Zone1 Should The Christian Bible Be Called "The Book of Opinions?"

[theHawk]

"Witness?" Used as a metaphor?

No.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

No.

Hmm...

 

[BreezeWood]

Actually, A scroll refers to Him. The Son of God text refers to the Son of God, but there is little of it that remains:
Here's some:
He will be called the Son of God, they will call Him Son of the Most High, The spirit of God will rest upon Him. Fragments contain the wrath of God and Tribulation. After much killing and slaughter a prince of nations. He will be ruler over the land. Will be subject to Him and obey Him. Will be called the Great.
^
It resembles Revelation. But, John died in the first century. And the Son of God text is from the 1st. century. So how did the 4th century forgers get ancient pen and paper to write their Bible Book on a scroll too, (to make it seem like a 1st century document) and then hide it until 1958?

The Bible is the most widely circulated book on earth. And yet the author/s remain a mystery to nonbelievers. That's weird.

- provide the archive of documents preserved by those counsels that wrote their 4th century christian bible that verify anything they included for what they wrote in writing their bible -

the 1st century events were the repudiation of judaism's false commandments and hereditary idolatry -

the scrolls are written by jews and mimic their false religion - what little in truth that was written, same as during inquisitions would be destroyed that veered from the prevailing orthodoxy - especially having just crucified their opponent. the same persona in writing their christian bible in the 4th century - the state religion of the roman empire.

your example does not mention jesus only a belief for something that never materialized at least in regards to a verified statement made by the exemplar in their own writing.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Yes the scrolls were written by Jews. That doesn't make them less accurate. In fact, archeologists rely on the Bible in determining where to dig.

If we can only rely on what is written by someone's own hand, that means only auto biographies can be legitimate, historic and reliable. I disagree.