How bad does a president have to be to get impeached?

Of course you do.Progs detest ANYTHING that keeps them from getting their way
You know what will happen, right?

- The Democrats will remove this policy.
- A Democrat President will be indicted while in office
- The Democrats will scream and cry about an unfair and racist and unconstitutional policy

Absolutely
 



Don't know why Dershowitz is complaining about what Mueller stated in that video because Mueller stated the same thing in the report.

The report came out on April 18, 2019.

Why in Hell is Dershowitz just this week bitching about what Mueller said?

Obviously Dershowitz didn't read the fucking report.


Dershowitz is rightly pointing out that Prosecutors aren't supposed to "exonerate"...they are supposed to prosecute if the evidence warrants it! You on the left have lost your minds. You now seem to think that our legal system is based upon people being able to prove their innocence rather than a prosecutor proving their guilt!


everything that Mueller stated in his ~10 minute briefing the other day was already stated in the finished report.

Dershowitz is attempting to put on some fucking 'dog & pony' show.

I seriously doubt Dershowitz ever read the report.


Why...because he refutes the crap that people like you are trying to peddle here, Kid? Dershowitz is one of the US's leading authorities on the law and has been for decades. You attack him because he rightly points out that your entire premise has no merit!


I am merely pointing to the FACT that after ~40 days of having access to the full (redacted) report, that Dershowitz is just now bitching about what Mueller stated.

I find that quite telling & it points to several issues:
(1) Dershowitz never read the report
(2) Dershowitz bitched about what Mueller stated verbally, which is the same thing stated in the report
(3) Dershowitz got on Fox News to make a whiny ass point, in defense of his hero in The White House, only after Mueller verbalized a few points on national TV; points that were identical to the points made in the report
(4) Dershowitz was about 6 weeks behind the curve with his fake outrage


Dershowitz was "outraged" about what Mueller was doing a lot longer than 6 weeks ago! He's been quite vocal about why he thinks Mueller hasn't been acting in the way that a Special Prosecutor should...and has been quite vocal about that for some time now!
 



Don't know why Dershowitz is complaining about what Mueller stated in that video because Mueller stated the same thing in the report.

The report came out on April 18, 2019.

Why in Hell is Dershowitz just this week bitching about what Mueller said?

Obviously Dershowitz didn't read the fucking report.


Dershowitz is rightly pointing out that Prosecutors aren't supposed to "exonerate"...they are supposed to prosecute if the evidence warrants it! You on the left have lost your minds. You now seem to think that our legal system is based upon people being able to prove their innocence rather than a prosecutor proving their guilt!


everything that Mueller stated in his ~10 minute briefing the other day was already stated in the finished report.

Dershowitz is attempting to put on some fucking 'dog & pony' show.

I seriously doubt Dershowitz ever read the report.


Why...because he refutes the crap that people like you are trying to peddle here, Kid? Dershowitz is one of the US's leading authorities on the law and has been for decades. You attack him because he rightly points out that your entire premise has no merit!


I am merely pointing to the FACT that after ~40 days of having access to the full (redacted) report, that Dershowitz is just now bitching about what Mueller stated.

I find that quite telling & it points to several issues:
(1) Dershowitz never read the report
(2) Dershowitz bitched about what Mueller stated verbally, which is the same thing stated in the report
(3) Dershowitz got on Fox News to make a whiny ass point, in defense of his hero in The White House, only after Mueller verbalized a few points on national TV; points that were identical to the points made in the report
(4) Dershowitz was about 6 weeks behind the curve with his fake outrage


Dershowitz doesn't even like Donald Trump! He campaigned for Hillary in 2008! He endorsed Barack Obama when he won the nomination! He's a member of the Democratic Party! Despite those things however, Alan Dershowitz is also an ardent defender of people's rights! That includes the rights of people he doesn't agree with politically...like Donald Trump!
 
Trump and Pence are both illegitimate Russian puppets. Pence must never be allowed to pardon Trump.

The best way to do that is to leave President Trump alone. That way President Pence won't need to pardon him.

But there's diddly you can do to prevent Pence from doing it.
 
Anything worse than a blow job is worthy of impeachment


The Starr report cited 11 specific possible grounds for impeachment in four categories: five counts of lying under oath, four counts of obstruction of justice, one count of witness tampering and one count of abuse of constitutional authority. All of which arose from his liaison with Ms. Lewinsky and not from the Whitewater land deal and other matters Starr investigated. [8]

The outlined eleven possible grounds for impeachment allegedly committed by President Bill Clinton were given in the Introduction of the report as:

"1. President Clinton lied under oath in his civil case when he denied a sexual affair, a sexual relationship, or sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky.

2. President Clinton lied under oath to the grand jury about his sexual relationship with Ms. Lewinsky.

3. In his civil deposition, to support his false statement about the sexual relationship, President Clinton also lied under oath about being alone with Ms. Lewinsky and about the many gifts exchanged between Ms. Lewinsky and him.

4. President Clinton lied under oath in his civil deposition about his discussions with Ms. Lewinsky concerning her involvement in the Jones case.

5. During the Jones case, the President obstructed justice and had an understanding with Ms. Lewinsky to jointly conceal the truth about their relationship by concealing gifts subpoenaed by Ms. Jones's attorneys.

6. During the Jones case, the President obstructed justice and had an understanding with Ms. Lewinsky to jointly conceal the truth of their relationship from the judicial process by a scheme that included the following means: (i) Both the President and Ms. Lewinsky understood that they would lie under oath in the Jones case about their sexual relationship; (ii) the President suggested to Ms. Lewinsky that she prepare an affidavit that, for the President's purposes, would memorialize her testimony under oath and could be used to prevent questioning of both of them about their relationship; (iii) Ms. Lewinsky signed and filed the false affidavit; (iv) the President used Ms. Lewinsky's false affidavit at his deposition in an attempt to head off questions about Ms. Lewinsky; and (v) when that failed, the President lied under oath at his civil deposition about the relationship with Ms. Lewinsky.

7. President Clinton endeavored to obstruct justice by helping Ms. Lewinsky obtain a job in New York at a time when she would have been a witness harmful to him were she to tell the truth in the Jones case.

8. President Clinton lied under oath in his civil deposition about his discussions with Vernon Jordan concerning Ms. Lewinsky's involvement in the Jones case.

9. The President improperly tampered with a potential witness by attempting to corruptly influence the testimony of his personal secretary, Betty Currie, in the days after his civil deposition.

10. President Clinton endeavored to obstruct justice during the grand jury investigation by refusing to testify for seven months and lying to senior White House aides with knowledge that they would relay the President's false statements to the grand jury -- and did thereby deceive, obstruct, and impede the grand jury.

11. President Clinton abused his constitutional authority by (i) lying to the public and the Congress in January 1998 about his relationship with Ms. Lewinsky; (ii) promising at that time to cooperate fully with the grand jury investigation; (iii) later refusing six invitations to testify voluntarily to the grand jury; (iv) invoking Executive Privilege; (v) lying to the grand jury in August 1998; and (vi) lying again to the public and Congress on August 17, 1998 -- all as part of an effort to hinder, impede, and deflect possible inquiry by the Congress of the United States."[9]
 
Trump and Pence are both illegitimate Russian puppets. Pence must never be allowed to pardon Trump.

The best way to do that is to leave President Trump alone. That way President Pence won't need to pardon him.

But there's diddly you can do to prevent Pence from doing it.

Pence's hands aren't clean, either. He is also illegitimate. Speaker Pelosi should move up to president.
 
Trump and Pence are both illegitimate Russian puppets. Pence must never be allowed to pardon Trump.

The best way to do that is to leave President Trump alone. That way President Pence won't need to pardon him.

But there's diddly you can do to prevent Pence from doing it.

Pence's hands aren't clean, either. He is also illegitimate. Speaker Pelosi should move up to president.
Washington redskin,
chuck-schumer-looking-for-nancys-brain.jpg
 
Trump and Pence are both illegitimate Russian puppets. Pence must never be allowed to pardon Trump.
The best way to do that is to leave President Trump alone. That way President Pence won't need to pardon him. But there's diddly you can do to prevent Pence from doing it.
Pence's hands aren't clean, either. He is also illegitimate. Speaker Pelosi should move up to president.
Because a raging IDIOT says so? We've yet to prove Trump guilty of a crime and already you've convicted Pence? :laughing0301:

"... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..." - R. Mueller III
 
This was the question that Washington Post columnist and associate editor Eugene Robinson asked on MSNBC's Ari Melber show, The Beat, a few hours ago.

How much more does Trump have to do to warrant impeachment? Shoot someone on 5th Avenue?

What do you think?

Mueller Reiterates Investigation Didn’t Exonerate Trump, Hints At Impeachment



Mueller report - Department of Justice



I think opinions are like assholes, everyone has one and most all of them stink. Whether or not Trump has done something bad is a matter of opinion. To date there has been no actionable legal finding against Trump.

.
 
Trump and Pence are both illegitimate Russian puppets. Pence must never be allowed to pardon Trump.

The best way to do that is to leave President Trump alone. That way President Pence won't need to pardon him.

But there's diddly you can do to prevent Pence from doing it.

Pence's hands aren't clean, either. He is also illegitimate. Speaker Pelosi should move up to president.

That's not how it works. Get rid of Trump, the first thing Pence does is appoint his own VP, then pardons Trump. Your wishing it were different does nothing.
 
This was the question that Washington Post columnist and associate editor Eugene Robinson asked on MSNBC's Ari Melber show, The Beat, a few hours ago.

How much more does Trump have to do to warrant impeachment? Shoot someone on 5th Avenue?

What do you think?

Mueller Reiterates Investigation Didn’t Exonerate Trump, Hints At Impeachment



Mueller report - Department of Justice

We are PRESUMED innocent, that is not a state bestowed on us by a prosecutor like Dirty Bob.

Prosecutors either indict or they shut up.

FACE, MEET PALM: ‘Morally Bankrupt:’ Joe Biden Blames Trump for Obama Immigration Policies.
 
FDR issued an executive order that authorized the incarceration of American citizens without due process. JFK used the CIA to illegally raise, train and equip an invasion army. Shouldn't they have been impeached?
 

Forum List

Back
Top