Here's a List of Democrats Who Also Met With The Russian Ambassador

upload_2017-3-5_14-1-39-png.115571

from CNN
 
They were doing their jobs is the difference, while Trump's campaign, we know now, was working with the Russians to hack Clinton and pervert American elections.

The weight piles up on Russia's running dogs in America.

NY Times takes it to Trump Russia contacts
The only meetings Trump officials had with Russia was arranged by Obama as part of the transition.
Who knew it was all a setup to claim he was rigging the election.
Why must you lie about this? You know nothing
Where's the lie?
Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inaugurated
Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.
 
They were doing their jobs is the difference, while Trump's campaign, we know now, was working with the Russians to hack Clinton and pervert American elections.

The weight piles up on Russia's running dogs in America.

NY Times takes it to Trump Russia contacts
The only meetings Trump officials had with Russia was arranged by Obama as part of the transition.
Who knew it was all a setup to claim he was rigging the election.
Why must you lie about this? You know nothing
Where's the lie?
Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inaugurated
Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
There are 2 separate scenarios
1. hacking the election
2. the frequent meeting of Trumps with the russians.
are they separate or connected
 
The only meetings Trump officials had with Russia was arranged by Obama as part of the transition.
Who knew it was all a setup to claim he was rigging the election.
Why must you lie about this? You know nothing
Where's the lie?
Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inaugurated
Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
There are 2 separate scenarios
1. hacking the election
2. the frequent meeting of Trumps with the russians.
are they separate or connected

Really? If it wasn't for these paranoid conspiracy stories about hacking the election, then what difference does it make whether Trump or his people had contact with Russians? Both are idiotic.
 
Why must you lie about this? You know nothing
Where's the lie?
Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inaugurated
Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
There are 2 separate scenarios
1. hacking the election
2. the frequent meeting of Trumps with the russians.
are they separate or connected

Really? If it wasn't for these paranoid conspiracy stories about hacking the election, then what difference does it make whether Trump or his people had contact with Russians? Both are idiotic.
You know absolutely nothing about what really happened, so why do you call it idiotic. Your mind is made up, the facts might confuse you?
 
Why must you lie about this? You know nothing
Where's the lie?
Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inaugurated
Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
There are 2 separate scenarios
1. hacking the election
2. the frequent meeting of Trumps with the russians.
are they separate or connected

Really? If it wasn't for these paranoid conspiracy stories about hacking the election, then what difference does it make whether Trump or his people had contact with Russians? Both are idiotic.
:lol:
 
The only meetings Trump officials had with Russia was arranged by Obama as part of the transition.
Who knew it was all a setup to claim he was rigging the election.
Why must you lie about this? You know nothing
Where's the lie?
Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inaugurated
Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.
Like Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?

Apparently, no it's not.
 
Where's the lie?
Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inaugurated
Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
There are 2 separate scenarios
1. hacking the election
2. the frequent meeting of Trumps with the russians.
are they separate or connected

Really? If it wasn't for these paranoid conspiracy stories about hacking the election, then what difference does it make whether Trump or his people had contact with Russians? Both are idiotic.
You know absolutely nothing about what really happened, so why do you call it idiotic. Your mind is made up, the facts might confuse you?

What "facts?"
 
Why must you lie about this? You know nothing
Where's the lie?
Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inaugurated
Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.
Like Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?

Apparently, no it's not.
The democrats who met with Russians were part of an administration, Trumps people weren't and they lied about it
 
Why must you lie about this? You know nothing
Where's the lie?
Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inaugurated
Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.
Like Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?

Apparently, no it's not.
Like the other GOP politicos who also talked to the Russians as did the Dems with legitimate reasons, unlike the Trump campaign members and staffers?
 
Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inaugurated
Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
There are 2 separate scenarios
1. hacking the election
2. the frequent meeting of Trumps with the russians.
are they separate or connected

Really? If it wasn't for these paranoid conspiracy stories about hacking the election, then what difference does it make whether Trump or his people had contact with Russians? Both are idiotic.
You know absolutely nothing about what really happened, so why do you call it idiotic. Your mind is made up, the facts might confuse you?

What "facts?"
The facts that will come to light after a thorough investigation
 
Where's the lie?
Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inaugurated
Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.
Like Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?

Apparently, no it's not.
The democrats who met with Russians were part of an administration, Trumps people weren't and they lied about it

What does being "part of an administration" have to do with it? Is there a law against a private citizen talking to Russians? Furthermore, Sessions was a Senator, just like Schumar and McCaskal, and Flynn was part of an administration.

Dims have a million idiotic excuses explaining why they aren't colossal hypocrites, and they all suck.

No one is fooled.
 
Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
There are 2 separate scenarios
1. hacking the election
2. the frequent meeting of Trumps with the russians.
are they separate or connected

Really? If it wasn't for these paranoid conspiracy stories about hacking the election, then what difference does it make whether Trump or his people had contact with Russians? Both are idiotic.
You know absolutely nothing about what really happened, so why do you call it idiotic. Your mind is made up, the facts might confuse you?

What "facts?"
The facts that will come to light after a thorough investigation

You mean, you have no facts. You just admitted it. That's why you need a fishing expedition.
 
Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inaugurated
Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.
Like Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?

Apparently, no it's not.
The democrats who met with Russians were part of an administration, Trumps people weren't and they lied about it

What does being "part of an administration" have to do with it? Is there a law against a private citizen talking to Russians? Furthermore, Sessions was a Senator, just like Schumar and McCaskal, and Flynn was part of an administration.

Dims have a million idiotic excuses explaining why they aren't colossal hypocrites, and they all suck.

No one is fooled.
If it was no big deal why did Sessions lie, why was Flynn kicked out of office, why was Trumps son in law involved? Inquiring minds want to know
 
There are 2 separate scenarios
1. hacking the election
2. the frequent meeting of Trumps with the russians.
are they separate or connected

Really? If it wasn't for these paranoid conspiracy stories about hacking the election, then what difference does it make whether Trump or his people had contact with Russians? Both are idiotic.
You know absolutely nothing about what really happened, so why do you call it idiotic. Your mind is made up, the facts might confuse you?

What "facts?"
The facts that will come to light after a thorough investigation

You mean, you have no facts. You just admitted it. That's why you need a fishing expedition.
Personally I have no facts, but others sure do- like our intelligence community
 
Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inaugurated
Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.
Like Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?

Apparently, no it's not.
The democrats who met with Russians were part of an administration, Trumps people weren't and they lied about it

What does being "part of an administration" have to do with it? Is there a law against a private citizen talking to Russians? Furthermore, Sessions was a Senator, just like Schumar and McCaskal, and Flynn was part of an administration.

Dims have a million idiotic excuses explaining why they aren't colossal hypocrites, and they all suck.

No one is fooled.
That does not wash, and you know it. Congress has said it will investigate. The feebs and intel agencies are investigating.
 
Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.
Like Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?

Apparently, no it's not.
The democrats who met with Russians were part of an administration, Trumps people weren't and they lied about it

What does being "part of an administration" have to do with it? Is there a law against a private citizen talking to Russians? Furthermore, Sessions was a Senator, just like Schumar and McCaskal, and Flynn was part of an administration.

Dims have a million idiotic excuses explaining why they aren't colossal hypocrites, and they all suck.

No one is fooled.
If it was no big deal why did Sessions lie, why was Flynn kicked out of office, why was Trumps son in law involved? Inquiring minds want to know
He didn't lie. He simply had a different interpretation of the question than dim bulbs like you jumped on after the fact.
 
Really? If it wasn't for these paranoid conspiracy stories about hacking the election, then what difference does it make whether Trump or his people had contact with Russians? Both are idiotic.
You know absolutely nothing about what really happened, so why do you call it idiotic. Your mind is made up, the facts might confuse you?

What "facts?"
The facts that will come to light after a thorough investigation

You mean, you have no facts. You just admitted it. That's why you need a fishing expedition.
Personally I have no facts, but others sure do- like our intelligence community

How do you know?
 
The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.
Like Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?

Apparently, no it's not.
The democrats who met with Russians were part of an administration, Trumps people weren't and they lied about it

What does being "part of an administration" have to do with it? Is there a law against a private citizen talking to Russians? Furthermore, Sessions was a Senator, just like Schumar and McCaskal, and Flynn was part of an administration.

Dims have a million idiotic excuses explaining why they aren't colossal hypocrites, and they all suck.

No one is fooled.
If it was no big deal why did Sessions lie, why was Flynn kicked out of office, why was Trumps son in law involved? Inquiring minds want to know
He didn't lie. He simply had a different interpretation of the question than dim bulbs like you jumped on after the fact.
Yup, and the Congress apparently said, "nope," and Sessions recused himself.
 
Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.
Like Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?

Apparently, no it's not.
The democrats who met with Russians were part of an administration, Trumps people weren't and they lied about it

What does being "part of an administration" have to do with it? Is there a law against a private citizen talking to Russians? Furthermore, Sessions was a Senator, just like Schumar and McCaskal, and Flynn was part of an administration.

Dims have a million idiotic excuses explaining why they aren't colossal hypocrites, and they all suck.

No one is fooled.
That does not wash, and you know it. Congress has said it will investigate. The feebs and intel agencies are investigating.
The facts "don't wash?" Since when? Whatever Congress does, it doesn't change the fact that all these Trump colluded with the Russian hack conspiracy theorists are a bunch of lying sleazy imbecile pieces of shit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top