If it walks like a duck....quacks like a duck.....
This could go in politics, or in history....but if 'past is prologue,' then, history it is.
Remember when Obama scoffed at the idea that ObamaCare was a "Bolshevik plot"???
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcRWS45gPzo]Obama To Republicans: Stop Pretending Health Care Reform Is A 'Bolshevik Plot' - YouTube[/ame]
Well, OK...perhaps not a 'plot'....but certainly Bolshevik in conception, design, and purpose!.
1. Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too.
Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917 (Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately.
Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.
2. Obama wasn't the first Bolshevik to support socialized medicine.
For context, there was Henry Sigerist:
"He devoted himself to the study of history of medicine. Socialized Medicine in the Soviet Union (1937), and History of Medicine were among his most important works. He emerged as a major spokesman for "compulsory health insurance". ...He attacked the American Medical Association because of his conflicting views on socialized medicine."
Henry E. Sigerist - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
a. And, Sigerist was one of the apologists for Stalin, including his state-engineered famine in the Ukraine. 7 million perished (The History Place - Genocide in the 20th Century: Stalin's Forced Famine 1932-33).
b. Sigerist "shared with the architects of Soviet health policy under Stalin an outlook best described as medical totalitarianism. He really believed that humanity would be better off if every individual were under the medical supervision of the state from cradle to grave....[and] Sigerist's belief in the necessity for state control over all aspects of medicine ultimately made him an apologist for state control over most aspects of human life."
Fee and Brown, eds. "Making Medical History: The Life and Times of Henry E. Sigerist," p. 252
Does he sound just like a certain President??
Quack quack quack.....
3. That's quite a jump, from Stalin to Obama, you say. How did it happen?
Well, let's admit that the ascension of Barack Obama proves the ideological victory of Marxian beliefs. Perhaps the greatest factor was, as historian Robert Conquest explains it, that the West, unlike the USSR, "did not have a universal and exclusively defined mind-set." They attacked, and won, in the universities, the media, pop culture, the arts, and even Wall Street.
Robert Conquest, "Reflections on a Ravaged Century," p. 155.
a. The details of the attack involve the writings of Antonio Gramsci, the invasion by the 'Frankfurt School, the early attacks by Progressives, and the shredding of the Constitution by FDR....and lets not forget Saul Alinsky. All of flowed from the wellspring of Marxism, and flooded, saturated, and finally, warped, Western Civilization.
4. The bulwark, Christianity itself, was subject to the attack as well. Dr.Paul Kengor, in DUPES: How Americas Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century, writes of the infiltration of religion:
"Generally, the Religious Left is a tragic case. Herb Romerstein, the veteran investigator of the communist movement and authority on the Venona papers, calls the Religious Left the biggest suckers of them all.
I think thats right. Picture this scenario: here was the Religious Left, invoking Jesus blessed are the peacemakers, turn the other cheek being exploited by clandestine communists, who they trusted to a fault. Bear in mind that these were militantly atheistic communists, whose leader, Stalin, was blowing up churches and locking up and executing priests, and yet the Religious Left, again and again, joined the communists at their rallies, in their petitions, and on and on sometimes literally locked arm in arm. It would be laughable if it werent so tragic. These liberal Christians were sheep led to the slaughter. The brooding communists privately held them in contempt for their breathtaking gullibility."
10 questions with ?DUPES? author Paul Kengor | The Daily Caller
5. Then there's this:
It turns out were pretty common-sense folks, Mr. Obama said at a fundraiser at a private home in Palo Alto, Calif. We believe in the free market [and] a light touch when it comes to regulations.
Hilarious: Obama Tells Fatcat Donors Democrats Favor Free-Market Solutions and Less Government Regulation | Jammie Wearing Fools
So...here we are, left with the laughable query....who is Barack Obama's intellectual soul mate, Adam Smith....or Joseph Stalin.
C'mon....be serious.
This could go in politics, or in history....but if 'past is prologue,' then, history it is.
Remember when Obama scoffed at the idea that ObamaCare was a "Bolshevik plot"???
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcRWS45gPzo]Obama To Republicans: Stop Pretending Health Care Reform Is A 'Bolshevik Plot' - YouTube[/ame]
Well, OK...perhaps not a 'plot'....but certainly Bolshevik in conception, design, and purpose!.
1. Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too.
Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917 (Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately.
Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.
2. Obama wasn't the first Bolshevik to support socialized medicine.
For context, there was Henry Sigerist:
"He devoted himself to the study of history of medicine. Socialized Medicine in the Soviet Union (1937), and History of Medicine were among his most important works. He emerged as a major spokesman for "compulsory health insurance". ...He attacked the American Medical Association because of his conflicting views on socialized medicine."
Henry E. Sigerist - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
a. And, Sigerist was one of the apologists for Stalin, including his state-engineered famine in the Ukraine. 7 million perished (The History Place - Genocide in the 20th Century: Stalin's Forced Famine 1932-33).
b. Sigerist "shared with the architects of Soviet health policy under Stalin an outlook best described as medical totalitarianism. He really believed that humanity would be better off if every individual were under the medical supervision of the state from cradle to grave....[and] Sigerist's belief in the necessity for state control over all aspects of medicine ultimately made him an apologist for state control over most aspects of human life."
Fee and Brown, eds. "Making Medical History: The Life and Times of Henry E. Sigerist," p. 252
Does he sound just like a certain President??
Quack quack quack.....
3. That's quite a jump, from Stalin to Obama, you say. How did it happen?
Well, let's admit that the ascension of Barack Obama proves the ideological victory of Marxian beliefs. Perhaps the greatest factor was, as historian Robert Conquest explains it, that the West, unlike the USSR, "did not have a universal and exclusively defined mind-set." They attacked, and won, in the universities, the media, pop culture, the arts, and even Wall Street.
Robert Conquest, "Reflections on a Ravaged Century," p. 155.
a. The details of the attack involve the writings of Antonio Gramsci, the invasion by the 'Frankfurt School, the early attacks by Progressives, and the shredding of the Constitution by FDR....and lets not forget Saul Alinsky. All of flowed from the wellspring of Marxism, and flooded, saturated, and finally, warped, Western Civilization.
4. The bulwark, Christianity itself, was subject to the attack as well. Dr.Paul Kengor, in DUPES: How Americas Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century, writes of the infiltration of religion:
"Generally, the Religious Left is a tragic case. Herb Romerstein, the veteran investigator of the communist movement and authority on the Venona papers, calls the Religious Left the biggest suckers of them all.
I think thats right. Picture this scenario: here was the Religious Left, invoking Jesus blessed are the peacemakers, turn the other cheek being exploited by clandestine communists, who they trusted to a fault. Bear in mind that these were militantly atheistic communists, whose leader, Stalin, was blowing up churches and locking up and executing priests, and yet the Religious Left, again and again, joined the communists at their rallies, in their petitions, and on and on sometimes literally locked arm in arm. It would be laughable if it werent so tragic. These liberal Christians were sheep led to the slaughter. The brooding communists privately held them in contempt for their breathtaking gullibility."
10 questions with ?DUPES? author Paul Kengor | The Daily Caller
5. Then there's this:
It turns out were pretty common-sense folks, Mr. Obama said at a fundraiser at a private home in Palo Alto, Calif. We believe in the free market [and] a light touch when it comes to regulations.
Hilarious: Obama Tells Fatcat Donors Democrats Favor Free-Market Solutions and Less Government Regulation | Jammie Wearing Fools
So...here we are, left with the laughable query....who is Barack Obama's intellectual soul mate, Adam Smith....or Joseph Stalin.
C'mon....be serious.
