How many believe the Dems had a 2 year supermajority?

[francoHFW]

So why do Pubs continue to say Obama had a 2 year supermajority, endlessly? As well as all the other whoppers, hater dupes? LOL! And why do the dupes enjoy parroting total BS? A disgrace.

 

[Freewill]

So why do Pubs continue to say Obama had a 2 year supermajority, endlessly? As well as all the other whoppers, hater dupes? LOL! And why do the dupes enjoy parroting total BS? A disgrace.

The reason could be because they are the voices in your head you are hearing not real people.

Just like a hopeless liberal. Make a BS statement as fact then bad mouth people over the lie you post. Simply idiotic.

 

[whitehall]

Can you believe it? The radical left is whining that Obama's first two years had just a plain radical socialist lefist majority and not a super one. What a bunch.

 

[Freewill]

Bush vetoed everything but Min Wage rise, Pubs had 200 filibusters 2009-11. Total disfunction. During the THIRTEEN DAYS Dems had 60 votes, passed the most important social reform in our history...2009- passed stimulus that ended the 2nd Pub Great Depression, biggest Wall St reform ever.

Pubs don't do anything but cut taxes on the rich and start stupid wars and corrupt economic bubbles....they love disfunction.

Gosh you really go through a lot of pants with the fire and all. Here look at the vetos:

Bill Clinton 36 1 37 2 5% 6%
George W. Bush 11 1

List of United States presidential vetoes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Well look at that, Clinton with three time the regular vetos. My my how unfortunate for you. Obama doesn't have many because the democrats have made the government pretty dysfunctional and the democrats have gotten everything they wanted.

Could be because the Pubs were in the majority 3x as long under Clinton...

Pubs under Obama have set records for mindless obstruction, fear mongering, and LYING that will never be touched. See OP, my sig para. #1...They may be out of power for 20-30 years...

It could be because Clinton was a liar, that makes as much sense. Never the less 3 times the veto, you were proved wrong once again don't try and change the subject.

Again, what major initiative didn't Obama get?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Bush vetoed everything but Min Wage rise, Pubs had 200 filibusters 2009-11. Total disfunction. During the THIRTEEN DAYS Dems had 60 votes, passed the most important social reform in our history...2009- passed stimulus that ended the 2nd Pub Great Depression, biggest Wall St reform ever.

Pubs don't do anything but cut taxes on the rich and start stupid wars and corrupt economic bubbles....they love disfunction.

Gosh you really go through a lot of pants with the fire and all. Here look at the vetos:

Bill Clinton 36 1 37 2 5% 6%
George W. Bush 11 1

List of United States presidential vetoes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Well look at that, Clinton with three time the regular vetos. My my how unfortunate for you. Obama doesn't have many because the democrats have made the government pretty dysfunctional and the democrats have gotten everything they wanted.

Could be because the Pubs were in the majority 3x as long under Clinton...

Pubs under Obama have set records for mindless obstruction, fear mongering, and LYING that will never be touched. See OP, my sig para. #1...They may be out of power for 20-30 years...

As usual you completely ignore the fact that the Senate under the democrats REFUSED to even submit any bills from the house. No committee nothing just a refusal to do their job.

 

[francoHFW]

Gosh you really go through a lot of pants with the fire and all. Here look at the vetos:

Bill Clinton 36 1 37 2 5% 6%
George W. Bush 11 1

List of United States presidential vetoes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Well look at that, Clinton with three time the regular vetos. My my how unfortunate for you. Obama doesn't have many because the democrats have made the government pretty dysfunctional and the democrats have gotten everything they wanted.

Could be because the Pubs were in the majority 3x as long under Clinton...

Pubs under Obama have set records for mindless obstruction, fear mongering, and LYING that will never be touched. See OP, my sig para. #1...They may be out of power for 20-30 years...

As usual you completely ignore the fact that the Senate under the democrats REFUSED to even submit any bills from the house. No committee nothing just a refusal to do their job.

those"jobs bills"? Pure propaganda, ALL just cut environmental and worker safeguards, dupe. A joke, DOA, never passed one thing to help the country, PERIOD.

 

[AmazonTania]

So what exactly did the Democrats have if it wasn't a super majority?

 

[francoHFW]

Gosh you really go through a lot of pants with the fire and all. Here look at the vetos:

Bill Clinton 36 1 37 2 5% 6%
George W. Bush 11 1

List of United States presidential vetoes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Well look at that, Clinton with three time the regular vetos. My my how unfortunate for you. Obama doesn't have many because the democrats have made the government pretty dysfunctional and the democrats have gotten everything they wanted.

Could be because the Pubs were in the majority 3x as long under Clinton...

Pubs under Obama have set records for mindless obstruction, fear mongering, and LYING that will never be touched. See OP, my sig para. #1...They may be out of power for 20-30 years...

It could be because Clinton was a liar, that makes as much sense. Never the less 3 times the veto, you were proved wrong once again don't try and change the subject.

Again, what major initiative didn't Obama get?

Again, Bush and Clinton exactly the same number per year the other party was a majority...

Look up the 200 filibusters- that's the laws they blocked. A real infrastructure/jobs bill- We could have been out of this Pub mess a couple years ago...NOW they're a deficit cult lol...

 

[blackhawk]

They controlled the White house and both Houses of Congress from January 2009 till January 2011 with a huge numbers edge if that is not a super majority what is it?

200 filibusters? FoxRushbots!

The only true filibuster in the last four years was the one by Rand Paul the rest were threatened filibusters and parliamentary procedure stunts that Obama and the Dems could have easily called their bluff on. I can't believe I was actually so bored I took you off ignore to respond to this idiocy oh well live and learn the only thing worse than a blind partisan is a stupid one and you qualify for both now back to ignore with the rest of the useless of the message board.

 

[francoHFW]

There were 200 Pub filibusters in the 2 years that Pubs keep saying they had a supermajority. End of story, hater dupes...

 

[Lakhota]

FOX NEWS LIES: Obama only had a majority for 133 days, not two years

Chris Wallace: Obama Had A Filibuster Proof Senate Majority For 2 Years | TPM LiveWire

Rep. Aaron Schock's fib - Chicago Tribune

Chris Wallace Falsely Claims Obama Had Filibuster-Proof Majority for 2 Years | Video Cafe

 

[francoHFW]

1. 1/07 – 12/08 – 51-49 – Ordinary Majority.
2. 1/09 – 7/14/09 – 59-41 – Ordinary Majority. (Coleman/Franklin Recount.)
3. 7/09 – 8/09 - 60-40 – Technical Super Majority, but since Kennedy is unable to vote, the Democrats can’t overcome a filibuster
4. 8/09 – 9/09 - 59-40 – Ordinary Majority. (Kennedy dies)
5. 9/09 – 10/09 - 60-40 – Super Majority for 11 working days.
6. 1/10 – 2/10 – 60-40 – Super Majority for 13 working days

Total Time of the Democratic Super Majority: 24 Working days.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/resources/pdf/2009_calendar.pdf
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/resources/pdf/2010_calendar.pdf
United States Senate election in Minnesota, 2008 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
111th United States Congress - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[RetiredGySgt]

1. 1/07 – 12/08 – 51-49 – Ordinary Majority.
2. 1/09 – 7/14/09 – 59-41 – Ordinary Majority. (Coleman/Franklin Recount.)
3. 7/09 – 8/09 - 60-40 – Technical Super Majority, but since Kennedy is unable to vote, the Democrats can’t overcome a filibuster
4. 8/09 – 9/09 - 59-40 – Ordinary Majority. (Kennedy dies)
5. 9/09 – 10/09 - 60-40 – Super Majority for 11 working days.
6. 1/10 – 2/10 – 60-40 – Super Majority for 13 working days

Total Time of the Democratic Super Majority: 24 Working days.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/resources/pdf/2009_calendar.pdf
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/resources/pdf/2010_calendar.pdf
United States Senate election in Minnesota, 2008 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
111th United States Congress - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Once again for the slow and stupid. Bush had 51 Senators for 4 years Yet you all routinely claim that he had total control for 6 years some say 8.

 

[Lakhota]

Bush was fortunate to have some "loyal" opposition. Obama hasn't been that fortunate.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Dems passed their entire agenda without any Republican support.

 

[francoHFW]

Bush could pass tax cuts with 51 votes. Obama wanted to pass laws and programs to help America.

Pubs say Dems had a 2 year supermajority- total BS.

I've never heard anyone say Bush had total control. Just a great liar to get the Iraq War, and enough Dems to pass tax cuts, or "reconciliation"... That's all Pubs want, more money for the rich, the gd greedy idiot chickenhawks and their silly hater dupes...

 

[francoHFW]

Entire agenda? LOL! You mean a GOP style health reform...

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Bush could pass tax cuts with 51 votes. Obama wanted to pass laws and programs to help America.

Pubs say Dems had a 2 year supermajority- total BS.

I've never heard anyone say Bush had total control. Just a great liar to get the Iraq War, and enough Dems to pass tax cuts, or "reconciliation"... That's all Pubs want, more money for the rich, the gd greedy idiot chickenhawks and their silly hater dupes...

I suggest you go back and check who ran the Senate when the resolution for Iraq came up. Then check the votes for passage. At the time the dems controlled the Senate.

I bet you didn't whine about the 2 years where the dem Senate refused to even hear any nominees by Bush for Judgeships. did you?

 

[whitehall]

You almost gotta laugh at the last desperate effort by the radical left to tell us how great socialism could have become if Obama only had a super-majority instead of a plain old majority in both houses of congress. Scary stuff.

 

[rdean]

Remind us How Bush had complete control for 6 years or are you still saying 8?

Bush never had more then 53 Senators and only controlled the Senate for 4 years of 8. He never had a super majority at ALL.

The democrats controlled the House and the Senate for 4 straight years 2 under Bush and 2 under Obama. And exactly what did they accomplish?

You are making the mistake of thinking Democrats vote in a block. They aren't Republicans who vote in a block because they are 90% or more white.

Democrats have conservatives that are called "Blue Dogs" and we can name them. Republicans have NO liberals. Not one.

But you knew all that and still said something you know to be stupid. Why?

What a crock, democrats are lemmings they act the same they talk the same.

There are NO democrats that are conservative it is an oxymoron to think so.

What you think are conservatives are merely closer to center liberals that didn't drink the liberal kool aid and go off the deep end.

And you are right there are no liberals in the Republican party why should there be?

Exactly. There are no liberals in the Republican Party because they are monolithic, 90% or more white, they worship ignorance, believe science is a faith, and detest minorities of every kind. It's why they have brought so much destruction to the US. In fact, the futures of the children of Republicans have a very bleak future. Without health care, education, job training, they will be the future destitute.