How do you do a cover up when there wasn't even a crime?

[SuperDemocrat]

Isn't it kind of hard to claim a cover-up when Comey has already told Trump that he wasn't under investigation? The left is claiming that Trump fired Comey to attempt to stop an investigation into Trump but how can that be if Trump was never under investigation or wasn't going to be be investigated by Comey? How can you fire someone for the reasons of blocking an investigation when there was never ever an investigation by that person in the first place? I believe that Comey has actually said that trump was not under investigation and trump believed him. Whether or not Comey was telling him the truth on the matter is irrelevant because Trump believed him so he made decisions based on what he believed. Trump goes out an fires him when he believed he wasn't under investigation so the motives for firing him must be something different than to block an investigation since Trump believed he wasn't under investigation in the first place.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Isn't it kind of hard to claim a cover-up when Comey has already told Trump that he wasn't under investigation? The left is claiming that Trump fired Comey to attempt to stop an investigation into Trump but how can that be if Trump was never under investigation or wasn't going to be be investigated by Comey? How can you fire someone for the reasons of blocking an investigation when there was never ever an investigation by that person in the first place? I believe that Comey has actually said that trump was not under investigation and trump believed him. Whether or not Comey was telling him the truth on the matter is irrelevant because Trump believed him so he made decisions based on what he believed. Trump goes out an fires him when he believed he wasn't under investigation so the motives for firing him must be something different than to block an investigation since Trump believed he wasn't under investigation in the first place.

Shut up they said

 

[paperview]

Isn't it kind of hard to claim a cover-up when Comey has already told Trump that he wasn't under investigation? The left is claiming that Trump fired Comey to attempt to stop an investigation into Trump but how can that be if Trump was never under investigation or wasn't going to be be investigated by Comey? How can you fire someone for the reasons of blocking an investigation when there was never ever an investigation by that person in the first place? I believe that Comey has actually said that trump was not under investigation and trump believed him. Whether or not Comey was telling him the truth on the matter is irrelevant because Trump believed him so he made decisions based on what he believed. Trump goes out an fires him when he believed he wasn't under investigation so the motives for firing him must be something different than to block an investigation since Trump believed he wasn't under investigation in the first place.

There's an ongoing investigation into the Trump campaign.

Derp.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Opinion | Trump committed no crime. Democrats need to get over it.

 

[candycorn]

The investigations into the multiple major scandals continues….

 

[Manonthestreet]

On Display In Russia Hearings, Democrats' Trump-Hatred Is Worthy Of Captain Ahab

 

[Divine Wind]

Isn't it kind of hard to claim a cover-up when Comey has already told Trump that he wasn't under investigation? The left is claiming that Trump fired Comey to attempt to stop an investigation into Trump but how can that be if Trump was never under investigation or wasn't going to be be investigated by Comey? How can you fire someone for the reasons of blocking an investigation when there was never ever an investigation by that person in the first place? I believe that Comey has actually said that trump was not under investigation and trump believed him. Whether or not Comey was telling him the truth on the matter is irrelevant because Trump believed him so he made decisions based on what he believed. Trump goes out an fires him when he believed he wasn't under investigation so the motives for firing him must be something different than to block an investigation since Trump believed he wasn't under investigation in the first place.

Trump wasn't under investigation, but his friends were.

 

[Jackson]

Isn't it kind of hard to claim a cover-up when Comey has already told Trump that he wasn't under investigation? The left is claiming that Trump fired Comey to attempt to stop an investigation into Trump but how can that be if Trump was never under investigation or wasn't going to be be investigated by Comey? How can you fire someone for the reasons of blocking an investigation when there was never ever an investigation by that person in the first place? I believe that Comey has actually said that trump was not under investigation and trump believed him. Whether or not Comey was telling him the truth on the matter is irrelevant because Trump believed him so he made decisions based on what he believed. Trump goes out an fires him when he believed he wasn't under investigation so the motives for firing him must be something different than to block an investigation since Trump believed he wasn't under investigation in the first place.

I thought Comey was fired because Trump said the FBI was in disarray and he was an ineffective leader. Thus, Comey was hurt or "defamed" as he puts it and acutally, Comey's attempt to change the focus of the Congressional Hearings from the Russian Investigation to the Comey-Trump meetings where Comey felt that Trump would be tarnished.

Instead, I came out that Comey was "ethically challenged."

 

[RightyTighty]

Those like the OP thinking this is over need to start dealing with the fact that - this has just started.

 

[Jackson]

Those like the OP thinking this is over need to start dealing with the fact that - this has just started.

You don't know that for a fact, nor do I. We will have to see how it cames out from the wash.

 

[danielpalos]

Isn't it kind of hard to claim a cover-up when Comey has already told Trump that he wasn't under investigation? The left is claiming that Trump fired Comey to attempt to stop an investigation into Trump but how can that be if Trump was never under investigation or wasn't going to be be investigated by Comey? How can you fire someone for the reasons of blocking an investigation when there was never ever an investigation by that person in the first place? I believe that Comey has actually said that trump was not under investigation and trump believed him. Whether or not Comey was telling him the truth on the matter is irrelevant because Trump believed him so he made decisions based on what he believed. Trump goes out an fires him when he believed he wasn't under investigation so the motives for firing him must be something different than to block an investigation since Trump believed he wasn't under investigation in the first place.

Just typical right wing propaganda and rhetoric? Why should the left take You seriously about politics, economics, or the law.