Hillary....The Best Choice for 2016!

2008 was Clintons year.

The Dems threw her under the bus for Barry.

I doubt she will run again.

As for Biden? Good Gawd. If he's the best the Dems can come up with then my dead Border Collie is looking good for POTUS in 2016.

Did you know Hillary and Barack both received almost the same amount of votes in the primaries? 18,000,000 each.

Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2008 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I voted for Hillary in the Ohio primary but would have taken either one. They were both equally awesome. 2008 was a great year for Democrats. The Democrats didn't throw her under the bus just the same as Democrats aren't about to abandon Obama.

You all are such liars.

How childish and naive.

Of course Democrats won't abandon Obama. They are too damned blind to see that their leader is about to be forcefully abdicated from his seat of power. Maybe not impeached, but his edicts and positions will no longer be taken seriously by anyone, he will be nothing but a figurehead for the next three years coming.

He has obliterated Hillary's hopes for a 2016 run, whereas Hillary has damaged Obama's presidency. Yes, the White House did indeed throw Hillary under the bus when Carney insisted that the Administration was not involved, and such a thing was purely a matter of the state.

Their primary numbers are meaningless. Do you not recognize the seriousness of the things these two have been accused of?!

1. Talking points edited by White House/State Department more than 12 times before being released to public

2. A stand down order was issued to Marine FAST teams while the attack on the consulate was commencing. This resulted in the death of four men.

3. The IRS has been found to have targeted conservative groups for aggressive audits, also was found to have targeted pro-Israel groups.

4. In Breaking News, the Justice Department was found to have forcefully seized phone records from the Associated Press.

The Democratic Party has been damaged by this, and will continue to be for a long time. Please, get your head out of your rear, Sarah, this is reality of which I speak.

I fear Sarah is representative of the hundreds of thousands of sheeple drones who are incapable of differentiating fact from the fiction they have chosen.
 
So, that didn't stop the Dems from putting N'obama into office...twice.

I thought the majority of the voting public put him into office...twice.

332-206

In 2016, IL, WI, CO, NM all are going to be toss-ups. That is 45 votes. If they swing...that is 287. If Christie gets the Nom, that drops to 272 because NJ is gone probably. There is zero reason to think Ms Clinton has anything sewn up.

Huge differences here. First, the numbers you select represent the Electoral College. The candidate is a far cry from representative of an eclectic cross section of Americans.
 
ap957218643452.jpg

ap307742013715-540x414.jpg


Hillary Clinton's Legacy of Scandal

By Jeffrey T. Brown
6/15/13


In the midst of the eruption of near-daily scandals involving the Obama administration, let us not forget that until just a few months ago, Hillary Clinton was the most significant persona within that administration besides the president himself. Let us not also forget that notwithstanding the scandal-grenades going off all around us, Mrs. Clinton diligently plans her run for the presidency, even while several of those scandals are obviously and entirely her responsibility, exposing the State Department during her tenure as an utter sewer of corruption, cronyism, and fatal incompetence.


For as long as Hillary Clinton has been on the national scene, she has left a path of destruction and wreckage in her wake that is both impressive and terrible to behold. She is a testament to the extent of damage that can be done by one person determined to conquer everything before her in the quest for unlimited power and self-gratification. The only prize left to her in American politics is the presidency, which she has always felt is hers by right. Indeed, she would have attained it were it not for the upstart community organizer, a fellow admirer of Saul Alinsky, who spoke in volumes but said nothing.

...


As if Benghazi was not enough, and it should have been even with the little that has come to light thus far, news broke this week about the culture of pure corruption, decay, immorality, criminality, and scandal that has been our Department of State under Mrs. Clinton. We were regaled with liberal celebrations of the mythical "Greatest Secretary of State" ever, while those paying attention could not identify a single advancement in the image or policies of the United States during her tenure. Certainly the blame for that does not fall entirely upon her, given whose policies she was advocating, but she still opted to be the person who advanced those destructive policies, putting our country at risk and lowering its standing throughout the world. This reality was recently driven home by the revelation that the Clintons and President Obama struck a deal under which she accepted the post of secretary of state in exchange for Obama's support in 2016.

...


As the State Department scandal deepens, and as more people potentially refuse to take the fall for the advancement of an utterly corrupt politician, perhaps our knowledge of Mrs. Clinton will deepen -- as if we really needed to know more to understand who and what she is. We should be grateful as a nation for the gift of foresight. May it finally enlighten those who so far have proved poor excuses for sensible American citizens.


Read more: Articles: Hillary Clinton's Legacy of Scandal
 
Why procrastinate in picking the next presidential candidate...the next Democrat President?
Waiting in the wings is a person with the perfect credentials.
Allow me to make the case:


1. "JERUSALEM – Did former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton lie under oath when she testified in the January Benghazi hearings that no one within the government ever recommended the closure of the U.S. facilities in the Libyan city?

2. In her Jan. 23 testimony, Clinton stated: “Well, senator, I want to make clear that no one in the State Department, the intelligence community, any other agency, ever recommended that we close Benghazi. We were clear-eyed about the threats and the dangers as they were developing in eastern Libya and in Benghazi.”





3.... Clinton’s testimony is contradicted by Lt. Col. Andrew Wood, who led the U.S. military’s efforts to supplement diplomatic security in Libya.
Read more at Hillary perjured herself on Benghazi?

4. "SALT LAKE CITY —[Oct. 9 2012 ] Utah National Guardsman who headed an elite security force in Libya will tell a congressional committee Wednesday that his requests for more resources prior to the killing of a U.S. ambassador last month went unheeded.

5. Lt. Col. Andrew Wood is scheduled to testify at a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on security decisions leading up to the Sept. 11 Muslim extremist terror assault on the U.S. compound at Benghazi. U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three of his colleagues were killed in the attack.

6. "He was asking for more assets. He was asking for personnel. And the Obama administration denied that, and I think that plays a central role in what went wrong in Benghazi," said Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah." Utah Army commander Lt. Col. Andrew Wood sought more security before deadly attack in Libya | Deseret News

a. And, this, of course:
"On the occasion of the return of his son’s casket, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton pledged to Charles Woods that the U.S. would “make sure that the person who made that film was arrested.” She said this knowing full well at the time that the terrorist attack that murdered Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods and three other Americans had nothing to do with an anti-Muslim YouTube video which was being blamed for provoking it." Dems Circle Wagons Around Hillary As Benghazi Whistleblowers Signal 2016 Attacks - Forbes





A trip down memory lane to burnish those Hillary-credentials....

7. "Hillary Clinton has many admirable qualities, but candor and openness and transparency and a commitment to well-established fact have not been notable among them." Carl Bernstein: Hillary Clinton: Truth or Consequences

and this...

8. "Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady -- a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation -- is a congenital liar.
Drip by drip, like Whitewater torture, the case is being made that she is compelled to mislead, and to ensnare her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit..... her 10,000 percent profit in 1979 commodity trading... what some think amounted to a $100,000 bribe.... Hillary Clinton was lying when she denied actively representing a criminal enterprise known as the Madison S.& L., and indicate she may have conspired with Web Hubbell's father-in-law to make a sham land deal that cost taxpayers $3 million."
Essay - Blizzard of Lies - NYTimes.com





What better choice for a party that twice endorsed a harasser of women, and rapist, her husband, as President.

And, what better choice to succeed a man who refused to offer newborns resulting from mishandled abortions the most basic medical assistance?


Go, Hillary!
A perfect fit in the Democrat
panorama!


When Saul Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer....

....well...he couldn't be more proud of his followers!

Just what we need - an ugly lefty lesbian in the White House!:evil:
 

Forum List

Back
Top