How Can The FBI & CIA Claim Russians Hacked the DNC When They Never Examined DNC Servers?

[easyt65]

Hmmm: FBI, CIA never examined DNC servers? - Hot Air

"The FBI did not examine the servers of the Democratic National Committee before issuing a report attributing the sweeping cyberintrusion to Russia-backed hackers, BuzzFeed News has learned.

Six months after the FBI first said it was investigating the hack of the Democratic National Committee’s computer network, the bureau has still not requested access to the hacked servers, a DNC spokesman said. No US government entity has run an independent forensic analysis on the system."



"U.S. intelligence agencies obtained what they considered to be conclusive evidence after the November election that Russia provided hacked material from the Democratic National Committee to WikiLeaks through a third party, three U.S. officials said on Wednesday.

U.S. officials had concluded months earlier that Russian intelligence agencies had directed the hacking, but had been less certain that they could prove Russia also had controlled the release of information damaging to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton."
-- 'Evidence' they refuse to show / share.



"Well, isn’t that convenient timing. Put these two stories together, and it appears that the intelligence and law-enforcement communities didn’t take a very strong interest in chasing down evidence until after the election"


You really don't NEED to thoroughly investigate a FALSE NARRATIVE / FALSE CLAIM. Investigate it too thoroughly and it all falls apart...as it has been lately.

If the Intel Community had anything they would not have illegally ignored a Congressional Subpoena and would have appeared to show Congress what they have. Neither the Intel Leadership not Barry has produced any definitive evidence to date, and the Chairman of the Intel Committee has already declared that he sees NO EVIDENCE to support the claims that Russia 'hacked the election' and / or did so to help Trump.

More thorough investigations are needed, definitive evidence is needed, and the leaks and hacking vulnerabilities / piss-poor liberal cyber security measures/practices need to be resolved.

 

[Compost]

They called the Psychic Hotline.

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

Hmmm: FBI, CIA never examined DNC servers? - Hot Air

"The FBI did not examine the servers of the Democratic National Committee before issuing a report attributing the sweeping cyberintrusion to Russia-backed hackers, BuzzFeed News has learned.

Six months after the FBI first said it was investigating the hack of the Democratic National Committee’s computer network, the bureau has still not requested access to the hacked servers, a DNC spokesman said. No US government entity has run an independent forensic analysis on the system."



"U.S. intelligence agencies obtained what they considered to be conclusive evidence after the November election that Russia provided hacked material from the Democratic National Committee to WikiLeaks through a third party, three U.S. officials said on Wednesday.

U.S. officials had concluded months earlier that Russian intelligence agencies had directed the hacking, but had been less certain that they could prove Russia also had controlled the release of information damaging to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton."
-- 'Evidence' they refuse to show / share.



"Well, isn’t that convenient timing. Put these two stories together, and it appears that the intelligence and law-enforcement communities didn’t take a very strong interest in chasing down evidence until after the election"


You really don't NEED to thoroughly investigate a FALSE NARRATIVE / FALSE CLAIM. Investigate it too thoroughly and it all falls apart...as it has been lately.

If the Intel Community had anything they would not have illegally ignored a Congressional Subpoena and would have appeared to show Congress what they have. Neither the Intel Leadership not Barry has produced any definitive evidence to date, and the Chairman of the Intel Committee has already declared that he sees NO EVIDENCE to support the claims that Russia 'hacked the election' and / or did so to help Trump.

More thorough investigations are needed, definitive evidence is needed, and the leaks and hacking vulnerabilities / piss-poor liberal cyber security measures/practices need to be resolved.

 

[Moonglow]

i am sure the contractor hired to provide the service have a record of the occurrence..

 

[easyt65]

i am sure the contractor hired to provide the service have a record of the occurrence..

So the FBI and CIA's process for investigating crimes involves taking people's word about what happened?

'Thorough'!

 

[Dragonlady]

Hmmm: FBI, CIA never examined DNC servers? - Hot Air

"The FBI did not examine the servers of the Democratic National Committee before issuing a report attributing the sweeping cyberintrusion to Russia-backed hackers, BuzzFeed News has learned.

Six months after the FBI first said it was investigating the hack of the Democratic National Committee’s computer network, the bureau has still not requested access to the hacked servers, a DNC spokesman said. No US government entity has run an independent forensic analysis on the system."



"U.S. intelligence agencies obtained what they considered to be conclusive evidence after the November election that Russia provided hacked material from the Democratic National Committee to WikiLeaks through a third party, three U.S. officials said on Wednesday.

U.S. officials had concluded months earlier that Russian intelligence agencies had directed the hacking, but had been less certain that they could prove Russia also had controlled the release of information damaging to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton."
-- 'Evidence' they refuse to show / share.



"Well, isn’t that convenient timing. Put these two stories together, and it appears that the intelligence and law-enforcement communities didn’t take a very strong interest in chasing down evidence until after the election"


You really don't NEED to thoroughly investigate a FALSE NARRATIVE / FALSE CLAIM. Investigate it too thoroughly and it all falls apart...as it has been lately.

If the Intel Community had anything they would not have illegally ignored a Congressional Subpoena and would have appeared to show Congress what they have. Neither the Intel Leadership not Barry has produced any definitive evidence to date, and the Chairman of the Intel Committee has already declared that he sees NO EVIDENCE to support the claims that Russia 'hacked the election' and / or did so to help Trump.

More thorough investigations are needed, definitive evidence is needed, and the leaks and hacking vulnerabilities / piss-poor liberal cyber security measures/practices need to be resolved.

Hot Air, Buzzfeed???? What nothing from TMZ???

I love how under the Liar-in-Chief, only gossip sites and the internet are deemed "reliable news sources". All the better to feed you propaganda and lies. You people are dumber than a sack of hammers.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

i am sure the contractor hired to provide the service have a record of the occurrence..

They emailed it to Hillary.

 

[easyt65]

Hot Air, Buzzfeed???? What nothing from TMZ???

'This' site is invalid because it says bad things about Libs/Barry, and because I say so'?! REALLY?!

 

[EverCurious]

They got the information, and the opinion of it being Russian government, from Crowdstrike, I've already laid all of this out for ya'll

See my posts (I think I parsed down to my fact posts, if not I apologize - will check Now checked and explained for reference )

Vlad the Merciful flushed Joke Obama down the toilett - Breaking down reports "evidence" - re Phishing
US EXPELS 35 Russian diplomats, closes two compounds. - Related: Explaining Phishing (Addendum 1)
US EXPELS 35 Russian diplomats, closes two compounds. - Related: Explaining Phishing (Addendum 2)

US EXPELS 35 Russian diplomats, closes two compounds. - Destroying the reports "evidence" - re Malware
Wikileaks: Russia didn't hack shit. - Wikileaks has always claimed it was an insider, Crowdstrike connection, and further breaking down report's evidence
US EXPELS 35 Russian diplomats, closes two compounds. - Related: Wikileaks nailing Russia (and specifically Putin, aka they are no friends)
PROOF: FBI, DHS release joint report on Russia hacking - Related: Just how easy it is too get the malware proclaimed as Russia (malware claims to be Ukrainian - Guccifer 2.0 claims to be Ukrainian as well )
CIA Concludes Russia Interfered In Election To Help Trump Win - Related: explaining a bit on how hacking/coding/malware works, as well as trashing the proclaimed "keyboard" tracking the media is flapping about.

US EXPELS 35 Russian diplomats, closes two compounds. - Related: Our reactions to other countries hacking us in the very recent past (aka 2015)

and:

Oh and I forgot one linky:

No evidence has been submitted that the Russians hacked the DNC - Explaining Guccifer 2.0 and APT28 & APT29 (labeled Fuzzy Bear and Cozy Bear by a private company, not our government, Crowdstrike connection part 2

 

[easyt65]

I investigated the claim that Hillary joined in once with Bubba and Monica. One of the janitors had made a note in her notebook she always keeps when she makes her rounds...so it has to be true.

 

[Lakhota]

Hmmm: FBI, CIA never examined DNC servers? - Hot Air

"The FBI did not examine the servers of the Democratic National Committee before issuing a report attributing the sweeping cyberintrusion to Russia-backed hackers, BuzzFeed News has learned.

Six months after the FBI first said it was investigating the hack of the Democratic National Committee’s computer network, the bureau has still not requested access to the hacked servers, a DNC spokesman said. No US government entity has run an independent forensic analysis on the system."



"U.S. intelligence agencies obtained what they considered to be conclusive evidence after the November election that Russia provided hacked material from the Democratic National Committee to WikiLeaks through a third party, three U.S. officials said on Wednesday.

U.S. officials had concluded months earlier that Russian intelligence agencies had directed the hacking, but had been less certain that they could prove Russia also had controlled the release of information damaging to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton."
-- 'Evidence' they refuse to show / share.



"Well, isn’t that convenient timing. Put these two stories together, and it appears that the intelligence and law-enforcement communities didn’t take a very strong interest in chasing down evidence until after the election"


You really don't NEED to thoroughly investigate a FALSE NARRATIVE / FALSE CLAIM. Investigate it too thoroughly and it all falls apart...as it has been lately.

If the Intel Community had anything they would not have illegally ignored a Congressional Subpoena and would have appeared to show Congress what they have. Neither the Intel Leadership not Barry has produced any definitive evidence to date, and the Chairman of the Intel Committee has already declared that he sees NO EVIDENCE to support the claims that Russia 'hacked the election' and / or did so to help Trump.

More thorough investigations are needed, definitive evidence is needed, and the leaks and hacking vulnerabilities / piss-poor liberal cyber security measures/practices need to be resolved.

This thread is FAKE NEWS.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Anyone watching the bearings going on.....They aren't going to release the "proof" cause of course it's too sensitive.