No one in her position would be charged with a crime for what she did...unless in the military....perhaps, but they are under a more restrictive military code.Yeah, she did. As I recall, Comey did not recommend an indictment against her because he didn't believe the prosecution couldn't prove criminal intent. The only problem is, that's not the law. Federal law states that 'gross negligence' in handling the nation's intelligence can be punished criminally with prison time or fines, and there is no requirement that defendants act intentionally or recklessly. Since no one has ever been successfully prosecuted under that federal law for that crime without proving criminal intent, the democrats used that as an excuse to let her off the hook. It was funny, Comey's own finding was that Hillary did in fact exhibit gross negligence, but the wording got changed by that smarmy Strzok bastard to look less criminal. Okay, not funny but that's DC politics and justice for you.
But make no mistake, she WAS guilty as hell and should've gone to jail for it. An ordinary person would have been indicted and convicted; many others have been convicted without proving intent, but well, she was a democrat and a Clinton. Different rules for some people. To say she was not above the law is ridiculous.
Petraeus was charged with a misdemeanor, for top secret breach that he knowingly did, and knowingly lied about, to investigators....is what Comey said...
Him with a misdemeanor for what he did, left Hillary's unknowing breach because the TS documents were not marked top secret according to law, left her with a reprimand at most, as a justifiable punishment....