JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,520
- 2,165
- Banned
- #41
from CNN
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inauguratedWhere's the lie?Why must you lie about this? You know nothingThe only meetings Trump officials had with Russia was arranged by Obama as part of the transition.They were doing their jobs is the difference, while Trump's campaign, we know now, was working with the Russians to hack Clinton and pervert American elections.
The weight piles up on Russia's running dogs in America.
NY Times takes it to Trump Russia contacts
Who knew it was all a setup to claim he was rigging the election.
There are 2 separate scenariosBefore he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inauguratedWhere's the lie?Why must you lie about this? You know nothingThe only meetings Trump officials had with Russia was arranged by Obama as part of the transition.They were doing their jobs is the difference, while Trump's campaign, we know now, was working with the Russians to hack Clinton and pervert American elections.
The weight piles up on Russia's running dogs in America.
NY Times takes it to Trump Russia contacts
Who knew it was all a setup to claim he was rigging the election.
There are 2 separate scenariosBefore he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inauguratedWhere's the lie?Why must you lie about this? You know nothingThe only meetings Trump officials had with Russia was arranged by Obama as part of the transition.
Who knew it was all a setup to claim he was rigging the election.
1. hacking the election
2. the frequent meeting of Trumps with the russians.
are they separate or connected
You know absolutely nothing about what really happened, so why do you call it idiotic. Your mind is made up, the facts might confuse you?There are 2 separate scenariosBefore he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inauguratedWhere's the lie?Why must you lie about this? You know nothing
1. hacking the election
2. the frequent meeting of Trumps with the russians.
are they separate or connected
Really? If it wasn't for these paranoid conspiracy stories about hacking the election, then what difference does it make whether Trump or his people had contact with Russians? Both are idiotic.
There are 2 separate scenariosBefore he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inauguratedWhere's the lie?Why must you lie about this? You know nothing
1. hacking the election
2. the frequent meeting of Trumps with the russians.
are they separate or connected
Really? If it wasn't for these paranoid conspiracy stories about hacking the election, then what difference does it make whether Trump or his people had contact with Russians? Both are idiotic.
Like Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inauguratedWhere's the lie?Why must you lie about this? You know nothingThe only meetings Trump officials had with Russia was arranged by Obama as part of the transition.
Who knew it was all a setup to claim he was rigging the election.
You know absolutely nothing about what really happened, so why do you call it idiotic. Your mind is made up, the facts might confuse you?There are 2 separate scenariosBefore he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inauguratedWhere's the lie?
1. hacking the election
2. the frequent meeting of Trumps with the russians.
are they separate or connected
Really? If it wasn't for these paranoid conspiracy stories about hacking the election, then what difference does it make whether Trump or his people had contact with Russians? Both are idiotic.
The democrats who met with Russians were part of an administration, Trumps people weren't and they lied about itLike Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inauguratedWhere's the lie?Why must you lie about this? You know nothing
Apparently, no it's not.
Like the other GOP politicos who also talked to the Russians as did the Dems with legitimate reasons, unlike the Trump campaign members and staffers?Like Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inauguratedWhere's the lie?Why must you lie about this? You know nothing
Apparently, no it's not.
The facts that will come to light after a thorough investigationYou know absolutely nothing about what really happened, so why do you call it idiotic. Your mind is made up, the facts might confuse you?There are 2 separate scenariosBefore he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inaugurated
1. hacking the election
2. the frequent meeting of Trumps with the russians.
are they separate or connected
Really? If it wasn't for these paranoid conspiracy stories about hacking the election, then what difference does it make whether Trump or his people had contact with Russians? Both are idiotic.
What "facts?"
The democrats who met with Russians were part of an administration, Trumps people weren't and they lied about itLike Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inauguratedWhere's the lie?
Apparently, no it's not.
The facts that will come to light after a thorough investigationYou know absolutely nothing about what really happened, so why do you call it idiotic. Your mind is made up, the facts might confuse you?There are 2 separate scenariosBefore he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
1. hacking the election
2. the frequent meeting of Trumps with the russians.
are they separate or connected
Really? If it wasn't for these paranoid conspiracy stories about hacking the election, then what difference does it make whether Trump or his people had contact with Russians? Both are idiotic.
What "facts?"
If it was no big deal why did Sessions lie, why was Flynn kicked out of office, why was Trumps son in law involved? Inquiring minds want to knowThe democrats who met with Russians were part of an administration, Trumps people weren't and they lied about itLike Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inaugurated
Apparently, no it's not.
What does being "part of an administration" have to do with it? Is there a law against a private citizen talking to Russians? Furthermore, Sessions was a Senator, just like Schumar and McCaskal, and Flynn was part of an administration.
Dims have a million idiotic excuses explaining why they aren't colossal hypocrites, and they all suck.
No one is fooled.
Personally I have no facts, but others sure do- like our intelligence communityThe facts that will come to light after a thorough investigationYou know absolutely nothing about what really happened, so why do you call it idiotic. Your mind is made up, the facts might confuse you?There are 2 separate scenarios
1. hacking the election
2. the frequent meeting of Trumps with the russians.
are they separate or connected
Really? If it wasn't for these paranoid conspiracy stories about hacking the election, then what difference does it make whether Trump or his people had contact with Russians? Both are idiotic.
What "facts?"
You mean, you have no facts. You just admitted it. That's why you need a fishing expedition.
That does not wash, and you know it. Congress has said it will investigate. The feebs and intel agencies are investigating.The democrats who met with Russians were part of an administration, Trumps people weren't and they lied about itLike Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.Do you know just how many members of the Trump administration met with Russians before he was inaugurated
Apparently, no it's not.
What does being "part of an administration" have to do with it? Is there a law against a private citizen talking to Russians? Furthermore, Sessions was a Senator, just like Schumar and McCaskal, and Flynn was part of an administration.
Dims have a million idiotic excuses explaining why they aren't colossal hypocrites, and they all suck.
No one is fooled.
He didn't lie. He simply had a different interpretation of the question than dim bulbs like you jumped on after the fact.If it was no big deal why did Sessions lie, why was Flynn kicked out of office, why was Trumps son in law involved? Inquiring minds want to knowThe democrats who met with Russians were part of an administration, Trumps people weren't and they lied about itLike Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
Apparently, no it's not.
What does being "part of an administration" have to do with it? Is there a law against a private citizen talking to Russians? Furthermore, Sessions was a Senator, just like Schumar and McCaskal, and Flynn was part of an administration.
Dims have a million idiotic excuses explaining why they aren't colossal hypocrites, and they all suck.
No one is fooled.
Personally I have no facts, but others sure do- like our intelligence communityThe facts that will come to light after a thorough investigationYou know absolutely nothing about what really happened, so why do you call it idiotic. Your mind is made up, the facts might confuse you?Really? If it wasn't for these paranoid conspiracy stories about hacking the election, then what difference does it make whether Trump or his people had contact with Russians? Both are idiotic.
What "facts?"
You mean, you have no facts. You just admitted it. That's why you need a fishing expedition.
Yup, and the Congress apparently said, "nope," and Sessions recused himself.He didn't lie. He simply had a different interpretation of the question than dim bulbs like you jumped on after the fact.If it was no big deal why did Sessions lie, why was Flynn kicked out of office, why was Trumps son in law involved? Inquiring minds want to knowThe democrats who met with Russians were part of an administration, Trumps people weren't and they lied about itLike Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.
Apparently, no it's not.
What does being "part of an administration" have to do with it? Is there a law against a private citizen talking to Russians? Furthermore, Sessions was a Senator, just like Schumar and McCaskal, and Flynn was part of an administration.
Dims have a million idiotic excuses explaining why they aren't colossal hypocrites, and they all suck.
No one is fooled.
The facts "don't wash?" Since when? Whatever Congress does, it doesn't change the fact that all these Trump colluded with the Russian hack conspiracy theorists are a bunch of lying sleazy imbecile pieces of shit.That does not wash, and you know it. Congress has said it will investigate. The feebs and intel agencies are investigating.The democrats who met with Russians were part of an administration, Trumps people weren't and they lied about itLike Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, McCaskal, and Schumer?The OP is about those who meet with Russians before the election, bripat.Before he was inaugurated? What difference does it make who met with them after the election? I thought this was supposedly about hacking the election.
Apparently, no it's not.
What does being "part of an administration" have to do with it? Is there a law against a private citizen talking to Russians? Furthermore, Sessions was a Senator, just like Schumar and McCaskal, and Flynn was part of an administration.
Dims have a million idiotic excuses explaining why they aren't colossal hypocrites, and they all suck.
No one is fooled.