Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
I'll have to look. Not sure I saved it.
You don't have to believe it. I'm cool with that. Are you?
I'm cool with all your imagined science.
Let me know when you find it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll have to look. Not sure I saved it.
You don't have to believe it. I'm cool with that. Are you?
I'm cool with you thinking that about it too. I'm satisfied with the record of our conversation.I'm cool with all your imagined science.
Let me know when you find it.
I'm cool with you thinking that about it too. I'm satisfied with the record of our conversation.
It's already out there.No kidding.
A new species is a single mutation away.
You should publish.
It's already out there.
That's because you can criticize what you don't believe without ever actually stating what you do believe for like forever. It doesn't require defining what something is which is harder.New species from one mutation?
That's your silliest claim yet.
Are we done yet?
I doubt it.
That's because you can criticize what you don't believe without ever actually stating what you do believe for like forever. It doesn't require defining what something is which is harder.
AGAIN:ding said:
And yet our planet is 2C cooler than in the past with 120 ppm more atmospheric CO2.
Scientists reach opposite conclusions depending upon which datasets they consider.AGAIN:
How do we know the build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is caused by humans?
Fossil fuels are the only source of carbon dioxide large enough to raise atmospheric carbon dioxide amounts so high so quickly.
""...The increase between the year 1800 and today is 70% larger than the increase that occurred when Earth climbed out of the last ice age between 17,500 and 11,500 years ago, and it occurred 100-200 times faster.
In addition, fossil fuels are the only source of carbon consistent with the isotopic fingerprint of the carbon present in today’s atmosphere. That analysis indicates it must be coming from terrestrial plant matter, and it must be very, very old. These and other lines of evidence leave no doubt that fossil fuels are the primary source of the carbon dioxide building up in Earth’s atmosphere."...""
`
How do we know the build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is caused by humans? | NOAA Climate.gov
Fossil fuels are the only source of carbon dioxide large enough to raise atmospheric carbon dioxide amounts so high so quickly.
`
AGAIN:
How do we know the build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is caused by humans?
Fossil fuels are the only source of carbon dioxide large enough to raise atmospheric carbon dioxide amounts so high so quickly.
""...The increase between the year 1800 and today is 70% larger than the increase that occurred when Earth climbed out of the last ice age between 17,500 and 11,500 years ago, and it occurred 100-200 times faster.
In addition, fossil fuels are the only source of carbon consistent with the isotopic fingerprint of the carbon present in today’s atmosphere. That analysis indicates it must be coming from terrestrial plant matter, and it must be very, very old. These and other lines of evidence leave no doubt that fossil fuels are the primary source of the carbon dioxide building up in Earth’s atmosphere."...""
`
How do we know the build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is caused by humans? | NOAA Climate.gov
Fossil fuels are the only source of carbon dioxide large enough to raise atmospheric carbon dioxide amounts so high so quickly.
`
Given the age of homo sapiens and of human culture with infrastructure, here is a far more pertinent dataset:
I can appreciate both how desperate one must be to keep posting that animated crap chart and how stupid one must be to convince themself that the current global temperature anomaly has remained that low.I'm glad grumblenuts can appreciate how funny it is that our planet is 2C cooler with 120 ppm more CO2.
That's hilarious. The beauty of that prediction is that it will be so easy to see how wrong it really was.Given the age of homo sapiens and of human culture with infrastructure, here is a far more pertinent dataset:
View attachment 602375
And before arguing that the current warming is not unprecedented in its rapidity, I suggest you read the article and its discussion of the import of actual climate sensitivity.
Desperate? It's actually quite fun. Desperate would be more like what true believers like yourself feel when global carbon emissions increase every year by 1 billion tons.I can appreciate both how desperate one must be to keep posting that animated crap chart and how stupid one must be to convince themself that the current global temperature anomaly has remained that low.
So your wish that things not be as they are is fulfilled by your speculations about what will come. How perfectly circular and distracting of you as usual. Bubbye again.Within 30 years everything you believe will be proven wrong by colder temperatures.