Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not if I don't have permit in a state other than my own.
Now you don't need a permit. That's the point.
You need a permit to carry a concealed weapon in a national park.
if you want to know what Repubs think about the gov't just remember grover's "drown in the bathtub" quote. Of course the hypocrites use all the infrastructure created by gov't though
LOL, I love liberal hypocrits that are for the little guy, but make the little guys' life much rougher with expensive light bulbs, electricity and food...
yeah and do you think republicans are anarchists?
You're just stupid. You really are.
Republicans are such dumb fucks, they ruin the economy of farmers in state after state. Worse, many of those whose lives that are being destroyed are Republicans. Hilarious, a whirlwind of 'unintended consequences'. My new phrase for the GOP. Everything they touch ends up being a fail because of "unintended consequences". This comes from stupid people doing stupid things.
Why Republicans are doing an about-face on tough Alabama immigration law -a whirlwind of 'unintended consequences' - CSMonitor.com
Elected officials in Georgia are ruining their economy
Immigration laws in Arizona and Alabama come at a great economic cost | TIME.com
Alabama Illegal Immigrant Crackdown Destroys Farm Business
Farmers Oppose G.O.P. Bill on Immigration
Why are Republicans doing this:
House Republicans propose extra $2 billion for embassy security | Reuters
and this:
House appropriators pump $2 billion into US embassy security - The Hill
After doing this:
GOP, Paul Ryan cut half a billion dollars from embassy security
and this:
GOP Rep Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) : I 'Absolutely' Voted To Cut Funding For Embassy Security
and finally:
Republicans have no shame
Conservative women didn't like "legitimate rape". They didn't like "binders full of women".
They didn't like this:
And I suspect many don't like their men smearing a woman after she warned them what would happen:
Hillary Clinton warned Republicans in the House and the Senate of the negative effects of cuts to Embassy security
So now they are scrambling to fund what they cut? Why? Why not leave it the way you left it. Isn't that other reason still valid?
Hmmm, this sure looks like the Republicans CONCEDING that there was not enough money for Embassy security before.
Why are Republicans doing this:
House Republicans propose extra $2 billion for embassy security | Reuters
and this:
House appropriators pump $2 billion into US embassy security - The Hill
After doing this:
GOP, Paul Ryan cut half a billion dollars from embassy security
and this:
GOP Rep Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) : I 'Absolutely' Voted To Cut Funding For Embassy Security
and finally:
Republicans have no shame
Conservative women didn't like "legitimate rape". They didn't like "binders full of women".
They didn't like this:
And I suspect many don't like their men smearing a woman after she warned them what would happen:
Hillary Clinton warned Republicans in the House and the Senate of the negative effects of cuts to Embassy security
So now they are scrambling to fund what they cut? Why? Why not leave it the way you left it. Isn't that other reason still valid?
Gotta love it.
1. Cut the budget for embassy security.
2. Ignore warnings and/or requests.
3. Wait until someone dies.
4. Blame the other guys.
5. Raise the budget.
Fucking conservatives.
True, but i also have to wonder why the hell the Ambassador was in such a lightly guarded place on 9-11?????????
The truth is, many ambassadors are in lightly guarded places. You can't just go station a battalion of marines in a foreign country. Try to figure out why.
Just kidding. I'll tell you why. If you are trying to set an example and influence another country, you have to do it through deeds and actions, not just words. You can't do it hiding behind a line of rifles facing the backs of Marines. It's why many ambassadors eschew security. See, an organization like al Qaeda isn't a country. They don't have ambassadors. You wouldn't hurt the Chinese ambassador because they have ours. al Qaeda doesn't give a fuck.
I'm thinking this is why Republicans are such massive failures at foreign affairs. To be an effective ambassador, you have to put yourself in the shoes of the people in the country where you are stationed. To build a bridge, you have to effectively understand them. Republican bully. They don't want to understand anyone. You know it's true. Please be honest and admit it.
Ever been to an Embassy? I've been to about 2 dozen of them. Back in the 70's early 80's the guards were US Marines........
I love how republican's try to treat the symptom and not the disease.
The problem is our foreign policy and military aggression in the ME.
That is what is radicalizing normal, law-abiding citizens, into jihadists.
The number of jihadists are directly proportional to the amount of bombs we drop on ME country's.
The less bombs we deliver, the less bombs we get in return.
Really? So that's why we were attacked on 9-11-01? Because we went into a country and beat their ass to save another (Muslim) country?
Really?
I love how republican's try to treat the symptom and not the disease.
The problem is our foreign policy and military aggression in the ME.
That is what is radicalizing normal, law-abiding citizens, into jihadists.
The number of jihadists are directly proportional to the amount of bombs we drop on ME country's.
The less bombs we deliver, the less bombs we get in return.
Really? So that's why we were attacked on 9-11-01? Because we went into a country and beat their ass to save another (Muslim) country?
Really?
In a nutshell?
That was the immediate reason.
Bin Laden was pissed that the Saudis asked the US to help out with Kuwait.
Obama and the Dems increased federal spending by 25% as a ratio of GDP, and they couldn't figure out how to protect an embassy.
Go figure.
*sigh* rdean at it again with this false narrative aka liberal lying scumbucket talking points.
The budget cuts had no effect on the Security situation in Benghazi.
They had enough money to hire a Libyan milita didn't they now? Talk about a "worse ever idea" for a foreign embassy in a war torn region.
And the militia even warned the State Department that they would not protect Ambassador on his planned 5 day trip to Benghazi.
They were on a "mini strike" for more money and they told the State Department "no security" would be available for the Ambassador.
$2B or $ 2 Trillion, it's irrelevant because Obama didn't want to offend Muslims by stationing guards at the Consulate
Fail Dean
I mean more so than usual
$2B or $ 2 Trillion, it's irrelevant because Obama didn't want to offend Muslims by stationing guards at the Consulate
Fail Dean
I mean more so than usual
$2B or $ 2 Trillion, it's irrelevant because Obama didn't want to offend Muslims by stationing guards at the Consulate
Fail Dean
I mean more so than usual
Prove it.
$2B or $ 2 Trillion, it's irrelevant because Obama didn't want to offend Muslims by stationing guards at the Consulate
Fail Dean
I mean more so than usual
Prove it.
this thread is so full of fail
dems didn't propose the money, now or back then, yet, rdean still WHINES when pubs want to fund the embassies after bengazi. shit, when they don't fund them "enough" rdean whines, when they want to give them 2 billion, rdean whines.
conclusion:
when a republican does anything, breathes for example, they are wrong
$2B or $ 2 Trillion, it's irrelevant because Obama didn't want to offend Muslims by stationing guards at the Consulate
Fail Dean
I mean more so than usual
Prove it.
It was unguarded, Dean
Why did Obama leave the Consulate unguarded?
Where were the Marines?
I love how republican's try to treat the symptom and not the disease.
The problem is our foreign policy and military aggression in the ME.
That is what is radicalizing normal, law-abiding citizens, into jihadists.
The number of jihadists are directly proportional to the amount of bombs we drop on ME country's.
The less bombs we deliver, the less bombs we get in return.
Really? So that's why we were attacked on 9-11-01? Because we went into a country and beat their ass to save another (Muslim) country?
Really?
No. Try again. If you don't know. Let me know and I will help you.
Now you don't need a permit. That's the point.
You need a permit to carry a concealed weapon in a national park.
For years, federal law at National Parks allowed people to bring in unloaded weapons as long as they were stowed away. But starting Monday, that will change. Now anyone with a legal permit can bring in a loaded gun, concealed or otherwise, as long as it concurs with state laws.
Starting today, loaded guns allowed in National Parks | Seattle
So get a permit. Then you can do anything you want. That's called "expanded gun laws".
Why are Republicans doing this:
House Republicans propose extra $2 billion for embassy security | Reuters
and this:
House appropriators pump $2 billion into US embassy security - The Hill
After doing this:
GOP, Paul Ryan cut half a billion dollars from embassy security
and this:
GOP Rep Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) : I 'Absolutely' Voted To Cut Funding For Embassy Security
and finally:
Republicans have no shame
Conservative women didn't like "legitimate rape". They didn't like "binders full of women".
They didn't like this:
And I suspect many don't like their men smearing a woman after she warned them what would happen:
Hillary Clinton warned Republicans in the House and the Senate of the negative effects of cuts to Embassy security
So now they are scrambling to fund what they cut? Why? Why not leave it the way you left it. Isn't that other reason still valid?
Gotta love it.
1. Cut the budget for embassy security.
2. Ignore warnings and/or requests.
3. Wait until someone dies.
4. Blame the other guys.
5. Raise the budget.
Fucking conservatives.
I know. Right?
The truth is, many ambassadors are in lightly guarded places. You can't just go station a battalion of marines in a foreign country. Try to figure out why.
Just kidding. I'll tell you why. If you are trying to set an example and influence another country, you have to do it through deeds and actions, not just words. You can't do it hiding behind a line of rifles facing the backs of Marines. It's why many ambassadors eschew security. See, an organization like al Qaeda isn't a country. They don't have ambassadors. You wouldn't hurt the Chinese ambassador because they have ours. al Qaeda doesn't give a fuck.
I'm thinking this is why Republicans are such massive failures at foreign affairs. To be an effective ambassador, you have to put yourself in the shoes of the people in the country where you are stationed. To build a bridge, you have to effectively understand them. Republican bully. They don't want to understand anyone. You know it's true. Please be honest and admit it.
Ever been to an Embassy? I've been to about 2 dozen of them. Back in the 70's early 80's the guards were US Marines........
A couple. Not a battalion.
