Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Attorney General Eric Holder acknowledged Wednesday that the "courts have final say," and said his department would respond formally to an appeals court order to explain whether the Obama administration believes judges in fact have the power to overturn federal laws.
The attorney general, at a brief press conference in Chicago, made clear the administration thinks they do.
"We respect the decisions made by the courts since Marbury v. Madison," Holder said Wednesday, referring to the landmark 1803 case that established the precedent of judicial review. "Courts have final say."
Holder Says 'courts Have Final Say' In Response To Furor Over Obama's Health Law Comments | Fox News
Attorney General Eric Holder acknowledged Wednesday that the "courts have final say," and said his department would respond formally to an appeals court order to explain whether the Obama administration believes judges in fact have the power to overturn federal laws.
The attorney general, at a brief press conference in Chicago, made clear the administration thinks they do.
"We respect the decisions made by the courts since Marbury v. Madison," Holder said Wednesday, referring to the landmark 1803 case that established the precedent of judicial review. "Courts have final say."
I wonder what Obama thinks of this statement...
Holder Says 'courts Have Final Say' In Response To Furor Over Obama's Health Law Comments | Fox News
Attorney General Eric Holder acknowledged Wednesday that the "courts have final say," and said his department would respond formally to an appeals court order to explain whether the Obama administration believes judges in fact have the power to overturn federal laws.
The attorney general, at a brief press conference in Chicago, made clear the administration thinks they do.
"We respect the decisions made by the courts since Marbury v. Madison," Holder said Wednesday, referring to the landmark 1803 case that established the precedent of judicial review. "Courts have final say."
I wonder what Obama thinks of this statement...
did you actually listen to what the president said?
i'm thinking you might not have.
Holder Says 'courts Have Final Say' In Response To Furor Over Obama's Health Law Comments | Fox News
Attorney General Eric Holder acknowledged Wednesday that the "courts have final say," and said his department would respond formally to an appeals court order to explain whether the Obama administration believes judges in fact have the power to overturn federal laws.
The attorney general, at a brief press conference in Chicago, made clear the administration thinks they do.
"We respect the decisions made by the courts since Marbury v. Madison," Holder said Wednesday, referring to the landmark 1803 case that established the precedent of judicial review. "Courts have final say."
I wonder what Obama thinks of this statement...
did you actually listen to what the president said?
i'm thinking you might not have.
Holder Says 'courts Have Final Say' In Response To Furor Over Obama's Health Law Comments | Fox News
I wonder what Obama thinks of this statement...
did you actually listen to what the president said?
i'm thinking you might not have.
I did.... both freeking times, and he was out of line.
You of all people should know he was out of line.
Holder Says 'courts Have Final Say' In Response To Furor Over Obama's Health Law Comments | Fox News
I wonder what Obama thinks of this statement...
did you actually listen to what the president said?
i'm thinking you might not have.
Me too; Obama spoke against JUDICIAL ACTIVISM, which is usually a conservative complaint, but did not deny the USSC authority,
did you actually listen to what the president said?
i'm thinking you might not have.
I did.... both freeking times, and he was out of line.
You of all people should know he was out of line.
i wasn't commenting on whether he should have commented or not.
i was commenting on the misrepresentation of what he said.
He was just sticking up for his law. I'd be surprised if he didn't.
He was just sticking up for his law. I'd be surprised if he didn't.
He was just sticking up for his law. I'd be surprised if he didn't.
While the case is pending he should have declined to address any questions.
They are falling all over themselves to try to stop the bleeding. The last two weeks have been a nightmare for Barry and Co.
Lovin every minute of it.
He was just sticking up for his law. I'd be surprised if he didn't.
While the case is pending he should have declined to address any questions.
He was just sticking up for his law. I'd be surprised if he didn't.
While the case is pending he should have declined to address any questions.
Holder Says 'courts Have Final Say' In Response To Furor Over Obama's Health Law Comments | Fox News
Attorney General Eric Holder acknowledged Wednesday that the "courts have final say," and said his department would respond formally to an appeals court order to explain whether the Obama administration believes judges in fact have the power to overturn federal laws.
The attorney general, at a brief press conference in Chicago, made clear the administration thinks they do.
"We respect the decisions made by the courts since Marbury v. Madison," Holder said Wednesday, referring to the landmark 1803 case that established the precedent of judicial review. "Courts have final say."
I wonder what Obama thinks of this statement...
did you actually listen to what the president said?
i'm thinking you might not have.
He was just sticking up for his law. I'd be surprised if he didn't.
While the case is pending he should have declined to address any questions.
My thoughts exactly.
While the case is pending he should have declined to address any questions.
My thoughts exactly.
So, on this we are in agreement. NO PUBLIC TALK about pending cases from the President. NONE.
Holder Says 'courts Have Final Say' In Response To Furor Over Obama's Health Law Comments | Fox News
I wonder what Obama thinks of this statement...
did you actually listen to what the president said?
i'm thinking you might not have.
Actually....we did. Seems some didn't.
He was whining.
And threatening.
And if he tries to influence the court that is a felony.
If he sends a bunch of ACORN or La Raza to their private homes he's in serous trouble.
did you actually listen to what the president said?
i'm thinking you might not have.
Actually....we did. Seems some didn't.
He was whining.
And threatening.
And if he tries to influence the court that is a felony.
If he sends a bunch of ACORN or La Raza to their private homes he's in serous trouble.
obama deranged as always snooks.
someday maybe you'll actually rationally assess something, anything, the president does.
