Hey Democrats, Impeach this.....

So it is your opinion that an impeachment inquiry cannot even be started without ironclad evidence of wrongdoing? Your opinion is wrong. Like any investigation there only has to be credible allegations of wrongdoing. Solid actionable evidence can only be obtained in the course of an official investigation. We've all seen how the administration simply refuses to cooperate with run-of-the-mill hearings. Now let's see them simply refuse to cooperate with an impeachment inquiry. That alone is grounds for impeachment on obstruction.
You just admitted that you have no evidence.

The Biggest Nothingburger Of Them All.

“The Democrats have no believable scandal; they can only impeach him once. This will be the biggest and bitterest nothingburger of all. Bring it on.”​

In his second term, he’ll have more flexibility.
We are talking legal stuff here, try to keep up. Allegations do not become evidence until it is "found" in an investigation. If you cannot understand that then I can't help you.
Evidence, something the idiots on the left don't have.
The inquiry will quickly find that the White House attempted to cover up the whistle blower complaint as well as the records of the call in question. Anyone who has a passing familiarity with Watergate knows that covering things up is a great big no-no. The depth of the cover-up is also a strong indication that the White House knew what they were doing was illegal.
They didn't cover anything up and they didn't do anything illegal. Trump released everything so fast, that there were some Democrats demanding their release even after they were released and the lies the Democrats told about them, thoroughly debunked.

It appears the positioning was in anticipation of Trump asserting privilege and he did not, leaving you guys dumped on your asses. That's the good thing about having a President that is a very stable genius with an unusually large brain.
He only released the complaint and the records after he got found out, not the same thing.
 
You just admitted that you have no evidence.

The Biggest Nothingburger Of Them All.

“The Democrats have no believable scandal; they can only impeach him once. This will be the biggest and bitterest nothingburger of all. Bring it on.”​

In his second term, he’ll have more flexibility.
We are talking legal stuff here, try to keep up. Allegations do not become evidence until it is "found" in an investigation. If you cannot understand that then I can't help you.
Evidence, something the idiots on the left don't have.
The inquiry will quickly find that the White House attempted to cover up the whistle blower complaint as well as the records of the call in question. Anyone who has a passing familiarity with Watergate knows that covering things up is a great big no-no. The depth of the cover-up is also a strong indication that the White House knew what they were doing was illegal.
They didn't cover anything up and they didn't do anything illegal. Trump released everything so fast, that there were some Democrats demanding their release even after they were released and the lies the Democrats told about them, thoroughly debunked.

It appears the positioning was in anticipation of Trump asserting privilege and he did not, leaving you guys dumped on your asses. That's the good thing about having a President that is a very stable genius with an unusually large brain.
He only released the complaint and the records after he got found out, not the same thing.
He was never "found out" about anything. He released the records so fast and free of redactions that the only reasonable response is amazement at how fast and completely he provided everything, even the IC's finding on the applicability of the Whistle Blower statute to the President, it doesn't apply. But, Trump promptly released everything anyway.
 
We are talking legal stuff here, try to keep up. Allegations do not become evidence until it is "found" in an investigation. If you cannot understand that then I can't help you.
Evidence, something the idiots on the left don't have.
The inquiry will quickly find that the White House attempted to cover up the whistle blower complaint as well as the records of the call in question. Anyone who has a passing familiarity with Watergate knows that covering things up is a great big no-no. The depth of the cover-up is also a strong indication that the White House knew what they were doing was illegal.
They didn't cover anything up and they didn't do anything illegal. Trump released everything so fast, that there were some Democrats demanding their release even after they were released and the lies the Democrats told about them, thoroughly debunked.

It appears the positioning was in anticipation of Trump asserting privilege and he did not, leaving you guys dumped on your asses. That's the good thing about having a President that is a very stable genius with an unusually large brain.
He only released the complaint and the records after he got found out, not the same thing.
He was never "found out" about anything. He released the records so fast and free of redactions that the only reasonable response is amazement at how fast and completely he provided everything, even the IC's finding on the applicability of the Whistle Blower statute to the President, it doesn't apply. But, Trump promptly released everything anyway.
Bullshit, the whistle-blower complaint was filed on August 12 and the IG finished his review on August 26. Shiff issued a subpoena for the complaint on September 13 and we saw nothing from the White House until September 25. That's a month longer than it should have taken and there should not have been a subpoena to make them do it.
 
And so the death of the republican party continues. If it is now the prevalent republican opinion that none of the rules apply to republican presidents then the party deserves what happens next and they have only themselves to blame.


Let's hear the phone conversations with Comrade Putin after Comrade Obama " had more flexibility" . Didn't they take over Crimea during his Admin and Invade The Ukraine. Maybe he was talking about his being Flexible enough to Kiss Putin's ass and jerk the American people off at the same time. :texflag:
 
Evidence, something the idiots on the left don't have.
The inquiry will quickly find that the White House attempted to cover up the whistle blower complaint as well as the records of the call in question. Anyone who has a passing familiarity with Watergate knows that covering things up is a great big no-no. The depth of the cover-up is also a strong indication that the White House knew what they were doing was illegal.
They didn't cover anything up and they didn't do anything illegal. Trump released everything so fast, that there were some Democrats demanding their release even after they were released and the lies the Democrats told about them, thoroughly debunked.

It appears the positioning was in anticipation of Trump asserting privilege and he did not, leaving you guys dumped on your asses. That's the good thing about having a President that is a very stable genius with an unusually large brain.
He only released the complaint and the records after he got found out, not the same thing.
He was never "found out" about anything. He released the records so fast and free of redactions that the only reasonable response is amazement at how fast and completely he provided everything, even the IC's finding on the applicability of the Whistle Blower statute to the President, it doesn't apply. But, Trump promptly released everything anyway.
Bullshit, the whistle-blower complaint was filed on August 12 and the IG finished his review on August 26. Shiff issued a subpoena for the complaint on September 13 and we saw nothing from the White House until September 25. That's a month longer than it should have taken and there should not have been a subpoena to make them do it.
Go Trump, screw the commie left.
 
You either have solid evidence of high crimes or you don't. It's really that simple.
So it is your opinion that an impeachment inquiry cannot even be started without ironclad evidence of wrongdoing? Your opinion is wrong. Like any investigation there only has to be credible allegations of wrongdoing. Solid actionable evidence can only be obtained in the course of an official investigation. We've all seen how the administration simply refuses to cooperate with run-of-the-mill hearings. Now let's see them simply refuse to cooperate with an impeachment inquiry. That alone is grounds for impeachment on obstruction.
You just admitted that you have no evidence.

The Biggest Nothingburger Of Them All.

“The Democrats have no believable scandal; they can only impeach him once. This will be the biggest and bitterest nothingburger of all. Bring it on.”​

In his second term, he’ll have more flexibility.
We are talking legal stuff here, try to keep up. Allegations do not become evidence until it is "found" in an investigation. If you cannot understand that then I can't help you.
Evidence, something the idiots on the left don't have.
The inquiry will quickly find that the White House attempted to cover up the whistle blower complaint as well as the records of the call in question. Anyone who has a passing familiarity with Watergate knows that covering things up is a great big no-no. The depth of the cover-up is also a strong indication that the White House knew what they were doing was illegal.
So what are you know some kind of a self styled sooth sayer.
Got nothing, never had anything and will never have anything but a bunch of bullshit imaginary nonsense.
 
So it is your opinion that an impeachment inquiry cannot even be started without ironclad evidence of wrongdoing? Your opinion is wrong. Like any investigation there only has to be credible allegations of wrongdoing. Solid actionable evidence can only be obtained in the course of an official investigation. We've all seen how the administration simply refuses to cooperate with run-of-the-mill hearings. Now let's see them simply refuse to cooperate with an impeachment inquiry. That alone is grounds for impeachment on obstruction.
You just admitted that you have no evidence.

The Biggest Nothingburger Of Them All.

“The Democrats have no believable scandal; they can only impeach him once. This will be the biggest and bitterest nothingburger of all. Bring it on.”​

In his second term, he’ll have more flexibility.
We are talking legal stuff here, try to keep up. Allegations do not become evidence until it is "found" in an investigation. If you cannot understand that then I can't help you.
Evidence, something the idiots on the left don't have.
The inquiry will quickly find that the White House attempted to cover up the whistle blower complaint as well as the records of the call in question. Anyone who has a passing familiarity with Watergate knows that covering things up is a great big no-no. The depth of the cover-up is also a strong indication that the White House knew what they were doing was illegal.
So what are you know some kind of a self styled sooth sayer.
Got nothing, never had anything and will never have anything but a bunch of bullshit imaginary nonsense.
It's amazing, they memorize these phrases like parrots, regurgitate them like they are saying something intelligent and profound and it's all empty air with no support.

That works in the Fake News Echo Chamber, but if this gets to trial, they need REAL evidence of actual crimes and they have nothing.

It will be a nice comparison when we get Barr and Durham's findings where we can contrast the difference between empty rhetoric and real fact based analysis.

Have you notices the Fake News Campaign to discredit Barr?

Take the phone transcript between the President's of Ukraine and the US. Long before the conversation came around to the Biden topic, the “favor” that Trump asked for was Zelensky’s assistance in Barr’s ongoing investigation of the genesis of the Trump-Russia investigation.

Trump made a wholly appropriate request to the head of state of a country in possession of relevant evidence, for cooperation with a legitimate investigation being conducted by our country’s Justice Department.

The Dems strategy is to claim that Barr’s investigation is an adjunct of the Trump 2020 campaign — rather than the Justice Department’s investigation of intelligence and law-enforcement abuses of power attendant to the 2016 election.

Trump opponents do not like Barr’s investigation of the genesis and conduct of the Russia investigation. It is, nonetheless, a proper exercise of the Justice Department’s lawful authority. Indeed, contrary to the Mueller investigation, there are no questions about the propriety of the prosecutor’s assignment. John Durham, the U.S. Attorney for Connecticut assigned by Barr, is not a special counsel brought in from outside. He is an in-house Justice Department lawyer, authorized to examine potential law violations. There is no question, moreover, that the attorney general has the authority to investigate possible malfeasance or misfeasance by the Justice Department — if nothing else, for the purpose of preventing its repetition by improving internal guidelines or even asking Congress for curative legislation.

It is a commonplace for our government to seek assistance from foreign governments in ongoing federal investigations. In fact, Washington and Kyiv entered a mutual legal assistance treaty in 1998. In approving this U.S.–Ukraine “MLAT” in 2000, the Senate noted that the original purpose of such treaties was “to permit the United States to obtain evidence from foreign jurisdictions in a form admissible in American courts.” As chief executive, it is not at all unusual for a president to encourage another country’s assistance in Justice Department investigations.

The Biden portion of the conversation was merely a subordinate strand of a perfectly appropriate executive-branch request for assistance in a completely legitimate Justice Department investigation into government misconduct that is potentially serious.

Attorney General Bill Barr -- Do Republicans See the Strategy to Discredit the Barr Investigation? | National Review
 
Evidence, something the idiots on the left don't have.
The inquiry will quickly find that the White House attempted to cover up the whistle blower complaint as well as the records of the call in question. Anyone who has a passing familiarity with Watergate knows that covering things up is a great big no-no. The depth of the cover-up is also a strong indication that the White House knew what they were doing was illegal.
They didn't cover anything up and they didn't do anything illegal. Trump released everything so fast, that there were some Democrats demanding their release even after they were released and the lies the Democrats told about them, thoroughly debunked.

It appears the positioning was in anticipation of Trump asserting privilege and he did not, leaving you guys dumped on your asses. That's the good thing about having a President that is a very stable genius with an unusually large brain.
He only released the complaint and the records after he got found out, not the same thing.
He was never "found out" about anything. He released the records so fast and free of redactions that the only reasonable response is amazement at how fast and completely he provided everything, even the IC's finding on the applicability of the Whistle Blower statute to the President, it doesn't apply. But, Trump promptly released everything anyway.
Bullshit, the whistle-blower complaint was filed on August 12 and the IG finished his review on August 26. Shiff issued a subpoena for the complaint on September 13 and we saw nothing from the White House until September 25. That's a month longer than it should have taken and there should not have been a subpoena to make them do it.

Straining at gnats ? Much ?
 
You just admitted that you have no evidence.

The Biggest Nothingburger Of Them All.

“The Democrats have no believable scandal; they can only impeach him once. This will be the biggest and bitterest nothingburger of all. Bring it on.”​

In his second term, he’ll have more flexibility.
We are talking legal stuff here, try to keep up. Allegations do not become evidence until it is "found" in an investigation. If you cannot understand that then I can't help you.
Evidence, something the idiots on the left don't have.
The inquiry will quickly find that the White House attempted to cover up the whistle blower complaint as well as the records of the call in question. Anyone who has a passing familiarity with Watergate knows that covering things up is a great big no-no. The depth of the cover-up is also a strong indication that the White House knew what they were doing was illegal.
They didn't cover anything up and they didn't do anything illegal. Trump released everything so fast, that there were some Democrats demanding their release even after they were released and the lies the Democrats told about them, thoroughly debunked.

It appears the positioning was in anticipation of Trump asserting privilege and he did not, leaving you guys dumped on your asses. That's the good thing about having a President that is a very stable genius with an unusually large brain.
He only released the complaint and the records after he got found out, not the same thing.
You're attempting to assume the point. That's the kind of horseshit that's not going to work in the Senate trial. You can't just scream "crime!" make up a bunch of crap, deliberately misconstrue, impute motives and cut 500 words out of a transcript. You have to actually name the crime and then prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Trump, with criminal intent, violated that law. You guys don't have squat. You think with a fancy shuffle you can shove this through and this isn't just publishing fake news, you have to actually prove your case.

WHAT KIND OF IMPEACHMENT SCHEDULE IS PELOSI PURSUING? Do you recall how long the Clinton and Nixon impeachment processes ran? Big timing problem for the Democrats.

The Clinton impeachment took five months, the Nixon impeachment took eight months. If they want to get it done by Thanksgiving, that’s 6 1/2 weeks from today. If they want it done by Iowa, it’s four months. If we are in the election season, the obvious question will be: "Why not just let the voters decide?"

Pelosi and key House Democratic leaders such as House Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) haven’t made sufficient progress.

We know no more today than we did Friday. They haven't even come up with a crime, they're kind of stuck there.

Without Republicans and Democrats on board, this is viewed as a partisan exercise, a loser for them politically in the 2020 elections.

The New York Times reported that Schiff was briefed by an intelligence committee staffer on the whistleblower’s complaint days before Pelosi’s Sept. 24 announcement of an “official” impeachment inquiry. Trump released the transcript of his Ukraine call the very same day.

Pelosi’s Democrats are blowing it by focusing so much of their efforts and political capital on impeaching Trump rather than working for The American People.

13 of the 18 House seats Republicans need to gain in 2020 to regain the House majority were in districts Trump carried by five or more points in 2016.

Most of the Democrats’ 2018 pickups ran as moderates. By making impeachment high profile, those ‘moderates’ look like Nancy Pelosi robots, or worse, AOC robots.

The impeachment emphasis in 2019 contradicts the basic themes the 2018 Democratic pickups ran on, such as “let’s get things done,” “I’m a veteran, vote for me,” and “I’m a moderate.”

Democrats also make themselves appear unconcerned about the economic progress achieved by key middle-class voters in battleground states like Ohio, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.

During the entire 16 years of presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, the median income in the U.S. increased by only $1,000.

Since Trump became president, the media income in the U.S. increased by $4,144. And our taxes went down by $1,400 in 2018 after the Trump/GOP tax cut.

That is the group that elected Trump, and they have been amply rewarded in that trust being kept. Democrats continue to talk about everything other than the economic well-being of the average American.

Democrats hijacked by their extremist elements.
 
Kbrrei3_d.jpg
 
Hey Democrats, Impeach This!

hahahahahaha....

Summed up well.

From the article....

Letting these creeps steal our country from us is worse than the resulting carnage from the fight they’ve picked. We could roll over, but instead we’ll take the hit to keep our liberty. In the end, after many figurative casualties, impeachment is going to boomerang on these clowns. The elite insiders are willfully blind to the fact that the key question to Normal Americans will be, “What was that brother’s widow-marrying, coke-snorting, kicked-out-of-the-Navy-in-disgracing, non-Ukrainian-speaking loser scion doing getting paid $50K a month by an oligarch that wasn’t directly related to his gropey pa being Obama’s veep/court jester?

Hunter Biden’s beyond a mere prodigal son – he’s a catastrophe of Biblical proportions, compounded by Hairplug One thinking it was super-duper savvy to brag about helping his snorterrific son on video. The media will try and hide it. The Democrats will declare it – have already declared it – out-of-bounds and irrelevant, but they can’t gate-keep that question from being asked forever. And the answer to the question is that our liberal elite is terminally corrupt.

************

Oh yeah,

Payback time.


He didn't marry his brothers widow, they just had a fling while he was married to his first wife. Someone doesn't know what they're talking about.

.
 
Hey Democrats, Impeach This!

hahahahahaha....

Summed up well.

From the article....

Letting these creeps steal our country from us is worse than the resulting carnage from the fight they’ve picked. We could roll over, but instead we’ll take the hit to keep our liberty. In the end, after many figurative casualties, impeachment is going to boomerang on these clowns. The elite insiders are willfully blind to the fact that the key question to Normal Americans will be, “What was that brother’s widow-marrying, coke-snorting, kicked-out-of-the-Navy-in-disgracing, non-Ukrainian-speaking loser scion doing getting paid $50K a month by an oligarch that wasn’t directly related to his gropey pa being Obama’s veep/court jester?

Hunter Biden’s beyond a mere prodigal son – he’s a catastrophe of Biblical proportions, compounded by Hairplug One thinking it was super-duper savvy to brag about helping his snorterrific son on video. The media will try and hide it. The Democrats will declare it – have already declared it – out-of-bounds and irrelevant, but they can’t gate-keep that question from being asked forever. And the answer to the question is that our liberal elite is terminally corrupt.

************

Oh yeah,

Payback time.


He didn't marry his brothers widow, they just had a fling while he was married to his first wife. Someone doesn't know what they're talking about.

.

Biden is a mess.
 
Hey Democrats, Impeach This!

hahahahahaha....

Summed up well.

From the article....

Letting these creeps steal our country from us is worse than the resulting carnage from the fight they’ve picked. We could roll over, but instead we’ll take the hit to keep our liberty. In the end, after many figurative casualties, impeachment is going to boomerang on these clowns. The elite insiders are willfully blind to the fact that the key question to Normal Americans will be, “What was that brother’s widow-marrying, coke-snorting, kicked-out-of-the-Navy-in-disgracing, non-Ukrainian-speaking loser scion doing getting paid $50K a month by an oligarch that wasn’t directly related to his gropey pa being Obama’s veep/court jester?

Hunter Biden’s beyond a mere prodigal son – he’s a catastrophe of Biblical proportions, compounded by Hairplug One thinking it was super-duper savvy to brag about helping his snorterrific son on video. The media will try and hide it. The Democrats will declare it – have already declared it – out-of-bounds and irrelevant, but they can’t gate-keep that question from being asked forever. And the answer to the question is that our liberal elite is terminally corrupt.

************

Oh yeah,

Payback time.


He didn't marry his brothers widow, they just had a fling while he was married to his first wife. Someone doesn't know what they're talking about.

.

Biden is a mess.


No doubt, but no reason to lie about him, he wrecked his life enough with out help.

.
 
The clown show in the house is fun to watch. Their little fake commie inquiry is nothing more than a cover-up of their crimes. Idiots.
 
The clown show in the house is fun to watch. Their little fake commie inquiry is nothing more than a cover-up of their crimes. Idiots.
Yup. They are trying to use impeachment to derail the Barr/Durham investigation, they will shame themselves and fail.
 
Hey Democrats, Impeach This!

hahahahahaha....

Summed up well.

From the article....

Letting these creeps steal our country from us is worse than the resulting carnage from the fight they’ve picked. We could roll over, but instead we’ll take the hit to keep our liberty. In the end, after many figurative casualties, impeachment is going to boomerang on these clowns. The elite insiders are willfully blind to the fact that the key question to Normal Americans will be, “What was that brother’s widow-marrying, coke-snorting, kicked-out-of-the-Navy-in-disgracing, non-Ukrainian-speaking loser scion doing getting paid $50K a month by an oligarch that wasn’t directly related to his gropey pa being Obama’s veep/court jester?

Hunter Biden’s beyond a mere prodigal son – he’s a catastrophe of Biblical proportions, compounded by Hairplug One thinking it was super-duper savvy to brag about helping his snorterrific son on video. The media will try and hide it. The Democrats will declare it – have already declared it – out-of-bounds and irrelevant, but they can’t gate-keep that question from being asked forever. And the answer to the question is that our liberal elite is terminally corrupt.

************

Oh yeah,

Payback time.
Done
 

Forum List

Back
Top