Hillary Calls Mother of Benghazi Dead a Liar Again During the Debate

[PaintMyHouse]

It is amazing that Hillary, with the long history of lies, corruption, and ineffectiveness; is being considered for POTUS. I guess Dem voters either are uninformed or don't care.

I doubt very much that R voters would ever support a candidate in their party, with the past of Hillary.

What does that say about D voters?

Considering who you are running, I wouldn't be pointing fingers. And HC can win, that actually matters in elections eh?

See now that is completely nonsensical. The R candidates are nothing like Hillary...yeah they have their issues, but nothing close to Hillary. They have not lied for decades, committed all kinds of corrupt actions for decades, were not utterly ineffective in government positions.

Bernie is far more competent and does not have decades of corruption and lies in his past. But, D voters still go for Cankles.

It could be that the MSM and the elites can more easily dupe D voters.

The GOP has an internal war, on full public display, of three people who can't win while the Dems have one that can. I'd say you have other things to concern yourself with eh?

Means nothing.

Clearly Hillary is as corrupt a politician as there ever was, yet D voters still vote for her. CRAZY!!!

Some people, and I know this sounds odd to you, actually like to vote for someone who can actually win. Crazy shit eh?

 

[JoeB131]

See now that is completely nonsensical. The R candidates are nothing like Hillary...yeah they have their issues, but nothing close to Hillary. They have not lied for decades, committed all kinds of corrupt actions for decades, were not utterly ineffective in government positions.

Again, you guys have been talking this smack for 20 years now... nobody care anymore.

I don't particularly want to vote for Hillary, but compared to a Malignant Narcissist like Trump or a Nihilist like Cruz, I know she could run the government if elected.

I'm pretty sure Trump can't. (Imagine the first time Congress tells him he can't have something) Cruz is hated by his fellow Republicans.

 

[kaz]

It is amazing that Hillary, with the long history of lies, corruption, and ineffectiveness; is being considered for POTUS. I guess Dem voters either are uninformed or don't care.

I doubt very much that R voters would ever support a candidate in their party, with the past of Hillary.

What does that say about D voters?

That they don't care about petty bullshit like "lying about a blow job" or "using the wrong e-mail server" or "was it a video or not." like you OCD types do.

They look at the fact that things get better for working folks when D's are in charge and worse for them when R's are in charge.

You know, the important stuff.

Oh Joe...do you have to start with STUPID, this early in the morning?

24x7!

 

[gipper]

It is amazing that Hillary, with the long history of lies, corruption, and ineffectiveness; is being considered for POTUS. I guess Dem voters either are uninformed or don't care.

I doubt very much that R voters would ever support a candidate in their party, with the past of Hillary.

What does that say about D voters?

Considering who you are running, I wouldn't be pointing fingers. And HC can win, that actually matters in elections eh?

See now that is completely nonsensical. The R candidates are nothing like Hillary...yeah they have their issues, but nothing close to Hillary. They have not lied for decades, committed all kinds of corrupt actions for decades, were not utterly ineffective in government positions.

Bernie is far more competent and does not have decades of corruption and lies in his past. But, D voters still go for Cankles.

It could be that the MSM and the elites can more easily dupe D voters.

The GOP has an internal war, on full public display, of three people who can't win while the Dems have one that can. I'd say you have other things to concern yourself with eh?

Means nothing.

Clearly Hillary is as corrupt a politician as there ever was, yet D voters still vote for her. CRAZY!!!

Some people, and I know this sounds odd to you, actually like to vote for someone who can actually win. Crazy shit eh?

So, winning is the only criteria. It matters not that the candidate is awful.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Considering who you are running, I wouldn't be pointing fingers. And HC can win, that actually matters in elections eh?

See now that is completely nonsensical. The R candidates are nothing like Hillary...yeah they have their issues, but nothing close to Hillary. They have not lied for decades, committed all kinds of corrupt actions for decades, were not utterly ineffective in government positions.

Bernie is far more competent and does not have decades of corruption and lies in his past. But, D voters still go for Cankles.

It could be that the MSM and the elites can more easily dupe D voters.

The GOP has an internal war, on full public display, of three people who can't win while the Dems have one that can. I'd say you have other things to concern yourself with eh?

Means nothing.

Clearly Hillary is as corrupt a politician as there ever was, yet D voters still vote for her. CRAZY!!!

Some people, and I know this sounds odd to you, actually like to vote for someone who can actually win. Crazy shit eh?

So, winning is the only criteria. It matters not that the candidate is awful.

She's fine, another maintenance president keeping the house of cards together and in an election, winning does actually matter. Think on that...

 

[gipper]

See now that is completely nonsensical. The R candidates are nothing like Hillary...yeah they have their issues, but nothing close to Hillary. They have not lied for decades, committed all kinds of corrupt actions for decades, were not utterly ineffective in government positions.

Again, you guys have been talking this smack for 20 years now... nobody care anymore.

I don't particularly want to vote for Hillary, but compared to a Malignant Narcissist like Trump or a Nihilist like Cruz, I know she could run the government if elected.

I'm pretty sure Trump can't. (Imagine the first time Congress tells him he can't have something) Cruz is hated by his fellow Republicans.

Joe you must stop with the DNC and MSM talking points every day. It is so transparent.

If an R candidate had the past of Hillary, you would never accept this BS of nobody cares anymore.

You can't sweep Hillary's past under the rug, though you desperately want to.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You can't sweep Hillary's past under the rug, though you desperately want to.

Her past is why she's likely going to be the next president. No one is more qualified, and the baggage is just part of the package deal.

 

[gipper]

You can't sweep Hillary's past under the rug, though you desperately want to.

Her past is why she's likely going to be the next president. No one is more qualified, and the baggage is just part of the package deal.

That is the funny thing. Nothing in her past would make a thinking objective person consider her for POTUS.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You can't sweep Hillary's past under the rug, though you desperately want to.

Her past is why she's likely going to be the next president. No one is more qualified, and the baggage is just part of the package deal.

That is the funny thing. Nothing in her past would make a thinking objective person consider her for POTUS.

Lawyer, First Lady, Senator, Secretary of State, decades in politics. Yep, I have no idea why anyone would vote for her when you can vote for a billionaire TV star instead...

 

[gipper]

You can't sweep Hillary's past under the rug, though you desperately want to.

Her past is why she's likely going to be the next president. No one is more qualified, and the baggage is just part of the package deal.

That is the funny thing. Nothing in her past would make a thinking objective person consider her for POTUS.

Lawyer, First Lady, Senator, Secretary of State, decades in politics. Yep, I have no idea why anyone would vote for her when you can vote for a billionaire TV star instead...

Okay so job titles is all that matters...not what she actually did.

 

[rightwinger]

Obama has raised the bar when if comes to lying, Hillary has much work to do

-Geaux

Obama never did quite match....We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You can't sweep Hillary's past under the rug, though you desperately want to.

Her past is why she's likely going to be the next president. No one is more qualified, and the baggage is just part of the package deal.

That is the funny thing. Nothing in her past would make a thinking objective person consider her for POTUS.

Lawyer, First Lady, Senator, Secretary of State, decades in politics. Yep, I have no idea why anyone would vote for her when you can vote for a billionaire TV star instead...

Okay so job titles is all that matters...not what she actually did.

What has Trump done that makes him qualified for the highest political office in the land? Oh right, nothin'...

 

[sealybobo]

Clinton: Mother of Benghazi victim 'wrong'
Clinton: Mother of Benghazi victim 'wrong'

“You know, look, I feel a great deal of sympathy for the families of the four brave Americans that we lost at Benghazi," Clinton said. "And I certainly can’t even imagine the grief that she has for losing her son. But she’s wrong. She’s absolutely wrong. I and everybody in the administration, all the people she named — the president, the vice president, [then-United Nations Ambassador] Susan Rice — we were scrambling to get information that was changing literally by the hour."

----------------------

Hillary reportedly told the families of the deceased that their loved ones were dead due to a video. Hillary declared that to be false...and did so again during the latest Democratic Party 'Debate'. In her Bullshi, er, explanation above she tries to paint a picture of how there was no definitive answer....much later when she stood with the families as their loved one's flag-draped coffins were off-loaded from a plane, when she told them the reason was due to a video and promised to put the director / movie-maker in jail!

In Hillary's own e-mails it reveals she told a foreign Ambassador the night after the attack, 'We KNOW this was a terrorist attack and that the video had nothing to do with it' and later told Chelsea 4 Americans were killed by terrorists'. Sorry, Hillary, 'We weren't sure', and 'we didn't have all the info' doesn't wash anymore - you've been BUSTED.

But what you knew THAT NIGHT is irrelevant because you met with the family members AFTER that, when it had already been proven it was a terrorist attack.

It is absolutely shameful that these 4 Americans died NEEDLESSLY to begin with because of her incompetence and unwillingness to make the necessary call(s) required to keep Americans safe ,but to continue calling the deceased family members 'liars' for continuing to point out HILLARY'S lies is truly disgusting. It's not bad enough she got their loved ones needlessly murdered but now she is insulting them and smearing their names to protect her own ass.

Yawn

 

[imawhosure]

You can't sweep Hillary's past under the rug, though you desperately want to.

Her past is why she's likely going to be the next president. No one is more qualified, and the baggage is just part of the package deal.

That is the funny thing. Nothing in her past would make a thinking objective person consider her for POTUS.

It seems that many Democrat voters think like you too Gipper. They sure aren't coming out in the primaries in droves to give her the nod.

The left always wants to claim I think crazy, so maybe you could help them out deciphering these tea leaves for them-------->

Bernie, a populist beats Hillary in Michigan. Trump, a populist on the GOP side, has record turnout in Michigan, and is propelled to victory with the help of many Democratic voters.

Now I know it is hard, very hard for some to understand Gipper, (you not being one of those) but you think you could explain the ramifications of this to our lefty friends!

 

[sealybobo]

You can't sweep Hillary's past under the rug, though you desperately want to.

Her past is why she's likely going to be the next president. No one is more qualified, and the baggage is just part of the package deal.

That is the funny thing. Nothing in her past would make a thinking objective person consider her for POTUS.

Lawyer, First Lady, Senator, Secretary of State, decades in politics. Yep, I have no idea why anyone would vote for her when you can vote for a billionaire TV star instead...

Okay so job titles is all that matters...not what she actually did.

What has Trump done that makes him qualified for the highest political office in the land? Oh right, nothin'...

He was born in America. Cruz can't say that.

 

[sealybobo]

You can't sweep Hillary's past under the rug, though you desperately want to.

Her past is why she's likely going to be the next president. No one is more qualified, and the baggage is just part of the package deal.

That is the funny thing. Nothing in her past would make a thinking objective person consider her for POTUS.

It seems that many Democrat voters think like you too Gipper. They sure aren't coming out in the primaries in droves to give her the nod.

The left always wants to claim I think crazy, so maybe you could help them out deciphering these tea leaves for them-------->

Bernie, a populist beats Hillary in Michigan. Trump, a populist on the GOP side, has record turnout in Michigan, and is propelled to victory with the help of many Democratic voters.

Now I know it is hard, very hard for some to understand Gipper, (you not being one of those) but you think you could explain the ramifications of this to our lefty friends!

Same reason Greece elected a socialist

 

[my2¢]

The lying that took place after Benghazi isn't anywhere near what occurred after the friendly fire shooting of Pat Tillman.

 

[jknowgood]

See now that is completely nonsensical. The R candidates are nothing like Hillary...yeah they have their issues, but nothing close to Hillary. They have not lied for decades, committed all kinds of corrupt actions for decades, were not utterly ineffective in government positions.

Again, you guys have been talking this smack for 20 years now... nobody care anymore.

I don't particularly want to vote for Hillary, but compared to a Malignant Narcissist like Trump or a Nihilist like Cruz, I know she could run the government if elected.

I'm pretty sure Trump can't. (Imagine the first time Congress tells him he can't have something) Cruz is hated by his fellow Republicans.

Nobody cares. Try to spell right next time.

 

[sealybobo]

The lying that took place after Benghazi isn't anywhere near what occurred after the friendly fire shooting of Pat Tillman.

I forgot about how bush lied and used Tillman for propaganda and political purposes

 

[gipper]

You can't sweep Hillary's past under the rug, though you desperately want to.

Her past is why she's likely going to be the next president. No one is more qualified, and the baggage is just part of the package deal.

That is the funny thing. Nothing in her past would make a thinking objective person consider her for POTUS.

It seems that many Democrat voters think like you too Gipper. They sure aren't coming out in the primaries in droves to give her the nod.

The left always wants to claim I think crazy, so maybe you could help them out deciphering these tea leaves for them-------->

Bernie, a populist beats Hillary in Michigan. Trump, a populist on the GOP side, has record turnout in Michigan, and is propelled to victory with the help of many Democratic voters.

Now I know it is hard, very hard for some to understand Gipper, (you not being one of those) but you think you could explain the ramifications of this to our lefty friends!

Yes it was somewhat gratifying to see D voters in Michigan go for Bernie. They aren't all mindless drones.

But in the end, it looks like it will not matter. Bernie can't win. The Ds and the establishment want Cankles and it appears D voters will give them what they want.