Lonestar_logic
Republic of Texas
- May 13, 2009
- 24,539
- 2,233
It was made public that witnesses that did not fit what they wanted to hear, were dismissed. It was said on national TV that some witnesses were liars, some were misquoted, and others were completely left out of the mix. Several sources reveal as much. And no independent agency investigated the case. The DOJ, Ferguson officials, and the state of Missouri investigated it, no one else. I'd love to hear "ALL" the facts, and not just the cherry picked evidence that was used to determine no wrong doing. I do NOT believe any Liberal nonsense, none. I'm NOT a Liberal, and do not associate myself with Liberals. Anything else?Yes, I am anti-cop, and with good reason. No, I'm NOT a Liberal, by any stretch of the imagination. And, no, facts, all facts, were not taken under consideration, and it was made public that witnesses were dismissed that countered what the investigators wanted to hear. I gave examples of those witnesses earlier in this thread. And, the investigation was done by a law enforcement agency, and not by an outside independent source. Bias can be assumed when the part of one agency investigate another part of that agency. Cops investigating cops prove nothing. Law enforcement agencies investigating law enforcement agencies prove nothing.Well I'm certainly not a Liberal, by any stretch of the imagination. Also, in no way am I paranoid about anything, especially not about cops killing unarmed citizens. And, sticks and stones do nothing for me, not a thing. In addition, no one has kicked anyone's ass on this topic. This has been nothing more than a conversation where many opinions and feelings have been expressed. I haven't seen any "ass kicking" take place. Obviously, you see some kind of contest or war going on here. This is merely a forum where different ones express their views and opinions, nothing more. It' silly to think of it any other way.You sure sound like a liberal. I haven't attacked you, you're just being your paranoid liberal self. Sticks and stones.....learn it!!
You've had your ass kicked on this topic plenty enough.
Where I come from we judge people by their actions and your actions shows you to be an anti-cop liberal. You have been given all the facts and you still want to argue. Typical liberal response. The fact that a Grand Jury sat through hours of testimony, read thousands of pages of documents, heard from dozens of witnesses then decided that there was not enough probable cause to indict police officer Darren Wilson, you still want to argue the point. Typical liberal reaction!
Do you even understand how a Grand Jury works? The prosecutors control who is or isn't heard in Grand Jury, their job is to find enough evidence to indict, they would not go to a Grand Jury and suppress testimony that would help them achieve that goal. So your "witnesses were dismissed that countered what the investigators wanted to hear." comment is complete and utter nonsense. A third party DID in fact investigate, The DOJ cleared Wilson after conducting their own investigation. But you don't want to hear the facts. You want to believe whatever liberal nonsense you can dream up.
So they dismissed witnesses because they were shown to be liars. And that upsets you?
You do know that it's the County prosecutor's office that handles all investigations. Why should this case be any different than any other? The DOJ did in fact conduct their own investigation.