HaShev
Gold Member
- Jun 19, 2009
- 17,651
- 7,017
- 335
Blah blah blah the same old bullshit idiots have been claiming for ages as if Josephus never mentioned Jesus, nor the Romans.Ummm you are the one who listed not one single source with your ad hominem response.
Donct you dare list gospels because your own fictional character said self testimony is false evidence.
There is no historical proof of Jesus, only the MANY figures used for small portions of his image and stories.
Name one historian and what he says.
I dont have time for people who are determined to be stupid, so have fun blathering your bullshit, I am not going to play, bubba.
We had this discussion already remember:
JimBowie1958, post: 16667390
HaShev, post: 16660493
But we might not have discussed why your Josephus argument is failed.
1)you can't post one Josephus source yet call me stupid when I have given you the sources in other discussions.
You wouldnct need name calling if you were right.
2) you have no ability to see earlier copies of Josephus make no mention of Jesus at all. You have no access to script to know the difference between later forged copies and earlier ones.
3)Your mistake due to not researching Josephus yourself and taking every other idiots word for the claims of the books of Josephus
Josephus accounts of Jesus are proven placed in at a later date probably by Eusebius who was known as the great liar who often forged books. I say this because early copies have no mention of Jesus and it's not until the time of Constantine and Eusebius thst it magically appears out of context as if placed in and forced in.
Have some common sense Josephus being a Jew writing about a Jewish Rabbi to a Jewish audience does not use the non Hebrew name Jesus- only a LATER Christian would use the IESUS NAME. also Josephus being Jewish not Christian nor follower would ever call him "the christ".
Josephus mentions the many figures used for the Jesus image (as does the book of acts mention the other christs) but actually never mentions Jesus at all which is odd being I did a lineage search on Josephus and I was the only one to connect the dots that he was related distant wise to KING Jannaeus lineage who's wife Salome (friend /follower) of Yeshu son of Mary of 100bc was supposed to be related to Yeshu. ODD since Josephus doesn't even mention Yeshu who the RCC favors in it's trinity of christs used to make the Jesus character.