Hey Democrats, Impeach this.....

And so the death of the republican party continues. If it is now the prevalent republican opinion that none of the rules apply to republican presidents then the party deserves what happens next and they have only themselves to blame.
We aren't the Clowns trying to impeach the President without any High Crimes.
There is no higher crime a president can commit than to use the power of his office to subvert democracy itself. Again going to a foreign power in an effort to fix the election cannot be allowed to stand...
That's the wild claim, but the transcript of the call shows these claims to be as vacuous as Dems other deluded fantasies.
... Trump has been a system rigger since birth...
Your personal aversion to him is NOT a high crime, the fact that Dems don't understand this, tells us all we need to know about them. Dems first tried to criminalize policy disagreements and now they are trying to criminalize personalities.

But don't let me dissuade you, when is the House going to vote?
This is the moment presidential power becomes absolute or gets taken down a few notches, I don't have to ask which side you are on comrade.
You either have solid evidence of high crimes or you don't. It's really that simple.
So it is your opinion that an impeachment inquiry cannot even be started without ironclad evidence of wrongdoing? Your opinion is wrong. Like any investigation there only has to be credible allegations of wrongdoing. Solid actionable evidence can only be obtained in the course of an official investigation. We've all seen how the administration simply refuses to cooperate with run-of-the-mill hearings. Now let's see them simply refuse to cooperate with an impeachment inquiry. That alone is grounds for impeachment on obstruction.
 
We aren't the Clowns trying to impeach the President without any High Crimes.
There is no higher crime a president can commit than to use the power of his office to subvert democracy itself. Again going to a foreign power in an effort to fix the election cannot be allowed to stand...
That's the wild claim, but the transcript of the call shows these claims to be as vacuous as Dems other deluded fantasies.
... Trump has been a system rigger since birth...
Your personal aversion to him is NOT a high crime, the fact that Dems don't understand this, tells us all we need to know about them. Dems first tried to criminalize policy disagreements and now they are trying to criminalize personalities.

But don't let me dissuade you, when is the House going to vote?
This is the moment presidential power becomes absolute or gets taken down a few notches, I don't have to ask which side you are on comrade.
You either have solid evidence of high crimes or you don't. It's really that simple.
So it is your opinion that an impeachment inquiry cannot even be started without ironclad evidence of wrongdoing? Your opinion is wrong. Like any investigation there only has to be credible allegations of wrongdoing. Solid actionable evidence can only be obtained in the course of an official investigation. We've all seen how the administration simply refuses to cooperate with run-of-the-mill hearings. Now let's see them simply refuse to cooperate with an impeachment inquiry. That alone is grounds for impeachment on obstruction.
You just admitted that you have no evidence.

The Biggest Nothingburger Of Them All.

“The Democrats have no believable scandal; they can only impeach him once. This will be the biggest and bitterest nothingburger of all. Bring it on.”​

In his second term, he’ll have more flexibility.
 
Hey Democrats, Impeach This!

hahahahahaha....

Summed up well.

From the article....

Letting these creeps steal our country from us is worse than the resulting carnage from the fight they’ve picked. We could roll over, but instead we’ll take the hit to keep our liberty. In the end, after many figurative casualties, impeachment is going to boomerang on these clowns. The elite insiders are willfully blind to the fact that the key question to Normal Americans will be, “What was that brother’s widow-marrying, coke-snorting, kicked-out-of-the-Navy-in-disgracing, non-Ukrainian-speaking loser scion doing getting paid $50K a month by an oligarch that wasn’t directly related to his gropey pa being Obama’s veep/court jester?

Hunter Biden’s beyond a mere prodigal son – he’s a catastrophe of Biblical proportions, compounded by Hairplug One thinking it was super-duper savvy to brag about helping his snorterrific son on video. The media will try and hide it. The Democrats will declare it – have already declared it – out-of-bounds and irrelevant, but they can’t gate-keep that question from being asked forever. And the answer to the question is that our liberal elite is terminally corrupt.

************

Oh yeah,

Payback time.
Forks up!. Idiots are trying to take over our country for their own exploitation. We ain't letting that happen.

Bastards are going to feel it big time as they pay for their hypocrisy.

Bill was impeached disbarred and humiliated then re elected. Hilary was just Humiliated "twice" and not elected the left hates that! They think she deserved it because of her very public Humiliation regarding her Husband and a certain "intern"!
Bill was not re-elected after impeachment.

As usual, a Trumpian's grasp of history proves to be tenuous. He was impeached during his second term.
No one claimed that parallel.
If only you had read the post preceding mine!

Is it both history and reading that poses problems for Trumpians?
 
Mueller Investigating Ukrainian’s $150,000 Payment for a Trump Appearance

Investigators subpoenaed the Trump Organization this year for an array of records about business with foreign nationals. In response, the company handed over documents about a $150,000 donation that the Ukrainian billionaire, Victor Pinchuk, made in September 2015 to the Donald J. Trump Foundation in exchange for a 20-minute appearance by Mr. Trump that month through a video link to a conference in Kiev.


The payment from Mr. Pinchuk “is curious because it comes during a campaign and is from a foreigner and looks like an effort to buy influence,” said Marcus S. Owens, a former head of the Internal Revenue Service division that oversees tax-exempt organizations. He called the donation “an unusual amount of money for such a short speech.”
 
Forks up!. Idiots are trying to take over our country for their own exploitation. We ain't letting that happen.

Bastards are going to feel it big time as they pay for their hypocrisy.

Bill was impeached disbarred and humiliated then re elected. Hilary was just Humiliated "twice" and not elected the left hates that! They think she deserved it because of her very public Humiliation regarding her Husband and a certain "intern"!
Bill was not re-elected after impeachment.

As usual, a Trumpian's grasp of history proves to be tenuous. He was impeached during his second term.
No one claimed that parallel.
If only you had read the post preceding mine!

Is it both history and reading that poses problems for Trumpians?
You are correct. Thank you for bringing my error to my attention.
 
Hey Democrats, Impeach This!

hahahahahaha....

Summed up well.

From the article....

Letting these creeps steal our country from us is worse than the resulting carnage from the fight they’ve picked. We could roll over, but instead we’ll take the hit to keep our liberty. In the end, after many figurative casualties, impeachment is going to boomerang on these clowns. The elite insiders are willfully blind to the fact that the key question to Normal Americans will be, “What was that brother’s widow-marrying, coke-snorting, kicked-out-of-the-Navy-in-disgracing, non-Ukrainian-speaking loser scion doing getting paid $50K a month by an oligarch that wasn’t directly related to his gropey pa being Obama’s veep/court jester?

Hunter Biden’s beyond a mere prodigal son – he’s a catastrophe of Biblical proportions, compounded by Hairplug One thinking it was super-duper savvy to brag about helping his snorterrific son on video. The media will try and hide it. The Democrats will declare it – have already declared it – out-of-bounds and irrelevant, but they can’t gate-keep that question from being asked forever. And the answer to the question is that our liberal elite is terminally corrupt.

************

Oh yeah,

Payback time.
The Dems must be hoping that their are enough naïve people to buy into their manufactured scandals.
They know that they can control what people see on the News and in entertainment.
But, it seems like more people are wising-up to the Left's propaganda machine.
 
There is no higher crime a president can commit than to use the power of his office to subvert democracy itself. Again going to a foreign power in an effort to fix the election cannot be allowed to stand...
That's the wild claim, but the transcript of the call shows these claims to be as vacuous as Dems other deluded fantasies.
... Trump has been a system rigger since birth...
Your personal aversion to him is NOT a high crime, the fact that Dems don't understand this, tells us all we need to know about them. Dems first tried to criminalize policy disagreements and now they are trying to criminalize personalities.

But don't let me dissuade you, when is the House going to vote?
This is the moment presidential power becomes absolute or gets taken down a few notches, I don't have to ask which side you are on comrade.
You either have solid evidence of high crimes or you don't. It's really that simple.
So it is your opinion that an impeachment inquiry cannot even be started without ironclad evidence of wrongdoing? Your opinion is wrong. Like any investigation there only has to be credible allegations of wrongdoing. Solid actionable evidence can only be obtained in the course of an official investigation. We've all seen how the administration simply refuses to cooperate with run-of-the-mill hearings. Now let's see them simply refuse to cooperate with an impeachment inquiry. That alone is grounds for impeachment on obstruction.
You just admitted that you have no evidence.

The Biggest Nothingburger Of Them All.

“The Democrats have no believable scandal; they can only impeach him once. This will be the biggest and bitterest nothingburger of all. Bring it on.”​

In his second term, he’ll have more flexibility.
We are talking legal stuff here, try to keep up. Allegations do not become evidence until it is "found" in an investigation. If you cannot understand that then I can't help you.
 
What are they waiting for? Democrats already have everything they need to impeach Trump. They have the majority and a complete lack of integrity. They must be waiting for their media friends to bomb Trump some more to get peoples opinions against him.
They have nothing and they know it. It's all about the election.
 
That's the wild claim, but the transcript of the call shows these claims to be as vacuous as Dems other deluded fantasies.
Your personal aversion to him is NOT a high crime, the fact that Dems don't understand this, tells us all we need to know about them. Dems first tried to criminalize policy disagreements and now they are trying to criminalize personalities.

But don't let me dissuade you, when is the House going to vote?
This is the moment presidential power becomes absolute or gets taken down a few notches, I don't have to ask which side you are on comrade.
You either have solid evidence of high crimes or you don't. It's really that simple.
So it is your opinion that an impeachment inquiry cannot even be started without ironclad evidence of wrongdoing? Your opinion is wrong. Like any investigation there only has to be credible allegations of wrongdoing. Solid actionable evidence can only be obtained in the course of an official investigation. We've all seen how the administration simply refuses to cooperate with run-of-the-mill hearings. Now let's see them simply refuse to cooperate with an impeachment inquiry. That alone is grounds for impeachment on obstruction.
You just admitted that you have no evidence.

The Biggest Nothingburger Of Them All.

“The Democrats have no believable scandal; they can only impeach him once. This will be the biggest and bitterest nothingburger of all. Bring it on.”​

In his second term, he’ll have more flexibility.
We are talking legal stuff here, try to keep up. Allegations do not become evidence until it is "found" in an investigation. If you cannot understand that then I can't help you.
Evidence, something the idiots on the left don't have.
 
Hey Democrats, Impeach This!

hahahahahaha....

Summed up well.

From the article....

Letting these creeps steal our country from us is worse than the resulting carnage from the fight they’ve picked. We could roll over, but instead we’ll take the hit to keep our liberty. In the end, after many figurative casualties, impeachment is going to boomerang on these clowns. The elite insiders are willfully blind to the fact that the key question to Normal Americans will be, “What was that brother’s widow-marrying, coke-snorting, kicked-out-of-the-Navy-in-disgracing, non-Ukrainian-speaking loser scion doing getting paid $50K a month by an oligarch that wasn’t directly related to his gropey pa being Obama’s veep/court jester?

Hunter Biden’s beyond a mere prodigal son – he’s a catastrophe of Biblical proportions, compounded by Hairplug One thinking it was super-duper savvy to brag about helping his snorterrific son on video. The media will try and hide it. The Democrats will declare it – have already declared it – out-of-bounds and irrelevant, but they can’t gate-keep that question from being asked forever. And the answer to the question is that our liberal elite is terminally corrupt.

************

Oh yeah,

Payback time.
Your country?

I don’t think so
Better than your scum sucking country. Go Trump. Stupid retarded libs.
 
This is the moment presidential power becomes absolute or gets taken down a few notches, I don't have to ask which side you are on comrade.
You either have solid evidence of high crimes or you don't. It's really that simple.
So it is your opinion that an impeachment inquiry cannot even be started without ironclad evidence of wrongdoing? Your opinion is wrong. Like any investigation there only has to be credible allegations of wrongdoing. Solid actionable evidence can only be obtained in the course of an official investigation. We've all seen how the administration simply refuses to cooperate with run-of-the-mill hearings. Now let's see them simply refuse to cooperate with an impeachment inquiry. That alone is grounds for impeachment on obstruction.
You just admitted that you have no evidence.

The Biggest Nothingburger Of Them All.

“The Democrats have no believable scandal; they can only impeach him once. This will be the biggest and bitterest nothingburger of all. Bring it on.”​

In his second term, he’ll have more flexibility.
We are talking legal stuff here, try to keep up. Allegations do not become evidence until it is "found" in an investigation. If you cannot understand that then I can't help you.
Evidence, something the idiots on the left don't have.
The inquiry will quickly find that the White House attempted to cover up the whistle blower complaint as well as the records of the call in question. Anyone who has a passing familiarity with Watergate knows that covering things up is a great big no-no. The depth of the cover-up is also a strong indication that the White House knew what they were doing was illegal.
 
Hey Democrats, Impeach This!

hahahahahaha....

Summed up well.

From the article....

Letting these creeps steal our country from us is worse than the resulting carnage from the fight they’ve picked. We could roll over, but instead we’ll take the hit to keep our liberty. In the end, after many figurative casualties, impeachment is going to boomerang on these clowns. The elite insiders are willfully blind to the fact that the key question to Normal Americans will be, “What was that brother’s widow-marrying, coke-snorting, kicked-out-of-the-Navy-in-disgracing, non-Ukrainian-speaking loser scion doing getting paid $50K a month by an oligarch that wasn’t directly related to his gropey pa being Obama’s veep/court jester?

Hunter Biden’s beyond a mere prodigal son – he’s a catastrophe of Biblical proportions, compounded by Hairplug One thinking it was super-duper savvy to brag about helping his snorterrific son on video. The media will try and hide it. The Democrats will declare it – have already declared it – out-of-bounds and irrelevant, but they can’t gate-keep that question from being asked forever. And the answer to the question is that our liberal elite is terminally corrupt.

************

Oh yeah,

Payback time.
Forks up!. Idiots are trying to take over our country for their own exploitation. We ain't letting that happen.

It’s already happened.

It happened in 2016.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You either have solid evidence of high crimes or you don't. It's really that simple.
So it is your opinion that an impeachment inquiry cannot even be started without ironclad evidence of wrongdoing? Your opinion is wrong. Like any investigation there only has to be credible allegations of wrongdoing. Solid actionable evidence can only be obtained in the course of an official investigation. We've all seen how the administration simply refuses to cooperate with run-of-the-mill hearings. Now let's see them simply refuse to cooperate with an impeachment inquiry. That alone is grounds for impeachment on obstruction.
You just admitted that you have no evidence.

The Biggest Nothingburger Of Them All.

“The Democrats have no believable scandal; they can only impeach him once. This will be the biggest and bitterest nothingburger of all. Bring it on.”​

In his second term, he’ll have more flexibility.
We are talking legal stuff here, try to keep up. Allegations do not become evidence until it is "found" in an investigation. If you cannot understand that then I can't help you.
Evidence, something the idiots on the left don't have.
The inquiry will quickly find that the White House attempted to cover up the whistle blower complaint as well as the records of the call in question. Anyone who has a passing familiarity with Watergate knows that covering things up is a great big no-no. The depth of the cover-up is also a strong indication that the White House knew what they were doing was illegal.
Then go after obuthole for it also. Hypocritical asswipes on the left.
 
Hey Democrats, Impeach This!

hahahahahaha....

Summed up well.

From the article....

Letting these creeps steal our country from us is worse than the resulting carnage from the fight they’ve picked. We could roll over, but instead we’ll take the hit to keep our liberty. In the end, after many figurative casualties, impeachment is going to boomerang on these clowns. The elite insiders are willfully blind to the fact that the key question to Normal Americans will be, “What was that brother’s widow-marrying, coke-snorting, kicked-out-of-the-Navy-in-disgracing, non-Ukrainian-speaking loser scion doing getting paid $50K a month by an oligarch that wasn’t directly related to his gropey pa being Obama’s veep/court jester?

Hunter Biden’s beyond a mere prodigal son – he’s a catastrophe of Biblical proportions, compounded by Hairplug One thinking it was super-duper savvy to brag about helping his snorterrific son on video. The media will try and hide it. The Democrats will declare it – have already declared it – out-of-bounds and irrelevant, but they can’t gate-keep that question from being asked forever. And the answer to the question is that our liberal elite is terminally corrupt.

************

Oh yeah,

Payback time.
Your country?

I don’t think so

The first three words are what really what describe you.
 
So it is your opinion that an impeachment inquiry cannot even be started without ironclad evidence of wrongdoing? Your opinion is wrong. Like any investigation there only has to be credible allegations of wrongdoing. Solid actionable evidence can only be obtained in the course of an official investigation. We've all seen how the administration simply refuses to cooperate with run-of-the-mill hearings. Now let's see them simply refuse to cooperate with an impeachment inquiry. That alone is grounds for impeachment on obstruction.
You just admitted that you have no evidence.

The Biggest Nothingburger Of Them All.

“The Democrats have no believable scandal; they can only impeach him once. This will be the biggest and bitterest nothingburger of all. Bring it on.”​

In his second term, he’ll have more flexibility.
We are talking legal stuff here, try to keep up. Allegations do not become evidence until it is "found" in an investigation. If you cannot understand that then I can't help you.
Evidence, something the idiots on the left don't have.
The inquiry will quickly find that the White House attempted to cover up the whistle blower complaint as well as the records of the call in question. Anyone who has a passing familiarity with Watergate knows that covering things up is a great big no-no. The depth of the cover-up is also a strong indication that the White House knew what they were doing was illegal.
Then go after obuthole for it also. Hypocritical asswipes on the left.

Actually, we need to go after Pelosi.

She has skated for a decade.
 
You either have solid evidence of high crimes or you don't. It's really that simple.
So it is your opinion that an impeachment inquiry cannot even be started without ironclad evidence of wrongdoing? Your opinion is wrong. Like any investigation there only has to be credible allegations of wrongdoing. Solid actionable evidence can only be obtained in the course of an official investigation. We've all seen how the administration simply refuses to cooperate with run-of-the-mill hearings. Now let's see them simply refuse to cooperate with an impeachment inquiry. That alone is grounds for impeachment on obstruction.
You just admitted that you have no evidence.

The Biggest Nothingburger Of Them All.

“The Democrats have no believable scandal; they can only impeach him once. This will be the biggest and bitterest nothingburger of all. Bring it on.”​

In his second term, he’ll have more flexibility.
We are talking legal stuff here, try to keep up. Allegations do not become evidence until it is "found" in an investigation. If you cannot understand that then I can't help you.
Evidence, something the idiots on the left don't have.
The inquiry will quickly find that the White House attempted to cover up the whistle blower complaint as well as the records of the call in question. Anyone who has a passing familiarity with Watergate knows that covering things up is a great big no-no. The depth of the cover-up is also a strong indication that the White House knew what they were doing was illegal.
They didn't cover anything up and they didn't do anything illegal. Trump released everything so fast, that there were some Democrats demanding their release even after they were released and the lies the Democrats told about them, thoroughly debunked.

It appears the positioning was in anticipation of Trump asserting privilege and he did not, leaving you guys dumped on your asses. That's the good thing about having a President that is a very stable genius with an unusually large brain.
 
You just admitted that you have no evidence.

The Biggest Nothingburger Of Them All.

“The Democrats have no believable scandal; they can only impeach him once. This will be the biggest and bitterest nothingburger of all. Bring it on.”​

In his second term, he’ll have more flexibility.
We are talking legal stuff here, try to keep up. Allegations do not become evidence until it is "found" in an investigation. If you cannot understand that then I can't help you.
Evidence, something the idiots on the left don't have.
The inquiry will quickly find that the White House attempted to cover up the whistle blower complaint as well as the records of the call in question. Anyone who has a passing familiarity with Watergate knows that covering things up is a great big no-no. The depth of the cover-up is also a strong indication that the White House knew what they were doing was illegal.
Then go after obuthole for it also. Hypocritical asswipes on the left.

Actually, we need to go after Pelosi.

She has skated for a decade.
For what? The Speech and Debate Clause protects her from anything she says on the floor of the House and her district is Democrat +37! Electorally she is bullet proof.
 
That's the wild claim, but the transcript of the call shows these claims to be as vacuous as Dems other deluded fantasies.
Your personal aversion to him is NOT a high crime, the fact that Dems don't understand this, tells us all we need to know about them. Dems first tried to criminalize policy disagreements and now they are trying to criminalize personalities.

But don't let me dissuade you, when is the House going to vote?
This is the moment presidential power becomes absolute or gets taken down a few notches, I don't have to ask which side you are on comrade.
You either have solid evidence of high crimes or you don't. It's really that simple.
So it is your opinion that an impeachment inquiry cannot even be started without ironclad evidence of wrongdoing? Your opinion is wrong. Like any investigation there only has to be credible allegations of wrongdoing. Solid actionable evidence can only be obtained in the course of an official investigation. We've all seen how the administration simply refuses to cooperate with run-of-the-mill hearings. Now let's see them simply refuse to cooperate with an impeachment inquiry. That alone is grounds for impeachment on obstruction.
You just admitted that you have no evidence.

The Biggest Nothingburger Of Them All.

“The Democrats have no believable scandal; they can only impeach him once. This will be the biggest and bitterest nothingburger of all. Bring it on.”​

In his second term, he’ll have more flexibility.
We are talking legal stuff here, try to keep up. Allegations do not become evidence until it is "found" in an investigation. If you cannot understand that then I can't help you.
Allegations are NOT evidence. If you cannot understand that, then, I can't help you.
 
We are talking legal stuff here, try to keep up. Allegations do not become evidence until it is "found" in an investigation. If you cannot understand that then I can't help you.
Evidence, something the idiots on the left don't have.
The inquiry will quickly find that the White House attempted to cover up the whistle blower complaint as well as the records of the call in question. Anyone who has a passing familiarity with Watergate knows that covering things up is a great big no-no. The depth of the cover-up is also a strong indication that the White House knew what they were doing was illegal.
Then go after obuthole for it also. Hypocritical asswipes on the left.

Actually, we need to go after Pelosi.

She has skated for a decade.
For what? The Speech and Debate Clause protects her from anything she says on the floor of the House and her district is Democrat +37! Electorally she is bullet proof.

Agreed she is bulletproof as far as elections are concerned.

All that botox has probably made her bullet proof in other ways.

She has not suffered the kind of scrutiny others have.

And the GOP should be working to get her booted as the Speaker.....

Then help get AOC in there.
 
Evidence, something the idiots on the left don't have.
The inquiry will quickly find that the White House attempted to cover up the whistle blower complaint as well as the records of the call in question. Anyone who has a passing familiarity with Watergate knows that covering things up is a great big no-no. The depth of the cover-up is also a strong indication that the White House knew what they were doing was illegal.
Then go after obuthole for it also. Hypocritical asswipes on the left.

Actually, we need to go after Pelosi.

She has skated for a decade.
For what? The Speech and Debate Clause protects her from anything she says on the floor of the House and her district is Democrat +37! Electorally she is bullet proof.

Agreed she is bulletproof as far as elections are concerned.

All that botox has probably made her bullet proof in other ways.

She has not suffered the kind of scrutiny others have.

And the GOP should be working to get her booted as the Speaker.....

Then help get AOC in there.
We have no means of removing her as speaker as long as she has 218 votes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top