Not so and anyone reading this thread has a pretty good idea of who has the correct information and who doesn't want to acknowledge it.You shouldn't be scandalized at all.After her January 2009 appointment as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton proposed hiring long-time Clinton friend and confidant Sidney Blumenthal as an advisor, however, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, blocked Blumenthal's appointment at the State Department.[74]Blumenthal was subsequently hired by the Clinton Foundation, earning a Foundation salary of about $10,000 a month, and after the 2011 uprising in Libya againstMuammar Gaddafi, Blumenthal prepared, from public and other sources, about 25 memos which he sent asemails to Clinton in 2011 and 2012 with advice regarding Libyan matters, and sometimes promoting his business associates for contract work in Libya.[75][76]
As I've said repeatedly in this thread - Ok, so what?
I've asked you to tell me in your own words why I should be scandalized by this. Can you do it?
So you've just been trolling this whole time?
BTW Just another note that Clinton did not disclose foreign donors to the Clinton fund as directed by Obama. Just add that to the witches brew.
Well, let's see.
You can't remember what's scandalous about the OP of this thread. You can't explain why I should care that Sidney Blumenthal was employed by the Clinton Foundation. All you've done is cut-and-paste blocks of text from wikipedia and post links to articles that you didn't even read - and yet you insist on claiming "victory", and somehow believing that mentioning random things about Hillary will bolster your argument.
As I've already said, I don't give a shit about Hillary - you and I likely have the same opinion of her. That doesn't mean I'm going to accept all the dishonest arguments and weak "scandals" that you try to throw at her.