Hirono under fire for remarks on Constitution: 'Who the heck would know what our Founding Fathers meant?'

Dont Taz Me Bro

Diamond Member
Staff member
Senior USMB Moderator
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Nov 17, 2009
70,322
38,138
If only they had written it down in numerous writings....

Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, is taking heat for remarks arguing there is no way to identify the Founding Fathers' thoughts on key issues when interpreting the Constitution, asking, "Who the heck would know what our Founding Fathers meant?"

The comment came during a Tuesday Senate Judiciary Committee hearing following last month's Supreme Court decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health and ignited criticism on Twitter after a clip of Hirono's remarks was shared online.

Chaos ensued in the comments, with critics noting the Constitution's "straightforward" language and using The Federalist Papers as another example of what the founders thought.

 
Last edited:
If only they had written it down in numerous writings....

Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, is taking heat for remarks arguing there is no way to identify the Founding Fathers' thoughts on key issues when interpreting the Constitution, asking, "Who the heck would know what our Founding Fathers meant?"

The comment came during a Tuesday Senate Judiciary Committee hearing following last month's Supreme Court decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health and ignited criticism on Twitter after a clip of Hirono's remarks was shared online.

Chaos ensued in the comments, with critics noting the Constitution's "straightforward" language and using The Federalist Papers as another example of what the founders thought.
He isnt the brightest. This isnt surprising at all.
What is surprising is, why did those idiots vote for this guy?
Ok, I guess that isnt surprising. America is known for electing idiots to positions of power.
 
If only they had written it down in numerous writings....

Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, is taking heat for remarks arguing there is no way to identify the Founding Fathers' thoughts on key issues when interpreting the Constitution, asking, "Who the heck would know what our Founding Fathers meant?"

The comment came during a Tuesday Senate Judiciary Committee hearing following last month's Supreme Court decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health and ignited criticism on Twitter after a clip of Hirono's remarks was shared online.

Chaos ensued in the comments, with critics noting the Constitution's "straightforward" language and using The Federalist Papers as another example of what the founders thought.


Makes ya wonder if she ever took civics or American history for that matter......... I know in a bunch of states neither one are required to graduate from HS.
 
Last edited:
If only they had written it down in numerous writings....

Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, is taking heat for remarks arguing there is no way to identify the Founding Fathers' thoughts on key issues when interpreting the Constitution, asking, "Who the heck would know what our Founding Fathers meant?"

The comment came during a Tuesday Senate Judiciary Committee hearing following last month's Supreme Court decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health and ignited criticism on Twitter after a clip of Hirono's remarks was shared online.

Chaos ensued in the comments, with critics noting the Constitution's "straightforward" language and using The Federalist Papers as another example of what the founders thought.


She's the dumbest Senator......and that's saying something.
 
If only they had written it down in numerous writings....

Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, is taking heat for remarks arguing there is no way to identify the Founding Fathers' thoughts on key issues when interpreting the Constitution, asking, "Who the heck would know what our Founding Fathers meant?"

The comment came during a Tuesday Senate Judiciary Committee hearing following last month's Supreme Court decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health and ignited criticism on Twitter after a clip of Hirono's remarks was shared online.

Chaos ensued in the comments, with critics noting the Constitution's "straightforward" language and using The Federalist Papers as another example of what the founders thought.


She is partially right. There are many issues where you cannot say what the founding fathers would have thought of it. Guns are a good example. The founding fathers' experience was with muskets. They had no clue what a machine gun or a tank was. To suggest the second amendment allows you to own any weapon you want is bogus.
 
She is partially right. There are many issues where you cannot say what the founding fathers would have thought of it. Guns are a good example. The founding fathers' experience was with muskets. They had no clue what a machine gun or a tank was. To suggest the second amendment allows you to own any weapon you want is bogus.
Another moron.
Hey, did you vote for that idiot hirono?
 

Forum List

Back
Top