Hmmmm?

[AmericanFirst]

Admiral claims Obama conspired with America's enemies to stage a phony scandal to kidnap Chris Stevens |

 

[Moonglow]

Well that was a well documented blert..

 

[Gracie]

As said in one of the comments in the link:

Who should we believe, a respected Admiral or a pathological liar?!

Personally, I believe the Admiral.

 

[AmericanFirst]

I would believe pinnochio over obamaturd.

 

[aaronleland]

All speculation from the same crabby old man who compared gays in the Navy to thieves and drug dealers. It's hard to take a person seriously after they have made such a comparison.

 

[Clementine]

I heard this shortly after the attack in Benghazi. The Admiral hasn't changed his story like others have.

I know some will ridicule the Admiral and anyone willing to listen to him by claiming it's a whacko conspiracy theory.

The same people won't question the fact that the Admiral's version actually explains everything. There are so many unanswered questions in the administration's version.

The left likes to believe that all the public threats and attacks in the area were unknown to the Obama administration. That is why they didn't just get our people out of Benghazi before the anniversary of 9/11. That would make too much sense to think that an even bigger attack would occur on that day and think ahead.

The left doesn't care about an explanation as to who exactly came up with the lie about the video riling protesters.

Who can be so blind as to allow many questions to go unanswered and still defend the administration?

There is way more to this story and too many people are not cooperating. The investigation didn't even get answers to a great many things, yet many are content to form an opinion without all the blanks being filled in.

The Admiral isn't some nutjob who just came up with this story. He tried to explain all this right away, but the media shied away from him.

 

[AmericanFirst]

I heard this shortly after the attack in Benghazi. The Admiral hasn't changed his story like others have.

I know some will ridicule the Admiral and anyone willing to listen to him by claiming it's a whacko conspiracy theory.

The same people won't question the fact that the Admiral's version actually explains everything. There are so many unanswered questions in the administration's version.

The left likes to believe that all the public threats and attacks in the area were unknown to the Obama administration. That is why they didn't just get our people out of Benghazi before the anniversary of 9/11. That would make too much sense to think that an even bigger attack would occur on that day and think ahead.

The left doesn't care about an explanation as to who exactly came up with the lie about the video riling protesters.

Who can be so blind as to allow many questions to go unanswered and still defend the administration?

There is way more to this story and too many people are not cooperating. The investigation didn't even get answers to a great many things, yet many are content to form an opinion without all the blanks being filled in.

The Admiral isn't some nutjob who just came up with this story. He tried to explain all this right away, but the media shied away from him.

Liberals do not like facts.

 

[Moonglow]

Considering that closed door hearings on the matter are still occurring, your assertions are simply assumptions from facts you do not know fully and unbiased, Convicting by hearsay and conjecture are not allowed in law.

 

[Gracie]

A lot of admirals and generals have been fired, too, during Obamas watch. Hmmmmm, indeed.

 

[The Rabbi]

All speculation from the same crabby old man who compared gays in the Navy to thieves and drug dealers. It's hard to take a person seriously after they have made such a comparison.

It's hard for you to take anyone seriously who says something that disagrees with your preconcieved notions.

 

[Mojo2]

A lot of admirals and generals have been fired, too, during Obamas watch. Hmmmmm, indeed.

That was my immediate thought when I read the OP.

And for the POTUS and Hillary and the entire administration closing ranks to make this story go away as they have tried to do, it tells me something mighty ugly must have been going on in Benghazi.

Add to that the lack of real progress in the investigation and the firing of the Admirals, and you get the idea we very well might discover criminal acts by several higher ups.

If Hillary is nominated she will not stand a chance in hell of winning.

Obama deserves a prison cell just from what we KNOW he's done! And that's saying nothing about the things we can only guess he did.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Liberal logic, hide the truth therefore the truth dosen't matter. IDIOTS!!!!

 

[candycorn]

This is why the world hates Republicans.

 

[The Rabbi]

This is why the world hates Republicans.

Never seen anyone so consistently wrong.
Why winning back the House is a tough task for Democrats

 

[AmericanFirst]

This is why the world hates Republicans.

Never seen anyone so consistently wrong.
Why winning back the House is a tough task for Democrats

Consistently wrong is the only thing libtards can be proud of.

 

[Clementine]

Considering that closed door hearings on the matter are still occurring, your assertions are simply assumptions from facts you do not know fully and unbiased, Convicting by hearsay and conjecture are not allowed in law.

Says someone from the left, who declared the entire administration innocent before any facts were in. And the filmmaker was blamed instantly sans any proof.

The filmmaker was more or less convicted by the administration after being tried in the press after lies were told starting on day one. And the story was all a lie created by the administration. Hillary, Obama and Rice are the only ones who told it, so one of them must be the author. The filmmaker took more heat from the administration than the cold-blooded terrorists. Hillary promised the families of the victims that the guy would be punished and he was declared guilty without any due process or proof. Liberals didn't care about that then.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Considering that closed door hearings on the matter are still occurring, your assertions are simply assumptions from facts you do not know fully and unbiased, Convicting by hearsay and conjecture are not allowed in law.

Says someone from the left, who declared the entire administration innocent before any facts were in. And the filmmaker was blamed instantly sans any proof.

The filmmaker was more or less convicted by the administration after being tried in the press after lies were told starting on day one. And the story was all a lie created by the administration. Hillary, Obama and Rice are the only ones who told it, so one of them must be the author. The filmmaker took more heat from the administration than the cold-blooded terrorists. Hillary promised the families of the victims that the guy would be punished and he was declared guilty without any due process or proof. Liberals didn't care about that then.

Yep. Obama lied, stevens died. The three stooges all should pay. Moonglow, keep up supporting the liars, comedy suits you.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

James Lyons retired as Admiral almost 30 years ago. He has no actual knowledge of the claims he's making.

It's speculation with no basis in reality.

 

[Iceweasel]

This is why the world hates Republicans.

You aren't the world, sugarpuss.