How did we pick the 7 countries?

[buckeye45_73]

You said every terrorist is a Muslim. That's how we get "Muslim terrorist".

Everyone banned is a Muslim. That's how we get "Muslim ban".

Don't tell me my logic is stupid. It is YOUR logic.

It is stupid, because not every muslim is banned

Jordan...not banned
Saudi arabia....not bannex
Indonesia....not banned
Pakistan.....not banned..

Kuwait...not banned


Youndont get anuance, if yourr from the 7 countries you are banned TEMPORARILY, nut a Muslim ban would ban EVERY muslim.

Is Trump banning Syrian Christian refugees?

I asked you a question ot two.
How many syrians are Christian?
How many did we take in?

Just give percentages.

Then well move.on.

Is Trump banning Christian refugees or not?

No... Jesus, let it go. The order makes no mention of religion.

Hes an idiot like rdean. I gabe him the info, he doesnt want to believe it. Even other lefties see this protest as bullshit.

 

[BlindBoo]

Is Trump banning Syrian Christian refugees?

I asked you a question ot two.
How many syrians are Christian?
How many did we take in?

Just give percentages.

Then well move.on.

Is Trump banning Christian refugees or not?

Every article i found, wapo, nyt, telegraph never said either way.
The only thing i found was Trump bitching about christains not let in.

Bit if they are froma.. country on the list, no they should not be let in. Unless we can verify them, and that goes for muslims and others as well.

Donald Trump says if you're from Syria and a Christian, you can't come to the U.S. as a refugee

Wow that piece is so biased its disgusting propaganda
First it was less than one percent of refugees were christians 190 out of 19500
Second thats a very small percentage compared to 10 percent of the population.

I mean the left complains aboit blacks not getting a fair shot even if they are in the low double digits for an industry or colege entrance, ect.....

Got a link for those numbers? Trump the candidate was lying.

Our ruling

Trump said that "if you're from Syria and you're a Christian, you cannot come into this country" as a refugee. This is wrong on its face -- a small number of Syrian Christians been admitted as refugees over the past nine months -- and also false in spirit, since there is nothing in the United States’ laws or regulations that discriminates against Christian refugees. We rate the claim False.

 

[g5000]

View attachment 109600

Cherry picking - Wikipedia

Confirmation bias - Wikipedia

Stereotype - Wikipedia

 

[Indeependent]

Trump won't say "Muslim ban". He is just like Obama who would not say "Muslim terrorist".

Pussy.

Well since he's not banning every Muslim, hut every terrorist was a Muslim, its an incorrect and fake comparison

Try again.

Everyone Trump is banning is a Muslim. It's a Muslim ban.

Not true; most, but not all.

 

[boedicca]

We picked the seven countries in the Middle East with the most ragheads. Let's not be coy about it. Trump promised us a Muslim ban.

Promise kept!

Go Trump!

B'loney. There are 40 other countries with Muslim majorities, the sum of whose populations vast outweighs that of the seven countries. But go ahead, keep promoting your Fake News Meme. More insane Lefty Outrage will just ensure Trump's reelection in 2020.

He is just getting started. Trump had to start with laws already on the books. That's the easy part.

He is going to expand his Muslim ban.

Go Trump!

You are a moron. Soros must be dredging the Occupy Swamp for trolls.

 

[WillowTree]

View attachment 109600

Cherry picking - Wikipedia

Confirmation bias - Wikipedia

Stereotype - Wikipedia

Which parts are wrong?

 

[danielpalos]

View attachment 109600 Didn't ISIS say it would take advantage of the refugees and blend with them to gain entry?

So why is the left really upset that Muslims might suffer a temporary ban?

Just special pleading from the national socialist, right wing?

According to the Congressional Research Service’s study, American Jihadist Terrorism: Combatting a Complex Threat, between May 2009 and November 2010, law enforcement made arrests related to 22 homegrown jihadist-inspired terror plots by American citizens or legal residents of the U.S. This is a significant increase over the 21 plots caught in the seven interim years after the September 11 attacks. During these seven years, two plots resulted in attacks, compared to the two attacks between May 2009 and November 2010, which resulted in 14 deaths. This spike post-May 2009 shows that some Americans are susceptible to ideologies that support a violent form of jihad.[3][7]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_terrorism#Recent_trends

 

[danielpalos]

You said every terrorist is a Muslim. That's how we get "Muslim terrorist".

Everyone banned is a Muslim. That's how we get "Muslim ban".

Don't tell me my logic is stupid. It is YOUR logic.

It is stupid, because not every muslim is banned

Jordan...not banned
Saudi arabia....not bannex
Indonesia....not banned
Pakistan.....not banned..

Kuwait...not banned


Youndont get anuance, if yourr from the 7 countries you are banned TEMPORARILY, nut a Muslim ban would ban EVERY muslim.

Is Trump banning Syrian Christian refugees?

I asked you a question ot two.
How many syrians are Christian?
How many did we take in?

Just give percentages.

Then well move.on.

Is Trump banning Christian refugees or not?

No... Jesus, let it go. The order makes no mention of religion.

Federal law is federal law. Only the national socialist right wing, likes to "pick and choose" which federal laws they want to obey.

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965

• One of the main components aimed to abolish the national-origins quota. This meant that it eliminated national origin, race, and ancestry as basis for immigration.
  
  Refugees were given the seventh and last category preference with the possibility of adjusting their status. However, refugees could enter the United States through other means as well like those seeking temporary asylum.

 

[theHawk]

Liberals seem a little confused why the seven countries were selected:

Libya - civil war since 2014. ISIS in country.
Somalia - in civil war since 1991.
Syria - civil war since 2011. ISIS country.
Yemen - civil war since 2015. ISIS in country.
Iraq - civil war since 2014, ISIS country.
Iran - for obvious reasons we haven't had diplomatic relations with them, and they are seeking nuclear capability.
Sudan - another hell hole with history of war and massacres, the latest being in 2014. It is a very large country that terrorists often hide terrorist training camps in.

All of these countries except Iran are war torn shit holes. They train terrorists, and many have ISIS controlled areas.

Liberals are also passing around memes that Trump doesn't do business with any of these countries. No shit, no one does business with them. Who the fuck wants to open a resort in Somalia?

 

[theHawk]

It is stupid, because not every muslim is banned

Jordan...not banned
Saudi arabia....not bannex
Indonesia....not banned
Pakistan.....not banned..

Kuwait...not banned


Youndont get anuance, if yourr from the 7 countries you are banned TEMPORARILY, nut a Muslim ban would ban EVERY muslim.

Is Trump banning Syrian Christian refugees?

I asked you a question ot two.
How many syrians are Christian?
How many did we take in?

Just give percentages.

Then well move.on.

Is Trump banning Christian refugees or not?

No... Jesus, let it go. The order makes no mention of religion.

Federal law is federal law. Only the national socialist right wing, likes to "pick and choose" which federal laws they want to obey.

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965

• One of the main components aimed to abolish the national-origins quota. This meant that it eliminated national origin, race, and ancestry as basis for immigration.
  
  Refugees were given the seventh and last category preference with the possibility of adjusting their status. However, refugees could enter the United States through other means as well like those seeking temporary asylum.

Unfortunately for you, the President still has the authority to impose any restrictions he wants:

8 U.S. Code § 1182
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

 

[danielpalos]

Liberals seem a little confused why the seven countries were selected:

Libya - civil war since 2014. ISIS in country.
Somalia - in civil war since 1991.
Syria - civil war since 2011. ISIS country.
Yemen - civil war since 2015. ISIS in country.
Iraq - civil war since 2014, ISIS country.
Iran - for obvious reasons we haven't had diplomatic relations with them, and they are seeking nuclear capability.
Sudan - another hell hole with history of war and massacres, the latest being in 2014. It is a very large country that terrorists often hide terrorist training camps in.

All of these countries except Iran are war torn shit holes. They train terrorists, and many have ISIS controlled areas.

Liberals are also passing around memes that Trump doesn't do business with any of these countries. No shit, no one does business with them. Who the fuck wants to open a resort in Somalia?

Somalia used to be an AnCap showcase.

 

[danielpalos]

Is Trump banning Syrian Christian refugees?

I asked you a question ot two.
How many syrians are Christian?
How many did we take in?

Just give percentages.

Then well move.on.

Is Trump banning Christian refugees or not?

No... Jesus, let it go. The order makes no mention of religion.

Federal law is federal law. Only the national socialist right wing, likes to "pick and choose" which federal laws they want to obey.

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965

• One of the main components aimed to abolish the national-origins quota. This meant that it eliminated national origin, race, and ancestry as basis for immigration.
  
  Refugees were given the seventh and last category preference with the possibility of adjusting their status. However, refugees could enter the United States through other means as well like those seeking temporary asylum.

Unfortunately for you, the President still has the authority to impose any restrictions he wants:

8 U.S. Code § 1182
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, is federal law. 8USC1182 does not supersede it. It must be reconciled with the previous federal act, unless repealed.

 

[theHawk]

I asked you a question ot two.
How many syrians are Christian?
How many did we take in?

Just give percentages.

Then well move.on.

Is Trump banning Christian refugees or not?

No... Jesus, let it go. The order makes no mention of religion.

Federal law is federal law. Only the national socialist right wing, likes to "pick and choose" which federal laws they want to obey.

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965

• One of the main components aimed to abolish the national-origins quota. This meant that it eliminated national origin, race, and ancestry as basis for immigration.
  
  Refugees were given the seventh and last category preference with the possibility of adjusting their status. However, refugees could enter the United States through other means as well like those seeking temporary asylum.

Unfortunately for you, the President still has the authority to impose any restrictions he wants:

8 U.S. Code § 1182
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, is federal law. 8USC1182 does not supersede it. It must be reconciled with the previous federal act, unless repealed.

That is codified law, it wasn't repealed. The 1965 bill just adds to the code, and it did not repeal the previous text. If it did not explicitly take away the Presidential powers, it stands.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

no matter what countries Trump would of chosen, the left would of been crying,protesting, and pooping in the snow.

 

[danielpalos]

Is Trump banning Christian refugees or not?

No... Jesus, let it go. The order makes no mention of religion.

Federal law is federal law. Only the national socialist right wing, likes to "pick and choose" which federal laws they want to obey.

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965

• One of the main components aimed to abolish the national-origins quota. This meant that it eliminated national origin, race, and ancestry as basis for immigration.
  
  Refugees were given the seventh and last category preference with the possibility of adjusting their status. However, refugees could enter the United States through other means as well like those seeking temporary asylum.

Unfortunately for you, the President still has the authority to impose any restrictions he wants:

8 U.S. Code § 1182
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, is federal law. 8USC1182 does not supersede it. It must be reconciled with the previous federal act, unless repealed.

That is codified law, it wasn't repealed. The 1965 bill just adds to the code, and it did not repeal the previous text. If it did not explicitly take away the Presidential powers, it stands.

here is one of the conditions of the Act of 1965:

One of the main components aimed to abolish the national-origins quota. This meant that it eliminated national origin, race, and ancestry as basis for immigration.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965

 

[theHawk]

No... Jesus, let it go. The order makes no mention of religion.

Federal law is federal law. Only the national socialist right wing, likes to "pick and choose" which federal laws they want to obey.

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965

• One of the main components aimed to abolish the national-origins quota. This meant that it eliminated national origin, race, and ancestry as basis for immigration.
  
  Refugees were given the seventh and last category preference with the possibility of adjusting their status. However, refugees could enter the United States through other means as well like those seeking temporary asylum.

Unfortunately for you, the President still has the authority to impose any restrictions he wants:

8 U.S. Code § 1182
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, is federal law. 8USC1182 does not supersede it. It must be reconciled with the previous federal act, unless repealed.

That is codified law, it wasn't repealed. The 1965 bill just adds to the code, and it did not repeal the previous text. If it did not explicitly take away the Presidential powers, it stands.

here is one of the conditions of the Act of 1965:

One of the main components aimed to abolish the national-origins quota. This meant that it eliminated national origin, race, and ancestry as basis for immigration.

Yea so? No one is setting national origins quotas. Nothing about abolishing Presidential powers and the executive's right to enforce any restriction he wants.

You failed again. Keep digging though, I'm sure the MSM didn't lie to you.

 

[danielpalos]

no matter what countries Trump would of chosen, the left would of been crying,protesting, and pooping in the snow.

It is politics; but, the left doesn't have the conflicts of interest, the right seems to have:

President Trump has signed an executive order that bans citizens from seven Muslim-majority countries in the Middle East from entering the United States for 90 days, according to the White House. His proposed list doesn’t include Muslim-majority countries where his Trump Organization has done business or pursued potential deals. Properties include golf courses in the United Arab Emirates and two luxury towers operating in Turkey.--https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2017-trump-immigration-ban-conflict-of-interest/

 

[easyt65]

'How did we pick the 7 countries?'

'WE' didn't - Barry did!

 

[danielpalos]

Federal law is federal law. Only the national socialist right wing, likes to "pick and choose" which federal laws they want to obey.

Unfortunately for you, the President still has the authority to impose any restrictions he wants:

8 U.S. Code § 1182
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, is federal law. 8USC1182 does not supersede it. It must be reconciled with the previous federal act, unless repealed.

That is codified law, it wasn't repealed. The 1965 bill just adds to the code, and it did not repeal the previous text. If it did not explicitly take away the Presidential powers, it stands.

here is one of the conditions of the Act of 1965:

One of the main components aimed to abolish the national-origins quota. This meant that it eliminated national origin, race, and ancestry as basis for immigration.

Yea so? No one is setting national origins quotas. Nothing about abolishing Presidential powers and the executive's right to enforce any restriction he wants.

You failed again. Keep digging though, I'm sure the MSM didn't lie to you.

Just lousy reading comprehension from the national socialist right wing?

This meant that it eliminated national origin, race, and ancestry as basis for immigration.

 

[danielpalos]

'How did we pick the 7 countries?'

'WE' didn't - Barry did!

In our current president's, executive order?