Hillary Clinton suggests jailing Americans for posting "misinformation"

Funny how words like this only qualify as inciting violence when Trump says them.
I mean, when the mob goes directly from him saying the words to going and actually doing the fighting, it's a lot stronger of a case for incitement.
 
If only he'd said that more than once at the beginning of his lie filled screed, and instead of:

"And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore.

Our exciting adventures and boldest endeavors have not yet begun. My fellow Americans, for our movement, for our children, and for our beloved country.

And I say this despite all that's happened. The best is yet to come.

So we're going to, we're going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I love Pennsylvania Avenue. And we're going to the Capitol, and we're going to try and give.

The Democrats are hopeless — they never vote for anything. Not even one vote. But we're going to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones because the strong ones don't need any of our help. We're going to try and give them the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country.

So let's walk down Pennsylvania Avenue.

I want to thank you all. God bless you and God Bless America.

Thank you all for being here. This is incredible. Thank you very much. Thank you.

What was there about storming the capitol?
 
Funny how words like this only qualify as inciting violence when Trump says them.
The Capitol police still don't think it's funny at all. Nor was it the only incendiary phases about fighting and trial by combat from the podium that morning before the riot. That was just Benedict Donald's final word to his flock as he sent them to the Capitol.
 
The Capitol police still don't think it's funny at all. Nor was it the only incendiary phases about fighting and trial by combat from the podium that morning before the riot. That was just Benedict Donald's final word to his flock as he sent them to the Capitol.
Still trying to figure out how peacefully is storm the capitol?
 
1726602355678.png
 
There were plenty of non-Nazi and white supremacists who were not in favor of taking down that statue. There were also some non-violent types on the other side that just felt strongly that the statue should be taken down, not just violent extremists. In other words, there were some bad people on both sides and some "fine" people on both sides. What don't you understand about that?
It was a “Unite the Right “ rally and if you march n something like that with Nazis carrying torches like it’s Nuremberg in 1933 you are not “good people”
 
Still trying to figure out how peacefully is storm the capitol?
Yawn:

By focusing on that brief phrase, Trump is trying to deceive both the courts and the public. He wants people to focus on a short passage in which he told his supporters to march “peacefully and patriotically” to the Capitol, while ignoring all the inflammatory rhetoric he employed during the same speech.

With the federal election conspiracy case likely now on track for summer 2024 and Trump making many more public appearances over the course of this year, we can expect to see this line of defense play out in both the court of public opinion and in the run-up to the federal criminal trial (and the Georgia one where a 2024 trial has also been requested by prosecutors).

As we explain in detail below, Trump’s defense should fail in both those tribunals. We expect prosecutors will explain to the jurors why the sentence in the Ellipse speech is, in actuality, more incriminating than exculpatory when understood in context.

 
Yawn:

By focusing on that brief phrase, Trump is trying to deceive both the courts and the public. He wants people to focus on a short passage in which he told his supporters to march “peacefully and patriotically” to the Capitol, while ignoring all the inflammatory rhetoric he employed during the same speech.

With the federal election conspiracy case likely now on track for summer 2024 and Trump making many more public appearances over the course of this year, we can expect to see this line of defense play out in both the court of public opinion and in the run-up to the federal criminal trial (and the Georgia one where a 2024 trial has also been requested by prosecutors).

As we explain in detail below, Trump’s defense should fail in both those tribunals. We expect prosecutors will explain to the jurors why the sentence in the Ellipse speech is, in actuality, more incriminating than exculpatory when understood in context.

Nothing gets in the way of a Prog and their endless accusations towards anything they deem not for their Communist dreams.
 
I mean, when the mob goes directly from him saying the words to going and actually doing the fighting, it's a lot stronger of a case for incitement.
You mean like when a guy posts phrases from the MSM disparaging Trump before trying to shoot him? Kind of like that? The entire MSM should face charges of incitement.
 

Forum List

Back
Top