🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Hillary: Another Candidate With A Red Tint

Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.


Well, Bluesy.....as the Democrats/Liberals stand for the very same principles as did the Communist Party....
...it is hard to find any distinctions that represent real differences.

Really....let's call a spade a spade.
Damn that Thomas Jefferson and his desire for public schools..


Clearly, your post is one more example of the numerous lacunae resulting from your lack of an education.


You might want to look up 'non sequitur.'
Surely you might want to look up pigeon hole in the dictionary for your understanding of the Democrat Party, that political party nomenclature you misspell every damn day...


Let's cut to the chase:
Can you find anything in my posts that isn't true, accurate and correct?


No?

What conclusion should you draw from that?

There is nothing in this thread, or any thread you've posted that does not provide an accurate account of your opinion, that is, The RED SCARE!
 
In this thread, a reminder that any who vote Democrat have been manipulated into accepting, endorsing, and advancing the same worldview as Soviet Communists.

Such individuals will find it impossible to deny any of the facts that I am about to reveal.
Liberalism is a spin-off of the Soviet Communist political philosophy, and the current Democrat candidate for President exhibits a central view concomitant with earlier Bolsheviks.....



.....a jaundiced view of religion.
Any difference from that of earlier communists is one of degree....never of kind.

1. As one of his friends later recalled, "Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results...Famine, he explained....would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too." The Black Book of Communism, p.123-124.

2. Christianity was fundamentally incompatible with Communism....the contest between the scientific materialism of the new communist state and the enduring faith of much of the Soviet Union's population.
Lenin was implacably opposed to all religious sentiment, as was Marx. 'Any religious idea,' he wrote to Maxim Gorky in 1913, ...is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful "infection." "The Dictators," by Richard Overy, p. 270.


January 28, 1918, the Russian Orthodox Church was formally separated from the state;....Religious property was liquidated and a twenty year program of church closures began. Religion was banned from schools. The state and the party were officially atheist.....



3. Who can forget the Democrat Convention of 2012, at which 'God' was booed...






4. "The idea that Hillary Clinton would serve as a champion of religious freedom is being met with skepticism....

.....an op-ed piece the Democratic nominee herself wrote for the Deseret News, asserting that she’s been “fighting to defend religious freedom for years.” She boasts of her work overseas, but the author of the National Review piece, Alexandra DeSanctis, reckons that because Mrs. Clinton has “made no effort to defend religious freedom here in the U.S.” her claim “rings hollow.”

a. It’s hard to think of a single religious freedom case working its way through the courts here in America in which Mrs. Clinton is on the side of the religious parties."
Clinton’s Religious Freedom - The New York Sun




In short....vote Democrat, and you stand against the very doctrines on which this nation was established.

Do you really believe this or are you just trying out the spin?

You do realize that the USA was founded on principles of seperation of church and state, reenforced by Jefferson, right? It wasn't till the 1950s under eisenhower that God was injected more into our politics. Ie adding in God we trust to our paper currency and added under God to the pledge of allegiance etc.



Gads, you're a moron

1.. “52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” David Limbaugh Believers in the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, or, as they would be known today, “an extremist Fundamentalist hate group.”


2. There was never.....never....any such separation until the would-be dictator, Franklin Roosevelt used his first Supreme Court pick on a KKKer, Hugo Black, who inserted said separation into jurisprudence.
 
As is true of Communists, Socialists, Nazis, Fascists....and Liberals....


5. ".....the highly fraught disputes that are coming into focus with the conflict between religious communities and secular law in respect of abortion and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender rights. Even on the most anodyne religious freedom controversies, it’s hard to find Mrs. Clinton in the lists.


How about the attempts by New York City’s Human Rights Commission to block Satmar shopkeepers in Brooklyn from requiring, in their shops, modest dress of men and women?


Or the attempt by Mayor Bloomberg’s Department of Mental Hygiene to regulate the way circumcision is practiced in some Orthodox Jewish communities?


Or, halfway through the Obama presidency, the case in which the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sought to regulate the hiring of ministers at the Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Church and School?


..... Mrs. Clinton has “made no effort to defend religious freedom here in the U.S.” her claim “rings hollow.”
Clinton’s Religious Freedom - The New York Sun
 
In this thread, a reminder that any who vote Democrat have been manipulated into accepting, endorsing, and advancing the same worldview as Soviet Communists.

Such individuals will find it impossible to deny any of the facts that I am about to reveal.
Liberalism is a spin-off of the Soviet Communist political philosophy, and the current Democrat candidate for President exhibits a central view concomitant with earlier Bolsheviks.....



.....a jaundiced view of religion.
Any difference from that of earlier communists is one of degree....never of kind.

1. As one of his friends later recalled, "Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results...Famine, he explained....would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too." The Black Book of Communism, p.123-124.

2. Christianity was fundamentally incompatible with Communism....the contest between the scientific materialism of the new communist state and the enduring faith of much of the Soviet Union's population.
Lenin was implacably opposed to all religious sentiment, as was Marx. 'Any religious idea,' he wrote to Maxim Gorky in 1913, ...is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful "infection." "The Dictators," by Richard Overy, p. 270.


January 28, 1918, the Russian Orthodox Church was formally separated from the state;....Religious property was liquidated and a twenty year program of church closures began. Religion was banned from schools. The state and the party were officially atheist.....



3. Who can forget the Democrat Convention of 2012, at which 'God' was booed...






4. "The idea that Hillary Clinton would serve as a champion of religious freedom is being met with skepticism....

.....an op-ed piece the Democratic nominee herself wrote for the Deseret News, asserting that she’s been “fighting to defend religious freedom for years.” She boasts of her work overseas, but the author of the National Review piece, Alexandra DeSanctis, reckons that because Mrs. Clinton has “made no effort to defend religious freedom here in the U.S.” her claim “rings hollow.”

a. It’s hard to think of a single religious freedom case working its way through the courts here in America in which Mrs. Clinton is on the side of the religious parties."
Clinton’s Religious Freedom - The New York Sun




In short....vote Democrat, and you stand against the very doctrines on which this nation was established.

Do you really believe this or are you just trying out the spin?

You do realize that the USA was founded on principles of seperation of church and state, reenforced by Jefferson, right? It wasn't till the 1950s under eisenhower that God was injected more into our politics. Ie adding in God we trust to our paper currency and added under God to the pledge of allegiance etc.



Gads, you're a moron

1.. “52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” David Limbaugh Believers in the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, or, as they would be known today, “an extremist Fundamentalist hate group.”


2. There was never.....never....any such separation until the would-be dictator, Franklin Roosevelt used his first Supreme Court pick on a KKKer, Hugo Black, who inserted said separation into jurisprudence.

PoliSci101 or basic History:

Jefferson wrote,

“ "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church & State."[1]

Separation of church and state in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
English lesson:

com·mu·nism
ˈkämyəˌnizəm/
noun
  1. a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.


Well, Bluesy.....as the Democrats/Liberals stand for the very same principles as did the Communist Party....
...it is hard to find any distinctions that represent real differences.

Really....let's call a spade a spade.

I am so calling the PC agency on you for using the word "spade". ALARM she used the word spade ^^^ seize her!!
 
In this thread, a reminder that any who vote Democrat have been manipulated into accepting, endorsing, and advancing the same worldview as Soviet Communists.

Such individuals will find it impossible to deny any of the facts that I am about to reveal.
Liberalism is a spin-off of the Soviet Communist political philosophy, and the current Democrat candidate for President exhibits a central view concomitant with earlier Bolsheviks.....



.....a jaundiced view of religion.
Any difference from that of earlier communists is one of degree....never of kind.

1. As one of his friends later recalled, "Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results...Famine, he explained....would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too." The Black Book of Communism, p.123-124.

2. Christianity was fundamentally incompatible with Communism....the contest between the scientific materialism of the new communist state and the enduring faith of much of the Soviet Union's population.
Lenin was implacably opposed to all religious sentiment, as was Marx. 'Any religious idea,' he wrote to Maxim Gorky in 1913, ...is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful "infection." "The Dictators," by Richard Overy, p. 270.


January 28, 1918, the Russian Orthodox Church was formally separated from the state;....Religious property was liquidated and a twenty year program of church closures began. Religion was banned from schools. The state and the party were officially atheist.....



3. Who can forget the Democrat Convention of 2012, at which 'God' was booed...






4. "The idea that Hillary Clinton would serve as a champion of religious freedom is being met with skepticism....

.....an op-ed piece the Democratic nominee herself wrote for the Deseret News, asserting that she’s been “fighting to defend religious freedom for years.” She boasts of her work overseas, but the author of the National Review piece, Alexandra DeSanctis, reckons that because Mrs. Clinton has “made no effort to defend religious freedom here in the U.S.” her claim “rings hollow.”

a. It’s hard to think of a single religious freedom case working its way through the courts here in America in which Mrs. Clinton is on the side of the religious parties."
Clinton’s Religious Freedom - The New York Sun




In short....vote Democrat, and you stand against the very doctrines on which this nation was established.

Do you really believe this or are you just trying out the spin?

You do realize that the USA was founded on principles of seperation of church and state, reenforced by Jefferson, right? It wasn't till the 1950s under eisenhower that God was injected more into our politics. Ie adding in God we trust to our paper currency and added under God to the pledge of allegiance etc.



Gads, you're a moron

1.. “52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” David Limbaugh Believers in the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, or, as they would be known today, “an extremist Fundamentalist hate group.”


2. There was never.....never....any such separation until the would-be dictator, Franklin Roosevelt used his first Supreme Court pick on a KKKer, Hugo Black, who inserted said separation into jurisprudence.

PoliSci101 or basic History:

Jefferson wrote,

“ "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church & State."[1]

Separation of church and state in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



What???


You require even more proof that you're a moron????

Sure.

1. Jefferson was simply telling the Baptists that the 'wall' was one way: no government interference in their religious affairs.
“the Baptists who supported Jefferson were outsiders — a beleaguered religious and political minority in region where a Congregationalist-Federalist axis dominated political life.” They were seeking reassurances of a religion friendly disposition from their new president who was horribly vilified during the election as an “infidel and atheist.” This rumor had become so widespread during the presidential campaign, New England housewives were known to have buried their family Bibles in the backyards so fearful that the new Administration would confiscate their Holy Scriptures.

So this famous letter having to do with the ‘wall of separation between church and state’ was a political statement giving his reassurances to the Baptists that he was a friend to religion, and a response to the vilification he received from the Federalist Congregationalist establishment in Connecticut.

This was not a definitive manifesto on the relationship between government and religion.


2. In fact, his actions as president run counter to how modern day historians and justices construe this letter. President Jefferson supported the use of federal funds to be used to build churches and to help Christian missionary work among the Indians. So the modern day perception of Jefferson’s wall directly flies in face of how Jefferson behaved in his political life.

3. The force behind the misguided interpretation comes from the anti-Catholic former Ku Klux Klan member, Justice Hugo Black: The ‘high and impregnable’ wall central to the past 50 years of church-state jurisprudence is not Jefferson’s wall; rather, it is the wall that Justice Hugo Black built in 1947 in Everson v. Board of Education.
Writing About Anything I Want To

clip_image001.gif
clip_image002.gif



a. "... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]


Now....if you can be on your best behavior, I'm certain an nice adult will help you obtain a library card.....
...you dunce.
 
English lesson:

com·mu·nism
ˈkämyəˌnizəm/
noun
  1. a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.



What????

You require further lessons?????

What are you, a Liberal.


Start here:
Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life

9. Which restricts free speech and thought?

10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”



And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


Does that neon light flashing IDIOT over your head keep you awake at night?
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.


Well, Bluesy.....as the Democrats/Liberals stand for the very same principles as did the Communist Party....
...it is hard to find any distinctions that represent real differences.

Really....let's call a spade a spade.

I am so calling the PC agency on you for using the word "spade". ALARM she used the word spade ^^^ seize her!!


Just watch your step, BOY!!!!!
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.


Well, Bluesy.....as the Democrats/Liberals stand for the very same principles as did the Communist Party....
...it is hard to find any distinctions that represent real differences.

Really....let's call a spade a spade.
Damn that Thomas Jefferson and his desire for public schools..
damn those republicans for creating vouchers to use toward public schools.
 
6. "Mrs. Clinton was mum, too, in respect of the Trinity Lutheran Church Learning Center when Missouri sought to deny it safer playground paving because the school was religious.

For that matter, Mrs. Clinton kept quiet during the famous struggle of Pastor Clyde Reed against the town of Gilbert, Arizona, which sought to apply to the signage he used to advertise his services restrictions that were more onerous than signage for other services around town.

Nor was Mrs. Clinton any help to Greece, N.Y., in its long struggle for the right to begin town meetings with a prayer. Not a peep, even though the town Greece is in her home state and the case had been in the news in its long climb to triumph in the Supreme Court.

The idea that Hillary Clinton would serve as a champion of religious freedom is being met with skepticism....."
Clinton’s Religious Freedom - The New York Sun
 
Ronald Reagan, oh yeah, that guy that slept through his second term.....Will you all ever make up your mind about how the rich use their money? I don't care why do you? Berkshire Hathaway just gave me a refund on my escrow account for the mortgage, taxes and insurance...Surly they should have kept it for political purposes..
unless one doesn't have an escrow and keeps their money to make money. hahahahhahahaaha.
 
Well, Bluesy.....as the Democrats/Liberals stand for the very same principles as did the Communist Party....
...it is hard to find any distinctions that represent real differences.

Really....let's call a spade a spade.
Damn that Thomas Jefferson and his desire for public schools..


Clearly, your post is one more example of the numerous lacunae resulting from your lack of an education.


You might want to look up 'non sequitur.'
Surely you might want to look up pigeon hole in the dictionary for your understanding of the Democrat Party, that political party nomenclature you misspell every damn day...


Let's cut to the chase:
Can you find anything in my posts that isn't true, accurate and correct?


No?

What conclusion should you draw from that?

There is nothing in this thread, or any thread you've posted that does not provide an accurate account of your opinion, that is, The RED SCARE!
just like every donald scare tactic eh?
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.


Well, Bluesy.....as the Democrats/Liberals stand for the very same principles as did the Communist Party....
...it is hard to find any distinctions that represent real differences.

Really....let's call a spade a spade.
Damn that Thomas Jefferson and his desire for public schools..


Clearly, your post is one more example of the numerous lacunae resulting from your lack of an education.


You might want to look up 'non sequitur.'
Surely you might want to look up pigeon hole in the dictionary for your understanding of the Democrat Party, that political party nomenclature you misspell every damn day...


Let's cut to the chase:
Can you find anything in my posts that isn't true, accurate and correct?


No?

What conclusion should you draw from that?


people quit paying any attention you and your "truths" after you assured the world Keystone would pass without any problems, and then got stepped on like a worm.

so the conclusion I draw from THAT is simple. You're full of shit.
 
Well, Bluesy.....as the Democrats/Liberals stand for the very same principles as did the Communist Party....
...it is hard to find any distinctions that represent real differences.

Really....let's call a spade a spade.
Damn that Thomas Jefferson and his desire for public schools..


Clearly, your post is one more example of the numerous lacunae resulting from your lack of an education.


You might want to look up 'non sequitur.'
Surely you might want to look up pigeon hole in the dictionary for your understanding of the Democrat Party, that political party nomenclature you misspell every damn day...


Let's cut to the chase:
Can you find anything in my posts that isn't true, accurate and correct?


No?

What conclusion should you draw from that?


people quit paying any attention you and your "truths" after you assured the world Keystone would pass without any problems, and then got stepped on like a worm.

so the conclusion I draw from THAT is simple. You're full of shit.

"....you assured the world Keystone would pass without any problems, and then got stepped on like a worm."


Now watch how easily I slice you up.


I never said any such thing.

You're lying.

Find any such quote of mine, or accept the the appellation 'low-life, lying Liberal.'




Waiting.
 
In this thread, a reminder that any who vote Democrat have been manipulated into accepting, endorsing, and advancing the same worldview as Soviet Communists.

Such individuals will find it impossible to deny any of the facts that I am about to reveal.
Liberalism is a spin-off of the Soviet Communist political philosophy, and the current Democrat candidate for President exhibits a central view concomitant with earlier Bolsheviks.....



.....a jaundiced view of religion.
Any difference from that of earlier communists is one of degree....never of kind.

1. As one of his friends later recalled, "Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results...Famine, he explained....would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too." The Black Book of Communism, p.123-124.

2. Christianity was fundamentally incompatible with Communism....the contest between the scientific materialism of the new communist state and the enduring faith of much of the Soviet Union's population.
Lenin was implacably opposed to all religious sentiment, as was Marx. 'Any religious idea,' he wrote to Maxim Gorky in 1913, ...is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful "infection." "The Dictators," by Richard Overy, p. 270.


January 28, 1918, the Russian Orthodox Church was formally separated from the state;....Religious property was liquidated and a twenty year program of church closures began. Religion was banned from schools. The state and the party were officially atheist.....



3. Who can forget the Democrat Convention of 2012, at which 'God' was booed...






4. "The idea that Hillary Clinton would serve as a champion of religious freedom is being met with skepticism....

.....an op-ed piece the Democratic nominee herself wrote for the Deseret News, asserting that she’s been “fighting to defend religious freedom for years.” She boasts of her work overseas, but the author of the National Review piece, Alexandra DeSanctis, reckons that because Mrs. Clinton has “made no effort to defend religious freedom here in the U.S.” her claim “rings hollow.”

a. It’s hard to think of a single religious freedom case working its way through the courts here in America in which Mrs. Clinton is on the side of the religious parties."
Clinton’s Religious Freedom - The New York Sun




In short....vote Democrat, and you stand against the very doctrines on which this nation was established.

Because the left controls the media they can cause chaos and destruction everywhere they go and never be blamed for it. Now why would they want to cause this? Because causing hardship for your voters isn't damaging to their political aspirations like it used to be. A dishonest press isn't the check on corruption it used to be. So Democrats can do whatever they want and the media never blames them for any of it. Democrats want us to lose everything we have. That way they can tell us what to do using fear tactics.
 
Damn that Thomas Jefferson and his desire for public schools..


Clearly, your post is one more example of the numerous lacunae resulting from your lack of an education.


You might want to look up 'non sequitur.'
Surely you might want to look up pigeon hole in the dictionary for your understanding of the Democrat Party, that political party nomenclature you misspell every damn day...


Let's cut to the chase:
Can you find anything in my posts that isn't true, accurate and correct?


No?

What conclusion should you draw from that?


people quit paying any attention you and your "truths" after you assured the world Keystone would pass without any problems, and then got stepped on like a worm.

so the conclusion I draw from THAT is simple. You're full of shit.

"....you assured the world Keystone would pass without any problems, and then got stepped on like a worm."


Now watch how easily I slice you up.


I never said any such thing.

You're lying.

Find any such quote of mine, or accept the the appellation 'low-life, lying Liberal.'




Waiting.


hold your breath while you wait, Ms. Pipeline.
 
Clearly, your post is one more example of the numerous lacunae resulting from your lack of an education.


You might want to look up 'non sequitur.'
Surely you might want to look up pigeon hole in the dictionary for your understanding of the Democrat Party, that political party nomenclature you misspell every damn day...


Let's cut to the chase:
Can you find anything in my posts that isn't true, accurate and correct?


No?

What conclusion should you draw from that?


people quit paying any attention you and your "truths" after you assured the world Keystone would pass without any problems, and then got stepped on like a worm.

so the conclusion I draw from THAT is simple. You're full of shit.

"....you assured the world Keystone would pass without any problems, and then got stepped on like a worm."


Now watch how easily I slice you up.


I never said any such thing.

You're lying.

Find any such quote of mine, or accept the the appellation 'low-life, lying Liberal.'




Waiting.


hold your breath while you wait, Ms. Pipeline.


So....when can I expect you to be changing your avi to " 'low-life, lying Liberal'?

Time is pressing.
 
Surely you might want to look up pigeon hole in the dictionary for your understanding of the Democrat Party, that political party nomenclature you misspell every damn day...


Let's cut to the chase:
Can you find anything in my posts that isn't true, accurate and correct?


No?

What conclusion should you draw from that?


people quit paying any attention you and your "truths" after you assured the world Keystone would pass without any problems, and then got stepped on like a worm.

so the conclusion I draw from THAT is simple. You're full of shit.

"....you assured the world Keystone would pass without any problems, and then got stepped on like a worm."


Now watch how easily I slice you up.


I never said any such thing.

You're lying.

Find any such quote of mine, or accept the the appellation 'low-life, lying Liberal.'




Waiting.


hold your breath while you wait, Ms. Pipeline.


So....when can I expect you to be changing your avi to " 'low-life, lying Liberal'?

Time is pressing.

you know, and I know we went round and round over Keystone ... you were 100% pro, I was 100% against.

don't fuck with me or I'll spend some time and prove it ... and I'm retired.


for a start ... more Ms Pipeline?


Umm, do USMB Republicans understand that the Keystone pipeline will only create 35 permanent jobs?

TD quips ..


You've missed my other posts then. Because I'm loaded for bear on this issue. It's become a passion because there is so much bullshit out there and if there is one thing I hate it's lies and deceit. Sets me clean off.

How's this link for a rosy picture with this organization extolling the virtues of the Keystone pipelines and TransCanada?

I don't think that TransCanada could ask for a better letter of recommendation eh?

usdos-logo-seal.png


Media Note
Office of the Spokesman
Washington, DC
March 14, 2008


Keystone Pipeline Presidential Permit
On March 14, the Department of State issued a Presidential Permit authorizing TransCanada Keystone Pipeline LP to construct, operate and maintain facilities related to the Keystone crude oil pipeline project.

The Keystone pipeline will extend 1,300 miles from the Canadian border through the U.S. Midwest. When fully operational, the Keystone pipeline is anticipated to increase U.S. oil imports from Canada by an amount equivalent to as much as 4.5 percent of total U.S. daily imports.

Canada is the United States' largest supplier of oil, natural gas, and electricity.

The Department has determined that issuance of the permit to TransCanada Keystone Pipeline LP is in the national interest, in part, because it increases U.S. market access to crude oil supplies from a stable and reliable trading partner, Canada, that is in close proximity to the United States.


Canadian oil represents a safe, secure supply for the North American market.

In 2004, Canada became the largest supplier of crude oil to the United States. In 2006, Canada supplied the United States with 2.3 million barrels of oil per day (mbd), equivalent to 17% of total U.S. imports.

The permit was signed in the State Department’s Treaty Room by the Undersecretary of State for Economics, Energy and Agriculture Affairs, Reuben Jeffery III, who also serves as the Department’s International Energy Coordinator. Canadian Ambassador Michael Wilson witnessed the signature.

The United States and Canada have a wide array of bilateral and multilateral mechanisms to discuss energy and the environment, and will continue to address the importance of mitigating greenhouse gases from all sources of energy production.

Prior to making its determination to issue the permit to TransCanada Keystone Pipeline LP, the Department completed an environmental review of the entire project.

All public documents related to the Department’s decision regarding TransCanada Keystone LP’s application can be downloaded atwww.keystonepipeline.state.gov.

2008/192

Released on March 14, 2008

U.S. Department of State







And when he comes to call, my pa ain't got a good word to say
Guess it's 'cause he's just as wild in his younger days
So blow, you old blue northern, blow my love to me
He's driving in tonight from California
He loves his damned old rodeo as much as he loves me
Someday soon, going with him someday soon Thanks Sylvia. I know you wrote the words.
 
Last edited:
if your beliefs don't include any notions that everyone else is required to believe the same or else suffer some kind of punishment, then you're probably not going to have any conflicts with anyone. in that respect, both islam and communism are probably the worst things americans can get involved with.
 

Forum List

Back
Top