Historically, no Antarctic ice shelf when CO2 is above 400 ppm

[Crick]

This is the difference between science and "the science."

"The science" is 100% about parroting.

It is not about data or truth. It is about shouting down truth by claiming "I am parroting a greater guru."

The simple truth is as follow.

The overwhelming majority of earth ice is on land near an earth pole. Land moves.

It should not take too much more for anyone with any intelligence to figure out the rest...

None of that is relevant to the thread topic.

 

[EMH]

None of that is relevant to the thread topic.

In short, the parroting you cite is completely wrong.

Climate change is about land moving near the poles.

Two polar oceans = no ice on earth


As for what a complete beaked birdbrain moron you are, let's do a chart....


X axis - earth temperature
Y axis - moisture in earth atmosphere


When earth has a hi surface temp of 30F, there is NO MOISTURE in the atmosphere, since all h2o is frozen.

When earth has a surface low temp of 220F, all h2o is steam and in the atmosphere.

In between, we have today and Jurassic, which was WARMER and WETTER than today.

The warmer earth gets the wetter it gets.

Wetter = fewer fires

Schooled again.

 

[Crick]

In short, the parroting you cite is completely wrong.

Climate change is about land moving near the poles.

Wrong

Two polar oceans = no ice on earth

Wrong

As for what a complete beaked birdbrain moron you are, let's do a chart....

X axis - earth temperature
Y axis - moisture in earth atmosphere

I see no chart

When earth has a hi surface temp of 30F, there is NO MOISTURE in the atmosphere, since all h2o is frozen.

Wrong

When earth has a surface low temp of 220F, all h2o is steam and in the atmosphere.

Wrong

In between, we have today and Jurassic, which was WARMER and WETTER than today.

The warmer earth gets the wetter it gets.

Wetter = fewer fires

Schooled again.

Have you ever thought of trying your hand at stand-up comedy?

So, again, besides being delusional nonsense, this has no relevance to the thread topic whatsoever.

 

[EMH]

The topic is typical of "the science."

It relies on morons like crick to parrot and shout down, forfeiting the actual debate in the process....

Antarctica 90%
Greenland 7%

Of earth ice....

But if the land moved, we'd have to parrot hundreds of taxpayer funded PhDs who are paid to lie and fudge data to keep morons believing co2 is the cause....

 

[abu afak]

The topic is typical of "the science."
It relies on morons like crick to parrot and shout down, forfeiting the actual debate in the process....
Antarctica 90% Greenland 7% Of earth ice.... But if the land moved, we'd have to parrot hundreds of taxpayer funded PhDs who are paid to lie and fudge data to keep morons believing co2 is the cause....

What's the Cause of this Unnatural spike, Continental Drift?
I posted this earlier in this thread.
You seem to be new but also a Climate Denying MAGAt.

You can't "school" anyone you dipshlt!
You have NO Time scale perspective.
IF you want to see IF it's AGW you have to look at a time scale that's relevant.

[Marcott] SPIKING from -.4 to near +1 degree in 2016 etc in app 150 years.
More representations showing the OBVIOUS available.
We were cooling before we turned on the engines.

and

`

 

[Crick]

The topic is typical of "the science."

It relies on morons like crick to parrot and shout down, forfeiting the actual debate in the process....

Antarctica 90%
Greenland 7%

Of earth ice....

But if the land moved, we'd have to parrot hundreds of taxpayer funded PhDs who are paid to lie and fudge data to keep morons believing co2 is the cause....

Are you trying to say that recent global warming is somehow due to plate tectonics?

 

[EMH]

Are you trying to say that recent global warming is somehow due to plate tectonics?

The "recent warming" is all fudge.

That is why there is

No breakout in canes
No ocean rise
No warming in the atmosphere
No warming in the oceans


It takes an absolute moron to fall for it....

 

[Crick]

The "recent warming" is all fudge.

That is why there is

No breakout in canes
No ocean rise
No warming in the atmosphere
No warming in the oceans


It takes an absolute moron to fall for it....

How is it, then, that as one poster put it, I have ten times the Bible's worth of evidence that says there has been recent warming in the air, on the land and in the seas, that the ice is melting and the oceans rising and that all of that is almost entirely due to human GHG emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels... and you don't have SHIT?

 

[EMH]

How is it, then, that as one poster put it, I have ten times the Bible's worth of evidence that says there has been recent warming in the air, on the land and in the seas, that the ice is melting and the oceans rising and that all of that is almost entirely due to human GHG emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels... and you don't have SHIT?

You have fudge charts.

You have no idea how they were manufactured

And, as part of "the science," you parrot them as true when you have no idea what data was used, fudged, thrown out, "corrected" etc.

All parrots are morons and you are no exception.


Planet earth during the past 100 years had

No warming except on the surface of growing urban areas...



Remember the big lie about sea ice...

Remember when 2005 was "just the beginning" for canes....



Your side has been WRONG WRONG WRONG and then it changes the subject.....

 

[Crick]

You have fudge charts.

You have no idea how they were manufactured

And, as part of "the science," you parrot them as true when you have no idea what data was used, fudged, thrown out, "corrected" etc.

All parrots are morons and you are no exception.


Planet earth during the past 100 years had

No warming except on the surface of growing urban areas...



Remember the big lie about sea ice...

Remember when 2005 was "just the beginning" for canes....



Your side has been WRONG WRONG WRONG and then it changes the subject.....

I repeat, you don't have SHIT. Everything you've tried to push here is simply your own personal fantasy. No scientist anywhere, in any field agrees with ANY of the nonsense you're spewing. I've had enough. Find someone else whose graces you might abuse.

 

[ding]

That's wrong ... the 14th included African-Americans to the 1st and the 5th ... by intent ... after 150 years, it's not a process, it's hypocrisy ... think `Sandra Bland` ...

Look up the so called Blaine amendment.

 

[Crick]

Look up the so called Blaine amendment.

You two have gotten completely off-topic.

 

[ding]

You two have gotten completely off-topic.

That might have been the only thing you have ever posted in this forum that was accurate.

 

[Crick]

That might have been the only thing you have ever posted in this forum that was accurate.

Fuck you.

 

[mamooth]

Climate change is about land moving near the poles.

The land has only moved a few centimeters, while climate has warmed drastically.

That means you're stupid even by denier standards. And that's saying something.

 

[EMH]

The land has only moved a few centimeters, while climate has warmed drastically.

That means you're stupid even by denier standards. And that's saying something.

Bull

Outside of urban heat sink, your side has NO EVIDENCE of warming at all

 

[Crick]

Bull

Outside of urban heat sink, your side has NO EVIDENCE of warming at all

Pa.... thetic

 

[ding]

Fuck you.

Hard pass.

 

[ding]

The land has only moved a few centimeters, while climate has warmed drastically.

That means you're stupid even by denier standards. And that's saying something.

Why is it 2C cooler than in the past with 120 ppm more CO2?

 

[Crick]

Why is it 2C cooler than in the past with 120 ppm more CO2?

Why is it still dark in your closet even though the sun is up?