Hillary did not concede immediately

[Catsnmeters]

They investigated it, hoping to remove Trump out of office. Starting the russian collusion story isn't opposition research.

Who investigated it?

Republicans?

Yes, I know.

 

[jknowgood]

Who investigated it?

Republicans?

Yes, I know.

Lol, it was a big deal over a lie started by Hillary.

 

[Magnus]

Lol, but lying isn't a good trait.

There ya go. Admitting is the first step. Good luck.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Lol, it was a big deal over a lie started by Hillary.

What lie by Hillary?

 

[jknowgood]

There ya go. Admitting is the first step. Good luck.

You were the one lying. Jan 6th was a protest with you loons definition of of one.

 

[jknowgood]

What lie by Hillary?

The russian collusion lie.

 

[Catsnmeters]

The russian collusion lie.

Can you be more specific?

Collusion isn't a crime so not sure what you are referring to.

Republicans were investigating conspiracy, not collusion.

 

[Catsnmeters]

You were the one lying. Jan 6th was a protest with you loons definition of of one.

Jan 6 was seditious conspiracy.

Not a protest.

Do you support seditious conspiracy?

 

[jknowgood]

Can you be more specific?

Collusion isn't a crime so not sure what you are referring to.

Republicans were investigating conspiracy, not collusion.

And they found nothing.

 

[jknowgood]

Jan 6 was seditious conspiracy.

Not a protest.

Do you support seditious conspiracy?

It was more peaceful than the summer of love.

 

[Catsnmeters]

And they found nothing.

That's not true but regardless, what does that have to do with Hillary or Democrats.

 

[Catsnmeters]

It was more peaceful than the summer of love.

It was more peaceful then WW2 as well.

What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?

If you want to make a thread about the "summer of love", send me a message and let me know when it's up.

See yah there.

 

[Robert W]

Not legally, it wouldn't violate the first amendment, no.

Why would you think that?

Just to add...the Trump campaign purchased opposition research from Cambridge.

Was that ok?

Here is where the road meets the face.
When a person is tried two times based on the fraudulent so called evidence, the party causing the court or Impeachment action when wrong, as Hillary is, belongs in prison, not the attacked party.

 

[Leo123]

These are not talking points, they are facts.

No they’re not.

 

[jknowgood]

That's not true but regardless, what does that have to do with Hillary or Democrats.

Hillary paid for the Steele dossier.

 

[jknowgood]

It was more peaceful then WW2 as well.

What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?

If you want to make a thread about the "summer of love", send me a message and let me know when it's up.

See yah there.

The next one will be at the democrat convention. You loons trained them to be violent and Biden has pissed both sides off.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Here is where the road meets the face.
When a person is tried two times based on the fraudulent so called evidence, the party causing the court or Impeachment action when wrong, as Hillary is, belongs in prison, not the attacked party.

Is that what the constitution says?

What court or impeachment action did Hillary cause?

 

[Catsnmeters]

Hillary paid for the Steele dossier.

So?

Opposition research is normal for presidential campaigns.

What is your problem?

 

[Catsnmeters]

The next one will be at the democrat convention. You loons trained them to be violent and Biden has pissed both sides off.

The next seditious conspiracy?

Are Trump supporters planning it or something?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

So?

That was illegal lying to the FISA court