🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

How fast can the 2nd amendment be erased?

militias are civilian groups, not professional--and your local church group or club can easily double as a civilian militia.

I would say the local police is the closest thing to a militia except they are professionals in that they are paid for their services.
You left out paid by the government.
 
The founders intended the 2nd amendment to allow the people to protect their freedom from the government.
That was the late 1700s when muskets and cannons were high tech and anyone could own one or make one.

Exactly how does that translate to the present day. Even if every American is armed with a fully auto M-16 we could never begin to defeat our own army. It would be over in a few days.

So what's the thought here on people that think the 2nd amendment somehow is the same as in 1780? We'd have to have tanks, helicopters, F-18s, aircraft carriers, and nukes.

So other than for personal protection what does the 2nd amendment to for us?
Then have a Constitutional Cenvention. The founders gave us that avenue if we want to change it.
 
All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.
SCOTUS doesn't make laws. That's the job of Congress. Sorry 'bout that.
SCOTUS doesn't make laws.

that used to be the case


They just re-wrote obamacare. They do make law and they can simply interpret the 2nd amendment to mean anything they want it to mean.
 
militias are civilian groups, not professional--and your local church group or club can easily double as a civilian militia.

I would say the local police is the closest thing to a militia except they are professionals in that they are paid for their services.
I see where you are trying to go but damn. Police are hardly militia. They would piss their pants and run away in any real invasion scenario.
 
No Fascist dictator ever ran a campaign on Cultural purity, subservience and obedience. They always start telling you how awful your current life is, how powerless you are against some internal enemy and if you give them power they'll make it all better. That's how they first come to power.

Next, they take away your ability to fight back. They might have needed you armed to help get them into power, that's no longer necessary. Besides you're better off now, right? Why would you need to be armed against the people you put in power to help you?

Boenher, Roberts and Obama are all Book Burners but they know they need to tred carefully and in small increments
 
as-an-american-before-i-fire-up-the-grill-ice-down-the-beer-and-pretend-the-nsa-isnt-monitoring-this-20665.png
 
Da Liberals will never stop until they reach Nirvana.....................

The Ultimate Wet Dream of Liberal Fanatics who believe their views are Supreme to all others........

That they will finally see the day when all guns are banned in this country..........and that all will OBEY.............

They already go through the back door pushing agenda, via the courts................Judicial Activism............

and should they get a majority of liberals in the Supreme Court they will eventually get a Mickey Mouse court to change the meaning of the 2nd Amendment..............

They have changed the very wording of the Second Amendment in school books already...........attempting to change the wording by BLATANTLY ALTERING THE SUMMARY.................to brain wash our kids................

If they succeed.................they will demand ALL GUNS GONE.....................what will they then do when we REFUSE................
 
All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.

You mean how they interpreted it from 1787 until 2008?

Yes, that would be horrible if we decided that Killer Clowns no longer had a right to machine guns!
 
All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.
SCOTUS doesn't make laws. That's the job of Congress. Sorry 'bout that.


Hillarys supreme court wont worry about nonsense like that. Even Roberts now helps Obama and dems write laws.
Biggest fuck up of the Bush Admin, without a doubt.

Really? Two senseless wars and that is the biggest mistake?
 
All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.
SCOTUS doesn't make laws. That's the job of Congress. Sorry 'bout that.


That changed with the obamacare decisison....roberts changed the original ruling to make obamacare constitutional then on this ruling he changed it again..........they can now change the law on their own..........that is the problem when judges make laws.....they have lifetime appointments and so cannot be removed without impeachment...they were never meant to create laws because they didn't like what congress put together....
 
militias are civilian groups, not professional--and your local church group or club can easily double as a civilian militia.

I would say the local police is the closest thing to a militia except they are professionals in that they are paid for their services.


Hillarys supreme court can say a militia is anything they want it to be.


Yes....republicans had better get really serious about the next election and march to the polls regardless of who the republican is....she will not take half steps. She is a true leftist, like obama....I wonder what he has on roberts...........and she will appoint judges who will be vetted for anti gun judicial activism. She will also have 2, probably more appointments to the Supreme Court, and Heller and Macdonald were only 1 vote decisions....she will also not care about legal precedent......they will grab the first gun case they can and overturn all of it.......
 
You know what's hilarious is that the progs have been whining about impeaching Roberts for a while now.

I wonder if they realize that he's the one who is their biggest judicial activist.
 
militias are civilian groups, not professional--and your local church group or club can easily double as a civilian militia.

I would say the local police is the closest thing to a militia except they are professionals in that they are paid for their services.


Hillarys supreme court can say a militia is anything they want it to be.


Yes....republicans had better get really serious about the next election and march to the polls regardless of who the republican is....she will not take half steps. She is a true leftist, like obama....I wonder what he has on roberts...........and she will appoint judges who will be vetted for anti gun judicial activism. She will also have 2, probably more appointments to the Supreme Court, and Heller and Macdonald were only 1 vote decisions....she will also not care about legal precedent......they will grab the first gun case they can and overturn all of it.......


What worried me was when a lower court, in San Francisco ignored Heller and Macdonald, and the Supreme Court decided not to hear it.....it takes 4 Justices to vote to hear a case........and they couldn't get 4 votes...that means roberts is probably completely gone......
 
All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.
SCOTUS doesn't make laws. That's the job of Congress. Sorry 'bout that.


Hillarys supreme court wont worry about nonsense like that. Even Roberts now helps Obama and dems write laws.
It's hard to believe anyone is truly this stupid.


Well...we know you are that fucking stupid, and yet you still post.....moron....
 
The founders intended the 2nd amendment to allow the people to protect their freedom from the government.
That was the late 1700s when muskets and cannons were high tech and anyone could own one or make one.

Exactly how does that translate to the present day. Even if every American is armed with a fully auto M-16 we could never begin to defeat our own army. It would be over in a few days.

So what's the thought here on people that think the 2nd amendment somehow is the same as in 1780? We'd have to have tanks, helicopters, F-18s, aircraft carriers, and nukes.

So other than for personal protection what does the 2nd amendment to for us?
Then have a Constitutional Cenvention. The founders gave us that avenue if we want to change it.

But what would the change be? That individuals can own tanks and jets?
 
All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.
SCOTUS doesn't make laws. That's the job of Congress. Sorry 'bout that.


Hillarys supreme court wont worry about nonsense like that. Even Roberts now helps Obama and dems write laws.
It's hard to believe anyone is truly this stupid.
The Devil's Advocates and the Devil's Disciples are flexing their muscles now and don't realize that soon, God is going to strike them down.
 

Forum List

Back
Top