common sense in determining which person under oath is the most credible.

Dr. Ford was credible, Judge Kavanaugh was not. In my professional opinion, Kavanaugh committed perjury.

I am informed and you are the uneducated liar

An accusation whether under oath or not is NOT EVIDENCE

An accusation requires SOME kind of evidence to support it and ford HAD NONE WHATSOEVER

We do not have a justice system which engages in circular logic which is what you are trying to claim
Judges to not give such instructions you liar,

They instruct jurors to consider or disregard EVIDENCE

Dr. Fords had no credibility. Kavanaugh needed none because he was the accused and the burden is always on THE ACCUSER

testimony

TESTIMONY: "Oral or written evidence given by a competent witness, under oath, at trial or in an affidavit or deposition."

You are thinking of a criminal trial where the burden is on the prosecutor to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Senate hearings are not criminal nor civil so the burden of truth is not presented to an unbiased jury.

For argument's sake the burden of truth is on those who paid close attention to the hearings, the demeanor of the Senators, the demeanor of the Witnesses and the credibility of each of them.

Having been a witness in Criminal and Youth Court many many times, and in the jury box five times (and always thanked and excused by the defendant's attorney) I can assure you testimony under oath and presented to the triers of fact is evidence.

Wrong

I am not thinking of criminal trial WE BOTH were discussing criminal trial

You actually made a bogus and dishonest claim that judges ALWAYS tell the jury who's testimony should be believed. You also claimed Kavanaugh would have been found guilty by any jury DESPITE a COMPLETE lack of evidence. That is BULLSHIT.

The fact is an accusation whether sworn or not is NOT evidence An accusation does not prove itself nor can it be used as evidence that the accusation is true

An accusation requires evidence and the burden is on the accuser


That principle does not only apply to criminal trial it is a principle for any intelligent person who hears an accusation.

You are a liar and a proven dunce and you know it

You disgusting defense of with hunts and hearsay is vile and dishonest

"You actually made a bogus and dishonest claim that judges ALWAYS tell the jury who's testimony should be believed."
Soupnazi630

This is a damn lie ^^^. Any judge who would make this statement to a jury or juror would immediately cause a mistrial, and likely be sanctioned by the State Commission on Judaical Conduct.

Go away Nazi, you have no clue as to what the issue is.

Every trump supporter here is a Nazi at heart They support a lying degenerate scumbag

So you were a nazi when you supported clinton or obama.

They were lying degenerate scumbags as well. Apparently in your pea bran the definition of a nazi is one who supports a lying degenerate scumbag

 

[Denizen]

New evidence is emerging about Brett Kavanaugh that agrees with Christine Blaisey Fords allegations that Brett Kavanaugh was a sex assault predator and drunkard.

After the Senate hearings it is also evident that Brett Kavanaugh is a liar and perjurer.

Donald Trump has appointed a sex pervert to the Supreme Court which slimes all the conservative justices on the Supreme Court.

GOP lawmaker talked a lot of shit during the Senate hearings and will be compelled to eat their words.

Its not over till the fat lady sings.

New Reporting Says Brett Kavanaugh Did Touch Yale Classmates With His Penis—Twice

New Reporting Claims Brett Kavanaugh Did Touch Yale Classmates With His Penis—Twice
By TOM SCOCCA
SEPT 14, 201911:50 PM

“At least seven people” were aware of the story that Brett Kavanaugh had drunkenly exposed his penis to an unwilling Yale classmate, who ended up touching it while trying to avoid him, the New York Times reported. In an excerpt from their forthcoming book, The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation, Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly wrote that Deborah Ramirez’s account of being confronted by the future Supreme Court justice’s penis—an incident that Kavanaugh’s supporters dismissed as uncorroborated during his 2018 confirmation hearings—was supported by their later reporting:

Pogrebin and Kelly wrote:
During his Senate testimony, Mr. Kavanaugh said that if the incident Ms. Ramirez described had occurred, it would have been “the talk of campus.” Our reporting suggests that it was.
In addition, their investigation turned up a witness to a second, previously unreported incident in which Kavanaugh was said to have brandished his penis, at a different party:
A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student. Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington, notified senators and the F.B.I. about this account, but the F.B.I. did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly. (We corroborated the story with two officials who have communicated with Mr. Stier.)

Unlike Christine Blasey Ford, who said Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted her in high school, Ramirez did not testify in the confirmation hearings. With the Republican majority on the Senate Judiciary Committee focused on pushing Kavanaugh through, Pogrebin and Kelly reported, the investigation into claims against Kavanaugh failed to follow up on dozens of possible leads:

Ms. Ramirez’s legal team gave the F.B.I. a list of at least 25 individuals who may have had corroborating evidence. But the bureau — in its supplemental background investigation — interviewed none of them, though we learned many of these potential witnesses tried in vain to reach the F.B.I. on their own.

Two F.B.I. agents interviewed Ms. Ramirez, telling her that they found her “credible.” But the Republican-controlled Senate had imposed strict limits on the investigation. “‘We have to wait to get authorization to do anything else,’” Bill Pittard, one of Ms. Ramirez’s lawyers, recalled the agents saying. “It was almost a little apologetic.”

In addition to taking his lifetime seat on the Supreme Court, by the fall of last year, Kavanaugh had returned to coaching girls’ basketball.

So when did this skank, I mean woman, ever file a police report?

Where was she during the show trial of Kavanaugh’s confirmation?

Donald Trump is loading the SCOTUS with perverts and liars to perform his own future rescue from justice and litigation.

 

[edward37]

I am informed and you are the uneducated liar

An accusation whether under oath or not is NOT EVIDENCE

An accusation requires SOME kind of evidence to support it and ford HAD NONE WHATSOEVER

We do not have a justice system which engages in circular logic which is what you are trying to claim
Judges to not give such instructions you liar,

They instruct jurors to consider or disregard EVIDENCE

Dr. Fords had no credibility. Kavanaugh needed none because he was the accused and the burden is always on THE ACCUSER

testimony

TESTIMONY: "Oral or written evidence given by a competent witness, under oath, at trial or in an affidavit or deposition."

You are thinking of a criminal trial where the burden is on the prosecutor to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Senate hearings are not criminal nor civil so the burden of truth is not presented to an unbiased jury.

For argument's sake the burden of truth is on those who paid close attention to the hearings, the demeanor of the Senators, the demeanor of the Witnesses and the credibility of each of them.

Having been a witness in Criminal and Youth Court many many times, and in the jury box five times (and always thanked and excused by the defendant's attorney) I can assure you testimony under oath and presented to the triers of fact is evidence.

Wrong

I am not thinking of criminal trial WE BOTH were discussing criminal trial

You actually made a bogus and dishonest claim that judges ALWAYS tell the jury who's testimony should be believed. You also claimed Kavanaugh would have been found guilty by any jury DESPITE a COMPLETE lack of evidence. That is BULLSHIT.

The fact is an accusation whether sworn or not is NOT evidence An accusation does not prove itself nor can it be used as evidence that the accusation is true

An accusation requires evidence and the burden is on the accuser


That principle does not only apply to criminal trial it is a principle for any intelligent person who hears an accusation.

You are a liar and a proven dunce and you know it

You disgusting defense of with hunts and hearsay is vile and dishonest

"You actually made a bogus and dishonest claim that judges ALWAYS tell the jury who's testimony should be believed."
Soupnazi630

This is a damn lie ^^^. Any judge who would make this statement to a jury or juror would immediately cause a mistrial, and likely be sanctioned by the State Commission on Judaical Conduct.

Go away Nazi, you have no clue as to what the issue is.

Every trump supporter here is a Nazi at heart They support a lying degenerate scumbag

So you were a nazi when you supported clinton or obama.

They were lying degenerate scumbags as well. Apparently in your pea bran the definition of a nazi is one who supports a lying degenerate scumbag

Do you really want to compare Clinton and Obama to the trump gwb manure ? That's why America is in the toilet now ,,because of shitheads like you

 

[Soupnazi630]

testimony

TESTIMONY: "Oral or written evidence given by a competent witness, under oath, at trial or in an affidavit or deposition."

You are thinking of a criminal trial where the burden is on the prosecutor to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Senate hearings are not criminal nor civil so the burden of truth is not presented to an unbiased jury.

For argument's sake the burden of truth is on those who paid close attention to the hearings, the demeanor of the Senators, the demeanor of the Witnesses and the credibility of each of them.

Having been a witness in Criminal and Youth Court many many times, and in the jury box five times (and always thanked and excused by the defendant's attorney) I can assure you testimony under oath and presented to the triers of fact is evidence.

Wrong

I am not thinking of criminal trial WE BOTH were discussing criminal trial

You actually made a bogus and dishonest claim that judges ALWAYS tell the jury who's testimony should be believed. You also claimed Kavanaugh would have been found guilty by any jury DESPITE a COMPLETE lack of evidence. That is BULLSHIT.

The fact is an accusation whether sworn or not is NOT evidence An accusation does not prove itself nor can it be used as evidence that the accusation is true

An accusation requires evidence and the burden is on the accuser


That principle does not only apply to criminal trial it is a principle for any intelligent person who hears an accusation.

You are a liar and a proven dunce and you know it

You disgusting defense of with hunts and hearsay is vile and dishonest

"You actually made a bogus and dishonest claim that judges ALWAYS tell the jury who's testimony should be believed."
Soupnazi630

This is a damn lie ^^^. Any judge who would make this statement to a jury or juror would immediately cause a mistrial, and likely be sanctioned by the State Commission on Judaical Conduct.

Go away Nazi, you have no clue as to what the issue is.

Every trump supporter here is a Nazi at heart They support a lying degenerate scumbag

So you were a nazi when you supported clinton or obama.

They were lying degenerate scumbags as well. Apparently in your pea bran the definition of a nazi is one who supports a lying degenerate scumbag

Do you really want to compare Clinton and Obama to the trump gwb manure ? That's why America is in the toilet now ,,because of shitheads like you

Sure

You do not.

It is partisan crap to claim they are any better

 

[Terri4Trump]

New evidence is emerging about Brett Kavanaugh that agrees with Christine Blaisey Fords allegations that Brett Kavanaugh was a sex assault predator and drunkard.

After the Senate hearings it is also evident that Brett Kavanaugh is a liar and perjurer.

Donald Trump has appointed a sex pervert to the Supreme Court which slimes all the conservative justices on the Supreme Court.

GOP lawmaker talked a lot of shit during the Senate hearings and will be compelled to eat their words.

Its not over till the fat lady sings.

New Reporting Says Brett Kavanaugh Did Touch Yale Classmates With His Penis—Twice

New Reporting Claims Brett Kavanaugh Did Touch Yale Classmates With His Penis—Twice
By TOM SCOCCA
SEPT 14, 201911:50 PM

“At least seven people” were aware of the story that Brett Kavanaugh had drunkenly exposed his penis to an unwilling Yale classmate, who ended up touching it while trying to avoid him, the New York Times reported. In an excerpt from their forthcoming book, The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation, Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly wrote that Deborah Ramirez’s account of being confronted by the future Supreme Court justice’s penis—an incident that Kavanaugh’s supporters dismissed as uncorroborated during his 2018 confirmation hearings—was supported by their later reporting:

Pogrebin and Kelly wrote:
During his Senate testimony, Mr. Kavanaugh said that if the incident Ms. Ramirez described had occurred, it would have been “the talk of campus.” Our reporting suggests that it was.
In addition, their investigation turned up a witness to a second, previously unreported incident in which Kavanaugh was said to have brandished his penis, at a different party:
A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student. Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington, notified senators and the F.B.I. about this account, but the F.B.I. did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly. (We corroborated the story with two officials who have communicated with Mr. Stier.)

Unlike Christine Blasey Ford, who said Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted her in high school, Ramirez did not testify in the confirmation hearings. With the Republican majority on the Senate Judiciary Committee focused on pushing Kavanaugh through, Pogrebin and Kelly reported, the investigation into claims against Kavanaugh failed to follow up on dozens of possible leads:

Ms. Ramirez’s legal team gave the F.B.I. a list of at least 25 individuals who may have had corroborating evidence. But the bureau — in its supplemental background investigation — interviewed none of them, though we learned many of these potential witnesses tried in vain to reach the F.B.I. on their own.

Two F.B.I. agents interviewed Ms. Ramirez, telling her that they found her “credible.” But the Republican-controlled Senate had imposed strict limits on the investigation. “‘We have to wait to get authorization to do anything else,’” Bill Pittard, one of Ms. Ramirez’s lawyers, recalled the agents saying. “It was almost a little apologetic.”

In addition to taking his lifetime seat on the Supreme Court, by the fall of last year, Kavanaugh had returned to coaching girls’ basketball.

You are such an ignorant piece of s*** that it is frightening. This Thread is all about more lies. But hypothetically, even if it were true, how would this constitute Trumpery? Why would Trump have anything to do with Kavanaugh's Behavior? Not only are you a lying sack of shit and a low life, but your lies don't even make any sense because you're a stupid moron

 

[deanrd]

Democrat Desperation has set in. This tells me that the Media knows that something damageing is coming out soon and they need to create a distraction from it.

New sexual misconduct accusation against Kavanaugh emerges, echoing previous Yale allegation

Brett Kavanaugh Fit In With the Privileged Kids. She Did Not.

There should’ve been an FBI investigation. And now we’re hearing reports that two dozen people reached out to the FBI with information about junk grinder and the FBI just totally ignored them.

Republicans are the sleaziest and dirtiest political party I’ve ever seen in my lifetime. Even pure Nazis are better than them because pure Nazis have standards no matter how awful those standards are.
Adultery, sexual assault, junk grinding, lying. That’s who the GOP is.

 

[Denizen]

New evidence is emerging about Brett Kavanaugh that agrees with Christine Blaisey Fords allegations that Brett Kavanaugh was a sex assault predator and drunkard.

After the Senate hearings it is also evident that Brett Kavanaugh is a liar and perjurer.

Donald Trump has appointed a sex pervert to the Supreme Court which slimes all the conservative justices on the Supreme Court.

GOP lawmaker talked a lot of shit during the Senate hearings and will be compelled to eat their words.

Its not over till the fat lady sings.

New Reporting Says Brett Kavanaugh Did Touch Yale Classmates With His Penis—Twice

New Reporting Claims Brett Kavanaugh Did Touch Yale Classmates With His Penis—Twice
By TOM SCOCCA
SEPT 14, 201911:50 PM

“At least seven people” were aware of the story that Brett Kavanaugh had drunkenly exposed his penis to an unwilling Yale classmate, who ended up touching it while trying to avoid him, the New York Times reported. In an excerpt from their forthcoming book, The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation, Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly wrote that Deborah Ramirez’s account of being confronted by the future Supreme Court justice’s penis—an incident that Kavanaugh’s supporters dismissed as uncorroborated during his 2018 confirmation hearings—was supported by their later reporting:

Pogrebin and Kelly wrote:
During his Senate testimony, Mr. Kavanaugh said that if the incident Ms. Ramirez described had occurred, it would have been “the talk of campus.” Our reporting suggests that it was.
In addition, their investigation turned up a witness to a second, previously unreported incident in which Kavanaugh was said to have brandished his penis, at a different party:
A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student. Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington, notified senators and the F.B.I. about this account, but the F.B.I. did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly. (We corroborated the story with two officials who have communicated with Mr. Stier.)

Unlike Christine Blasey Ford, who said Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted her in high school, Ramirez did not testify in the confirmation hearings. With the Republican majority on the Senate Judiciary Committee focused on pushing Kavanaugh through, Pogrebin and Kelly reported, the investigation into claims against Kavanaugh failed to follow up on dozens of possible leads:

Ms. Ramirez’s legal team gave the F.B.I. a list of at least 25 individuals who may have had corroborating evidence. But the bureau — in its supplemental background investigation — interviewed none of them, though we learned many of these potential witnesses tried in vain to reach the F.B.I. on their own.

Two F.B.I. agents interviewed Ms. Ramirez, telling her that they found her “credible.” But the Republican-controlled Senate had imposed strict limits on the investigation. “‘We have to wait to get authorization to do anything else,’” Bill Pittard, one of Ms. Ramirez’s lawyers, recalled the agents saying. “It was almost a little apologetic.”

In addition to taking his lifetime seat on the Supreme Court, by the fall of last year, Kavanaugh had returned to coaching girls’ basketball.

This dumb shit is getting old, just get over it and move on.

You morons should be happy with Kavanaugh, he was the least ideological of the bunch that Trump could have chosen between.

Get over it and focus on trying to win either the White House or the Senate back.

Perverts are never welcome. The exposure of Kavanaugh will send a warning signal to other perverts on Trump's good ole boy list.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Democrat Desperation has set in. This tells me that the Media knows that something damageing is coming out soon and they need to create a distraction from it.

New sexual misconduct accusation against Kavanaugh emerges, echoing previous Yale allegation

Brett Kavanaugh Fit In With the Privileged Kids. She Did Not.

There should’ve been an FBI investigation. And now we’re hearing reports that two dozen people reached out to the FBI with information about junk grinder and the FBI just totally ignored them.

Republicans are the sleaziest and dirtiest political party I’ve ever seen in my lifetime. Even pure Nazis are better than them because pure Nazis have standards no matter how awful those standards are.
Adultery, sexual assault, junk grinding, lying. That’s who the GOP is.

No we are not hearing any reports about people reaching out and being ignored.

What we are hearing is a new and stupid and ridiculous accusation by a guy and the accusation is just too ludicrous.

The Senate investigated THOROUGHLY and found no merit to ANY of the allegations

The standard is presumption of innocence and only nazis such as you oppose it

 

[deanrd]

NY Times sparks furor with tweet describing alleged Kavanaugh behavior as 'harmless fun' | Fox News

Donald Trump said that Justice Brett Kavanaugh should start suing

I agree with Trump. Brett Kavanaugh should start suing women left and right. In fact Donald Trump should start suing women left and right. Sue all these women and see how many more women come forward. Because a guy that’s molested a couple of dozen women will molest 100 women.
We need to hear from all the victims of these two perv’s.

 

[Denizen]

New evidence is emerging about Brett Kavanaugh that agrees with Christine Blaisey Fords allegations that Brett Kavanaugh was a sex assault predator and drunkard.

After the Senate hearings it is also evident that Brett Kavanaugh is a liar and perjurer.

Donald Trump has appointed a sex pervert to the Supreme Court which slimes all the conservative justices on the Supreme Court.

GOP lawmaker talked a lot of shit during the Senate hearings and will be compelled to eat their words.

Its not over till the fat lady sings.

New Reporting Says Brett Kavanaugh Did Touch Yale Classmates With His Penis—Twice

New Reporting Claims Brett Kavanaugh Did Touch Yale Classmates With His Penis—Twice
By TOM SCOCCA
SEPT 14, 201911:50 PM

“At least seven people” were aware of the story that Brett Kavanaugh had drunkenly exposed his penis to an unwilling Yale classmate, who ended up touching it while trying to avoid him, the New York Times reported. In an excerpt from their forthcoming book, The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation, Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly wrote that Deborah Ramirez’s account of being confronted by the future Supreme Court justice’s penis—an incident that Kavanaugh’s supporters dismissed as uncorroborated during his 2018 confirmation hearings—was supported by their later reporting:

Pogrebin and Kelly wrote:
During his Senate testimony, Mr. Kavanaugh said that if the incident Ms. Ramirez described had occurred, it would have been “the talk of campus.” Our reporting suggests that it was.
In addition, their investigation turned up a witness to a second, previously unreported incident in which Kavanaugh was said to have brandished his penis, at a different party:
A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student. Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington, notified senators and the F.B.I. about this account, but the F.B.I. did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly. (We corroborated the story with two officials who have communicated with Mr. Stier.)

Unlike Christine Blasey Ford, who said Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted her in high school, Ramirez did not testify in the confirmation hearings. With the Republican majority on the Senate Judiciary Committee focused on pushing Kavanaugh through, Pogrebin and Kelly reported, the investigation into claims against Kavanaugh failed to follow up on dozens of possible leads:

Ms. Ramirez’s legal team gave the F.B.I. a list of at least 25 individuals who may have had corroborating evidence. But the bureau — in its supplemental background investigation — interviewed none of them, though we learned many of these potential witnesses tried in vain to reach the F.B.I. on their own.

Two F.B.I. agents interviewed Ms. Ramirez, telling her that they found her “credible.” But the Republican-controlled Senate had imposed strict limits on the investigation. “‘We have to wait to get authorization to do anything else,’” Bill Pittard, one of Ms. Ramirez’s lawyers, recalled the agents saying. “It was almost a little apologetic.”

In addition to taking his lifetime seat on the Supreme Court, by the fall of last year, Kavanaugh had returned to coaching girls’ basketball.

Funny, you don't lead with what this new evidence is. I skimmed the article. Seems just like the same unsupported bullshit.

Donald Trump thanks you for your blind support of his gut and for suporting his personally selected sex perverts.

I LOVE it!!
MAGA

You would evidently drop to your knees in the presence of Brett Kavanaugh.

 

[Soupnazi630]

New evidence is emerging about Brett Kavanaugh that agrees with Christine Blaisey Fords allegations that Brett Kavanaugh was a sex assault predator and drunkard.

After the Senate hearings it is also evident that Brett Kavanaugh is a liar and perjurer.

Donald Trump has appointed a sex pervert to the Supreme Court which slimes all the conservative justices on the Supreme Court.

GOP lawmaker talked a lot of shit during the Senate hearings and will be compelled to eat their words.

Its not over till the fat lady sings.

New Reporting Says Brett Kavanaugh Did Touch Yale Classmates With His Penis—Twice

New Reporting Claims Brett Kavanaugh Did Touch Yale Classmates With His Penis—Twice
By TOM SCOCCA
SEPT 14, 201911:50 PM

“At least seven people” were aware of the story that Brett Kavanaugh had drunkenly exposed his penis to an unwilling Yale classmate, who ended up touching it while trying to avoid him, the New York Times reported. In an excerpt from their forthcoming book, The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation, Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly wrote that Deborah Ramirez’s account of being confronted by the future Supreme Court justice’s penis—an incident that Kavanaugh’s supporters dismissed as uncorroborated during his 2018 confirmation hearings—was supported by their later reporting:

Pogrebin and Kelly wrote:
During his Senate testimony, Mr. Kavanaugh said that if the incident Ms. Ramirez described had occurred, it would have been “the talk of campus.” Our reporting suggests that it was.
In addition, their investigation turned up a witness to a second, previously unreported incident in which Kavanaugh was said to have brandished his penis, at a different party:
A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student. Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington, notified senators and the F.B.I. about this account, but the F.B.I. did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly. (We corroborated the story with two officials who have communicated with Mr. Stier.)

Unlike Christine Blasey Ford, who said Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted her in high school, Ramirez did not testify in the confirmation hearings. With the Republican majority on the Senate Judiciary Committee focused on pushing Kavanaugh through, Pogrebin and Kelly reported, the investigation into claims against Kavanaugh failed to follow up on dozens of possible leads:

Ms. Ramirez’s legal team gave the F.B.I. a list of at least 25 individuals who may have had corroborating evidence. But the bureau — in its supplemental background investigation — interviewed none of them, though we learned many of these potential witnesses tried in vain to reach the F.B.I. on their own.

Two F.B.I. agents interviewed Ms. Ramirez, telling her that they found her “credible.” But the Republican-controlled Senate had imposed strict limits on the investigation. “‘We have to wait to get authorization to do anything else,’” Bill Pittard, one of Ms. Ramirez’s lawyers, recalled the agents saying. “It was almost a little apologetic.”

In addition to taking his lifetime seat on the Supreme Court, by the fall of last year, Kavanaugh had returned to coaching girls’ basketball.

This dumb shit is getting old, just get over it and move on.

You morons should be happy with Kavanaugh, he was the least ideological of the bunch that Trump could have chosen between.

Get over it and focus on trying to win either the White House or the Senate back.

Perverts are never welcome. The exposure of Kavanaugh will send a warning signal to other perverts on Trump's good ole boy list.

There has been no such exposure.

Baseless accusations without evidence are not exposure.

the latest accusation is a ludicrous failure right out of the gate

 

[Dogmaphobe]

A claim was made that he whipped it out and a DIFFERENT guy pushed it I to the hands of a coed?

Grabbing another guy's junk and pushing it into a girl's hands sounds like plausible behavior for a straight guy, does it?