BreezeWood
VIP Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 17,217
- 1,391
- 85
..
I didn't say that. If I showed a statue of Jesus from his time, then dumb atheists and others will not believe it as proof of historicity. Instead of his time, the closest I could find was around 6th century AD at the city of Shivta in the Negev Desert :
View attachment 413240
Now, you need to fall down on your knees and beg forgiveness of your multitude of sins. As for Jesus' message being misconstrued, what are they? What is Jesus' message to you?
Haha. Your comments give you away and why people think you're schizo, i.e. nuts. You make up stuff that has nothing to do with reality -- this time actual history. You even got the internet and its search engines, but this is the best you can come up with.
.
the reality is the christian bibles photo realistic renderings of dialogues conducted during the 1st century that portray the arrest and subsequent crucifixion of their religious itinerant does so without a single mention of the proceedings of the trial that convicted them or their testimony in defence during the trial ...
that can only lead to the conclusion jesus renounced judaism as a fraudulent religion and likewise denied an allegiance to the roman gov't. and stressed their liberation theology for the individual to accomplish admission to the Everlasting by their own works without reliant on any other source for repatriation.
.
oh wise one - bring to our attention the trial of jesus and their recorded defense against what crimes they were charged and the testimony of the prosecution for the proceedings they initiated.
you are who make things up, bond to avoid a response.
I was right -- you are a nut goober.
>>the reality is the christian bibles photo realistic renderings of dialogues conducted during the 1st century that portray the arrest and subsequent crucifixion of their religious itinerant does so without a single mention of the proceedings of the trial that convicted them or their testimony in defence during the trial ...<<
This is so convoluted. Just what do you want from the trial of Jesus? Are you saying it didn't happen? And give an example of "photo realistic renderings of dialogues" in the Bible? I am not aware of any.
>>bring to our attention the trial of jesus and their recorded defense against what crimes they were charged and the testimony of the prosecution for the proceedings they initiated.<<
Did you not read about Caiaphas and Pontius Pilate?
Like all pagan materialists, Breezewood didn't get a pony on demand, so he's going to be all butt hurt and sniveling the rest of his life like a little baby.
.
to be corrected it is picaro and the three desert religions that have abandoned the true religion of antiquity prescribed and rendered by the catastrophic events at the time of noah placed on humanity as their last and final chance for survival - and the true events of the 1st century in the furtherance of that religion.
unlike you picaro not everyone refers to your 4th century christian bible, religion of the roman empire in reference to the 1st century events and the religious itinerant made famous by your single publication. nor the conclusions and dialogues as being in certain cases any more than propaganda of a purely political nature. propaganda disguised as a religion.
that time period was a repudiation of both judaism and roman political jurisdiction - the religious itinerant represents a return to the original religion of antiquity and liberation theology from roman oppression and chose to die for their just cause.
