Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It isn’t assumed. You have tested positive. How high you still feel is your problem.
You are drifting into incoherence.Surely you can find one non-high person pulling boners since you know everything.
And that is what is going to kill the bill. With entities like M.A.D.D., insurance companies, and law enforcement lobbying against this. It’s an uphill battle at best. Don’t get me wrong. I don’t care if people smoke pot. I do care very much about my kids not getting killed by a stoner driving down the road. And I’m not the only parent who feels that way. As far as I’m concerned. A positive test is sufficient for a guilty verdict by a jury, or insurance company; till a better test comes along.You tested positive for something in your system, not for being impaired or intoxicated. Once it is no longer illegal to have it in your system, then you are testing positive only for a legal substance in your system. It is incumbent upon the Govt to prove you were impaired or intoxicated, as those are what is against the law while driving.
Then flash an incarcerated man.You are drifting into incoherence.
Nope. The government doesn't need to prove impairment at all. Alcohol is legal, the limit is 0.08 in California. No need to get to intoxication.You tested positive for something in your system, not for being impaired or intoxicated. Once it is no longer illegal to have it in your system, then you are testing positive only for a legal substance in your system. It is incumbent upon the Govt to prove you were impaired or intoxicated, as those are what is against the law while driving.
That remains one of my fondest memories. I certainly am not going to run to some asinine excuse that I was high. On did you think I was embarrassed or something equally as silly?Then flash an incarcerated man.
It was just your way of being a teasing slut trying to get moist.That remains one of my fondest memories. I certainly am not going to run to some asinine excuse that I was high. On did you think I was embarrassed or something equally as silly?
Unfortunately, all the State has to do is rhrow a police report into evidence saying you appeared intoxicated on a pupil test or a motor skills test. And you will be convicted or be forced to plead out.You tested positive for something in your system, not for being impaired or intoxicated. Once it is no longer illegal to have it in your system, then you are testing positive only for a legal substance in your system. It is incumbent upon the Govt to prove you were impaired or intoxicated, as those are what is against the law while driving.
The government doesn't need to prove impairment at all
Alcohol is legal, the limit is 0.08 in California. No need to get to intoxication.
Pot breathalyzers are coming. They are a tricky thing and have been in testing for 30+ years.Of course it does. The charge against the person is Driving Under the Influence or Driving While Intoxicated/Impaired
That is the legal limit set for intoxication, anything above that is legally defined as intoxication.
There needs to be the same sort of test for pot.
Pot breathalyzers are coming. They are a tricky thing and have been in testing for 30+ years.
Also, the science shows impairment of cognitive and motor abilities persist for several days after Marijuana usage
1995 Deer Creek, Grateful dead show. Saw this with my own eyes:Good, they need to come as more states legalize pot.
If it’s in your system; you are under the influence. How high you feel is your problem.Of course it does. The charge against the person is Driving Under the Influence or Driving While Intoxicated/Impaired
That is the legal limit set for intoxication, anything above that is legally defined as intoxication.
There needs to be the same sort of test for pot.
Here is one:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
If it’s in your system; you are under the influence. How high you feel is your problem.
Then a bunch of these genius level pot heads need to put their heads together, and come up with a test that they find suitable. Till then, the test, is the test.Bullshit. If this were true then a single sip of beer would be enough to say you under the influence for law enforcement, yet that is not the case.
Which is? Simply having it in your system will not get you OWI.Then a bunch of these genius level pot heads need to put their heads together, and come up with a test that they find suitable. Till then, the test, is the test.
No need. It's not gonna happen.Good! Campaign on that shit.
That doesn't make sense.No need. It's not gonna happen.
